Was this the best casting ever?

>>72002696
Perhaps.

Assuming Jackson doesn't count as Nick Fury, then yes. Gary Oldman as Gordon comes close though

>>72002696
Oh most definitely. With the sole exception of Harrison Ford as Han Solo.

>>72002696
Not quite my tempo, namsayin?

Almost the whole cast of Lotr

File: 1cd202ecf87f7b286363765e60e2ef362c809dc7bfbeb36981847a9764c073d6.jpg (338KB, 1184x592px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

338KB, 1184x592px

>>72002696
perhaps not as inspired but still

>>72002757
Bryan Cranston would make a better Gordon
Also I'm biased since I think Cranston makes a good VA for Gordon

File: J.K._Simmons_as_Jameson.gif (69KB, 345x285px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

69KB, 345x285px

>>72002696

Pretty much.

Should have given him his own trilogy.

Three movies about real, hard hitting journalism and sending Parker out to get pictures of super heroes for the trash sections of the paper (like 5 minutes of film time each movie, tops..)

Focus on the news, ignore the super weirdos (show them in the background of scenes, out of focus, flying, fighting, fuckin around...).

Would have been gold.

>>72002757

Does Jackson even count? Ultimate Fury was based on Jackson to begin with, why would they choose anyone else?

>>72004960
>give him his own trilogy.
>Three movies about real, hard hitting journalism

I'm surprisingly okay with this.

No one will ever be as good of a JJJ as J.K. Simmons.