>same actors
>same directors
>same writers
Why is it then that the first one is so much better than the other two? It's on a whole other level.
Seriously, the other two are shit.
>first movie, one person on poster
>second movie, two people
>third, three
Pottery
>>72012323
The first one is the best because it's literally a perfect movie. It's 100 percent flawless in every way. Back to the future II is a fucking great movie, but it's not perfect. Back to the future III is also great but it's a departure from the other two, They're not shit you hyperbolic cunt. And Taken as a whole, the trilogy is a cohesive, single story that's really really well done with intricate layers of contuity and interweaving of cause, effect, and gives them a feeling of deja vu rather than repetetiveness.
tl;dr. BTTF is 11/10 Perfection, BTTFII and III are still 10/10, but not as good as the first because they couldn't possibly be. all together it's fucking 20/10 GOAT series
>>72012323
The second one hasn't aged well. Third one was always shit.
Or maybe someone went back and fucked with it... great scott!
I love Back to the Future III
Parts II and III do get overshadowed by Part I being practically perfect but that doesn't make II and III bad movies. And as previously mentioned, as a whole it's a great trilogy.
>>72012323
>Seriously, the other two are shit.
>>72012493
Well said, friend. This was almost exactly what I was going to say but you saved me the trouble.
Because the first was the movie they wanted to make and the second and third are ones that were made because of "oh shit this movie is successful let's cash in"
>>72012323
>same actors
Did you watch the movies?
>>72014535
>first one ends on a cliffhanger and tells you that BTTF 2 is coming
YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT
III sucks donkey kong dong
>>72014856
>second one ends on a cliffhanger and tells you that BTTF3 is coming
Fixed it for you bro
>>72014764
holy shit
i have watched these milion times but never noticed
>>72014970
Yes exactly.
