Come justify your purchase.

Still better than AMD

>>313214337
Objectively no.

>>313215993
AMD's opengl performance is complete shit. Game dev here.

>>313216085
>opengl

Because that's still relevant, right?

File: 55015246.jpg (174KB, 448x675px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

174KB, 448x675px

so you want us to go buy AMD then?

The only way I would use AMD is if it was a prize or a gift. Who would go out of their way to buy a bag of shit?

File: 1444343037993.jpg (54KB, 419x368px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

54KB, 419x368px

>>313216739
>mentioning intel

We all know AMD CPU's are shit. Fewer NSA backdoors though. Not that it matters.

For the same money you objectively get equal or better performance. This is fact and is backed up with numbers.

>inb4 you post 1 or 2 exceptions with nvidia branding and gameworks all over it

>>313217237
that was the only AMD hipstershit pic I had

>objectively

opinion disregarded

>>313217645
I'm using the word correctly though.

>>313214126
Ok

>>313216470
Being cross platform, yeah. Being more stable, yeah. Looking & performing better when rendering the same game with the same art assets even when the game doesn't officially support OpenGL, fucking yes it's relevant.