Are you hyped /v/?
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Are you hyped /v/?
Are you hyped /v/?
yes but you should stop making these threads
I now maintain a state of mild anticipation with all upcoming games.
The fact that I'm not playing it right the fuck now is causing me boundless frustration.
>>318262914
>loved JC2 to bits
>only playable platform for me right now is a 4 year old laptop because I am studying abroad
fuck this, at least I still have XCOM 2
>>318262914
yes
just fucking unlock it already, fucking avalanche
>>318262914
I thought that JC2 was kinda fun to fuck around with, but I wouldn't have paid more than 10 dollaridoos for it. And since this seems to be JC2 with better graphics, I'll wait for it to be cheap, and then maybe buy it.
I don't fully understand people who are predicting a GOTY out of this, nor do I understand the people who had JC2 as their GOTY.
>C4 can only be placed, not thrown
This really bothers me.
>>318262914
Meme Cause 3? Yea i'm hyped.
Is it out already?
>>318262914
Not at all.
>>318263484
hopefully the modding community can do more this time around if it's more optimized.
>>318264853
It's rumored to use Denuvo.
If that's the case, you won't have anything apart from model swaps.
I heard you can walk around inside a cargo plane while it's flying.
Is that true, because it's the best thing ever.
>>318264853
It just baffles me how they thought it would've been a good idea.
Wanna cause a massive explosion? Well, you can by running over to every object, placing the C4, and so on. Also, don't think you can go crazy. You can only place up to 5 at once.
>>318262914
No. It looks like a game where you dick around for a few hours and then get bored when you realise the game has nothing special to offer. It doesn't help it looks like a PS2 game, explosions are kind of nice though.
No, I'm not.
The environment looks so bland and boring.
>>318262914
Watched a stream last night, it reminds me of Lego island 2, it's good for fucking around but the shooting mechanics for example are just stupid.
>>318265338
>>318265075
>>318263441
Seconding these.
Also annoys me how there's no snow or desert area anymore.
>>318265576
>no snow
There is.
Not sure about deserts.
Yes, can someone please post some webms. I loved JC 2 and from the twitch streams this looks a lot more funnnbbvggg
>>318262914
Yes but I don't know if I want to buy JC3 or Xenoblade. I don't want to buy both since I already got the bloodborne dlc.
Fuck yeah I am.
Got the game for $35, because fuck paying $83 for it on Steam.
Looks like improved JC2 so definitely, I need another comfy game. I'm gonna miss the tropical setting though.
>nobodies on twitch playing the PC version early
HOW
I seriously doubt they got review codes
>>318267215
TotalCancer played it.
Also while the PS4 and Xbone versions are leaked, you need Steam activation on PC
>>318265691There is going to be a live vulcano tho
>tfw don't know whether to get this or Xenoblade
I want some shit to play before Christmas but neither of the two have anything that makes them an objectively 'better' choice for me.
>>318264984
Dunno about Denuvo, but there was an always-online component, When I saw an advance Twitch stream yesterday, it was in a cutscene and it 'lost online connection' and froze during it. a fucking cutscene.
>>318267363
Yeah, I've been there
>>318267215
>>318267289
They got authorized by Square to do it.
Also the PS4 version runs like shit so they don't really want people to see that one.
>>318262914
>bethesda gets shit on for releasing 2 fallout games 7 years apart
>jc3 is the same as jc2, which came out 5 years ago yet there is zero backlash because le ebin meme hype
loving this hypocrisy
If Avalanche wanted mods to be a thing on JC3, and for the community to make MP again... Why use Denuvo?
>>318267536
Did you add sweetfx/reshade/enb to that jc2?
>>318267598
>>bethesda gets shit on for releasing 2 fallout games 7 years apart
Nobody cares about that.
People shit on Bethesda because they continually make questionable design decisions in their games.
So what's actually new in this game? It looks very similar to JC2
>>318267598
>jc3 is the same as jc2
Except it's bigger and better in literally every way. Every facet of the gameplay revised and improved.
>>318267780
Fuck all. And that's the problem. I say this as someone who liked JC2.
Does Downes not voice Rico anymore?
He sounds like old Ezio.
>>318267865
>Every facet of the gameplay revised and improved.
No. The ability to have big bada booms is completely out of the window.
I only have a laptop. I can't.
>>318267939
>better shooting
>better flying
>better driving
>better graphics
>better engine
>biggest non-procedural game world ever
>>318267615
Well, they blew it. Also the performance apparently is ass, despite the engine being crazy optimized and JC2/Mad Max running smooth on anything.
But hey, at least we can't pirate it in the first 3 or so days, that counts for something I guess.
The new mediterranean look is great.
>>318268114
Yeah, those are better. Still not better in every way, as you stated.
And Fuel's world is bigger.
>>318268226
Fuel's map is procedural, derived from an algorithm, it is a physical impossibility to have that map stored on the game disc.
>>318268362
Oh, so it beats it out like that. Woopity doo.
>>318268226
I sincerely question whether they're actually better.
The shooting still looks like total shit.
>>318268448
Shooting is about the same.
>>318268117
i5's are fucked. i7's and any of AMD's 8 cores run it fine. Most GPU's on the minimum and recommended do it fine as well reportedly. There's a modding SDK being released in January as well.
There's just buttmad because some processors can't run and the PS4 runs like shit at 1080/30 while xbone only has issues with larger explosions at 900/30
Expect a ton of butthurt on release day.
>>318268445
>the world size is great
>but this game has a bigger world
>no you idiot you're objectively wrong
>b-but it doesn't matter anyway!
>>318268571
Yeah, it's the biggest non-procedural world ever. Looks great in an ad.
>>318268506
Everything looks about the same! That's what annoys me!
>>318268506
>>318268448
Except the guns sound and feel strong, which was the main problem with JC2
>>318268634
>there's no practical difference between a hand crafted world and a generic empty wasteland
>>318268724
They sound and feel the same. Stop overblowing it.
>>318268724
You are such a bullshit artist. I'm watching gameplay now and the guns and shooting look and soubd identical to JC2.
>>318268808
>fire guns in JC2
>a soft pissing of wind
>fire guns in JC3
>BOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOMBOOM
>whatever you're firing at gets torn to shreds
It makes all the difference in the world
Is this a prequel, or something? The JC continuity makes no sense.
I'm quite worried that the map is going to be copy pasted buildings and brush-placed trees all over again. Normies always get hyped about m-muh map size - meanwhile there's nothing to do on such huge maps.
>>318269002
Feels the same. Looks the same. Enemies still ragdoll away like bags of plastic.
Making it sound like Killzone here.
>>318269009
It has no continuity
>>318269074
You're full of shit
>>318267373
just flip a coin mate, you can't go wrong with either one
>>318269197
Having beaten you in this argument, it's time to talk about other things such as
>no proper city, just towns
>no actual big airport, just little ones
>>318269197
Fuck off he's right. You're spouting crap.
'Ripped the shreds', get fucking real. There isn't even a dismemberment system and the ragdolls have no weight.
>>318262914
I want to pre-order it, but after what happened when I bought AK on launch I'm a bit iffy on buying games on launch now.
>>318269206
Seems like the best plan.
>>318268556
ps4 users reported fps drops as well
all over jc3's twitter
>>318268556
Seen videos if people with i5s running it at 60 fps, so theres no way that the performance could be that bad.
My GTX 770 should work well for this game considering how optimized the series tends to be.
>>318263484
The throwing of C4 was meh in JC2 anyways. Might as well simply use grenades while you're at it.
WHAT'S THE BEST SITE TO BUY THIS SHIT ATM?
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST I NEED THIS GAME SO BAD
>>318270917
greenmangaming
>>318270917
kinguin if you trust them
25 yurobucks
>>318267524
Fixed if you run in offline mode on Steam.
>>318270813
It was good for setting up big explosions. You can't do that anymore. Not to mention you can only carry 5 grenades.
It's lame that I have to get to every obstacle I want to blow up. I can't just parachute by and throw a c4.
>>318263484
>>318264853
You can throw the C4, but only if you are using the parachute.
>>318264985
It is, you can also store cars and shit in it
>>318271204
Didn't know that. That's something, I guess.
>>318264984
https://support.codefusion.technology/justcause3/
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUUUUUCK
https://support.codefusion.technology/madmax/
https://support.codefusion.technology/mgstpp/
https://support.codefusion.technology/bak/
>>318269280
Both comments are wrong, a big city is already confirmed, as well as a main airport.
How about you do a little more research before you shitpost to no end.
>>318271117
That's not much of a fix man.
>>318271576
TPP is easy as fuck to mod calm down
>>318271598
Haven't seen them.
>>318264984
Denuvo is pretty much confirmed, if you look at the leaderboards during dev playthroughs, you can see Denuvo with high scores
>>318271140
>only carry 5 grenades
That sucks. Hopefully someone changes that.
>>318271806
I'd link you, but I can't be fucked
>>318271576
They've already said they want mods and that half of the new stuff in 3 is inspired by mods.
>>318270917
£20 on G2A
>>318271904
That's alright. I'll go fly around later and look for it.
>>318271576
>>318264984
>>318267524
Alright look here you shitters, take a look at the leaderboard
>dispatched
>mfw
Would have bought straight from Steam or GMG or something but physical from Amazon comes with a map.
>>318272136
Can you turn motion blur off?
>>318262914
I can't wait to go on a road/boat trip all over my home country to see all the sights
It's gonna be comfy as fuck
>>318271140
Can confirm parachute C4 does work, just good luck figuring out where it's going.
>>318272190
>pre-order from Amazon
I hope you enjoy playing the day after release.
>>318272207
Yes
>>318270917
G2Play/Kinguin. You can get it for 25 dollars.
Otherwise I suggest GMG.
>>318271097
If the key doesn't work or is taken, the website will give you a new one. You have to pay a 1 or 2 dollar "protection" fee or something though while buying the game itself.
To anyone who has the game early; can you change the FoV?
Got the game early on PS4 (french stores don't give a fuck about release dates and sold it to me on Thursday).
Played a bit (haven't had much time) but here's the basic rundown :
> A lot like JC2 but not in a bad way. It's just more JC fun
> Only explored one big island, flower fields and shit look good
> Game shits itself sometimes on PS4 and framerate drops when everything blows up at once but nothing too bad
> Wingsuit feels great
>>318272136
That Denuvo in the highscores has worried me since I found out about it.
I seriously hope it's just a joke username and that it isn't actually in JC3.
>>318273371
Doubt that t b h f a m s m h
>>318262914
>denuvo
no, thanks.buying it is obviously out of the question
>i5 2500k
>7850
how fucked am I
>>318271926
is it just a steam key you can pre-load wirh?
>>318272136
Some say that's a joke, like the main opponent's being initialled DRM.
>>318273680
There isn't any Denuvo
>>318262914
>Are you hyped /v/?
No. I already watched an one hour long let's play, so I'm satisfied.
>In related news, you can now watch the first hour of Just Cause 3. I did, and found it a good way to satisfy my desire to see/play a new game, without having to pay ~£30-50 for the privilege. I now have little to no interest in playing Just Cause 3 myself, which probably wasn't their intention.
http://www.pcgamer.com/just-cause-3-gets-first-patch-before-the-game-is-even-out/
>>318273884
Yes.
Make sure it says a key, and not a gift. Gifts are cheaper, but they're not really legal.
>>318262914
Hyped as fuck to play it until Friday then drop it for Xenoblade X.
>>318273973
https://www.change.org/p/avalanche-studios-release-just-cause-3-early-on-steam
Petition master race wants the game now!
>>318273973
Literally my exact same experience.
Fucking third world internet.
>>318274341
Bitch, please. 18.5GB would take me 3 nights to finish.
>>318263530
dec 1st
>>318262914
yes OP, yes i am.
>>318270917
Russian Steam ;)
I have just below minimum specs (first time in years this happens, going to upgrade next year). Am I able to play it well?
>>318278267
>check the minimum specs
>I'm right on the mark
FUCK
>>318274341
>tfw I live in a first world country and don't get much better
England infrastructure a shit.
>>318278267
I've been below minimum on CPU for most games for a really long time, it's not that bad.
>No option to play as a girl
dropped
it's the year 2015, seriously fucking christ.
>>318279238
>Hampshire
>>318268114
It is modified procedural. The terrain is procedural, with a constant seed, but the settlements and roads are hand placed. You can't have a large map like this without taking up loads of states unless it was procedural.
>denuvo
no.
>>318279489
>thinking she is not a girl just because she look like a man
Come on its current year.
>>318280920
>not pictured: deformed spine.
>>318271926
>>318272427
>G2P
Are these really trustworthy? I've heard people's games disappearing couple months later
>>318281405
Also do the Steam refunds work? I'd rather spend $15 more and get full, stable support and refunds on Steam that waste $30 if the key doesn't work, I have problems with the game or I just want refunds
>>318281405
>>318281587
I use a dummy account for all my G2P purchases.
I've had the account for about 2 years now, and bought about 40 games. 43 if you're willing to count the freebies G2P throws you on holidays and such.
That being said, I have never lost a game, gotten a single non-functional code or even had to wait more than a minute.
Neither have I ever had any trouble from Valve or experience anything weird about my games.
>>318281837
cool thanks
I want it but what's the best price I can get for this game ?
>>318274341
>Only 6 hours
You got time
where is the leaked version for pirates tho?
>>318272207
what fucking game doesn't allow that? That's like one in twenty games, even if you only count shitty ports.
>>318262914
How can you hate this?
>>318283910
Why do they put it in if everyone just turns it off anyway? It's like film grain but more annoying.
>>318262954
>>318263007
/thread
>>318283986
>you can only destroy designated buildings
Will we ever have Mercenaries destructability with Just Cause 2 gameplay?
>>318283910
I can't think of one off the top of my head but I know it's happened a few times in the past. Makes them almost unplayable for me.
>>318284015
good tool if you're making machinima afaik. Also some people like it, it hides flaws. Not as needed this generation, but now it's an industry standard.
Problems I've seen from couple streams
>Weird weapon/vehicle spawn and fast-travel system
>Spawned vehicles most likely explode on landing unless you order them on a really flat and safe area
>Some Online-fuckery
>You can't die from 500m drop, but can from a simple bumb if low hp
>No healthbar and minimap (?)
Anything else?
>>318268114
>muh biggest world
Too bad it's still as empty and boring as the JC2 map
The only thing that made JC2 good was teh multiplayer
>>318284015
I knew a friend who bought a prebuilt $2000 PC and then maxed everything, including all blurs and blooms and DoFs just because he could
We're not friends anymore
>>318284364
JC2MP was shit. It was fun for hour or two to race in the dirt track but 99% of the time there were too many players, everyone was lagging, performance was terrible and people just kept shooting everyone
>>318271669
Oh yeah, let's review TPP's mods: model swaps, and stat changers that could be done with Cheat Engine.
>>318262914
>6 hour long thread
>140 posts
So, did Avalanche hire the same shills from Mad Max that just bump the threads and keep them alive as much as possible?
>>318283986
Because you can do nothing else in the game.
I'll pirate it, if it uses Denuvo, i'll buy it for $1.50 like Just Cause 2.
I already fell for Mad Max, which was one of the most mind-blowingly boring and generic grindfests i've ever played.
>>318274271
>tiny petition
>currently 21 signers
All these pkeks are so sad!!!
>>318284132
Crackdown 3, probably
>>318284941
You could do even less in JC2 and people still played thousands of hours of it
>>318273973
This, holy shit.
I've been thinking
>huh, might be fun
Then I remember how everytime I tried getting into Just Cause 2, it was always
>do the first two missions
>finally open world
>destroy two bases
>drop the game and two weeks later uninstall when I notice it in my Steam library
Just Cause is one of the most shallow sandboxes out there, pretty much all Avalanche games suffer the same: good graphics, good optimization, but nothing else.
>>318284132
They could even use Red Faction destruction
It doesn't even have to look great, i just want to blow everything up
And their reason that the whole world would be empty after you blow everything up is stupid too
Since shit like the bridge just respwans too
>>318285539
Someone didn't discover the joy of fucking with physics I see. there's plenty to do.
>>318273973
>tfw got bored it took one half of a official gameplay video to start feeling fatigue from Just Cause 3
>>318285539
>play the game for couple hours
>stop playing and call it boring
Your loss
>>318285719
If I wanted to play with physics I would go play Red Faction Guerilla or Crysis.
If that's all there is to it, I don't know who the hell thought this game was worth $60.
>>318285847
Oh, so the game starts being more than destroying the same bases over and over again at some point?
>>318285858
You can Buy it for $25
Is Just Cause the most shilled and overrated game on /v/
And anyone who's opinion about the game is even remotely negative will be bashed
>>318285858
go do that then
what is the point you're arguing?
>>318285985
I'll wait for $5.
>>318285858
>I'd play Red Faction Gorilla or Crysis
Yes, and those aren't as good at it as Just Cause 2.
>>318285950
The point is not to destroy the bases
>So we redid Just Cause 2 with a new engine, what else could we do?
>Mmmm, I know, add wingsuits!
>Good, what next?
>Mmmm... Nah, nothing, start bug-testing and begin the physical format version production.
>>318286000
Not even close. There's Undertale, Indivisible, every AssCreed game and shitload of other games that are shilled on a daily basis. JC barely comes close.
>>318286000
But anon, don't you see that doing the same fucking thing over and over again is so le whacky and fun, BOOOM, haha, you get it? ;^)
>>318286282
>no wait! i forgot, remove some of the features like sprinting and throwing C4
>>318286341
I agree, Just Cause 3's shilling is even more obvious.
Mad Max had a similar shilling campaign where threads could last more than 15 hours because literally no one outside of shills posted in them.
>>318286387
>b-but its the games fault im so unimaginitive
its a sandbox game you fkn sperg l m a o t b h f a m
>>318286282
More like
>Ok let's start working on JC3. Should we make a reboot or what about making Rico a black gay person?
>Doesn't sound good. People loved JC2, so what about taking what's good in it and improving on it?
Been watching streams of the console version.
It's all destroying places.
Seriously, there's nothing else to do, it even has cheat mode activated by default with the infinite C4 thing, and incomprehensibly, you actually CAN'T throw C4.
There's some choices made with this game that are just... Why would you that?
>>318286000
It's a great game with tons of play value and it costs $2.5. It's not overrated or shilled if people tell you to try it and you for some reason don't like it
>>318286604
>I have to use my imagination to make up for the lack of content
>>318286649
>People loved JC2, so what about taking what's good in it and improving on it?
>Mmm, maybe we should add a wingsuit.
>That's it, begin testing for the final version of the game.
Also
>italians
>white
>>318286795
>a completely open sandbox game has to literally hold my hand and tell me how to have fun
>>318286795
Didn't you know how great MGSV was because of the fanfiction ending I wrote?
>>318286887
But that is a straight up lie
>>318286943
>a completely open sandbox has to literally be devoid of content
>''J-JUST USE YOUR IMAGINATION''
Okay then, the $60 i'll pay for this game will also be made up with my mind too.
>>318285686
>And their reason that the whole world would be empty after you blow everything up is stupid too
That is why unless you mod it the RFG demo is actually better than the full game because everything resets.
>all this samefag shilling
>>318287035
There's more things? Do tell.
I'm not ready but I will be.
Very soon.
>>318263007
I am also mildly anticipating JC3.
It looks a little too similar to JC2 for me but even if it's just updated JC2 it's worth it
>>318286887
tell me how you would "improve" the game
>>318287193
>>318268114
And to add that
>better grappling hook
>better parachute
>better fast-travel
>more gadgets
>in-game modding
>bigger map
>caves
and so on
OH SHIT, cdkeys codes are now releasing the codes.
get your preload started
>>318287356
>better
>better
>better
>more
>bigger
>>318287356
Oh, so you are the same shill from the previous threads that seriously thinks that a bigger or better feature counts as something new.
This is nothing more than a tweaked Just Cause 2 with a wingsuit, but i'm not arrogant, i'll pay the same price I paid for Just Cause 2: $1.30
>>318287103
>game has lots of content and you can basically do anything
>"WHY CAN'T I DO ANYTHING ELSE THAN BLOW THINGS UP WAHH"
>>318287568
>anything
Like?
Can you buy new pants?
>>318287568
>lots of content
Like what?
Like better grappling hooks like this nigga said?
>>318287356
My fucking sides.
Only ACTUAL new content they added were wingsuit challenges.
Literally nothing else.
This barely counts as a new game.
>>318287464
Yes? When did I say they added tons of new stuff?
>>318287559
No I'm not, haven't been to JC3 threads in days.
I agree that it's more like JC2.5, but I have no problems with it.
>Avalanche has the balls to charge $60 for this
Pathetic.
>>318287464
ok now I am convinced you are retarded
please give me an example of a good sequel in your eyes
>>318284451
sperg spotted
>>318287810
not even counting the key websites
>>318287810
>previous game has been sold at $2.50 for years
>"HOW DARE THEY CHARGE FULL PRICE ON THE SEQUEL"
>>318287821
A game that uses the previous game as a base, and builds upon it.
Assassins Creed 2, for example.
Even though the current franchise is completely dead, it was a natural evolution from AC1.
Just Cause 3 uses Just Cause 2 as it's goal.
They don't want to improve Just Cause 2, they just want to make another Just Cause 2.
An actual competent developer would make an actual sequel, take the slight risk of pushing forward the franchise.
>>318287810
>$60 is a lot of money for a video game
Nice poorfag meme
>>318287990
Thats pound you retard.
Its literally $55.. .WOW what a discount
>>318287456
>Picked it up a month ago
>Never used CDkeys
>Started to get worried.
Pre-loading right now. Pretty hyped from all the footage I saw.
>>318288014
>new game is barely different from the previous games
>''WOW, WHY WOULDN'T THEY CHARGE $60 FOR THIS WINGSUIT AND NEW MAP DLC''
>>318288089
They ask a lot for something that it's not a new videogame.
>>318288014
What
Wait
What is that logic even?
So if they sell JC3 for 2 bucks for a few years JC is allowed to cost 120 bucks?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVnHLn1Uapc
ignore the faggot talking over it
>>318288014
>WOW DON'T YOU SEE HOW GOOD THEY ARE? THEY PRICE OF A 5 YEAR OLD GAME HAS BEEN LOW FOR YEARS
Are you retarded?
>>318288068
but AC2 can literally be boiled down the same way
>different setting
>more weapons
>worse story
wow what a sequel
>>318288173
>literally a new game
>it's not a new game
Just wait for it to go on sale or rent it or pirate it poorfag
>>318288380
Seems fun, but I don't think this game is worth more than $10.
open world games are getting real stale.
why do you keep buying them, honestly?
>Why put multiplayer into our game when the modding community will do it for free anyway?
Fuck no I'm not buying this game. It is literally JC2
>>318288068
>>318288173
>Just Cause 3 is exactly like JC2, therefore it shouldn't be called 3
I don't know what you guys want. JC3 is like 2 but better in almost every aspect. It has new storyline, new map, new characters etc. The only thing that's the same is the gameplay with some improvements. That's exactly what Assasses and other games do as well (minus something like Half-Life which had more than couple years between the games)
>>318288238
The devs deserve some money if they've gotten almost none from the previous successful game. I'm not saying they're allowed to charge 120 for it, but what the hell is wrong at 60
>>318288484
>new game
>nothing new apart from the map and the wingsuit
>>318288535
Even worse, if it really has Denuvo, you won't see any modding apart from model swaps and things that Cheat Engine would do, just like TPP.
Should I, /v/?
>>318262914
Game looks like absolute trash, Im amazed you people gobble this shit up.
>>318288649
It's your mom's money, ask her
>>318288467
AC2 added actual variety to the missions, when AC1 was just do the same 3 missions to investigate your target, kill the target.
Repeat 9 times.
AC2 had different missions, things like the tombs to unlock Altair's armor, rebuilding Monterigionni.
>>318288606
>nothing new apart from the map and the wingsuit
smfh f a m
how i am laffin t b h
>>318288467
>more stealth options
>improved climbing and overall movement
>more features like swimming stealing different knd of weapons
>>318288534just 'cause.
Honestly though JC is one of the very few series that does open world right, even though I'd rather call it sandbox.
G2A has it for $30
>>318287456
>tfw couldn't buy it on CDKey because I only got a Maestro card.
Had to buy it on G2A
Still no Preload
>>318288590
They should make enough content that warrants it's $60 pricetag.
>>318288753
Do tell.
I've been asking for what new content there for 1 hour and nobody has been able to say.
It's obvious there is none.
This is just an expansion of Just Cause 2, not a new game.
After this, and the absolute chore that Mad Max was, I lost all my faith on Avalanche.
>>318288762
so improved gameplay then?
the same as JC3's improved gameplay
btfo
>>318288868
>buying on G2A
>>318288693
>butthurt detected
lol you keep on playing those nintendo and porn games, then
/v/ really does hate fun :)
>>318288731
The difference is that Just Cause is an open world game, Assass 2 is not. Just like Ass has more missions to do, JC3 has more areas to fuck around. JC3 also has more and different missions
>>318288762
>more
>improved
>more
>>318288910
Some people are fine paying $60 and playing +100 hours
>>318288775
>literally nothing to do apart from blowing up bases
>this is what some people consider ''doing open world right''
Jesus fucking christ.
>>318288928
see
>>318288731
>>318288868
CDKeys has it for $25
BOOM XD
>>318289015
>Assassins Creed 2 isn't an open world game
You don't even know your own genre, do you Avalanche guys?
>>318289023
torrent sites will have it for $0
>mfw shills already in damage control mode because ''BOOM BOOM'' is all there is to do in this ''game''
>>318262914
Nope. Just Cause was always a really boring free roam game with some gimmicks that are fun for about 30 minutes tops. I can't think of a single thing I really like about the game. The mechanics and gunplay are horrible, the movement is horrible, the plot is horrible, the environment is uninspired and boring, the characters are the most generic forgettable characters I've ever encountered. I just don't get it.
>>318288889
Really? I got my key in 2 minutes and preloaded it last night
>>318289015
>Some people are fine paying $60 and playing +100 hours
By destroying the same bases over and over again with the power of le imagination am i rite ;)))
>published by SquareEnix
Game will be under 10$ in a year or less.
Why not just wait a bit?
>>318289110
>small as fuck city with lots of limited areas
>versus 1000km2 of open land
Yeah I wouldn't call Ass2 an open world game
>>318289239
/thread
This literally Wide as an ocean, deep as a puddle: The Videogame.
And I have my doubts about the ''Wide'' part considering there's fuck-all to do in the game.
>>318289207
you say that as if its a bad thing
>>318289417
>people can't have fun with an open world game
>therefore it's a bad game
>>318289375
>smaller open world games aren't open world
Nice argument, but the point is that Just Cause 3 doesn't even try.
It's just yet another map for Just Cause 2.
Just Cause 3 is exactly what a sequel shouldn't be.
>>318289535
>opinions
>>318289314
>>318286000
>>318285758
>>318285539
>>318273973
Are you a woman? Who can't find fun in simply destroying random shit and playing with physics? I bet you fucking liked Undertale you piece of shit.
>>318289535
I can show you people having played MGS5 for 250 hours.
That won't make MGS5 less of a chore.
>>318289535
Well, yeah, that's exactly the point.
It's kind of weird though, you seem to be implying that open world games are all automatically fun. Just Cause is a prime example of the generic, unfun variety of open world games.
>>318289296
Nigga. Wat. Im gonna call support. I preordered on 25th.
Did you bought the G2A guard tho?
>>318288535
>has no multiplayer
and that's fucking fine with me. I'd rather developers focus on solo than a half-assed solo and crappy online. (like GTA 5)
>>318289602
>>318289672
>>318289676
But the difference is that Just Cause 2 is objectively a good game, you just can't have fun with it
>>318289672
it wasn't a chore and neither is this game maybe you don't like to play games?
>>318289703
>Did you bought the G2A guard tho?
No that's worthless, they have a refund policy anyway.
>>318289781
>focus on singleplayer game
>it's still Just Cause 2 with wingsuits
Avalanche is so fucking bad.
>>318289781
How about ditching the shitty cliche stories and braindead combat vs AI and instead focus on a rich multiplayer experience that has significantly more replay value than a cinematic experience aimed to be consumed within a couple hours?
>>318289815
>this opinion about this game is objective, even though i'm facing someone who disagrees
Are you retarded?
>>318289905
>cinematic experience
have you even played the games?
>>318289815
I'm perfectly content with not being able to enjoy bad games.
>>318289896
and vehicles that aren't shit
>>318289905
I've played over 200 hours of JC2 sp
Played MP for a day and got bored
>>318289649
>attacking the writer, and not the message
Sad.
And no, Just Cause 3 being an expansion of Just Cause 2 won't make Undertale any less of a meme game.
>>318290029
I just summed up single player games in a nutshell. I don't care what kind of le epic random XD Saints Row dildo bat shit you can do in single player. It's shallow and it's boring.
>>318290051
what kind of games do you like?
>>318290005
>>318290051
Yes, games can be objetively good even if you don't like them
>>318290065
Pointless since it's just faster using the wingsuit and the grappling hook.
>>318290087
And what did you do during those two hours?
>>318290157
Alright anon, could you tell me what kind of games do you like?
>>318290157
if you haven't played the games you cant judge them
>>318290169
>>318290229
Good ones.
>>318290224
I hate it because there's nothing else to do and fucking around gets boring.
Fast.
>>318290226
>since it's just faster using the wingsuit and the grappling hook.
It's not
>>318290226
have you seen the insane amount of upgrades for vehicles?
>>318290287
What? Just Cause? I own Just Cause 2. It's incredibly bad.
>>318290336
At least you were lucky enough to get a copy before release.
>>318290229
So the topic can switch from Just Cause 3 lacking content to you shitting on the game he likes?
>>318290382
see
>>318290351
Only vehicle faster than that are planes.
>>318290312
like?
>this thread
>"I don't know how to have fun in this game, that means the game is shit and I need to come to the thread to mention about it to everyone"
Worst attentionwhores
>>318290351
>"Its not fun"
>Didn't even played the game
I watched reynad play it yesterday and was surprised how many people in the chat hated it. Maybe it was because of how badly he was playing it.
>>318290395
Oh yeah, vehicle upgrades, basically more tools to destroy the same bases over and over again.
How about actual content, like side missions, or interesting missions, and delivering a complete game, and not a GTA-freeroam-only game?
>>318290437
1. that's a footage from trailer
2. >Only vehicle faster than that are planes. made you point invalid
>>318290551
this is pretty cool
>>318290524
>having to use your imagination to make up for the lack of content and value of the game
>>318290551
Oh, look at that webm that depicts something that I could do in Just Cause 2.
>>318290576
What? The game has tons of side mission and a full story. Are you only been looking at some meme letsplayers who stream 10 hours of exploding stuff?
>>318290576
its a sandbox if destroying a city isn't entertaining then its your problem and not the games fault
>>318290551
>YOU DIDN'T PLAY THE GAME, DON'T YOU SEE THIS SHIT THAT YOU CAN REPLICATE EXACTLY IN JUST CAUSE 2?
My fucking sides, no wonder shills have stopped doing damage control for how this is Just Cause 2.1 and are instead going
>b-b-but this is exactly what I wanted pls buy our game ;___;
>>318290690
The game is Just Cause 2 with a wingsuit and better destruction physics and more grappling options. That's enough for me, but I totally understand if its not enough for some people.
>>318290721
>10 hours of exploding stuff?
But people in this thread are telling me that's the fun of the game.
See
>>318290774
Anyway, what kind of side missions are there?
>>318290690
Just admit it, you can't have fun with open world games. They're not meant to tell you what to do.
>lack of content
So what you would've wanted? 100 huge cities next to eachother? Minigames and QTEs in every corner?
>>318290351
>fly around
>blow shit up
>thats it
And people buy this shit.
lads t b h its sunday evening and you're voilently samefaging a thread about a game you don't like
>>318290498
Mostly games that aren't part of the Just Cause series.
Hell, I can't think of any open world game that's worse than Just Cause.
So pick any other open world game for starters. Assume that I like it. Start tearing it to shreds. Be sure to include any meaningless comparisons and points as you can. Your mission is to convince me that I actually did have fun with Just Cause 2.
>>318290902
Some people enjoy that. I couldn't give a fuck about the story, but some do. I don't even care about the explosions that much, but more exploring the world and fucking around with everything.
There are lots of stuff to do if you have any sense of free will.
>>318291043
fuck can you just tell me what games you actually like instead of avoiding the question
>>318291000
Pretty much. It's a meme game for teenagers. /v/ just loves it because it's one of the few remaining AA series so they can actually like a game with a decent production value without being called a normie.
>>318291000
>"HOW DARE PEOPLE HAVE FUN"
>>318291043
>Hell, I can't think of any open world game that's worse than Just Cause.
think harder. jc2 is a flawed game but its not the worst open world game by a LONG shot.
>>318290806
>>318290690
Yeah you totally do this in Just Cause 2
>>318270917
if you are buying it from one of those shitty sites why not just pirate it?
>>318291182
its too unrealistic for teenagers kids these days prefer realistic games for "mature gamers"
>>318283986
Did that guard tower just shed its skin?
The fuck happened?
>>318291223
Oh man, I forgot all about Watch Dogs. Fair enough.
But still, I'm having issues thinking of any more. That doesn't bode well for a game that's supposed to be objectively good and fun.
PCfags ruined just cause threads
>was hyped for this game
>watching all the videos and reading threads reminded me how fucking godawful all the missions were despite fucking around being a lot of fun
Now I'm not sure what to do, should I cancel my preorder?
>mfw Giantbomb loved the game
>mfw first reviews are solid 8-9
>mfw TotalCancer Loved the game
>mfw Sterling stream loving the game
>mfw "instert your favorite Review source" going to love this game even if you faggot don't
>>318289649
Please, I'm a woman and I like just cause, don't be a soggy kneest.
>>318291424
nope its just a few shitposters
>>318291373
Realistic like what? Garry's Mod? That game is practically a video game version of daycare. It contains all the random and whacky shit you can do in Just Cause 2.
By the way, 4chan is an 18+ website, kiddo.
>>318291043
>Your mission is to convince me that I actually did have fun with Just Cause 2.
Differentfag, but no it isn't. We're just interested to hear what games you think are good if JC2 is the worst open world game you know
![Assassin's_Creed_III_Game_Cover[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/y4TlRpt.jpg "Assassin's Creed III Game Cover[1]")
>>318291392
>that's supposed to be objectively good and fun.
What? No game is objectively good and fun. Review scores are just subjective amalgamates of opinions. Why would you say that?
>>318291519
I was talking about cod you stupid fuck
>>318291519
>kiddo
ok guys we all can leave the thread
the autism has 100% been confirmed
>>318291539
No Fun Allowed: The Thread
No wonder you faggots love Indies so much
>>318291614
Not him, but of course some games are objectively good. For example things like Deus Ex, Morrowind, Baldurs Gate and so on. They are good games even if you didn't personally like them
>>318291639
>autism
That's one of the favorite memes of the underage on 4chan. You're really not doing yourself any favors by borderline announcing that you're breaking rule 2.
>Some people liked and others disliked JC2
>the people who liked JC2 will probably like JC3 and vice versa
I honestly don't know what your thinking is if you're expecting something entirely different from the third game of a series that's been open world destruction antics since the series began.
>>318291736
Not him, but no, a game cannot be objectively good. It can be objectively many things that deal with something factual about the game, but since something being good is subjective, it cannot be objective.
>>318291813
no one cares about you just go shitpost in another thread if you don't want to talk about the game
>>318291450
Make your own decisions you idiot
>>318291875
This. Why are people even in this thread if they don't like both games?
>>318291813
jesus christ what is wrong with you
>>318291715
Yeah but that dude is just shitposting, why would you give him oxygen?
>>318291736
No, none of those games are "objectively" good. If they were objectively good it could be scientifically proven they are good. Good cannot be quantified, therefore they cannot be objectively good. Good is a matter of opinion. You show Morrowind to a bunch of teenagers today and they'll probably think its a bad Skyrim ripoff. If it were objectively good everyone could agree it was a good thing.
>>318291494
every kpop autist calling himself a woman has outed themselves as trannies
>>318291939
We are talking about the game. You derailed the thread by talking about Call of Duty.
>>318291959
>Why are people even in this thread if they don't like both games?
In my opinion this is the biggest issue with /v/. On other sites you get sections to talk about a particular game, and people who don't like the game don't have to visit that section and see it. On /v/ its a free for all and if you hate JC and see a thread you'll probably be inclined to open it and shitpost. The other side of the coin is that insulted sections lead to insulated opinions where everyone loves a game and criticism is buried. Too bad there's no middle ground.
>>318291908
>>318291968
>something being good is subjective
>If they were objectively good it could be scientifically proven they are good.
But they can. They have all the elements of a good game. The music is good. The gameplay is good. The story is good and so on. Of course someone could always say they don't like it, but it doesn't change the fact that overall it's well made and also that people like it.
nice to see all the shitposters have found their favorite thread to shit up.
I'll get this eventually. Too many other games at the moment. At least too man open world games that take 100+ hours to finish
>>318292105
Is this goat simulator 2? XD
>>318292207
That pasta is so old it belongs in a museum.
>>318292103
no you aren't you were shitposting now fuck off
>>318292239
Good is subjective.
How are so many people playing it early?
Twitch is full of streams
>>318292097
I'm not particularly into kpop, just a reaction image.
>>318292239
>They have all the elements of a good game.
Even the elements that make up a good game are subjective.
>it doesn't change the fact that overall it's well made and also that people like it.
If people like its, its subjectively good to those people. Their opinion is that it is good. Doesn't make it objectively good.
I never liked any Souls game, but I understanded why people enjoyed it so I kept my criticisms to myself
I never liked Just cause so everyone is a faggot who liked it. how can you enjoy it no fun even though i never played it xdxdxd.
>>318292354
>OP openly asks everyone if they're excited for the game
>Say no and explain why
>Stop shitposting!
Never thought I'd see the day where /v/ becomes a hugbox like neogaf
>>318292439
Squeenix gives early access to streamers for marketing purposes.
>>318292413
If you talk about how well a game is made, then it's not
>>318292503
>Even the elements that make up a good game are subjective.
No it isn't. Some game can have the best combat in any game ever, but there can still be someone who dislikes it. That doesn't mean it's suddenly objectively bad.
>If people like its, its subjectively good to those people. Their opinion is that it is good. Doesn't make it objectively good.
Yes, there are bad games people like, but there can also be good games people don't like.
>>318292571
"because I can't have fun" isn't a valid opinion
>>318292571
we already gave the answer but the fag is still asking the same question now stop shitposting
>>318292682
>best combat in any game ever
That's a matter of opinion dude. There cannot be objectively good combat. Some people love Arkham combat, others hate it. There is no objective scale on which to measure Arkham combat's goodness.
>Yes, there are bad games people like, but there can also be good games people don't like.
Which means that there's no such this as an objectively good game. You might like Deus Ex, I might hate it. Doesn't mean your opinion is objectively truth for some reason.
>>318292292
>Too many other games at the moment
This.
>Albion Online
I know it's pay2beta and pay2win, not denying I'm an idiot, but it just hits all my buttons
>Divinity:OS EE
Never got round to finishing the original and now the EE has so many QoL changes that the game is even better.
>Dragom's Dogma PC
Soon(tm)
>XCOM2
If I'm done with all these games, I might take a look at JC3
>>318291875
That probably my reason for not wanting for buy JC3. Blowing up military bases ad nauseam even on the occasion you try to be creative got really boring after the first 10 or so bases.
The multiplayer mod really tired me out too, boring ass laggy deathmatches and races.
Are you fags capable of comprehending fun?
>>318292612
Best and most tolerable way of marketing imo
>literally showcasing the game exactly how it will be shipped
You cam just look at footage to see if you're interested. No scripted shit or false advertising involved.
More devs should do that.
>>318292973
>That's a matter of opinion dude.
No. Bamham combat fits the game and is made well. That makes it a good combat even though you might not like it. Or music. People have different tastes in music, but still some speedcore in a fantasy game isn't good even if you personally liked it.
>You might like Deus Ex, I might hate it. Doesn't mean your opinion is objectively truth for some reason.
Doesn't mean it's objectively shit either. Deus Ex is made well and has many great elements in it. I might like it because of that. I might also like something like Big Rigs. The difference is that the latter is objectively a good game.
>>318273973
>I wrote this sarcastic post to make fun of the PCGamer writer who said that watching let's plays gives you the same thing as playing a game
>come back 4 hours later
>mfw people are taking this post seriously and are agreeing with it
Jesus fucking Christ, what's wrong with you people?
>>318293395
former*
>>318293416
>gives you the same thing
gives you the same experience*
>>318293395
>Bamham combat fits the game and is made well.
That is again, a matter of opinion. There are plenty of people on this board that would disagree and say Bamham combat is shit. You can't say its objectively good. You have no proof its objectively good. You only have your opinion that it "fits the game" and that "its made well". But these are matters of opinion, not objectively provable quantities. Your opinion =/= objective truth.
>Doesn't mean it's objectively shit either.
Now I think you're not reading what I said. I never said Deus Ex was objectively shit. I said there is no objectivity in whether a game is good or bad. Its all a matter of opinion, of subjectivity. A game cannot be objectively good or bad.
>>318281047
> implying deformed spines aren't hot
>>318294023
Those toblerone edits never get old.
>>318293795
>That is again, a matter of opinion.
No it isn't. People may dislike the combat, but that doesn't change the fact that it's made well.
>Your opinion =/= objective truth.
I never said so, it just happens that I like good games. But for example I don't like Witchers, but I still think they're objectively good games
>>318294202
here's an extra
>>318291686
That just looks fucking stupid. I know it's not supposed to be realistic but come the fuck on.
>this thread
>literally 'no fun' shitposters
name a better 'sandbox' game (emphasis on sandbox) than Just Cause
>>318294221
>the fact that it's made well.
But its not a fact that it's made well. Consider what "made well" actually means. Does that mean its functional? Or does that mean animations are smooth? Or does that mean the enemy types are varied? Does that mean the framerate is 60fps or 30fps? Everything that can constitute "made well" is a matter of opinion. Does that make candy crush an objectively good game, because it was made well?
If the Witcher is an objectively good game, then you should like it. Because its objectively a good thing. And if it is factually, 100% provable that Witcher games are good, then there should be no reason for you to dislike them. Do you see the flaw with your logic? The Witcher is not an objectively good game. The consensus of many subjective opinions is that it is a good game. But it is not an objectively good game, or you would like it.
>>318294023
here have one that's not full of spelling errors and has the top right spin that's visible fixed.
>>318294774
whats the original for this from?
Yeah sure, can't wait to play a watered-down physics sandbox game where I will find hundreds of hours worth of entertainment grappling objects together and shooting things with the most mediocre gunplay mechanics imaginable.
>>318294774
why would you fix the spelling error?
>>318294723
>Does that mean its functional? Or does that mean animations are smooth? Or does that mean the enemy types are varied? Does that mean the framerate is 60fps or 30fps?
It means all of those and some more. If a game has functional, smooth, non-framerate-locked combat with good enemies you can't say "it's about opinion whether it's good or not". It's well made then and you have all the right to dislike it.
> Does that make candy crush an objectively good game, because it was made well?
I haven't played it myself, but as a mobile game it seems to lack depth and variety. It's probably not a good game even if the gameplay is good because there's nothing else in that game.
>If the Witcher is an objectively good game, then you should like it.
No. What makes you think everyone should like a game if it's good? I don't like those because I don't like story-heavy games, third person camera and many other features of Witchers. Those aren't negative things and I think they suit the game.
>>318262914
>wingsuit
More like wings. It's vertical flight. Rico is god now.
>>318262914
what are the recomended specs for pc?
also, who else day one pirate?
>>318295346
>If a game has functional, smooth, non-framerate-locked combat with good enemies you can't say "it's about opinion whether it's good or not". It's well made then and you have all the right to dislike it.
>you can't say "it's about opinion whether it's good or not"
>It's well made then and you have all the right to dislike it.
Which is it? Also do I really need to point out that " functional, smooth, non-framerate-locked combat with good enemies" are all subjective opinions as to what make combat good?
>What makes you think everyone should like a game if it's good?
Because according to you, its objectively good. And if its objectively good, then there's no reason to dislike it. Because its objectively good. If it was subjectively good according to some people, then it makes sense that other people can dislike it. But if its objectively good, there cannot be someone saying it isn't good. Like, this post was objectively written in English. You can't say it was written in another language, because that isn't true. So if Witcher is an objectively good game, you can't dislike it. Because its objectively good, and there is no reason to dislike a good thing. The only logical recourse is that games (or any form of art for that matter) cannot be objectively good.
Yeah
>>318296039
>" functional, smooth, non-framerate-locked combat with good enemies" are all subjective opinions as to what make combat good?
Because all those are positive things. Of course there might be someone who like non-functional, clunky, fps-locked combat with shit enemies, but again that doesn't mean it makes the game good.
> if its objectively good, then there's no reason to dislike it
I said objectively good, not objectively perfect. There's no such game every single person likes. But there are games that are so well made that most people should like them, even though there are many who don't. And those who don't like it can't say it's a shit game, because it's actually well made and they just personally don't enjoy some aspect of it.
Witcher is objectively good game, even though it has some flaws, just like Morrowind and other good games. Even if Witcher was flawless I still would dislike it because of some positive and completely normal things in it I just personally don't like. That doesn't make it a bad game
>>318267872
You mean other than the wingsuit and a new grappling and stunt system?
>>318296930
>There's no such game every single person likes.
Which means that there's no such thing as an objectively good game. If there was an objectively good game, then everyone would like it.
>>318294023
post original pls
>>318267215
broteam played it for five hours last night
It looked like shit
>>318297120
> If there was an objectively good game, then everyone would like it
Why? What the hell makes you think that? Game being made well or otherwise be almost flawless has nothing to whether you personally like to play it or not.
It makes me sad that literally whos are playing it and I have to wait
>>318297120
just stop fucking using that word.
Why does Rico look like Angry Joe? Why did they change his voice actor?
Why in the everliving fuck did they change him so much? He's not even remotely the same character from 1 or 2 now.
>>318297332
>Game being made well or otherwise be almost flawless has nothing to whether you personally like to play it or not.
If a game is flawless then there should be no reason for someone to dislike playing it. Because its objectively good. That's the whole point of objectiveness. Its a concrete, proven fact that its good. There is no factual basis on which to dislike an objectively good thing.
>>318297382
literally exactly what I'm arguing for
>>318297120
>>318296930
There ARE objectively good games, but people will pretend to hate them out of contrarianism or spite. Objectively good games are ones that people who claim to hate them actually enjoy but conceal it as a guilty pleasure or to be a hipster piece of shit.
>>318297758
No, there are not objectively good games, because there is no scale on which to measure "goodness" and prove a game is good. You can say a game is well optimized, has an objectively solid framerate, because these can be measured and proven. You can't measure "goodness". Good is a matter of opinion.
>>318297724
>If a game is flawless then there should be no reason for someone to dislike playing it
Yes there should. There could be a flawless game, but I wouldn't want to play it because it's in third person. That's not a flaw, but a normal feature. I would still say that the game is good.
Same goes with movies. There are tons of classics that are in every way masterpieces, but there are still people who didn't like them.
>>318297947
You seem to think we're talking about "good" in "whether I like it or not", when it's actually how well the game overall is made. If we're using your definition then of course there's no game everyone think is good. But there surely are games that are almost flawless even though people dislike them
>>318298253
Okay but "objectively good" and "objectively well-made" are two different things. You can measure how well-made a game is, you can't measure how good it is.
Got my serial from cdkeys LET'S DO THIS PRE-LOAD BABY! $25 day 0 key. Can't fucking beat it.
>>318297292
That's because he just drove fucking cars off the ledge for the first 2 hours
CDkeys came through. I'll probably end up buying the DLC pack with all the money I saved and still come out ahead.
Got it off greenmangaming, needed those preorder bonuses that others don't get.
>>318262914
Looks empty as fuck like JC2
>>318274341
Why the fuck does this game take up 38.5 GB when like 90% of the game is empty nothingness.
>>318298830
nice, souce?
>>318298830
What is even the source of this shit?
I need context
>>318298830
Who the fuck actually gets off on ripping spines out of people?
Gorefags, I assume? God what a fucking edgy and shit tier fetish.
"haha i broke her knee and cut off her tit so fucking HOT HOT HOT!""
>>318301204
you don't control fetishes
you don't pick them
and it's not a fetish, it's just stupid morbid curiosity for what people devise only to gain money
>>318292239
>They have all the elements of a good game. The music is good. The gameplay is good. The story is good and so on
That's just your warped subjective opinion, due to being a stupid fanboy.
I guess I will have to pirate it since I below min specs now.
>>318294657
ez
Garry's Mod
It has multiplayer, tons of shit you can do, near-infinite moddability, infinite maps and it's only 10 bucks.
Meanwhile, JC3 has just one map full of nothing and a couple things you can do, like blow things up and attach stuff to other stuff with hooks.....which you could already do in JC2.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KGfp2aTnHs
>>318281405
I've lost my Witcher 3 copy, but thankfully I got the G2A shield shit they have and I got refundedand bought the game again at a lower price :^)
>>318284132
>mercenaries
Don't remind me anon;_;
![photo[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wCXzN86.jpg "photo[1]")
![duchamp-urinal[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6ExAmFo.jpg "duchamp-urinal[1]")
