[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
49%
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 48
File: ghostbusters 2.png (186 KB, 743x316) Image search: [Google]
ghostbusters 2.png
186 KB, 743x316
Audience scores are out..wew.
>>
File: Screenshot_20160715-225126.jpg (276 KB, 1312x1046) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20160715-225126.jpg
276 KB, 1312x1046
Not looking good
>>
Wew
>>
>>72045109
It used to be 44% so it's actually improving.
>>
I saw it. It was alright. I'd give it like, a B/B-.
>>
>>72045109
>>72045204
People going to pretend you can rate things very easily with no proof of having experienced it?
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>>
Basically it's bad but because of feminism you're not allowed to critise it.

FUCK PC FUCK PC FUCK PC FUCK PC FUCK PC
>>
Just like on imdb, most of the people giving it low scores have probably not watched it nor do they plan on ever watching it
>>
>>72045323
so basically the opposite of BvS where all the fanboys were rating it 10/10 before ever seeing it huh?
>>
>>72045109
Angryjoe gave it a 2/10

Watch his spoiler discussion. He looses his nuts and laughs hysterically while describing the end fight scene which is just so ridiculous. I legit thought he was making it up because there is no way Hollywood writers would write this into a film...
@10:33
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m6F9g9Mu64
>>
>>72045313
more like it's mediocre but because misogyny it's the worst thing since the holocaust
>>
File: 9048902090211212.jpg (772 KB, 1680x1417) Image search: [Google]
9048902090211212.jpg
772 KB, 1680x1417
>>72045109
movie """"""""""critics""""""""""""""
>>
File: 4b0.png (81 KB, 825x441) Image search: [Google]
4b0.png
81 KB, 825x441
>>72045109

>Been out a week in the UK
>Literally no numbers posted yet

The silence says everything
>>
>>72045288
that goes for critics too
>>
>>72045492
>Kam Williams
>"A laff-a-minute, female empowerment fantasy far funnier than original."
>"laff-a-minute"
>"far funnier than the original."

My god... what the fuck is this shit?
>>
>>72045951
No streaming websites have it either. No one even wants to record the tripe with the shittiest of cams.
>>
>>72045109
>laff'
>used twice
I can't even
>>
>>72046072
meant for >>72045492
>>
>>72045109

When do we get box office figures?

I want to see if these empty cinema tweets are true.
>>
>>72046122
Friday grossed $17.1 Million, and they're now projecting a $45 million weekend overall.
>>
>>72045492
>implying any of those disgusting old people's opinions matter
>>
>>72046122
That Brad guy writing for Box office mojo was saying it'd make 45.

That said this is the same retard who was surprised Neighbors 2 underperformed based on the great reviews it was getting (that were the same feminist shit as this).
>>
File: image.jpg (40 KB, 325x347) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
40 KB, 325x347
>>72045492
>"whale on undead spirits"
Quite a fitting typo.
>>
File: 1467631656765.jpg (361 KB, 704x593) Image search: [Google]
1467631656765.jpg
361 KB, 704x593
>>72045492
>Gamergate troll
Salon delivering the bantz once again
>>
>>72046185

Is this a low figure for an opening night then?

Does it correlate with the empty seat tweets?
>>
>>72046222
I fully expected Sony to do the whole "buying tickets to falsely inflate box office" trick.
>>
File: Untitled.png (49 KB, 235x346) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
49 KB, 235x346
>>72045492
God it feels good to laugh
>>
>>72046222
According to the website I got it from, they're pretty pleased, but the overwhelming cost of the film and it being banned from China might make even decent opening fail for them.

http://deadline.com/2016/07/ghostbusters-weekend-box-office-1201787149/

No idea how it correlates to filled seats. Their successful movies are already netting over 100-200 million by their second week, so if this tapers off and doesn't get more than 50 million overall domestic, it's doomed.
>>
>>72046222
It's mediocre, but not a complete bomb. At best, they'd be looking at breaking even on their production budget domestically. But then you have to count in all the advertising, licensing, merchandise...overall, Sony probably won't be making money on this without China's help.
>>
>>72046270

Thanks for the info.

Perhaps seeing some real unbiased reviews will kill the hype and it will get pulled early.
>>
>>72046270
>pretty pleased

Yeah and Fox are still going to make a Fantastic Four 2
>>
>>72046270
>pretty pleased

PR speak for dog shit.
>>
>>72045492
Weren't the female scores a lot lower initially? Like 4s and 5s?
>>
>>72046312
It's one of those things where the numbers are decent if they're sustained for the next few weeks. Unfortunately for them, this is probably just an opening "curiosity" trip, and the SJWs don't have the attention span or the numbers to influence the box office with their repeat viewings.
>>
>>72046271
Remember this was supposed to launch their whole Ghostbusters cinematic universe.

It's not even going to make what Mad Max 4 an R rated movie did.
>>
>>72046339
I'm not in America so I don't know exactly what films are opening there but aren't Star Trek 3 and the new Ice Age opening next week?

Then there's still secret life of pets?
>>
>>72046371
Yeah. Star Trek 3 is a bit murky, but it's such a big title like Transformers that it'll probably do well, and Ice Age and Secret Pets will steal all the kids.

In my opinion, Ghostbusters' box office will drop like a rock and practically completely stop making money. It'll make a million here and their in foreign markets, but they're probably looking at a loss of somewhere in the realm of 300 million bucks on this film after DVD sales and toys.
>>
I saw the movie last night, its not some terrible pure garbage mess, some of it is kind of funny, but there is a lot of cringe inducing unfunny scenes, its really awkward when you're sitting in a theatre and something thats supposed to be funny is happening on the screen and everyone in the room is dead quiet

Once it gets to the climax it just becomes shit and I just wanted it to end, for some reason they dont capture ghosts anymore and just shoot them with beams until they explode, they fight an army of pilgrims and explode them with their proton packs

Chris Hemsworth and the black lady were the funniest parts about the movie
>>
>>72046419
>black lady

So was it a lady thing or a race thing?

I need to know.
>>
>>72045492

>this Ghostbusters remake is going to push us all to reckon with what a more equal world might look like

That's not a movie review, the purpose of movies isn't to alter the zeitgeist

When did this become acceptable?
>>
File: 1468089085145.jpg (35 KB, 429x573) Image search: [Google]
1468089085145.jpg
35 KB, 429x573
>>72046419
>cringe inducing
>>
>>72046460
When watching liking a movie becomes a political act it makes opinions like theirs meaningless.
>>
>>72045409

spy was medicore but everyone fellated Feig and McCarthy for it
>>
>>72046514
>When watching liking a movie

see >>72046476
>>
Doesn't the movie have to be 75% or higher to be certified fresh? Why is it certified fresh with 73%?
>>
>>72046560
It was 75% for a couple hours and got it. To lose it, it must drop below 70%, and even then, the RottenTomatoes team can choose to leave the fresh label on it at their discretion.
>>
>>72046531
Wrote one word wrote the other and forgot to delete.

Don't expect perfect spelling and grammar here.
>>
>>72046560
feminism
>>
>>72046476
>>72046531

thnx u 2
>>
>>72046453
It was a race thing.

A human race thing.
>>
Will tvtards still deny that their beloved RT critics aren't anything more that politically motivated shills and/or bought by companies?
>>
>>72045372
Pissed pedro is actually going neclear

Kek
>>
File: biased.png (43 KB, 135x239) Image search: [Google]
biased.png
43 KB, 135x239
>>72045492
Ghostbusters fresh checklist
>Girl power/empowerment
>angry nerds/misogynist trolls
>"fun"
>bigger and better
>acting like they're the sole crusader of justice over the negative critics
Maybe people just don't like the movie holy shit.
>>
File: 1405920740785.gif (499 KB, 599x520) Image search: [Google]
1405920740785.gif
499 KB, 599x520
>this will end up being a cult classic and /tv/ will be eternally BTFO
>>
JUST
>>
>>72045492
regular comments are more critical than these "critics" who 5 star any female lead
>>
>>72047476
Being a cult classic usually reserved for so bad it's good type of movies.
>>
>>72045109

Trolls. I saw it last night, and it was awesome. The jokes were amazing, and it had more action than the original. Went to Target to attempt to buy some of the toy, because they are going to hot Christmas items, but they were all sold out. Plenty of "Classic" Ghostbusters shit laying around though. It seems recently they can't even give away that crap.

It is going to funny when in 10 years people will be shock there was ever an "original" Ghostbusters. It is simply amazing what Hollywood can do these days. Taking a pile of 80s shit, and making it into gold.

Star Trek better get used to being BTFO.

Female blockbusters are the new thing senpai.
>>
I saw it, because I wanted to actually have a reason for hating it.

It's not as horrific as I thought it would be. It's not a good film, it's not an average film, but I thought it was going to be horrendous. Instead, it's just bad. None of it was funny, large segments of it were painful and awkward.

No one is going to go and watch that and think to themselves "That was decent." It simply isn't going to happen. People paid to write reviews about it might, but no regular customer is going to think they spent their money well. That, ultimately, will hurt it a lot more than the fact that it's got some feminist bullshit in it.
>>
>>72047655
plz be copypasta or b8
plz don't be true feelings
>>
>>72045290

why do you post your video in every thread?
>>
>>72047655

not even creative bait
>>
File: 1390638625729.gif (424 KB, 400x300) Image search: [Google]
1390638625729.gif
424 KB, 400x300
>>72047476
>this will end up being the next Dragon Age 2 and tumblr will be eternally BTFO
>>
File: 1467452974205.png (55 KB, 217x190) Image search: [Google]
1467452974205.png
55 KB, 217x190
>>72045109

I'm liking this.

>>72045492

>lib movie critics doing damage control

It's like Christmas morning
>>
>>72045109
Let's not sit here and pretend it's not angry manchildren who are sad MUH CHILDHOOD has been "ruined" by a remake of their beloved IP, most of which probably weren't even born yet when the original came out. Of course they're going to go bitch at a review site that allows anyone to chime in, and enough of them are angry enough to skew the reviews towards the negative. The same exact thing happens with video game launches and other movies, but for a lot of really petty reasons this one gets a lot more flack than say Transformers or RoboCop did.

But of course by me pointing this out it makes me a shill for the movie, and there'll be plenty of (You)s directed at me with all sorts of bullshit mental gymnastics used to defend the user scores.
>>
>>72047857
The only part that annoys me is the use of the word "manchildren". It's angry people who haven't seen it, yeah, but women are in the mix too. It's not just dudes who are pissed.
>>
>>72045492
EVERYONE WHO SAYS THIS MOVIE IS GOOD IS WRONG AND I KNOW FOR A FACT BECAUSE I KNOW THAT IT'S BAD BECAUSE IT'S BAD AND MY OPINION MEANS MORE THAN ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
>>72045492
>"these women are having fun together"
>please ignore the tensions on set
>>
>>72047694
maybe you're complete write-off of the movie going into it put you in a negative mindset, so you were ready to pounce on everything that reaffirmed your belief. These types of movies you need to go in with no expectations. Why waste your money going to see it if you didn't want to in the first place? Just so you can run back to your internet club to say "yep, boys, I was right! This movie sucks dick!"
>>
The movie isnt unwatchable, its like a low tier adam sandler film, all this feminist shit has caused these 'critics' to give it a higher rating than usual rather than judge it by its own merit which is embarassing. Overall its just a below average film
>>
>>72047994
>you don't know whether you liked a movie or not
>your confirmation bias made you hate it

Not even that guy but seriously go fuck yourself with that pretentious shit.
>>
>>72047896
They're an overwhelming majority of people who don't want this movie to succeed. And really, anyone who immediately jumps on the hate bandwagon (or alternatively the love bandwagon) without experiencing whatever it is they're jumping sides to for themselves are people who have a hard time using critical thinking skills and learning to think for themselves. I equate that to not being a well-functioning adult, and therefore wo/manchildren.
>>
>>72048045
You're only mad because it's true. When I was a teenager I used to right off tons of movies as "the ultimate black hole of suck," then when I watched those movies as an adult I realized they weren't that bad and I hated them for no reason. You'll come to realize the same thing when you grow up kiddo.
>>
>>72046185
>a $45 million weekend overall

RIP SONY

Star Trek is going to eat this for breakfast, especially now Chekov is dead
>>
>>72048065
Except that there are multiple trailers, 40 TV spots, and a half-dozen vignettes that can give someone a decent idea of whether they want to see it. Do you contend that seeing all that material means someone still can't form an opinion on the movie? Or is it absolutely necessary they give Sony 10-15 bucks to maybe enjoy themselves?
>>
>>72045109
49% isn't bad at all, if you take into account the hate campaign.
>>
>>72048065

So the trailers and previews meant to sell us on the product don't count as having experienced the film, at least in part?
>>
>>72047994
>you need to go into the ghostbusters remake with no expectations
delusional
>>
File: 1467688267475.jpg (132 KB, 681x496) Image search: [Google]
1467688267475.jpg
132 KB, 681x496
>>72045492
>>
>>72048065
>anyone who immediately jumps on the hate bandwagon (or alternatively the love bandwagon) without experiencing whatever it is they're jumping sides to for themselves are people who have a hard time using critical thinking skills and learning to think for themselves.

Actually people who need to experience things directly are the ones who can' think critically and have a hard time learning. Regular people can actually extrapolate.
For instance if you see a shitty trailer then you can be quite sure that the movie will be shit. Likewise you can recognize that swimming with alligators would be a bad idea by seeing what alligators can do to a person.
>>
>>72046185
>$45 million opening weekend
>goes up against Star Trek and Ice Age next weekend
>no China savior

RIP in peace Sony
>>
>>72048175
Oh come on, we all know trailers are shit most of the time these days. How many times have we seen a trailer for a big-time movie where everyone goes "well, that was shit, but I'm sure the movie will be good." Why does Ghostbusters get the "that was shit, so the movie must be shit too" treatment?

>>72048143
If you don't want to see the movie, just don't go see it. That's what I do. And yes all the TV spots are boring and annoying, but didn't people get sick of seeing Minions all over everything, but then got over it? Once the hype calms down the spots will be replaced (I'd say by the end of the month easily), happens all the time with big-name movies that do product placement.
>>
I'm not going to post it, but Polygon threw an article up literally begging people to go see this in 3D in the hopes of fooling some people to spend more money to try to save it. It's fucking pathetic.
>>
>>72048256
>If you don't want to see the movie, just don't go see it. That's what I do.
I'd like to see it just to know if their marketing team just just filled with complete retards, but I don't feel sold to spend my hard-earned money on it. I'd rather see a version online and then if I like it I'll give Sony my money and watch it in theater, but they just haven't sold me. Reviewers I respect have also been saying it's either meh, has a couple small laughs, or is absolute shit. Not glowing reviews.
>>
>>72045492
>bustier
>..........bustier
>>
File: rotten tomatoes is right.png (2 MB, 2216x1462) Image search: [Google]
rotten tomatoes is right.png
2 MB, 2216x1462
critics are never right
>>
>>72045492
what the fuck? these people get paid to write this drivel? one of the top critics actually misspelled a word completely.
>>
File: 1459824168705.png (108 KB, 319x279) Image search: [Google]
1459824168705.png
108 KB, 319x279
>>72048319
The Mummy gets me EVERY fucking time
>>
>>72048319
>only 68% for Thor

That's rather low, what the fuck?
>>
>>72048354
All capeshit should be <50.
>>
>>72048308
So you're admitting you want to see it just so you have more ammo to throw shit at it? Why? Why do you want to spend your time on something you're pretty sure you're not going to like? Wouldn't you rather spend your time doing something that's healthier than wallowing in your hate for something so inconsequential to your life?

It's like saying "I don't like carrots" then eating an entire bag of carrots to prove you don't like them.
>>
>>72046185
Isn't this more or less the same as batman begins?
>>
>>72048390
>So you're admitting you want to see it just so you have more ammo to throw shit at it?
No, I said I want to see it just to know if it's my style of dumb comedy. I even mildly enjoyed pixels, and bridesmaids was alright. I can have very low standards for humor, but I just don't feel sold based on what Sony has marketed at me yet.
>>
File: 1410042825363.jpg (55 KB, 500x501) Image search: [Google]
1410042825363.jpg
55 KB, 500x501
changing all main characters from man to women and then making all other male characters retarded, evil or incompetent is "equality"
>>
>>72045492
I wonder if there is a review from a "real professional movie critic" that is positive and doesnt mention "brobabies" "haters" "manchildren" "feminist" "empowerment" "girl power" "nerds" etc etc etc.
>>
>>72048140
Maybe they'll finally take the hint and stick to making video games and consoles, seems to be about the only thing they're good at. When was the last successful Sony movie anyway?
>>
>>72048476
This movie feels like a rule 63 some 12 year old made on Deviantart.
>>
>>72047476
Nah its actually going to be the kind of bad that will never turn into anyhing good.
>>
>>72046453
Given that she was acting like "crazy black lady stereotype #438" in the trailer, probably race.
>>
>>72048256
>Oh come on, we all know trailers are shit most of the time these days. How many times have we seen a trailer for a big-time movie where everyone goes "well, that was shit, but I'm sure the movie will be good."
never? shitty bait desu.
>>
>>72048404
Probably and I know you didn't really say this but do you really think this is going to have the legs that Batman Begins had to make it a strong earner?
>>
>>72046371
In Latin America Secret Life of Pets wasnt screened yet until next week. This is the weekend of tarzan, ghostbusters and Ice Age. Next week is Secret Life of Pets, Ice age still on screens and plus Star Trek
So yeah, is doomed here too.
>>
File: 1466560669704.jpg (80 KB, 766x960) Image search: [Google]
1466560669704.jpg
80 KB, 766x960
>>72046065
If an Armageddon tier meteor was set to hit the earth next week I'd welcome it. We don't deserve this planet anymore.
>>
>>72046065
What the fuck does laff-a-minute even mean?
>>
>>72045267
>okay
>B/B-
inflated ratings
>>
>>72048319
Prince of Darkness

But is really bad. Old enough to watch it on cinemas and was complete shit, even carpenter thinks is not good.
>>
>>72048342
The Mummy is mediocre at best.
>>
>>72045267
nice rating IGN
>>
>>72048319
only god forgives was poo poo though
>>
>>72045267
t. nu-male
>>
>>72046248
Somebody did notice a pattern where the very rear corner seats were bought up in a bunch of empty theaters...
>>
File: 1458068936754.jpg (90 KB, 640x640) Image search: [Google]
1458068936754.jpg
90 KB, 640x640
>>72048741
Me too, brother. Me too.
>>
>>72047556
And Ghostbusters 2k16 is a traffic jam, not a train wreck.
>>
File: 367.jpg (3 MB, 2058x4416) Image search: [Google]
367.jpg
3 MB, 2058x4416
from /pol/
>>
>>72048404
>batman begins?

That movie didn't had negative word of mouth
>>
>>72047902
Autism Speaks
>>
>>72048166
Its not something the old fans wanted, can it build its own audience?
>>
File: Bunny_Laugh.gif (1 MB, 332x332) Image search: [Google]
Bunny_Laugh.gif
1 MB, 332x332
>>72047655
Thank you for that.
>>
>>72048166
You mean the one against people who didn't want to see it?
>>
File: cQhQRdU.jpg (42 KB, 459x488) Image search: [Google]
cQhQRdU.jpg
42 KB, 459x488
>>72047725

>Dragon Age 2

Please stop, every day I see that in my steam library I become a being of white hot hate. The only RPG I physically couldn't bring myself to 100%, and I loved Origins so much.
>>
>>72045109
I saw it and it was actually very good. My theater was completely packed. I'm looking forward to my second viewing of Ghostbustersâ„¢ in a day!
>>
>>72045267
Of course it is. People giving it real scores will work against neckbeards bombing it with 1s like they did IMDb.
>>
File: 1467078629536.gif (2 MB, 400x225) Image search: [Google]
1467078629536.gif
2 MB, 400x225
>yfw its under-performing at the box office.
>yfw Feig said it needs to do at least 500 million dollars worldwide to break even.
>>
>Mother and her sister went to see it for birthday
>Walked out in the middle
>Got a refund
>Two words: It sucked

I then got to hear about how it's one of the worst birthday gifts she ever got, having to sit through half a movie with pussy fart jokes in it.
>>
>>72049344
What's wrong with DA2?
>>
>>72047655
2/10 bait, apply yourself
>>
>>72049373

Will it work against legbeards bombing it with 10s?
>>
>>72049069
Not the same guy, but IGN actually gave the movie a pretty low score.
>>
File: 1466823322249.jpg (162 KB, 680x796) Image search: [Google]
1466823322249.jpg
162 KB, 680x796
>Work in cinema
>See fathers coming in with their sons and daughters
>The kids are excited, shouting "Who you gonna call? Ghostbusters!"
>Look at the fathers' faces
>Look at their eyes
>They are dead inside
>>
>>72049441
If IMDb is any indication the former is more numerous than the latter.
>>
File: 1468557948256.png (228 KB, 397x331) Image search: [Google]
1468557948256.png
228 KB, 397x331
>>72049385
>no China
>45 million its first week
>likely 70% drop week-over-week

Feig is done in Hollywood. Praise kek.
>>
>>72049458
>projection
>>
>>72049508

>Choose the form of the big guy
>>
>>72049411

10/2 taint, reply yo shelf.
>>
>>72049551
>Dr Venkman, I'm EPA
>>
Call me sexist or a virgin or whatever, but the real issue I have about this film is that it's an obvious and gross fantasy film specifically for women to watch. Which is fine on its own, as guys have stuff like Conan. But the issue with this is that its TOO obvious that its a film just for girls, and has no redeeming values. There's 4 diverse quirky girls, who have a HOTTTTT assistant, who are perfect in every way except for when there's a forced joke about them but its endearing and they shoot the ghost in the nuts yeah girl power!!!! also every other joke is to remind us girls that we are girls.

In manly movies there might be the hot assistant, but good manly movies don't just sell on that they're for men. Shit like Conan, The Terminator, Rush, all of them have legitimate things to them that can be liked by women as well, and aren't clear power fantasies for men. Any movie like this (fart/dick jokes, hot girls and loser nerds doing bad ass shit) is either a horrible film or a parody, and as such this film should be treated the same.
>>
File: 123.png (102 KB, 765x621) Image search: [Google]
123.png
102 KB, 765x621
maybe I missed something but why can't I see the top critics score? A quick glance at the list shows that many of them didn't like it.

also
>73%, certified fresh
>avg score 6.5/10
>>
>>72049524
No I work concessions and box office not projection
>>
>>72049394

Literally everything.

Plot makes no sense
Map "design" is the same 7 fucking areas copy+pasted
Combat is no longer tactical and is just "a new wave approaches"
None of the characters are likeable or well written
Leliana was alive despite the fact I chopped her fucking head off in Origins
Anders went from being one of the best characters in the series to the worst
Retarded fucking crafting system

I could go on.
>>
File: pure coincidence.jpg (163 KB, 876x460) Image search: [Google]
pure coincidence.jpg
163 KB, 876x460
>yfw Ghostbusters made 530 times as much at the box office as any of its competition
>>
>>72049508
Nah, he'll be propped up by that moronic repulsive cunt Amy Pascal
>>
>>72049737
>Amy Pascal

You mean the lady who was fired last year?
>>
>>72049768
She has her own production company. Paul Fag can go to her and suck her dick and apologize for being a white male all he wants
>>
>>72047896
Manchildren come in all ages and genders.
>>
it's not even a funny edit why did you waste your time
>>
>>72049768
She got "demoted" to a producing positions. Besides Ghostbusters, shes currently working on The Emoji Movie, The Barbie Movie and the Spider Man Homecoming movie.

She also recently won the rights to turn Zoe Quinn's gamergate memoirs into a movie.

There is unironically no one in Hollywood stupider then Amy.
>>
>73%

That shouldn't be fresh.

RT is going to get shit on for this in the end. They had nothing to gain.
>>
>>72049875
>She also recently won the rights to turn Zoe Quinn's gamergate memoirs into a movie.

>Make a shitty video game
>Suck cock for good reviews
>Internet calls you a whore for a while
>Get a movie made about you and all the free money you'll ever need

Sorry but what exactly is hard about being a woman again?
>>
>>72047957
You see all those dead and cynical performances (aside from maybe McKinnon, who makes the best of being in a turd)? They're having SO much fun on set!
>>
File: manlet goofs.webm (97 KB, 252x208) Image search: [Google]
manlet goofs.webm
97 KB, 252x208
>>72049958
>Implying it'll ever get made
>>
File: Fucking ELVES.png (478 KB, 851x474) Image search: [Google]
Fucking ELVES.png
478 KB, 851x474
>>72049394

>What's wrong with DA2.

It'd take less time to list what isn't wrong with DA2.
>>
>>72049875
How do you make a movie out of "some people sent me death and rape threats"?

Hell, how do you make a book out of it?

Even viewing things in the light most favorable to ZQ and let's face it, she's an awful person but even she doesn't deserve the shit she got there's nothing there.
>>
>>72047655
I know this is fake, but I can confirm from multiple accounts that ghostbusters toys went on clearance at Target weeks ago. That's the only time I've seen people buy them.
>>
>>72045492
this isn't critics, it's just virtue signaling at this point
>>
File: 1452374767026.gif (1010 KB, 500x248) Image search: [Google]
1452374767026.gif
1010 KB, 500x248
>>72049875

>She also recently won the rights to turn Zoe Quinn's gamergate memoirs into a movie.

So she's making a pettier version of Gone Girl?
>>
>>72050103
>virtue signaling
This year's memes are so much shittier than in the past.
>>
>>72050023
>Scene opens
>It's Zoe Quinn played by a beautiful, slender actress
>She's busy researching the cure for cancer and running various charities for blind iguanas and children born without elbows
>The message alert on her phone goes off
>She gasps and pauses, eerie music steadily rising
>She reaches for the phone, hand shaking
>Tears are streaming down her face as she opens the message
>Intense close up on the screen
>"lol ur a slut"
>The music explodes into an avalanche of thunderous strings as she screams in horror and runs from the room
>She begins frantically packing her bags, realising that her home is no longer safe
>Gamergate
>HAD FOUND HER
>>
>>72050178

GO HOME GAMER GIRL
>>
File: 1465029019435.jpg (76 KB, 733x672) Image search: [Google]
1465029019435.jpg
76 KB, 733x672
>>72048319

>the mummy
>rotten

OUT OUT OUT
>>
>>72046453
she's actually kind of funny sometimes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ44aQWnH4I

The problem here is that the movie lacks a "Strait Guy" that is actually good.
Not in terms of sexuality, but some one who acts normal to ground it in reality to make the jokes stick, like bert from Bert and Ernie or moe from the three stooges, even Jerry Seinfeld fills the role in his show.
They tried to fill this role in the movie, but they dont have someone with any experience or aptitude in that role. the one most suited for this place doesn't seem happy or comfortable with being the "Straight guy"
>>
>>72050138
Gone Girl, except Amy is portrayed as completely justified in everything she did because men are pigs.
...I'd actually watch that.
>>
>>72050200
They leveled up
>>
>>72047902
aside from your obvious autism

he's criticizing the fact that the 'reviewers', instead of reviewing the movie based on its merits, inject personal bias into their 'reviews', therefore rendering them meaningless
>>
File: laughing brown man.gif (2 MB, 400x225) Image search: [Google]
laughing brown man.gif
2 MB, 400x225
>>72045492
>Kam Williams
>A laff-a-minute, female empowerement fantasy far funnier than the original
>>
Looks like this guy got yell at for his original title of the article.

http://variety.com/2016/film/news/box-office-ghostbusters-secret-life-of-pets-1201815410/

Google it in cache and it was called:
>'Ghostbusters' Materializing with Non-Stellar $45 Million Weekend

Looks like the media will try to say this was a success in any way possible.
>>
>>72047902
Thank you, someone had to say it.
>>
>rottenshills
>valid
pick one

if every reviewer gave the movie 6/10, the movie would be 100% fresh, if that's not a broken system I don't know what is
>>
File: 1468344650463.jpg (29 KB, 350x308) Image search: [Google]
1468344650463.jpg
29 KB, 350x308
>yfw the Bodan video is posted non-stop as a "no such thing as negative publicity" shill tactic by Sony employees
>>
File: 1336699043537.jpg (178 KB, 500x900) Image search: [Google]
1336699043537.jpg
178 KB, 500x900
>>72045492
>far funnier than the original

These are words that should earn you death.
>>
File: 1465629148364.jpg (90 KB, 615x820) Image search: [Google]
1465629148364.jpg
90 KB, 615x820
>>72049875

After Ghostbusters bombs, she is done as well.

>HEY LET ME PRODUCE THIS OTHER BIG MOVIE FOR GIRLS XD
>you lost us $200 million on Ghostbusters you stupid bitch
>>
>>72050213
Why can't it be the "straight woman"? Are you gay and need some sort of masculine hero in every movie?
>>
>>72050335
tbf the original isn't very funny. Only funny performance in the original is the guy from honey I shrunk the kids
>>
This movie has some of the most all over the map reviews I've seen for a movie in a long time.

I mean real reviews, not feminsts or neckbeards flooding the ratings with 1's or 10's.
>>
>>72045267
Nice try, shlomo
>>
>>72046270
Why was it banned in China again?
And I hope it ends up doing okay like deadpool, Hollywood really needs to kick its China habit. It's stupid.
>>
>>72050378
The positive "real" reviews just vomit shit like "TAKE THAT DUDEBROS GRRRRRLS RULE"
The negative ones actually talk about the movie
>>
>>72050421
china doesn't allow any depiction of ghosts in their movies.
>>
>>72047957
There was tension? How did they relieve that tension. I want detailed information.
>>
>>72050421
it's not stupid there's billions to be made in china
>>
>>72050421
>Why was it banned in China again?

Because China has damn fine taste

>>72050464
That sounds like bullshit
>>
Has BASED ARMOND reviewed it yet?
>>
>>72050455
>positive reviews are from people who enjoyed the movie, while negative ones just find ways to be as mean as possible
Hmm, really makes you think
>>
>>72050498
you know armond will like it
>>
File: 1466344783746.jpg (102 KB, 680x966) Image search: [Google]
1466344783746.jpg
102 KB, 680x966
>>72050529
>Negative reviews are mean :(
>>
>>72050221

I'd feel bad for whoever they cast as Eron Gjoni.

Actually, how much can they really touch on that before they get into blatant libel?
>>
>>72050542
He's generally pretty negative towards blatant agenda bullshit
>>
>>72050455
Not really. Go on youtube and look up reviews for it. Most of the positive ones say that it's just okay to enjoyable.

Of course say anything positive about the movie you get called a cuck or a shill or whatever other meme of the day is being used. Say anything negative and you get called misogynist meanie or some other buzzword.
>>
File: ThankYouJustinChang.png (55 KB, 643x159) Image search: [Google]
ThankYouJustinChang.png
55 KB, 643x159
>>72049709
>>
>>72050498
I'm half expecting him to love and praise it, but at the same time he's an homosexual right-leaning christian black man, so who knows.
>>
>>72050586
But he's also top contrarian
>>
>>72050283

Hah, if you open a new tab with it the original title is still there.
>>
>>72045267
That right sheckleberg? How about you qualify your respinse with reasons. How was the pacing or creature designs or performances?
>>
>>72050617

He slammed it AND Woody Allen's movie at the same time
>>
>>72050586
What agenda?

The "Give Sony Money" agenda?
>>
>>72050645
GURL POWER
>>
>>72045109
The first joke of the movie is a queef (puss fart) joke. Enough said. 2/10 Dogshit with Feminist propaganda. The jokes are bad.
>>
>>72050421

Kicking its China habit is less important to me than ensuring they're not financially able to continue beating the dead horse of the Ghostbusters franchise into the ground. I do not want to live to see the day where we get the "MCU" equivalent to Ghostbusters.
>>
>>72048476
At least the villains weren't bashing women nonstop, they were just genuinely retarded/dickish.
>>
>>72050617

Wouldn't it be contrarian to be opposed to it, when the media has been doing everything in their power to prop this flick up?
>>
>>72050671
what's your name again?
>>
>>72050669
Oh come on. If that's an agenda, it's apparently been being used since the 80's to sell toys and shit to little girls.

This movie was made for merchandising, let's not give it more credit than it deserves.
>>
>>72050672
Marvel didn't invent cinematic universes
>>
>>72049458
>Tfw dad is busy so we can't go see the new ghostbusters together
;_;
>>
>>72050479

Ok its not stupid to ignore china's millions, but if you are making a Ghostbusters movie, and China is funny about ghosts, I think the stupid thing to do would be to remove all ghosts from your film just to make them happy.
>>
>>72050496

it's a cultural thing, undead/ghosts acting in a inappropriate manner is a no-no

these are the same people that didn't want to build railroads in the late 1800s because they'd disturb the spirits of burial grounds
>>
File: [Republican Noises].jpg (2 MB, 1300x1950) Image search: [Google]
[Republican Noises].jpg
2 MB, 1300x1950
>>72050283
>It’s opening day on Friday

Now I'm not usually a Grammar Nazi, but this is triggering
>>
>>72050719
Buck
>>
>>72050736
They sell toys to little girls by saying that if you don't like the toy then you are manchild who spends all day in his parent's basement?
>>
>>72050742

Nor did I imply that they did.
>>
>>72050771
do you like to fuck?
>>
>>72050752
Oh anon, he's not busy. He just doesn't wanna spend 2 hours looking at a failed abortion. And also a shit movie.
>>
>>72050617
You're wronger than anyone else in this thread. Look at one of Armond's yearly breakdowns, and I'll bet you haven't even heard of most of the films he praises. He prefers movies that are artistic, accomplished and meaningful, with substance behind them. You've taken from the fact he'll say something positive about Jack & Jill to mean it's one of his favourite movies, and for that, you are literally retarded. It's your taste that is shit, and Armond points out the disingenuousness and hypocrisy of your kind.

>he said something good about jack & jill and transformers 2 but insulted avengers! how could this be so? contrarian! his taste is shit!
The kinds of movies Armond really cherishes are movies like Garçon stupide, Divine Intervention, Those Who Love Me Can Take the Train, etc -- movies you haven't even fucking heard of, you absolute pleb, and it's from that perspective he's judging your crudely made, emotionally barren movies parading as meaningful, and instead praising movies that at least know they're fucking garbage and do something with it.

You'll go, then, I don't doubt, from accusing him to enjoying garbage to accusing him of being pretentious, and you'll not see he occupies both simultaneously, as he can enjoy a fun romp for what it is, and he can enjoy majesty, beauty and vision, and that's what he does in his reviews. It's you who's got shit taste because you enjoy vacuous shite while thinking it's good and imagining you've got sophisticated taste.
>>
>>72050756
So what do they bust?
>>
>>72050760
>these are the same people that didn't want to build railroads in the late 1800s because they'd disturb the spirits of burial grounds

That's not why Ghosts are banned.

The Ghost ban is a way of deterring supernatural beliefs, courtesy of the Atheist Communist Agenda that still pervades Chinese Government
>>
>>72050636
really it was just a mildly critical essay
>>
>>72050816

t. american disinfo agent
>>
>>72050785
sure
>>
>>72050824

More like thesis, but you're not wrong, he still had nothing good to say about it
>>
>>72050808
BALLBUSTERS
>>
>>72050816
Based China
>>
>>72050580
Gjoni would just be opening himself up to a new gag order if he fought back.
Besides, it's not libel if it's true, and what he really did was bad enough.
>>
>>72050895

>and what he really did was bad enough.

You mean outing his abuser?
>>
>>72050816
explain this

The theme of ghosts is popular in Chinese cinema, including films made in Hong Kong, Singapore and the mainland. They may be based on traditional themes. A Chinese Ghost Story (Chinese: 倩女幽魂) is a 1987 Hong Kong romantic comedy - horror film starring Leslie Cheung, Joey Wong, and Wu Ma, directed by Ching Siu-tung, and produced by Tsui Hark. The story is loosely based on a short story in Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio. It was a huge success in Hong Kong, South Korea and Japan and sparked a trend of folklore ghost films in the HK film industry. The movie won many awards.[34][35] Ten years later, A Chinese Ghost Story: The Tsui Hark Animation was based on the same story. The first Chinese animated feature film from Hong Kong, it was produced by Tsui Hark and his production company, Film Workshop.[36]

The Maid is a 2005 Singaporean horror film telling of a maid recently arriving from the Philippines. She has to acclimate herself to the customs of the Chinese Ghost Month, during which she struggles with supernatural forces. The maid is employed by a Teochew opera family, a family with many secrets, who give her a place to stay in their dilapidated shophouse. The film broke the box office record in Singapore for the horror genre, won the European Fantastic Film Festival Federation Asian Film Award at the 10th Puchon International Fantastic Film Festival (PiFan).[39]
>>
>>72050464
Fuck those guys, spooky ghosts are great.
>>
>>72050826
Just as an example, every videogame with skeletons in it has had to change them into something else for either the chink versions or globally because of China, big games like dota and wow and shit.

China is a fucking madhouse with a billion inmates, their regulations are crazy shit that doesn't make any sense because it's a totalitarian hellhole.
>>
it got a few chuckles out of me lads. Don't worry I didn't pay for it.
>>
>>72050924

>Prior to the 2008 Summer Olympics, the PRC administration announced that "wronged spirits and violent ghosts, monsters, demons, and other inhuman portrayals" were banned from audio visual content.
>>
>>72050923
Women can't abuse men, silly.
>>
File: realmen.png (3 MB, 2126x1566) Image search: [Google]
realmen.png
3 MB, 2126x1566
>>
>>72051006
""""""""""Real men""""""""""
>>
File: 1366096020916.png (216 KB, 393x391) Image search: [Google]
1366096020916.png
216 KB, 393x391
>>72051006
>>
>>72051006
>Real men

Every fucking time.

>If a man agrees with me and does what I want him to do then he's a REAL man
>If he doesn't then he's just a SEXIST MISOGYNIST PISSBABY FAGGOT

It's getting very, very difficult to not outright hate women.
>>
File: 1466088966385.jpg (768 KB, 1034x2665) Image search: [Google]
1466088966385.jpg
768 KB, 1034x2665
>>72051006
literally the average /tv/ posters
>>
>>72051029
Real Men step up to lick the plate
>>
>>72051048
What are you gonna do, fuck traps and twinks? Hahaha women OWN you ;))
>>
>>72051006
"""""""""""""""""""""""""

must be the estrogen in the water
>>
>>72051054
>generals are full of autists
WHO KNEW
>>
>>72051089
But I already consume the penis.
>>
>>72051054
It bothers me that they covered that bane guy's bugs, could have putted those faces elsewhere
>>
>>72051048
Could you imagine openly making articles for "legitimate" publications calling women who disagree with you fat basement dwelling virgin babies?
>>
>>72051054
>4chan is frequented by college aged males of average or below average looks
Wow what a shock.
>>
>>72051158
That would be sexist. Everyone knows men can't be victims of sexism.
>>
>>72051158
No, because that isn't a thing. Only men can be like that.
>>
File: 1468632062522.png (11 KB, 530x492) Image search: [Google]
1468632062522.png
11 KB, 530x492
>>72051158
>women
>virgins
>>
>>72050924
The Ghostbusters 2016 was banned because the antagonist becomes a ghost by committing suicide and they fear that the movie might inspire other people to commit the same, since Chinks are superstitious as fuck.
>>
>>72051048
The irony is that women don't actually want that though. They'll friendzone those "real men"and go fuck a sexist asshole because deep down every woman wants to be dominated, not put on a pedestal
>>
>>72051158
You'd have to change up the terminology.

>This movie is great and any woman who doesn't think so is just a fat, ugly, gold-digging whore
>>
>>72051161
I'm pretty sure the image is older than most of the current userbase mate
twitter has shown this board is full of underage mexicans now
>>
>>72051234
>they fear that the movie might inspire other people to commit the same
I'd say those fears are warranted. This clip alone made me wanna kill myself. God knows what sitting through the whole movie would do to me.

https://youtu.be/pBCep_FiCVo
>>
>downvoted audience scores


A- CinemaScore with the under 25 crowd, and an overall B+
>>
>>72047655
Youre not even trying
>>
>>72051255
There's no such thing as "friendzoning"
You're just unattractive.
>>
>>72048319
>plebs will never understand OGF


The movie is a literal pleb test, im not surprised they didnt get it.
>>
>>72050793
Hi Armand!
>>
>>72049100

t. Capeshit fan
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 48

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.