What was his fucking problem?
>>72041421
Niggers
Eddie was lazy
>>72041421
Motherfucker spoke like 6 languages and was just there to translate. Didn't ask for that roasting.
>fuck a country up the ass for centuries
>leave it when you're dong pillaging
>b-b-but we built railroads!
The fuck they're supposed to do with shit form 1930 when they can't find anything to eat? What am I missing here?
>>72041590
>Introduce tribes to civilization and technology
>y-you fucked them up!
libcucks, everyone
>>72041610
Really now? Is this what colonists were doing? Spreading technology around the world?
>>72041635
>Remove imperialism
>Modern Africa would still be tribe based like indigenous people of South America
>India would have even more street shitters
>Australia would just be a rock with black people getting high and hitting sticks against each other
>America would still be tribe based society
>>72041421
>It's another stormfag baiting thread.
Oh great.
>>72041726
Nice, yet another post without any source
>>72041681
All the while denying indigenous people resources, discriminating them, raping them, committing acts of genocide, destroying their lands.
The colonialists wuz gud bois!
They dindu nuffin!
>>72041750
I'm not saying they didn't do anything wrong.
I'm saying they left off the colonies more advanced than they were before or would have ever been by themselves
>>72041681
>let me kill your people and steal everything you have, it's for your own good lil nigga
Yeah by that logic the muslims were completely justified to invade the shit out of Europe in the middle ages because they were more advanced in some fields, in fact anyone who thinks he's probably going to make better use of a land can just go ahead and invade the land and help the people by killing anyone who resists while coincidentally becoming richer and richer.
>>72041775
This desu.
Progress requires sacrifice.
It's like during the industrial revolution in Europe, where many poor people died for the sake of progress.
Today we have all kinds of laws and rules about ethics, which is why we're progressing much slower, technologically
>>72041859
let's begin with sacrificing you to the hungry tech god
>>72041726
Literally "WE WUZ KANGZ N SHIEEEET" the screencap
>>72041857
Are you saying Africa or australia would have been better off without colonialism?
>>72041495
Just like Chinese guy didn't ask for simple things to be such a fuckaround. Everything he said was valid.
>>72041750
Indigenous people wouldn't have ever used the resources in the first place if whites hadn't shown them how nigger. Africa is still the most natural resource abundant continent on the planet by an absolutely huge margin too, most of said resources going entirely to waste right now because of how incompetent niggers are. Also, the rapes only help Africans as the more intelligent white genes proliferate through their communities when the rape babies inevitably rape others.
>>72041938
There's literally no way to know you dumb fuck. How could you even pretend to know how things would go in a completely different reality?
And yeah the colonists were worried about the common good of humanity when they enslaved everyone and took everything valuable back to their countries.
>>72041750
>indigenous people
what did they grow out of the fucking ground?
they weren't as "peace and love" as you think
>>72042056
>How could you even pretend to know how things would go in a completely different reality
Good job invalidating all of your own arguments you dumb nigger.
>WE'D STILL BE KINGZ AND QUEENZ IF NOT FO DUH WHITE MANG
>>72041726
The problem with that, is that Africans could have developed more weaponry and technology to move faster and catch their prey. African hunting genetics are endurance based, they kill prey that's too tired to fight back. There is no reason for Africans to not realize that wheels on the open steppe would make them move faster. They would have rolled on a branch sometime and put two and two together.
>just like in the Americas
The Ameri-indians developed exceedingly complicated societies. Those fuckers were doing all sorts of math and astronomy. Niggers had no excuse, especially when geometry would be of serious use to them. Like what the fuck, thousands of years and all niggers have to show for it. Fucks sake, they didn't even have metallurgy.
There was just no real innovation for Sub-Saharan africans at all. For thousands of years.
>>72042210
I reckon Aboriginals are even worse. Constantly told how they've been here for 40,000 years or whatever yet during all that time they did precisely fuck all except make sticks, kill off numerous native animals to the point of extinction and burn the shit out of the place.
>>72042056
>And yeah the colonists were worried about the common good of humanity when they enslaved everyone and took everything valuable back to their countries.
> when they enslaved everyone and took everything valuable back to their countries.
The colonies didn't have white bois standing guard in every "oppressed" village or mining town. Africans agreed to play by colonialist rules out of purely financial incentives. Nobody ever forced Africans to do anything; they outnumbered the miniscule bureaucratic machine a thousand to one, both in manpower and access to arms.
Stop spreading revisionist history, would you?
>>72042210
voodo magic > foul technology
>>72042172
I never talked about alternate realities, I was talking about the colonists which actually happened and is relevant. You're retarded who can't read.
>WE'D STILL BE KINGZ AND QUEENZ IF NOT FO DUH WHITE MANG
I don't understand why are you saying this. Do you just go in these threads with a mindset and assume everyone else is the other opposite mindset or what?
>>72041421
Why can't west be more like china in this regard?
>>72041859
By that logic the Chinese Communists are completely justified in shitting up China's environment and cultural history in the name of technological advancement.
They've made shitloads of money over the past few decades, and all it cost was everything else.
>>72041437
fpbp
>>72042300
>By that logic the Chinese Communists are completely justified in shitting up China's environment and cultural history in the name of technological advancement.
>in the name of technological advancement.
What "technological advancement" are you referring to? Chinese are notorious for stealing intellectual property. Japs do the inventing.
>>72042287
How can you be so oblivious to your hypocrisy?
>you can't say that an alternate reality where colonists didn't exist could be bad for Africans
>but I can say that one where they didn't exist would be good
>>72042279
>Africans agreed to play by colonialist rules out of purely financial incentives. Nobody ever forced Africans to do anything;
What the fuck man. Nigga the colonists were marching with big guns and everything was a military campaign. What the "Africans" wanted couldn't be less relevant to them. That's why they won.
>they outnumbered the miniscule bureaucratic machine a thousand to one, both in manpower and access to arms.
Okay kill yourself because hat's just stupid. They never even had a chance against countries with sophisticated military forces.
>>72042369
I mean industrialization in general. China was still an agricultural society as recently as a century ago.
Where do you think all that smog and shit in Beijing comes from?
>>72042210
>Fucks sake, they didn't even have metallurgy.
That's debatable. I still think it's incredibly fascinating how Sub-saharan africa never had a bronze age so far as we can tell, one tribe jumped straight from copper to IRON and zerg-rushed almost half the continent. You can still see the evidence of this if you look at the spread of language families. I'm too tired to find sources right now, but so far as I know this is the only group we know of that skipped bronze and went straight to iron. ALSO! There's quite bit of evidence some african city-states had iron-casting technology we still can't replicate. Mind you it was entirely decorative, and that's probably because they were still fucking around with iron when we had steel and brass... but it's not stagnation.
>There was just no real innovation for Sub-Saharan africans at all. For thousands of years.
This simply isn't true. There's a definite technological curve, it just has severe problems dealing with the Tsetse fly and white people. Amusingly, we're pretty sure the tsetse fly only became so shitty when arab traders started spreading the diseases. So that's quite possibly the fault of /arab/ 'neo'-colonialism. Or something close enough.
>>72041590
The Chinese are very hard working, no nonsense people. Very intelligent and resourceful. I think the gook in Empire of dust legitimately couldn't understand how the Africans could just squander the opportunities they were given. The Chinese built themselves up from nothing. The Chinese and the Africans mine as well be two totally different creatures
>>72042408
> Nigga the colonists were marching with big guns and everything was a military campaign
You need to retake history class.
>That's why they won.
Wrong again. "They" won because "they" controlled ports and access to trade with countries that could afford buying African resources. Colonial inhabitants agreed to fill in the paperwork at a Governor's office, paying a small tax for the shipping infrastructure, and getting paid for the exported natural resources.
>They never even had a chance against countries with sophisticated military forces.
There were no "sophisticated" arms in the 19th century. African warlords could easily access the weapons used by colonialists, but chose not to use them out of pure greed. Kill the white man, watch trade and wealth of the nation go down the toilet.
>>72041610
>Stabs you
Have fun, I just introduced you to the bayonet, fag
>>72041421
Blacks are everyone's problem
>>72042408
> Nigga the colonists were marching with big guns and everything was a military campaign.
Africans sold out their own people to the white man. Were you forced to read Things Fall Apart? Because a huge chunk of that story is about how the Africans went with the white man's ways because those ways were easier. The main character's son even willingly drops his African name to a Christian one (Isaac as I recall). The ways of Christianity were simpler than their usual polytheism, only one God to pray to. And that was the nice easy 20th century way, focused mainly on religion. Trade is very useful.
It's far easier to just do trades and convert them to your religion than kill them.
>>72042481
>decorative
Who gives a shit then?
>This simply isn't true. There's a definite technological curve, it just has severe problems dealing with the Tsetse fly and white people.
>white people were there for thousands of years
Go to sleep already.
>>72042210
>The problem with that, is that Africans could have developed more weaponry and technology to move faster and catch their prey
Did you even read the fucking post? They didn't need to, they lived in a tropical paradise where they could pluck fruit from the tree, you fucking anime retard.
>>72042500
Not to mention the chinks and Indians in African countries are basically all rich or upper middle class, despite moving to a country with nothing, being discriminated by the English and having a language barrier.
Blacks, even on their home turf are really inferior as humans. Decent as pack animals though. Its sad, but objectively true.
>>72042381
>but I can say that one where they didn't exist would be good
Good thing I didn't say that at all. You're just too used to us vs them that you can't tell actual arguments from your own /pol/tier perceptions of them.
I only ever talked about the colonists and their intentions at the time, never said anything about how could things be without them. Nobody knows how things would have been with imperialism. Just like it could be much worse it could be just as likely much better. Or maybe ends being the same.
The actual hypocrisy is to say they were a force of good when all they've done was murder, pillage and enslave. No one was doing anyone any favors during that time and the fact that one came out of it much worse than the other doesn't mean the latter was the actual good guy and the guy who lost only did because he's such a loser lol.
It's a completely a shallow and narrowminded way to look at things and /pol/ kiddies are patting themselves on the back for it.
>>72042602
>Africans never hunted
>>72042643
Why did you even post this?
>>72042602
which should have left more time to develop hierarchies and civilization. Most of the ancient civilizations developed around fertile rivers were life was good enough to divide labor.
Not in the middle of baron wastelands. People in deserts basically live like nomads, even today.
Africans really just weren't smart enough to develop further. Remove the Caucasian civilizations from the equation and Africa would basically still be in the stone age. Unless maybe the Chinese came.
>>72042596
>white people were there for thousands of years
Nnnnnno, the Tsetse fly was. The moment the Tsetse fly went from 'holy shit how do people live here' to merely 'WHY do people live here', white people were already building colonies. Seriously, go read up on the Tsetse fly if you haven't. Did you know it basically renders animal-based agriculture unsustainable without prophylactic drugs in many regions? Even today?
I'll remind you that 'having cow-like animals replace human labor for farming' is incredibly useful and something that almost all of us take for granted as a basic level of technology, and it's just /not possible/ in large tracts of otherwise fertile land because the animals get sick and die. This also affects milk and manure, which are both incredibly useful. We're not even getting into 'how do you farm if you're infected with sleeping sickness' yet.
Africans want everything to be given to them, they don't like the concept of work. It is in their blood.
>>72042529
>There were no "sophisticated" arms in the 19th century.
Kill yourself
There's always sophisticated weaponry. Ever since humanity made something to kill with beside some well shaped rock. By the 19th centuries all kind of sophisticated arms were around.
>>72042626
>all they've done was murder, pillage and enslave
And exactly how is that different than what the Africans were already doing to eachother? When you balance in the civilization that colonists brought, it's a net positive.
>>72042619
>Blacks, even on their home turf are really inferior as humans.
It is quite sad isn't it. I'd almost feel pity if I didn't hate them so much. Every group of people on the planet has at least something to be proud of. Some kind of achievements, some kind of history. Not blacks tho. They're just an inferior slave race and they always will be. They're the dysfunctional, noisy retard in the back of the classroom of life.
>>72042687
>which should have left more time to develop hierarchies and civilization.
Do you have legitimate down syndrome? They didn't need to. Necessity is what drove invention. Please don't post again.
>>72042705
Is it that they don't like work or that they just don't have a good understanding of planning ahead and looking forward in time?
>>72042749
The "civilization" could've been brought without warfare genius.
Also it's really stupid what you're saying. So anyone can just invade a country as long as he thinks he's going to make better use of it than the people? What guarantees do you have that that the price you're forcing these people to pay is going to give the desired results? What even gives you the right to make that choice? You're literally viewing history as you see fit. Back then it was just a huge planet for the taking. No one gave a shit about bringing civilization to anyone.
>>72042481
>/arab/ 'neo'-colonialism
>neo
>it came before european colonisation
>>72042759
Yeah, must be why their populations exploded due to an abundance of natural resources.
Its a fact that civilizations never developed because people had excess food. Why would they need to? Right?
>>72043084
What the fuck are you babbling about, retard?
>>72042721
>There's always sophisticated weaponry.
What I meant was that gun control was non-existent and everyone with money could purchase the most advanced cannons and rifles of the era.
The situation in today's world is much different. Sophisticated weapons systems are now heavily regulated, available only to government goons. In 1850, practically everyone (except maybe chinks and japs) had a de facto right to keep and bear arms - which, as I mentioned earlier, were also widely distributed and easily accessible.
>>72042907
>The "civilization" could've been brought without warfare genius.
That's exactly what happened, genius. Colonialists had zero interest in skirmishing with local tribes. Instead, they set up ports and offered to trade with the local populace. Both parties reaped huge benefits.
>So anyone can just invade a country as long as he thinks he's going to make better use of it than the people?
Yes. That's human history in a nutshell. Might is right. Are you by any chance twelve years old?
>>72043084
>Its a fact that civilizations never developed because people had excess food.
Why are you fucking fighting history? They didn't have any snow, so they didn't need to build legitimate housing, they didn't have cold weather, so they didn't need to make any intricate clothing, they didn't need to build farming or agriculture because everything was tropical, raising cattle is nearly impossible because of the Tsetse fly.
Did you even learn history? You sound like a child right now. They didn't evolve because they didn't have the need to do so in order to survive as a species like other cultures. Please do some research, because you sound like a complete fool right now.
>>72042300
most of the shit in the room you're in now is made in china, so its your fault you monster
>>72041750
Colonist did bad things and in the end it really didn't matter
I rather would have had things they are now than be born in some bumfuck tribe in mexico's border
Only stupid ignorant white college cucks believe colonist are literally hitlers and they should have never intervene
>>72043115
You claim they had enough resources, from "fruits."
If that was true, they would have more children. Yet until Europeans brought agriculture to Africa, most Africans lived in extended families. Not what I would call thriving.
Not to mention Africa isn't some monolith of climate. Shit in the tropic region isn't like it is in South Africa.
Despite this for the most part Africa was in the stone age, except in North Africa or parts that had contact with the Arab world.
Now I know you didn't go to college, or take anthropology, or history, or science, or biology. But I want you to go to your middle school teacher, kick him in the balls, and say "you failed me." After that. If you really want it. I'll draw you a diagram about why your retarded theory about the lack of development in Sub-Saharan Africa is wrong.
>>72043229
Like Egypt, right?
>>72043305
>You claim they had enough resources, from "fruits."
>If that was true, they would have more children.
You are literally the dumbest human on earth right now. Please read >>72043229
>>72042267
i genuinely do not believe that aboriginal australians are humans
people like to give africans a hard time for not being developed but even the worst village in africa is like ancient rome compared to abo """"society""""
>>72041421
His problem was nigs are lazy people
>receive technology not yet introduced outside Europe and small parts of the America and smaller parts of Asia for decades
>all throughout the continent
>work alongside Europeans through it all
>they leave for a multitude of reasons
>do absolutely nothing with the tech
>for decades
>Africa regresses so badly it is like you're stepping back in time to the 1800s
>Europeans go back to Africa again
>are forced out by certain international forces and local forces
>Africa as a whole becomes worse
>in the meantime Asia has advanced in 40 years with less resources than africa could in nearly 100
>>72043463
that just goes to show the strengths of the asian race
they're like whites if you took away the concept of empathy
scary stuff
These fucking slaves, I'm paying them a whole dollar a day and they still lazing off, how am I supposed to buy another penthouse for my 20 pop idol wives?
>>72043538
Except china is a fucking shithole where escalators eat people and they have suicide nets for the 200 million virgin men who'll never get laid
>>72041421
it was all so tiresome
>>72043335
Cities of ancient Egypt were built along the Nile River. Every year the Nile flooded and made the soil fertile for crops.
>>72043463
They are lazy and if you follow the timeline it makes sense why
Niggers are worthless because of historical reasons and it's fascinating
>>72041857
Muslims were never more advanced.
>>72043577
Not to mention that Chinks make their money by being the world's factory and copying shit designed in other countries.
>>72043335
>egypt
>africa
>>72043577
>China is a shithole becau-
China is more advanced than a majority of the world
Rural areas in China have shoddy work sure but overall China is unironically a better place to live in than most of the world and unironically one of the safest places to live in
>>72043696
>2 yuan was placed into your account
>15 yuan was removed from your account for Peace tax
>>72042572
Which led to every other culture to invent armour. Meanwhile, the Africans just sat around flinging their own shit and hitting sticks
>>72041726
tl;dr
Africa is so comfy that niggers never had to get smart to survive
>>72043744
>I'm a shill because I said factually nice things about China
Expats living in China have documented their lives in China for years , some have even gotten famous in China doing so
It is a not a well kept secret that western media almost always shows China in a bad light
It was a pretty alright documentary though, I enjoyed it from both perspectives of the Chinese being stuck up, arrogant assholes, and the Congolese being unorganized, unethical and lazy.
There are lots of angles and context to the situation as a whole, but I personally appreciated it for what it was - what astounds me is how many people insist on using it as some sort of propaganda piece to fulfill an agenda.
>>72043787
Less money on marketing, more money for building rails on stairs
>>72042721
Not the guy youre replying to but when you use the kill yourself meme now adays its obv youre losing and it makes you look like a dumb fag
Especially when you use it 3 times in a row
>>72041750
>denying indigenous people minerals they couldn't extract themselves
>in return for the latest European medical advancements
hmmmm
>/tv/ is full of cucks
not surprising desu
>>72042056
Nigger, the Abos hadn't even worked out the wheel by the time they Brits came to Australia. You really think they were gonna go better here?
>>772043185
Hes prolly a self hating liberal faggot numale
>>72043611
>historical reasons
Niggers are worthless because they're niggers
>>72043832
/tv/ is infested with ledditors because of GoT
>>72043611
Yeah and theyre lazy in the us and every other part of the world for the same reason?
Theyre less evolved
>>72041421
I used to have a folder of shit from this movie
Are any of you really surprised that nigs are lazy, retarted apes who spend all their money on frivolous shit?
Look at what happened to south africa when the whites left.
Niggers are litterally sub human
Also
Would you rather be paraplegic and white or a black guy?
>>72041726
>African history
Cave paintings?
>>72043818
Well you can say dumb shit but not that dumb. If you do yes I'm afraid you need kill yourself.
>>72043598
This
>>72041421
>What was his fucking problem?
Which one, the greasy chinaman or the talking milkdud?
>>72043185
>That's exactly what happened, genius. Colonialists had zero interest in skirmishing with local tribes. Instead, they set up ports and offered to trade with the local populace. Both parties reaped huge benefits.
You actually think that's what happened in Africa? Because no. Nobody wanted to be in chains. The implicaiton that no violence was needed is ridiculous.
>Might is right. Are you by any chance twelve years old?
How ironic when you spout this shit. No it's not right at all. Did it happen? Yes. Was it right? No. Right was completely irrelevant. So when you look at it now and say side x or y was right it's completely retarded.
>>72044104
It's funny because retards like that are usually some neo-Nazi psychos. Not realizing that Germans were considered backward as fuck for most of their history.
>>72043577
Also
>designated spitting streets
They just can't keep it in their mouth.
>>72043840
That's not the point, the point is the brits didn't cross oceans to save the Abos. They had their own selfish reasons which is understandable, if not moral, but it's completely bullshit to claim they were going out of their way bring civilization to the Abos.
These threads would be much better if everyone didn't assume you're a BLM liberal reddit berniecuck unless start your post about niggers being niggers.
>>72041590
European colonization of sub suharan Africa lasted less than 100 years except in South africa.
There was virtually no pillaging. There wasn't much to pillage in the firs place though.
>>72043615
They were in the middle ages. The renaissance was sparked due to trading with muslims, since they had insight in greece technology and philosophy which Europe didn't have (was not allowed to have due to heathanism).
>>72041590
If it weren't for white people my country would still be living in huts ruled by chieftains while wearing almost nothing.
Go fuck yourself liberal
>>72044197
Go and huff some petrol, abbo cunt.
>>72044239
look at the cuck sucking dick to fit in
And who are your people?
Yang was roasting Eddie all episode but Eddie got one punch in when they were loading the gravel
>Lao: I can't figure anything out with this tape measure, it's shit
>Eddie: Of course it's shit, it's made in China
>L: how do you know?
>E: it says so on the bottom
What's the name of the doco?
>>72044279
yeah that was a sick burn
>>72044231
I seriously hope you don't believe this.
The Renaissance happened several centuries after any claim of golden age wewuzery, which if anything was in the years 800-1000. Even then the golden age thing is a western invention, arabs prior to being told this in the 19th century never envision history like this.
"Trading with muslims" also overshadows the fact it is the muslim that blocked the Mediterranean commerce. Muslim pirates completely destroyed the trade of Antiquity, and they were proud that Christians couldn't sail in the Southern/Eastern Med.
Also the muzzs seriousl didn't do shit. Transforming the most fertile lands in the world into deserts isn't my idea of achievement, especially when Yuropeans were at the same time terraforming countries into existence in Belgium/Netherlands and the conquest of the hinterland half of which was swamps.
>>72041421
>get contracted to work in Africa and live in a modified shipping container
>can't get job done because they can't supply gravel and won't tell you where they get rocks to make the gravel to help the community yet at the same time won't increase productivity to meet demand
>get goiter and ebola
>>72044320
>significant events
How can you even measure that?
>>72044259
Not even him but I'm part Maori. You think I want to go back to grass skirts, no plumbing and cooking all my food underground? Go fuck yourself
>>72044320
What book is this? It looks really silly.
>>72044259
Isn't it funny that licucks are the most die hard proponents of nativism for peoples that would at least benefit materially from their identity being trampled, but chimp out in rage when whiteys go even slightly into nativism even though it' clearly in their advantage on all points?
fug, it's funny how so many know so little, the vast majority of africans disn't even know that they were ruled by europeans and had no contact with them, the only example which contradicts that is india.
the colonization was a positive experience for africa as technology and infrastructure was introduced over a long time, if you were to parachute down schematics and information about everuthing needed for a civilization into the andaman islands or the brazilian rainforest, do you think they would apply it?
no, they would eat what could be eaten and then use the rest as cosmetics or fire material, if they even have invented fire yet, that's what would have happen if the colonization didn't happen in africa, they would be considered wildlife instead of people
>>72044320
>so you see, it turns out that British, French and German books mention British, French and German people the most
woah there I don't think I can process this
>>72043615
Absolutely they were in most fields. Sorry cuck you would have to accept that despite how much you hate muslims of today.
Though I do admit it's sometimes exaggerated for certain propaganda goals. The thing is if you replicate the conditions of musilm states during that time any place would make scientific advances. Riches, safety, and science being respected by the rulers. Of course science and arts are going to prosper.
It's no wonder that once those elements were removed science completely disappeared despite the fact that they were still muslims. Obviously the crusades and mongol invasion and general unrest made the place less safe, and discovering new roads around Africa and the new world made them less rich and the most important thing is Ottomans liked to keep everyone in the dark, that's why they ruled for so long but the price was by the time the reign ended there was hardly any trace of the aforementioned superiority. Which made perfect sense how the at that point the europeans basically just divided the place between themselves and how Israel came to be. Understanding this can give you a better understanding of the politics of our time.
>>72044423
>the colonization was a positive experience for africa
It wasn't.
>>72044395
>>72044416
It's Charles Murray Human Accomplishment.
He details his methodology there. It's largely a cross-reference of all authoritative encyclopedias.
When he presented just the raw results, nobody cared. Then he plotted such graphs from the findings and people chimped out.
>>72041726
>abundance of food for foraging
what about australia, 90% of the country is fucking desert and aboriginals didn't do shit for 40,000 years even in the non-desert areas
>>72041726
>Pro-Africans bitching about merging tribes together caused social problems.
>Proof Multi-culturalism doesn't work.
Pick two people!
>>72044464
only if you believe civilization and science in general are inherently negative and people were happier living as animals.
>>72044450
You have muslims confused with Arabs. Arabs did pioneer early mathematics, written language, and medicine.
Then Islam came along, took them back to the stone age, and kept them there.
>>72044464
ah right i guess being part of the wildlife is better than being people
>>72041421
Every time I see this series of screenshot I get triggered.
>chink talking shit on nig about how the black race has done nothing after whiteys left Africa
>this coming from people who still revered a dead gommie who literally tried to destroy 5000 years worth of Chinese history and killed a few million people in the process
>>72044491
>He came up with 4,139 persons and a list of events and ponders 20 persons in each of nine scientific, three philosophic, and nine artistic fields who were most extensively covered in the resources.
Pretty shitty methodology.
>>72044559
Maybe they were.
I'm half black and this scene made me laugh so fucking hard
It's kind of true what he's saying but he didn't have to do him like that
>>72044547
The abos turned it into a desert by fucking burning everything. Why everyone wants to pretend everywhere was peaceful before the white man came baffles me
>>72044564
Well he didn't want to compare composers and physicians, which I can understand.
>>72044560
Mesopotamians and Syrians weren't Arabs though if you are thinking about them.
>>72044564
it's accurate, before the propulsion after the renaissance though asia and europe were quite equal in innovation
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_historic_inventions
>>72044576
Some people just need to be fucking told
>>72044563
Yeah, and despite that, China is one of the strongest economic powers in the world. The Chinese are notorious overachievers who despise lazyness, Africans are notorious underachievers who made lazyness their lifestyle. Obviously this extreme clash of cultures would piss the guy off.
>>72044410
So time would stop if someone didn't land a ship to your country and kill you and cuck you hard?
Completely bullshit alternate reality that doesn't make any sense. For example we know for sure that native Americans adapted technology that they thought were useful and if you adapted tools and jeans there's no reason to assume you wouldn't adapt more advanced stuff. Every one steals tech and use it if they think it's going to do them good, they're not going to wait for white men with guns to get that sweet tech. If spreading technology was the goal then it was possible without genocide and slavery.
Yeah we both know you wouldn't say this shit if you weren't trying to fit in on 4chan.
>>72044592
Because dass rayciss.
Just like people don't want to know Tunisia was the breadbasket of the ancient world and it was Arabs that turned it into a desert with their "golden age" primitive technology, complete disregard for the long term and retarded law that couldn't establish clear property and land registry. You have to wait French dominion for Tunisia to become green again.
Same for Palestine. When the merchants came, they turned the semi desert into fertile land.
>>72044630
that's why the andaman island population is advanced right
>>72044593
It's Western bias. We know a lot about people living in the last 2 centuries that's why encyclopedia entries about them will be more common. And everyone can agree that the Western world has been dominating since the industrial revolution.
>>72041635
>Really now? Is this what colonists were doing? Spreading technology around the world?
Yes. They felt an obligation to help primitive cultures. It was called the white man's burden.
>>72041421
>niggers
>working
he obviously discovered he had to pick one
>>72044560
I'm not confusing anything faggot. Arabs of old mostly resemble muslims now. It is known. I'm talking about the golden abbasi period.
>it's a /pol/ cuck can't accept history episode
>>72044655
Murray addresses claims of "chronocentrism" is the book.
Even then, that's why he also recorded "significant events" rather than people, so that nameless innovations from times whose records have been lost are counted.
>>72044707
/his/ here, it was the persians which stood for the majority of ideas in the early islamic period, and that which wasn't persian was usually just translated from conquered areas such as byzantine
the """golden""" age of islam is a total meme
>>72044709
>significant events
Examples?
>all these libcucks ITT
>>72044299
Empire of Dust, it's available on youtube.
>>72044731
>/his/ here
/his/ hates /pol/.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_Campaign
Yes, because the Chinese are so much smarter. lol.
>>72044778
>implying /his/ isn't /pol/
>>72044778
yes, there's lots of apologists which doesn't want to accept the truth on his because it conflicts their pc agenda
BUT THEY'RE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY
and we're winning
: I )
>>72044792
/his/ is as /pol/ as /lit/. They defend Muslims and Blacks in every thread.
>>72044630
>and cuck you hard?
We're not Native Americans or retarded Abos, mate. Point is we wouldn't be advanced without white people showing up here as we have fucking nobody to steal tech from. We're isolated
>>72044707
>he actually thinks islam was responsible for preserving and cultivating technological and cultural innovation
>he doesnt know most greek, persian and roman knowledge was preserved largely in spite of islamic invasion and destruction
>he doesnt know islam is responsible for the technological and cultural stagnation of the middle east
>he believes in the islamic golden age meme
>he calls others historically illiterate
now thats spicy stuff
>>72044630
You is a overly sensitive bitch, is you? Likely, so. You probably one of those bitch ass Mexicans who think they white.
>>72041421
itt: salty nigs they were barely into the tool age when the other players showed up in the iron age.
I have a cousin that plays rts games this way too. He's also an insufferable cunt.
>tfw continually surrounded by chinese people in my university and suburb
I'd almost want to learn chinese if it weren't so fucking hard
>>72044731
>/his/ here
It looks like /pol/ to me. Because you don't actually know anything about history.
Also about translated from other people: since when anyone didn't do this? Everyone builds upon other civilizations, this is how it's always been.
>>72044855
/pol/'s history: Everyone was a nigger, except me.
>>72044918
I imagine Africans felt the way I do when I play AoEII on hardest. I've barely build 3 houses before the castle age rape train hits
>>72041421
I felt genuinely sorry for Eddie. He seemed like a clever guy but you could see the drop in IQ during the morning roll call. He seemed like he wanted to make his country better but is surrounded by people who don't give a shit and just steal all the stuff the Chinese are giving them.
>>72044792
/his/ is worse than tumblr. It's just faggots screaming that everything is racist to really obnoxious extremes.
>>72044744
Like the full crankshaft mechanism.
It's perhaps the main element of revolution between ancient and medieval engineering but nobody has the slightest idea who did it except it's somewhere in Yurop before 1100. Theophilus Presbyter is the first to give a real desciption but he was just a compiler.
Nobody knows who made the first azimuth rotational mill either. The first operational movable canon in the French army during the Italian wars are well known but not their designers. The old Romans transformed classical architecture with their arches but here again nobody knows. Arches, that were unknown in Greece, appeared at some point without more information.
>the radio man makes a fat joke about the mayor
>>72044966
In a historical context that statement is true. Only Europe, the Middle East and Asia created civilisation.
>>72041590
If you can't find anything to eat, then you're supposed to grow it yourself.
Remember, Rhodesia was the world's #1 food exporter at the time
>>72045120
And Africa didn't? You do realize Egypt is there right.
inb4 WE WUZ
Like it or not Egypt is part of Africa. So your statement is objectively incorrect.
>>72044104
>You actually think that's what happened in Africa? Because no. Nobody wanted to be in chains. The implicaiton that no violence was needed is ridiculous.
You're mixing a lot of things under one banner of colonialisation and confusing them together.
It's a complex issue and you're oversimplifying it. There were different issues with colonialism spread over centuries with many different nations venturing to different lands and interacting with the people there in different ways. The worst abuses typically came about when various people realised they couldn't be stopped and there was great profit to be made, ie/ forced enslavement and forced land sales on Easter Island, but it's not realistic to say that all tribal interaction is like that, though such a thing only has to happen once to a tribe for them to be changed forever.
>>72045197
Egypt doesn't have a meaningful contribution to the development of any European or Asian civilization. Egypt is interesting because it persisted for thousands of years without almost any change which, while notable, isn't exactly how you win the game of history
>>72045197
>trying to defend niggers like the pathetic cuck that he is
>invokes north africa in his attempt to do so
>literally devolves into WE WuZ territory
kill yourself my man
>>72045146
>>72045217
I'm not simplifying it. I'm replying to the guy who's saying it was simply what the people wanted(slavery, pillaging and murder in exchange for some tech!) and the colonists obliged them. Now that guy is simplifying things. He's also wrong.
Did I create this meme when I introduces this documentary to /pol/?
>>72045120
>Only Europe, the Middle East and Asia created civilisation.
Did your stormfront buddies tell you that, retard? Amerindians, west africans, north africans, polynesians, inuits damn well created civilizations, no matter how you wanna spin it.
>>72045375
I'm pretty sure it actually started on /tv/
>>72045197
>egypt
>sub-saharan africa
bretty much every nation north of the sahara consists of non-african peoples, mostly semitic people
>>72045355
>slavery, pillaging and murder
do you think this wasnt present in africa before the white man came?
>mfw
seriously reddit, why are you even trying?
>>72045382
>Amerindians, west africans, north africans, polynesians, inuits damn well created civilizations
>>72045302
What the fuck are you talking about?
Where did I try to "defend niggers"? What that guy was objectively wrong. Egypt is part of Africa. This isn't some black nationalist shit it's the absolute truth. No one is saying africans were kings. But Egypt did contribute. We can safely say that.
>>72045355
There was no slavery during colonial times. The two are separate events.
There was little pillaging because of the poverty of the land.
There was some murder, but why defeat the point by mixing it with retarded stuff? It sounds like the people surviving German camps and inventing stories of oven roller coaster and masturbation machines that killed their grandma three times in a single month.
>>72045398
pretty much every nation on the planet consists of originally African peoples
>>72045120
Kerma culture
D'mt
Kushite Kingdom
Blemmyes Kingdom
Axum
Makuria
Nobatia
Mali Empire
Ghana Empire
And much much more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_kingdoms_in_pre-colonial_Africa
>>72044464
usually you're supposed to provide arguments to back up what you say, but I know liberals love appealing to the stone.
>>72045399
>do you think this wasnt present in africa before the white man came?
It was present everywhere. Doesn't make it justifiable. And it doesn't make the "right" thing historically. We already talked about this.
>>72045429
>out of africa theory
>2016
>>72045433
>literally meaningless empires built on slavery and perpetual tribal warfare that contributed nothing to the world, like everything african
see pic
>>72045398
>I'm right because I don't consider north africa as part of africa
Okay man
>>72045477
I'm sorry that the most widely accepted origin theory bothers you but maybe it's time to read up
>>72045428
>There was no slavery during colonial times
Colonial times were the height of slavery in the west.
>>72045477
>>literally meaningless empires built on slavery and perpetual tribal warfare that contributed nothing to the world, like everything african
This is simply not true. None of those empires were built on slavery. I imagine you don't even know what most of those in the list are or where they were or when they existed. You're just a fool talking shit about another race to make yourself feel better for being white, so you can ride off the achievements of your collective group because you've never done anything. Just like all racists.
>>72045393
Idk, I show /pol/ the trailer last summer https://vimeo.com/29260656
It was on one of the public channels in Sweden a while back. Some Brazilian guy in the same thread took it upon him to buy it and put it on piratebay, then someone uploaded it to YouTube.
>>72045464
so if it was present everywhere and every continent has experienced it why is it niggers are the only ones still incapable of maintaining civilization?
really makes ya think
>>72045512
>links wikipedia article
>checkmate b-b-bigot
no, i am completely correct, ill wait for you to prove otherwise.
stupid fucking nigger/niggerlover xD
>>72045501
I'm talking of the colonization of Africa.
Which with the exception of South Africa (Cape and Orange, where there were very few indigenous negroes and not slaves) was barely begun by the 1840s when slavery was already abolished in most of Europe and dependencies.
Virtually all of non coastal Africa was out of the reach of yuropeans before the conference of Berlin of 1885. Even then people drew lines on the map that was essentially terra incognita. White people first reached Rwanda in the 1890s.
There was no negro slavery in colonial times. Actually there were important wars to abolish slavery, that is, some tribes enslaving other tribes.
>>72045573
why bother giving the liberal cuck a history lesson?
>>72045570
>no, i am completely correct, ill wait for you to prove otherwise.
No, the burden of proof is on you to prove that these empires were nothing but groups tribes. as it is your original claim.
However, loose groups of warring tribes don't built pyramids, nor do they become the richest people in the world like in the Mali Empire.
>>72044439
The Japanese did a study and came up with similar results.
>>72045625
Internalized racism much?
After all, Japs are honorary whites ever since their discovery.
>>72045645
Yes it is?
What is essential Africa-core?
Docus and films both welcome
I'll start
>Blood Diamond
>VICE docus on Africa - Liberian Warlords, Congo, getting the UN bulldozer to Sudan, bunch of other shit (low on the SJW, high on the fucked upness of Africa)
>Anthony Bourdain goes to Congo
What else???
>>72045675
Empire of Dust you pleb
>>72045573
Wasn't the Belgians or whatever pretty much using the natives as slaves in places like OP's picture?
At least for stuff like forced labor.
>>72045501
The fuck are you talking about? Slavery was banned way before the height of colonialism
>>72045692
Africa Addio
Goodbye Uncle Tom
Khartoum
>>72045675
The Ghost and the Darkness
>>72045692
is that what they told you in school fucking retard?
who do you think outlawed slavery fucking stupid retard?
>>72044197
when they got here they went out of their way to bring civilization to them
>>72045766
>Africa Addio
this is the one that made me realise niggers arent human
>>72045692
LIES, WE ONLY CHOPPED OF HANDS. LEOPOLD DID NOTHING WRONG
>>72041590
>>fuck a country up the ass for centuries
Wasn't even a hundred years.
>>72045774
No. It was what they said in the documentary and on Wikipedia.
I mean. I'm just asking if there's any truth to it from the little I know, don't get all /pol/ triggered.
>>72045774
So Brits are the most genetically superior people on earth?
>>72045882
refer again to this post for your answer
>>72045573
in regards to belgium if the nigger employees(paid for their work) stole, raped, attacked or otherwise acted violently toward themselves or other colonists the belgiums punished them in the only way the nigger understands.
but they werent slaves, and it wasnt just whitey hacking off limbs cuz dey evil and dey always tryen stifle dat black potential.
>>72045923
the anglo saxon is the pinnacle of mankind, shame modern britain is fucking gay.
>>72045935
Oh. So the hand cutting was in retaliation for them committing crimes? Not just being lazy workers and shit like that?
>>72045957
>the anglo saxon
But Brits are predominantly Celtic and pre-indo-european in genetics.
>>72045958
>>72045973
the modern anglo saxon is a genetic amalgam of saxons and celtics, predominantly british descent.
>>72045957
>Swedish people are the most Nordic on earth
Neat.I assume these stats were taken a few decades ago because now Sweden would be entirely J1.
>>72046035
Those labels are wrong. It's not possible to put it down to such unique labels. R1a and R1b are Indo-European, J1 and J2 are middle eastern, I's are native european, as in the very original people.
But all this is measuring is Male haplogroups, they account for about 2% of a persons genetics, they don't tell you the make up of a human at all, all they are useful for is tracking population movement as it is passed down from father to son. It's not a map of overall genetic make up of the population, it's a map of what haplogroup marker the men have.
>>72045923
I think Murray cheated and counted Ireland into Britain, making it go higher than France.
But yeah pretty much masterrace. Eternal Anglo reporting in.
>>72045957
>dat Finland
The khanate memes were true.
>>72046329
Of course.
Finns are based and straight up not European
>>72046103
>R1b are Indo-European
So how Basques are predominately R1b? I though they are some ancient pre Indo-Euroepan people.
>>72046329
>>72046387
Isn't Finland like more Germanic than most Scandinavian countries or something?
>>72046472
More Mongolian
>>72046472
Nope, they literally come from Ural mountains. This is not a secret nor a conspirary. That is why Finnish is such a odd language in Europe.
>>72045957
I wonder what would Hitler say about this.
>>72046482
No. but I mean memes aside. Like they are more generically pure Nordic Germanic than the Scandinavians since the Scandinavians started mixing more with other Europeans in the last 100-200 years or so.
>>72046520
Oh I know, but as we all know populations change.
>>72044259
>calls others a cuck
>talks about fitting in
>>72046520
>>72046557
Probably.
Finns are absolute masterrace tho
>>72046451
That's exactly why haplogroups are terrible for determining genetics. Basque male line is mostly Indo-European which means the Basque ancestors were all fucked by non Basque men, however basque genetics on the whole could still be mostly native basque. Haplogroup accounts for nothing but the dna of a single chromosome.
>>72044464
From a technological standpoint it was.
>>72041750
>discriminating them, raping them, committing acts of genocide, destroying their lands
What, do you really believe that the indigineous people were some peace loving hippies? The Aztecs treated war as a ritual festival
>africa
http://rubycalaber.com/WildestDreamsDeWhiteWashed.mp4
>>72046644
Technology isn't that important. They didn't really teach them anything.
>>72046704
>Technology isn't that important.
This fucking guy.
>>72042481
>problems dealing with the Tsetse fly and white people
>he brings up the fucking Tsetse fly
As if the Europeans didn't have to deal with all kinds of diseases and pathogens
>>72041437
First post, best post.
>>72041421
Anyone have the YouTube link to this?
>>72044104
>Because no. Nobody wanted to be in chains. The implicaiton that no violence was needed is ridiculous.
And who do you think chained up all these people? The Africans, before selling them off to Europeans. Hell, the European forts that were built in the 16th century have their cannons pointed towards the SEA, instead of the mainland, because other Europeans were more dangerous than Africans who wanted trade
>>72046823
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0C4_88ub_M
>>72042481
Not any of these other guys, but started reading up on the Tsetse fly out of curiosity from your post. Pretty interesting stuff and explains a lot actually.
>>72043577
I unironically agree with this. China is an """"""""""""""advanced""""""""" shithole. It's almost as bad as africa
>>72047111
Thanks trip senpai
>>72042408
I really think you need to read this book. You clearly don't understand how Africa was colonized at all.
>>72042408
Also the zulus and ashanti successfully fought against the British for years. And the Ethiopians beat the Italians. Why are you debating history when you clearly have a shallow, pop-history grasp on the subject? Do you think you're enlightened because you heard someone talk about it once and read a couple Wikipedia articles?
>>72045382
he probably meant in that civilizations which actually created something
>>72043577
>>72042481
it really is, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_historic_inventions
>>72048071
>the Africans could've easily won against the colonizers trust me I know my history
Well enlighten me as to why they didn't. Yeah because those uncivilized tribes you speak could've easily stand against an actual army.
>>72048539
>Bunch of mountain gooks flog the British army enough to get a treaty
>Maoris do the same
Maybe Africans are just shit at war?
>>72047972
Okonkwo did literally nothing wrong.
>>72048560
So now there's a war, but they didn't win because they're shit not because they didn't want to?
>>72048691
They couldn't even be fucked to try it seems, only the zulu, zande and ashanti really attempted anything
>>72048071
>the ethiopians beat the italians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Italo-Ethiopian_War
no
>the zulus successfully
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Zulu_War
>get fucked with twice the numbers against a fraction of the british miliary
no
apologists trying to rewrite history again, the sub-saharan african population did come up with some organized civilizations such as songhai and mali, notably west africans, though they never amounted to anything, see
>>72048493
>>72042907
> So anyone can just invade a country as long as he thinks he's going to make better use of it than the people?
Yes you mong fucking kek.
>>72048939
>Posts about the fucking second Italo-Ethiopian war
Almost like the first one didn't go so well for Italy isn't it?
>>72041421
>you'll never know if Lao Yang received his gravel
>>72049001
Ethiopia
Armed and Supported by:
United Kingdom United Kingdom
France French Republic
Russia Russian Empire
yeah i wonder why
>>72049073
Almost like Africa wouldn't have gotten fucked in the arse if they had diplomats or something to play the great powers against eachother
