[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

Is this a good opening day return?


Thread replies: 30
Thread images: 11

File: 1468641732921.jpg (174KB, 1240x940px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1468641732921.jpg
174KB, 1240x940px
Is this a good opening day return?
>>
>>72037501
Oh hell please be real
>>
>Thursday box office
Means nothing desu
>>
File: sony lmao.png (23KB, 722x168px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
sony lmao.png
23KB, 722x168px
JUST
>>
File: Screenshot_39.png (80KB, 648x353px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Screenshot_39.png
80KB, 648x353px
>>72037548
KEK
>>
>>72037548
Feig can star in "Cuck is the New Black"
>>
File: 12754578.png (22KB, 577x190px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
12754578.png
22KB, 577x190px
>Children dead on the streets of France
>"I know this sucks, but Ghostbusters is out. Please go see it. We all need a little bustin' in our lives."
>>
>>72037670
If he's using the word haters, then he hasn't heard anything, that word is literally used as a dismissive.
>>
File: 1460952160787.jpg (56KB, 503x301px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1460952160787.jpg
56KB, 503x301px
>>
>>72037501
>solid
>>
>>72037757
Yea those Ghostbusters comics are great, too bad it might be getting canceled due to the movie.
>>
>>72037501
http://www.strawpoll.me/10726820/
>>
File: whoyougonnacall.png (304KB, 849x656px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
whoyougonnacall.png
304KB, 849x656px
>>72037598
How do you feel about that?

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/ghostbusters-is-a-perfect-example-of-how-internet-ratings-are-broken/
>>
>>72037826
I enjoyed the TMNT crossover
>>
>>72037501
is the new

>solid 7
>>
File: back off.gif (3MB, 255x191px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
back off.gif
3MB, 255x191px
>>72038017
>lets talk about the men tanking the ratings
>lets not talk about the women fluffing them up
>>
File: 1458166945029.gif (1020KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1458166945029.gif
1020KB, 500x500px
>>72038017
>>
File: CnRsxepXgAAOkhU.jpg (477KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
CnRsxepXgAAOkhU.jpg
477KB, 1536x2048px
>>
>>72038171
So money creates validity.
>>
>>72037501
i just realizes after seeing this post for the 5th time that the title is a play on the "who you gonna call" thing...
>>
>>72037501
Maybe you should call and find out
>>
>>72038171
I'm glad he let us know he cares so little. So little that he felt the need to tell us.
>>
>>72038314
He called the movie shit. Not sure why people are getting offended.
>>
>>72038095
What on earth could that gif be about? The article shows internet aggregators like imdb, rotten tomatoes and metacritic are bullshit because EVERYONE (read: both men and women) were artificially manipulating the score by ranking it without the chance to see it.
>>
File: 1468646592601.png (1MB, 795x3700px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1468646592601.png
1MB, 795x3700px
>>72038017
>nate bronze
>>
>>72037598

>chris hemsworth first on the bill
>>
>>72038532
Well, damn. I really can't argue with that. Except that it only goes to prove the point that political polling projections (ie the data they had to work with) is also bullshit when they're done 15 months in advance of a presidential election. The article I cited had to do with movie review aggregator sites being manipulated in the last week by people that hadn't yet seen the film they were reviewing.

One of these things is not like the other.
>>
>>72038532

Man, the ¨left wing¨ in your country is fucking pathetic, it isn´t real and serious, it´s entirely different to real social behavior and economics, is unreal.
>>
>>72039164

>when they're done 15 months in advance of a presidential election.

The polling was constant as the primaries were going on, which were spread out over the course of months
>>
>>72039164
> (ie the data they had to work with)
That's a weird way to say
> The data they projected their bias onto
Thread replies: 30
Thread images: 11
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK