Why try to re-make a game's graphics if you're incapable of even making it look on-par, let alone better
>>317600834
Ask Nintendo because this looks like an exact copy of Paper Mario 2.
>>317601087
I tried finding an image to refute that, but I realized you're right.
TTYD might not measure up to 64 graphically, but at least it had all new locations and characters full of fun writing and content to make up for it.
I just crawled from under my rock.. Is there a remake happening?
>>317600834
How is that not an improvement? There is a little less color depth but otherwise everything is higher resolution and has a more consistent style.
>>317600834
What's the bottom pic from? I still prefer the top. It has a comfier feeling to it.
>>317603274
every time
>>317600834
Bottom looks a lot better. Are you wearing nostalgia goggles or what?
I like new version more.
>>317603274
Did the star people change into those fat babies? I thought they were different than the star people.
>>317603274
>>317603768
Fixed. You can now choose if you want Luma or an updated version of the original design. Same for all the other changed characters.
New version looks great. What are you complaining about again?
>>317600834
>>317601864
>>317603274
I don't understand the bottom one looks more colorful and better?
Any videos of this? I can't imagine TTYD Mario's sprite looks any good doing 64 animations
>>317600834
>>317603274
Both of the bottom images look far, far better.
People forget that sometimes they nostalgia goggles they wear are looking at what originally probably wasn't the artistic intent, but the result of hardware limitations. The remakes of a lot of games are closer to what the original intent was with more powerful hardware to get those ideas across.
never played this game before so no nostalgia goggles
the bottom one looks miles better
Oh great, another remake for full price
>>317600834
>>317603274
The original looks like shit, the remake looks even worse. Good job Nintendo. Better start looking into the pachinko market while you still own your IPs.
>>317603956
they changed a star sprite into a luma.
>Almost 2016
>Still no full-length Paper Mario ROMhack
>>317604278
You can change it back now.
Did I just enter a parallel universe? The bottom one is infinitely better than the top. The top is eye cancer in comparison and I love the original but come on, you have to be blind to prefer it
>>317604153
When did shitposters get so lazy? This is a free fan remake
>>317604153
>>317604230
It's a retextured N64 ROM for emulators.
>>317604230
the remake isn't even by Nintendo, you absolute retard
>>317604338
it's not cool to like the new stuff
>>317604153
>he thinks this is an actual nintendo product and not some project a single neckbeard has been working on for years
>>317604153
>yfw
>>317603956
>>317604106
>>317604230
Stop shilling for this shitty mod.
>>317604338
people are more annoyed by changes for no reason like changing Twink into a Luma, an elderly toad into toadsworth,
and something I can't remember about merlon or someone being turned into a merlon
>Nintendo's face when
>>317604027
>changing Super Block to Shine Sprite
>>317604409
>changing Mr. E to Toadette
>>317604510
>disgusting Sticker Star backgrounds
0/10, puking atm
>>317604720
>a complete retexture of a rom is a mod
>>317604230
it's fanmade
>>317604720
I didn't even know it was a mod, I assumed it was a real remake and everyone was assblasted about it. In that case, my argument about intent and hardware limitations is irrelevant. Stay mad though.
>>317604883
Not him but... that's literally what it is. What the fuck? I don't even understand why this post was made.
>>317604880
They can all be changed back to updated versions of the original designs if you want.
>"sticker star backgrounds"
Development on this mod vastly predates sticker star.
>>317604720
>shilling for something that costs nothing
Is this out yet? I remember seeing a few screenshots floating around a few years ago
>>317604720
>shilling
>for a mod for an emulated game
Glad to see /v/ still don't know how to use certain words.
Reminder that person making this justified all his changes in a long post and then ended it with "it's mine so I can do what I want with it :^)"
>>317605051
Development has stalled but he's still working on it. It's free and essentially a side-project to test his retexturing skills.
papel malio
>>317605354
Still better than NoA.
>>317604106
Nah, I beat it for the first time yesterday and I grew up with TTYD. The tops look far, far better.
>>317605354
So?
>>317605354
He's not wrong, but it's a good thing you can choose to use the original ones updated too.
>>317605624
It looks worse anyway even ignoring all the unnecessary and ugly changes. Just stick with the original.
>>317605592
It's a re-texture, not a re-imagining.
>Mario's retarded face still hasn't been fixed
>Ctrl+F "crayon"
>Phrase not found
Oh thank god, you idiots finally stopped using that stupid argument.
>>317605739
So, don't buy it. Oh wait, it's free.
>>317605758
The original looked more watercolor than crayon.
>>317605046
Nice rocks
I wish it were a high quality remade version of the graphics from 64, instead of new textures altogether.
It just subtly conveys a different feeling in the backgrounds when you start replacing them with new stuff instead of just redrawing them in HD.
Oh well, this wasn't what I was looking for, and I don't need to finish Paper Mario once more.
>>317605728
Then just play with the original, nobody is forcing you to play the fan remake, I don't know why a lot of people go full auitism over it, the guy is just doing it for fun and because he likes the game.
>>317605592
>>317605624
The point being that it's a bit silly to take all that time trying to justify the changes if you're going to just pass it all off with a passive-aggressive "I can do what I want with it anyway." Completely defeats the purpose of making any of those justifications, and makes you look like a twat.
You could probably even go further and question why he's trying to garner attention and advertise it to everyone when his argument is that he's just making it for him.
looks good, it's his project and he can do what the wants. he's trying to make it look like ttyd graphically and it succeeding. why are you fags mad? you don't have to play the mod
>>317605839
I'm referring to the dumb argument that is consistently brought up (probably by OP every time he makes this thread) that the original PM character sprites were supposed to look like they were drawn with crayon and not just because the N64 lacked the power to allow for non-blurry sprites.
>>317605758
>>317606237
that's not an argument anon, that's shitposting
Everything's too flat and vector looking, the original had a more painterly look, the new one looks boring and sterile even if it has a higher resolution.
>>317605983
That doesn't make it exempt from criticism, retard.
>So what if they defaced the painting! They did it for FREE, nobody MADE you go look at it!
>>317606321
I fucking hate Clarence.
It's literally everything bad about modern cartoons stitched together, from shit designs to awkward dialogue.
>>317605354
It's true, though. If you can't sleep knowing that he's doing what he wants, just take your medication you sperglord.
>Hurr durr it's his thing he can just change characters
If he really likes the game and wants to retexture it all he should do is remake everything with higher quality, not replace original PM characters with other already existing characters.
>>317604394
>when did shitposters get lazy
When trolling became shitposting. A shitpost takes absolutely zero effort, it's something literally anybody with half a mind can do.
>>317606237
This is the first time I've made this thread, stupid.
>>317606484
I didn't know his work magically replaces the textures in every single original cartridge and rom out there.
>>317606484
He didn't replace sprites in your copy of the game, retard.
>>317606493
see >>317606127
I don't care what he's doing with it since I'm not playing it.
>>317604409
Those Toadettes look like shit.
>faggots complain about the luma twinkle change when it was stated years ago and multiple times in this thread that you can choose which to use
never change /v/
>>317606321
>90s isn't anthro
One job Harry, one fucking job
>>317606484
the shitty mod doesn't replace the original paper mario, dipshit
what a stupid comparison
Paper Mariofags once again prove that they are even worse than Metroidfags.
Can't wait for them to shitpost again about Paper Jam later tonight.
>>317606674
>>317606695
>>317606857
That wasn't the point. Focus on the point. not the analogue.
>>317600834
What game, and is it on wiiu? Looks cool, and I have a wiiu.
Oh shit I forgot about this remake. Has there been anymore important updates? Haven't kept up with the project in a while.
>>317606978
The analogue still doesn't work. He didn't ruin the only existing copy of a certain work.
>>317606951
Pretty sure you guys that keep spouting this over and over again are the most autistic and annoying people on /v/. You can just pretend they're not different people in different threads for the sake of your argument, though.
>>317606321
Both of Harry's drawings are shit
This image is also underselling environments which I would say are bit more visually appealing in some of the cartoons up top.
>>317606321
I think I missed something. When did 5 fingers become a norm in american animation?
>>317606127
Holy shit brother, go take your medication, if something like that triggers you you're going to have a hard time out in the real world.
>>317606484
>comparing an opyional retexture of a videogame, where you can choose to not use it, to an almost hundred year painting that will never go back to the original state
Not only tou are autistic but also dumb.
>>317606978
>>317607076
the point went out the window with the shit analogy
cute samefag btw
>>317606806
Same thing applies to modern anthro though.
>>317607101
Noted.
>>317607151
>missing the point entirely
No, TOU are the autistic dummy
>>317604106
yup, nintendo couldn't make twink look like a mouthless cherub-faced retard due to hardware limitations.
>>317600834
That looks fantastic though
>>317603274
This I'm not 100% okay with, Luma's and little stars are not the same.
>>317600834
>>317603274
I think this looks great. Is it time for me to stop playing video games and get a new hobby?
>>317600834
Fuck you that looks amazing
>>317607169
>Posts that are a minute apart are ALWAYS a samefag
epic!
and his point was that just because he's making it for free doesn't mean it can't be judged for looking like shit.
I don't see the problem here... I mean the new versions just look like TTYD but with higher quality textures. If you think it looks like shit you must also think TTYD looks like shit too, in which case your just a disgusting nostalgiafag
i can't be the only one who'd enjoy this remake, can i?
It'd have the great art of TTYD mixed with the great gameplay of 64
seems like a win win to me, too bad Nintendo will never do such a thing
>>317607382
>>317607403
>>317607442
>samefagging from different windows
Cute.
>>317607486
>his point
no, really, stop pretending
>>317607382
>>317607403
>>317607442
fuck OFF, YOU FUCKING SHIIIIIILLS.
https://strawpoll.me/6082519
>>317605354
You should kill yourself.
>>317607382
>>317607403
>>317607442
What about it looks amazing.
>>317605082
>Retconning Chuck Quizmo with MC Ballyhoo
WHY
>>317607319
There is no point to be made with such a dumb analogy.
>>317607138
>trigger
Funny, I'm not triggered at all and just trying to make a point, yet you're the one who has clearly take offense to what I said.
What did I say that bothers you?
>>317607521
Yeah, but I'd rather have a remake that used hi-res sprites of the original designs. Just give Mario a normal red cap.
I also liked the "dark but colorful" atmosphere the original had going on. It was pretty distinct
>>317607618
It looks just like the modern Paper Mario games. I think that's an impressive accomplishment for a fan mod. What about it looks awful?
>>317607530
>>317607589
>multiple people can't share an onion
Nostalgiafags, everyone.
This thread proves that the Nintendo fanbase as a whole is shit.
Paper Mario 64 is my favourite paper mario and he new graphics look really fucking good, you guys are fucked in the head, you don't HAVE to hate everything, you know that right?
>>317607750
What a stupid thing to say. Stupider than the analogy.
>>317607912
>sharing your onions
Completely ruins your chances of taking a juicy bite.
looks great, wish they wouldn't change some of the things though, i.e. peach's dress, Mr.E, super blocks
still great though, way better then SS or Super paper mario
>>317606762
>>317606127
If you didn't care, you wouldn't point it out. Hell, you could have said "y-you also care about stupid things since my comment bothered you!" and still make more sense. You know you're saying stupid things when the person you're arguing with has to help your argument.
>>317607912
I don't know about you but I'm probably not going to be sharing an onion with another person unless I was slicing it for a sandwich.
>>317607912
>if you don't like the new remake that shits on the original you're a nostalgiafag
Onionfags, everyone.
>>317607976
>you don't HAVE to hate everything, you know that right?
>he says to people who like PM64
Anyone got high-res screenshots of Super Paper Mario on Dolphin?
>>317607986
I see you took the next logical step and started with retarded food analogies.
>>317607912
>>317608031
Super Paper Mario is way better tho.
>>317607976
The resolution sure is higher, but in my opinion it looks worse. I don't hate the new version one, I just think it looks inferior, therefor it's pointless.
>>317608059
I mean I don't care about the game, numbnuts. I care about his justification and I'm pointing out the flaw in it. I don't understand why you people are so defensive of this this guy and his texture pack.
>You know you're saying stupid things when the person you're arguing with has to help your argument.
Uh, what?
>>317603274
he made an ACTUAL Twink sprite not long back
>>317604206
So god damned cute
>>317608176
I don't understand what you're trying to say or what that post has to do with mine.
>>317600834
The bottom looks like New Paper Mario 64. It looks soulless.
>tfw after years and years, this will finally be released and only be on PC due to it being a mod
DAMN YOU PCFAGS, YOU WIN THIS ROUND
>>317608247
>I don't understand why you people are so defensive
it's /v/
trigger someone and they go umad
>>317608256
For reference sake.
>>317608339
That's actually what this fag is calling it.
>new paper mario
since when is this a thing?
>>317608343
Would /v/ hate it more or less if it was an official Nintendo remaster?
>>317608487
Those star cheeks look dumb.
>>317606321
>Everything's too flat
>In Paper Mario
>>317608557
Depends on what they change, on top of expecting you to pay for it.
So did he plan on replacing all the star people with Luma, or just Twink? If just Twink, was he going to erase his entire motivation and backstory? Is he going to take Twink out of the final battle?
If he was going to replace all star people with Luma, how would he justify that? That wouldn't make any sense at all, lore-wise.
>>317608557
hate it because it'd cost money, love it because it'd breath life back into the Paper Mario franchise
>>317600834
I don't get it. What's so bad about it?
>>317608247
No buddy. I don't care about plants, that's why i'm not posting in a plants board. See the difference?
>>317607589
>strawpoll
I can just spam the option I want to win, stupid.
This looks amazing what are you people on?
Fucking nostalgia fags
>>317608557
Probably like it more. If they change anything or the difficulty though then /v/ would hate.
>>317608487
Look at >>317608487 .
Twink is still Twink in an different version of the game.
>>317608934
Was that post meant for someone else?
>>317608487
the star cheeks thing does look stupid but ah, what can you do, right? Tons of characters have designs you'd wanna change but can't
>>317608934
You might as well be posting on a plants board.
The arguments here are brainless enough to come from a vegetable.
>>317609030
Eh it's just slapping Super Paper Mario assets onto Paper Mario 64, nothing "amazing" about it. You can like it if you want, but it looks very plain in comparison.
>>317608339
>>>>>soul
>>317604625
>Bow will never take you to the shadows and suck your cock in public
>>317600834
Some parts in that picture are better, like the characters, the bridge and the leaves.
Most are okay.
The forst and the clouds are plain garbage instead, they don't even look paper made.
It reminds me of the thousands of free to play mmos for kids
Like club penguin
>>317609225
We are not machines, we are men.
>>317609225
>>>>>soul
>>317609323
lust cries running through his eyes
ALRIGHT, I'LL SAY IT, I KNOW WE'RE ALL THINKING IT,i don't like the running animation
>>317605354
>>317606127
This.
creator is also a manchild
>>317608487
>"You guys keep complaining about m-muh luma, well fine you can have twink back"
>"Why does he have star cheeks? Those look terrible and aren't in the original design"
>"FUCK YOUUUUUU!!!!"
I really hate the creator, he got so fucking butt blasted about people not liking his changes. Yes, people are going to complain if you basically rape paper mario's dead corpse
>>317609847
/v/
Where everyone else is the manchild, and Edmund is the asshole and is in no-way a bully victim
/v/ is so insanely delusional, no wonder why they shoot up schools
>>317609446
DIANA DIANA KICK YOUR FEET UP
>>317606321
>not posting the full version
>>317610068
Now I realize why Penny has so much porn
will you keks stop shitting on the guy, he had a dream, to play an HD remake of PM64 and instead of waiting for it, he went ahead and made it himself, you guys could learn a thing or two from him
>>317610028
Why are you so defensive of him?
>>317607216
God, I hate that show. It's fucking unbearable.
>>317610068
Are we going full circle?
>yfw nintendo waits until 98% completion for cease and desist
>>317610382
>you guys could learn a thing or two from him
And what would that be wise guy?
>>317610686
They should. I want to see the rant this guy will make.
Goddamnit, Paper Mario is a fucking great game.
>>317610867
I think we can at least agree on that.
>>317604106
nah, the remake looks like a bunch of cheap bumper stickers slapped onto shallow photoshop backgrounds
![kino_no_tabi_02[h264.vorbis][niizk].mkv_snapshot_24.17_[2015.01.18_16.35.43].png](https://i.imgur.com/hefX7aA.png "kino_no_tabi_02[h264.vorbis][niizk].mkv_snapshot_24.17_[2015.01.18_16.35.43].png")
>>317600834
the old one had charm, the charm old videos have from banding.
The new one looks like homogenized paper mario shit all the games look the same
>>317608857
Does nobody have any clue what the fuck this guy was thinking? Please respond.
>things only /v/ could possibly get upset about
get a life you autists
>>317610986
What an utterly pointless comment.
>>317611076
>tells others to get a life
>posts on /v/ about how others should get a life
Projection much?
>>317610695
you know how many people sit on /v/ and complain that some Dev hasn't made a game they want yet?
"waah, no Jet Set Radio 3"
"waah, no Half Life 3"
"waah, no Waluigi game"
yet none of them get off their asses and make it themselves, do they? At least this guy did
>>317611143
What an utterly ironic response.
>>317610036
LUST BEARS HIS TEETH AND WHINES
>>317610686
if this happens, holy shit, i'll be pissed but god damn will i have a good laugh
>>317611252
And all his efforts will get him a cease and desist
>>317610536
I hate to bear responsibility for bearking this news to you but you have bearely scrapped to bottom of the bearral on this issue. Bearing in mind that it's just your opinion, it's beary much wrong.
>>317611372
so the public never gets the game? he still does, all his efforts lead him to finally sit down one day and play the game he's wanted to play so long
>>317611143
How insightful, thanks for the input Mr. Important.
With all these retarded "It doesn't matter what you say!" comments, I'm starting to become convinced the retard behind this shitty hack is samefagging up this thread.
>>317611252
Oh big fucking deal, he made a texture pack. Any retard could do that. That's not even remotely close to what in total is required to make a video game, and newsflash, not everyone is going to have the skill, talent, money, and other various requirements needed to make their own JSR3 or whatever.
The only thing there is to learn from this guy is how to make yourself look like a little bitch.
>>317611143
prove me wrong, fuccboi
>>317611589
"Charm" doesn't exist. What you call charm is just nostalgia.
>>317611252
I've made texture hacks and sprite hacks. Who cares? Anybody could do that.
>>317600834
Oh nice someone made a newgrounds flash version of paper mario. As long as its free I don't see what the big deal is.
>>317610986
>shit quality is charm
ok faM
I am convinced the guy who makes this posts here. Or at least his friends. Otherwise I don't know why so many people here are so defensive of him and so quick to fly off the handle when this thing is criticized.
>>317611641
Fun is just a buzzword when you can't actually think of any real reasons as to why the game is good, don't use it. Either way, being amused or entertained with something and being immersed are not the same thing.
So can we come to agree that Paper Mario fags are worse than Metroid fags?
>Shits on the Mario and Luigi series even though basically every game in the series in good
>Flips their shit every E3 because their crappy series didn't get showed off
>Even when someone decides to do some good to their series, they decide to bitch and moan about some small changes
>>317611721
The watercolor and painted pop-out shit in tiny, blurry resolution looks better than the "high quality" hack.
>>317611641
I played Super Paper Mario and TTYD before Pm64 nignog, saying charm doesn't exist is simply wrong.
Pm64 just looks better. Simple as that. It has more detail.
>>317611798
Oh fuck off with this shit, just because you got your feelings hurt doesn't mean every fanbase is shit.
>>317611906
>it has more detail
Now that is just objectively wrong.
>>317610986
I hope you realize the "banding" in Kino no Tabi is completely artificial and composited.
>>317611252
>Waaaahluigi
No, but seriously tho, there is a Waluigi game
>>317612091
Psycho Waluigi is pretty fun.
>>317611958
Oh shit son, I never looked at it that way. You're right, it totally looks like crap! You really convinced me with that well thought-out argument.
>>317611798
None of that is true, though.
>>Shits on the Mario and Luigi series even though basically every game in the series in good
A large portion of the Paper Mario fags are Mario RPG fags in general. Don't blame general disappointment with the latest games as "X fans must be behind it!" you fucking drone.
>>Flips their shit every E3 because their crappy series didn't get showed off
True of every single fanbase of every game series and subseries.
>>Even when someone decides to do some good to their series, they decide to bitch and moan about some small changes
Criticism isn't "bitching and moaning"
The one bitching and moaning is you.
So, can we come to agree that "fanbase of games I don't like are the worst" are the worst fags on /v/?
>>317611798
>partners in time
>good
>>317610068
they were fucking little boys in the 80's.
>>317611958
things have actual texture, while in new they just have a circle pattern bucket tool fill.
>>317611993
I know, I'm referring to old media that has banding, because every thing has banding. I'm not talking about filters. Kino would look good without filters too. It's Disney all over again
>>317612162
Stop shitposting for a second. Yes, you can say Paper Mario looks better, or that it has more charm, or that you prefer its style, but it does not have more detail. It has objectively lower res textures.
>>317604106
>wasn't the artistic intent, but the result of hardware limitations
But that's LITERALLY the excuse every Jap dev has in response to EVERY. SINGLE. JAP. GAME. running at 30FPS. Hell, the Evil Within wasn't patched on PC because Mikami was vehemently opposed to the idea. Yeah buddy, I'm sure making your game into a slideshow, on an engine that was DESIGNED in the first place to get 60FPS on consoles, was purely because of how you imagined it.
That said, I found it funny how Nintendo and their developers always admit of their consoles having limitations, yet Sony and their developers would NEVER admit to them. Sony went on to say that the PS1 was "more powerful than God," the S2 being "stronger than any workstation in the world," the PS3 obsoleting computers, and the PS4 being a supercharged PC.
>>317612278
That image is NOT okay
>>317611958
Dude, just look at the OP image. The background skybox, the floor texture, the racks, heck even Mario. It might be blurrier and lower-res, but the original truly does look better.
>>317612301
How about stop shitposting and provide some sort of evidence and not just "it's this way because I say so?"
>>317612449
rocks, not racks. sorry
>>317612301
>lower-res = less detail
Silent Hill HD Collection proves you wrong.
>>317612449
Fucking hell, I hate retards that think HD automatically means better
So much detail is lost in this "upgrade" and original charming characters are being replaced with things we've seen over and over again
>the new version has less detail
>Kooper actually has the bandage that his official art depicts him in
???
>>317612612
>but charm is just nostalgia xD
I just hate this place sometimes. Makes me wonder why I came to this thread knowing exactly what people were going to argue about.
>>317610068
>No 2000s
WOW FIRST TIME SEEIN THIS AND I CANT BELIEVE YOU FAGS
WHO CARES ABOUT WHETHER IT SURPASSES THE ORIGINAL TEXTURES?
THE POINT IS
ITS A NEW WAY TO REVISIT THE GAME
FUCKIN FINALLY
CHANE IT INTO A LUMA FUCKING WHO CARES
DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY TIMES I BEAT THIS FUCKING GAME
GIVE ME SOMETING NEW FUCK
POINT ME TO ANOTHER TEXTURE HACK
OH RIGHT
FUCK OFF YOU CUNTS
I HOPE HE DOESNT CANCEL THIS *FREE* FUCKING FAN PROJECT BECAUSE OF UNGRATEFUL DICKFUCKS WHINY BITCHES LIKE YOURSELVES
>HD is more detail
>>317612739
You can never leave, anon. Because as terrible and idiotic this place is, you won't find many other places on the internet that have such active communities and let you say pretty much whatever you want
>>317612719
He got literally one thing right out of thousands of assets, good for him. And even then, the proportions of Kooper's new sprite look goofier. Oh well.
>>317611915
>just because you got your feelings hurt
Kinda funny hearing that from a Paper Mario fan considering most of you come to /v/ after every E3 and cry about Paper Mario not being at it.
>>317612195
>A large portion of the Paper Mario fags are Mario RPG fags in general. Don't blame general disappointment with the latest games as "X fans must be behind it!" you fucking drone.
Except a large portion of them are not considering how much they bitched about Paper Jam.
>True of every single fanbase of every game series and subseries.
That point really fall flat because not a single Metroid fan complained about Federation Force or any Metroid game not being at E3.
>Criticism isn't "bitching and moaning"
The one bitching and moaning is you.
True for 1/4 of the thread, the rest is not giving a single reason why the new version or old version looks better.
>>317600834
>ITT: rose tinted goggles
>>317612948
well to be fair, koopas looked worse in TTYD, and it looks like he redrew a TTYD sprite for Kooper.
>>317612846
This project has been in development for almost five years and he's only in the middle of retexturing chapter 5.
If Twinkfags weren't enough to stop him, these neo /v/fags won't.
>>317612870
If HD means no fucking ugly jaggies (or less of them) count me the fuck in. It's a new style. If you hate it so much, just dont use it and replay the game with the same shit.
Why are people whining
It just seems weird he's changing all those things for no reason. Wouldnt it be easier to just go from the base and re-draw it from there??
>>317612964
>but people are bitching about paper jam!
Thanks for proving my point.
>I was just pretending to be retarded
Sure you were, buddy. Sure you were.
![tumblr_nm0zayzDok1qgsvs8o1_400[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/8Dy1CGI.gif "tumblr_nm0zayzDok1qgsvs8o1_400[1].gif")
>>317612870
I don't give a shit about any of this personally but I do felt the need to point out that you a nitpicking only the stuff you want to see. The bush have more detail on image 1 where the fence have more detail on image 2. The cutoff of the grass to dirt is kinda ugly on image 1 where it was done much better on image 2.
They both are good and bad in their own ways. It is really up for personalopinion.
Is he done with it yet?
>>317600834
What's the point if 3D models will look sharp and outdated anyway?
>>317613048
I guess that's true. Even the unused TTYD sprite would've looked better than his own silly looking sprite, though.
I'm inspired to make a re-texture sticking to the artistic integrity of the original. See you in a few years, /v/.
>>317610068
>the 80's depiction looks like a bit like an amime character
>most 80's cartoons were outsourced to Japanese animators
![tumblr_njiewh6FTz1qgsvs8o1_1280[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/h2Q2oTH.png "tumblr_njiewh6FTz1qgsvs8o1_1280[1].png")
>>317613374
Masters studies is taking its toll on him. He's only at chapter 5 but wants to finish it in time for Paper Mario's 15th anniversary in Europe.
>>317613435
screencapping this.
Don't give up when you get 50 hours in and you realize you're only at the desert
>>317613189
>Thanks for proving my point
Expect I didn't. Paper Jam is a fine game, the only people that are dissapointed are people that expected an other Paper Mario game (aka Paper Mario fags)
>>317603274
The only problem, but wow.
It doesn't matter if the rest of the soup is great, dropping a turd in just ruins it.
![tumblr_nizs5lRTjL1qgsvs8o1_1280[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/5MX5mLz.png "tumblr_nizs5lRTjL1qgsvs8o1_1280[1].png")
>>317609340
Well to be fair, PM64 backgrounds looked like they were painted onto a canvas, not paper.
>>317608571
The flatness of the characters is meant to contrast with the painted look of the backgrounds, now it just blends together into a flat mess, even modern cartoons understand contrast to a point.
>>317600834
>Top
>Extremely blurry textures because of resolution errors
>No detail in the textures but it's okay because it shows on a CRT TV
>Very good for the time but didn't hold up
>Bottom
>All textures high res and designed in a way to be clear and scalable always
>Using the design philosophy from new Paper Mario games
>Looks fine minus the black outlines
The top only looks "better" to you because it's blurry and has no detail.
![2N20aJi[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/SpRWH2n.png "2N20aJi[1].png")
>replacing watercolor backgrounds with flat colors and shapes
yeah this guy's got real talent
>>317613331
>Those bushes
God damn, that's terrible. They lost so much detail
And yes, they are supposed to be the same asset
>>317613586
>The Delfino Plaza and Shadow Mario logos on the walls
Not sure if nice touch or throwing in more needless bullshit.
>>317604027
Nowt wrong with this.
>>317604112
This however, I'm not so sure. The glazed over expression is what made this guy.
Everything else I've seen is good. Luma as optional is sensible - not that I can imagine anyone picking Luma other than being edgy.
![tumblr_nh1bahN0Re1qgsvs8o2_1280[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/enLudz1.png "tumblr_nh1bahN0Re1qgsvs8o2_1280[1].png")
>>317613594
Quality story books typically have detailed and colorful art, made from all sorts of different drawing styles and materials. The "new" backgrounds and textures and such may as well be from "Comic Book Mario"
>>317604112
>No blank stare
Fuck off
