>one attack button
>two combos (TTT, TT (short pause) T)
Why the fuck is this allowed?
there were two right?
It's just Resident Evil with swords.
Fuck off NGfag
Friendly Reminder
Action games (deep mechanics, skill intensive, fluid combat):
>Ninja Gaiden
>Batman Arkham
>God of War
Button mashers (shallow gameplay, little variety, just turn your brain off and enjoy the zanyness):
>DMC (pic related)
>Bayonetta
>MGRR
Meme games (avoid at all costs, absolute garbage):
>God hand
>Wonderful 101
>GUYS LOOK I DON'T LIKE THAT THING OTHER PEOPLE LIKE GIVE ME ATTENTION
Why is almost every fucking thread this now?
What the fuck happened here?
>>316838852
Arkham may be fluid but it's not deep,c'mon.
>>316839078
>le batman arkham has shallow combat!
oh boy, here we go with this epic meme again
>>316838852
>>316839280
>>316838852
>Batman Arkham
>God of War
>deep mechincs
No in batman it is just assassin creed combat with lots of enemy and less stealth and god off war is a real button masher. just square square and triangle and it will do most of your damage. comboing is so easy in both games, just as long as you dodge and spam you will do well
>>316838526
DMC was garbage until Itano perfected the series with 3 and 4.
>>316839317
>>316839398
Achewood thread?
>>316838852
>Batman
>God of War
>not button mashers
>>316838729
This
It's a great RE also. The bosses are dope (except on the ship with the huge owl)
>>316838852
What are the best ways to trigger /fgg/?
it's slower and more straight forward than dmc3 but the game requires dodging and attacking at exactly the right time to not get ass fucked
>>316838526
>>316838852
>this fag again
>>316840135
What do fighting games have to do with this?
There's 3 basic combos not including extra skills, air moves, guns and the upswing.
Nice troll attempt though
>>316840135
call them autists
>>316838526
>>316840415
There's also another set of weapons.
>>316838526
Because it's not a good genre yet? I mean it's cool that you can gatling into cancels and weapon swaps and styles or whatever, but there's not much going on beneath the hood and the genre has more or less stood still since DMC1.
>>316838852
not even bait
>>316838852
I don't feel like DMCs combat is really all that deep based on combos but the fact every move has its uses and it's more of a game about controlling your enemies rather than dodging.
Almost every enemy in the game will get stunned when you hit it and just let you beat it's ass. Your threat isn't usually the enemy you're fighting, it's the enemies on the side of you and behind you.
That's what I like about the series.
>>316838526
It was the first in its genre, cut it some slack. And it had way more than just two combos anyway.
>>316838852
Objectively wrong.
Arkham games aren't even remotely as technical as DMC or the rest of those games.
>>316842454
Just to clarify, there are absolutely insane combos you can do in the games I'm mainly talking about move variety.
>>316838729
No, RE with swords is Onimusha.
This is Onimusha with combos.
>>316842454
>>316842997
DMC combat is great due to the economy of moves: while there may be a less number of moves overall than other CUHRAYZEE games like NG or Bayonetta, each move has more individual worth as a result. Every move has a use, even moves that you might not think would see any use, like Real Impact. Its essentially a quality vs. quantity debate. Bayonetta and NG both, while I do very greatly enjoy them, give you so many combos per weapon, yet especially in NG's case, only a handful of them are really useful (it's really not so bad in Bayonetta honestly, especially when you get into Charge Modifiers and shit). DMC sets itself apart from just about every other franchise that took its cue from the series by crafting a combat system where each individual move is useful and may have more than one application in itself.
DMC1's less focused on sick combos than properly responding to each enemy.
DMC3 got carried away with combo potential and threw tons of damage sponges with bad AI and gimmick enemies at the player.
DMC4 found a good balance between the two.
>>316845234
>NG
>cuhrayzee
Do you even know what cuhrayzee is? It's used to describe action games that are bright and flashy and look complex when seeing their execution, but mechanically they are very shallow. eg Platinumshit and DMC games. DMC games are only a small step up from babby's first action game
>>316845582
You didn't even try
>>316845582
The only thing worse than someone blatantly trolling about what is cuhrayzee or not is people that think they know what cuhrayzee is and say it's not DMC. /cgg/ just laughs at /v/ threads about any third person action games because of how retarded you kids are.
>>316845582
A more succinct way of describing CUHRAYZEE is: flash WITH substance.
Sorry you're illiterate at video games and can't tell that despite all the crazy shit going on in the games, there's a lot of depth there as well.
>>316845815
I said DMC is cuhrayzee, it's where cuhrayzee. But cuhrayzee is not a good thing as the word came about to refer to DMC-like games that look flashy and complex but are mechanically shallow
>>316845989
You called DMC (so by extension, DMC3 and 4) mechanically shallow, please stop posting any time.
