Will he like new Ghostbusters?

>>71983648
Good question

What do you think, pleb

>>71983648

Damn Tech N9ne is getting old.

>>71983648
Nah, he's gonna call it a new bastion of racism or something.

Isn't he right wing and gay

>>71983648
Armond gets off on being contrarian but there are certain directors that he'll pan no matter what. For instance, the last time anyone liked the Wachowski brothers was The Matrix Reloaded but that hasn't stopped him from panning all of their films. He has consistently panned all of Paul Feig's films so I have no doubt he'll pan this one.

>>71983758
and?

>>71983648
why are you even asking

>>71983648
He will and /tv/ will be conflicted.

Maybe we'll start calling it kino ironically afterwards

>>71985841
Actually he probably wont as he isn't a fan of Feigs politics or any of his previous movies

>>71985841
No he won't

He will see through their pandering and call them out on it, screen cap it fags

>>71985882
I think he literally called all of feig's films garbage. He compared Spy to a toilet.

No but the /v/edditors and redditors that cry that hes a contrarian hipster will spam his review as proof that its a garbage flick which is going to be hilarious

>>71986018
This was better 2bh
http://www.avclub.com/article/armond-white-rings-in-another-year-by-calling-stev-106756

>>71986115
>who’d derided McQueen’s movie as “torture porn” in print —shouting, “You’re an embarrassing doorman and garbage man. Fuck you. Kiss my ass.”

I saw an interview where he denied this, but I could definitely believe it.