MISOGYNIST MANBABIES BTFO
- Home
- Board: /tv/ - Television & Film
- Reading: MISOGYNIST MANBABIES BTFO
MISOGYNIST MANBABIES BTFO
will pissbabies EVER recover???
>a girl thinks her opinion about comedy is relevant
That's like me giving a review about tampons.
>manohla
what kinda shitty name is this one
Wow, I really feel like I just had my ass handed to me. Oh my God. Help.
>>71938355
>for whites sensing decline
>emerging republican platform goes far to the right
>the g.o.p. party's over
>>71938355
>Girls Rule. Women are funny. Get over it.
Is the fucking writer a 5th grader?
I'm glad this movie bothers people
FREAKY
MAN
BABY
>>71938416
>>71938477
A Pulitzer nominee actually.
http://age-of-treason.com/2011/02/14/jews-run-hollywood-whites-get-the-blame/
>>71938530
What a butterface.
>she gets paid 100k a year by the new york times for biased half ass paid reviews
What kind of parents would name their kid Manohla? No wonder this cuck is miserable
>every positive review
>only talks about girl power casting and the meta narrative
Yeah I'm sure this flick is a real gem.
>>71938355
>That article
>Those headlines
jesus christ
Women are not funny though. That's not some political statement but just observing reality.
>>71938355
>those headlines
>>71938355
Get over what?
>>71938581
this movie proves otherwise, get over it you butthurt little bitch
>>71938355
You, supporters and the creators of this shit are beyond retarded.
Men and women are not equal.
Forcing this shit down peoples throats will not make the situation better for almost anyone.
>it's good when it panders to me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
>>71938723
It's not funny tho
>>71938355
>We can't review a movie objectively
>>71938355
Why can't people just admit that women didn't need to develop a sense of humor to attract sexual partners?
>>71938747
its Fresh score says otherwise
A woman calls men misogynist for having an opinion. Imagine that.
>>71938530
>A Pulitzer nominee actually.
Winning Pulitzers doesn't mean shit, even less not winning one.
>>71938793
> 47% Top Critics
wew lad
>>71938530
>>71938355
Hol' up, so you be saying she gets paid thousands for each of these bad reviews?
All the reviews are varying shades of "meh". Not good enough to be any sort of victory for women in comedy, not bad enough to put the whole thing to rest.
All this has done is show that putting a social justice spin on a movie's marketing is a viable business strategy, which is a lose for everyone.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTqX9o0rhLw
>>71938901
Yes.
>>71938880
>>71938793
do dummies really think humour is objective?
>Anon, are you going to watch ghostbusters?
>Nah
>Holy shit, why? are you a misogynist?
>No, is just that I'm not the target audience
>So you're a misogynist
Literally wouldn't care about this movie if they weren't insulting me every damn time
Robocop remake was shit, but they didn't insult me
Total recall remake was shit, but they didn't insult me
Literally every shitty remake ever was shit, but they didn't insult me once I said I wasn't going to watch it
>>71938975
All art is objective.
>>71938991
>implying white male pissbabies don't need to be insulted to know their place
If you recognize yourself in the description you're what's wrong with the world.
>>71938991
I bet they're kicking themselves for not making Robocop and Total Recall all female.
Hollywood has the golden formula now though. Get ready for similar stuntcasting remakes of successful 80's movies.
>BttF
>Escape From New York
>Big Trouble in Little China
>Beverly Hills Cop
>Indiana Jones
I wonder what will be first.
>>71939036
this
Great. Get ready for years of "feministsploitation" which patronises feminists and insults everyone else.
>>71939036
No it fucking isn't
>>71938477
>pulitzer prize for criticism
wew
anyway she didn't get it
>>71939164
Swearing only weakens your already weak argument.
>>71938355
sounds like an objective an unbiased review
>>71939144
At least the inevitable femsploitation genre parodies might eventually make it funny.
>>71938778
When evolutionary psychology stops being so reductionist
>>71938991
How about you give us a snippet of a real world conversation instead of one you just made up to smear people who disagree with as straw men?
>>71939280
> dat word salad
This movie is going to make history, first original female lead movie, it was about time.
>>71938530
She looks like the type of person who would laugh at women overcoming a male villain by shooting him in the penis.
>>71938355
MANCHILDREN GETTING BTFO
>>71938355
Someone needs to tell these guys they're going overboard and achieving opposite effect.
>>71938778
When you admit you're the uglier sex.
>>71938820
>implying you don't do the same
>>71938861
Said the loser.
>>71938520
AN INVISIBLE BED
>>71938991
yeah that really sounds like a conversation that actually happened
I fucking hate the Jew York Times.
>>71939555
A
FREAKY
GHOST
BED
>>71938530
>Pulitzer
Even winners have been known to shit on it
>Girls rule
I know feminism isn't exactly associated with self-awareness, but Jesus Christ.
wtf i love ghostbusters now
>>71938355
If they were funny, why didn't they come up with their own movie idea instead of taking Ghostbusters? Are their ideas not good enough to stand for themselves, they have to get a boost handicap from men?
>>71938723
if this were true, he wouldn't need to get over anything
he would just find it funny
>>71938355
>Our 'Ghostbusters' Review: Girls Rule.
this whole things is one giant circus for the rubes
identity politics in the west has been co-opted and bastardized into one giant rube circus
>GET OVER IT
get over what?
if you're funny, you're funny
if you're not, crying about it doesn't make it any funnier
is this so hard to comprehend ?
then again, this thread might be just S U C C
>Ghostbusters III. Is it really gonna happen? Should it happen? Well, if they made The Santa Clause III, Free Willy III, Home Alone III, Psycho III, The Neverending Story III, Problem Child III, and about 10,000 Scary Movie and American Pie sequels, all the crap that gets shat out of Hollywood's big fat fucking ass, I don't see why Ghostbusters III shouldn't get made. I grew up with those movies. I would love to see those guys put on the proton packs one more time. Even if the whole movie's just the Ghostbusters sitting around taking a shit, I'd go see it.
>>71939430
By whom? lol
>>71938355
>whites sensing decline
>far to the right
>last gasp of empire
Are they trying to foment a reactionary revolution?
Why would these people not fight when you're telling them it's their end and you're rooting for it?
Someone post the webm of that blonde bitch licking her lightsaber gun.
>You can say girls rule
>You can't say boys rule
>Men are better, get over it
Why is she such a sexist?
This is like deja vu all over again.
>>71940270
I wanna fuck that one on the right.
>>71940350
Considering where we are, I'm not surprised.
>>71940270
>implying
Don't be a daft cunt.
>>71938355
(((new york times)))
>>71938723
>Written and directed by a man
>>71940205
Never grew up mentally I suppose. Arrested development.
>>71940382
Earth?
>>71938910
Wow,what a fun group of people having an awesome time together.
>>71940474
Don't play dumb.
>>71938355
For fucks sake those are some buzzfeed tier headlines.
NYT has really gone down the shitter.
>>71940618
>"the welcomed and managed decline of the majority and how we can cheer for it without guilt through fabricated narratives of color divisions"
>>71938530
>feminist propaganda machine
>pulitzer winner
story checks out.
>>71941035
"are your employees getting uppity? Remind them that it's not all lives that matter, there's someone out there somewhere (not here because omg ugh) that needs and deserves things more than the majority of your peasants"
http://fortune.com/2016/02/25/mark-zuckerberg-black-lives-matter/
>>71940075
Fucking lying faggot.
>>71938355
YAAS QUEEN SLAY
>>71938355
>those top articles
Why won't the Jews just leave western civilization alone already fuck.
>>71941173
>http://fortune.com/2016/02/25/mark-zuckerberg-black-lives-matter/
Zuckerberg really is a little shit, goddamn
> movie studio looking to cashin on old name brand
>SJW make this their waterloo
way to pick your moments
>>71938355
jesus, its not that all women are not funny, its that this movie is not funny
brides maids cracked me up the whole way though
>this headline was published by the fucking new york times
the world is dead
>>71938355
Women can be funny
CAN
Not every comedy with a woman in it is automatically funny because muh feminism.
You gotta earn that shit.
>>71938540
You can't see her body, how can you call her a butterface
Opinion is fact. GET OVER IT.
>>71943028
it's almost like they're stupid or something
>>71943122
the times is a rag.
>>71943787
He meant ugly. No one would expect a 60-year-old(?) to have a DAMN! body. Butterface then is a misguided synonym for uggo.
>>71938355
Fucking retarded argument. "Girls rule". Okay, whatever the fuck that means. Generally if you have to say "we are awesome", then you aren't.
"Women are funny". Not as funny as men. And these women AREN'T funny, just like Adam Sandler and Kevin James aren't funny. Kaitlin Olson is funny, Tina Fey and Amy Poehler can both be funny sometimes.
This is just a shit movie. I'd be just as pissed if they put Adam Sandler's crew in as the new Ghostbusters. They could have done a mixed gender Ghostbusters crew with actual decent comedians and comediennes and it would have been 100 times better and would still be "equal".
>>71938355
NEW YORK MANHOLE OPINION IS RIGHT
GET OVER IT
>>71938355
Wtf, I hate men now!
Holy fuck
How will these reddit mra plebs recover??
>>71938355
why is it that every glowing review pretty much boils down to
>yeah the movie is garbage but you'll enjoy it so much you won't even care! AND THE FEMALE CAST IS GREAT!
?
>>71944561
Because it's agenda setting propaganda.
This movie is a political debate. I really want to see how the media will react when it flops.
>>71939280
If you don't give evolutionary psychology at least some credit you might as well be a fucking creationist.
>>71940270
Spice JoJos
>>71944561
Because they know you children of /v/eddit will keep the """discussion""" (crying and memements) going
>>71943146
Who cares if they're funny or not. What other demographic allows you to both pay them less while turning their inclusion into a marketing strategy in order for a quick cash grab due to nostalgia reinforced by politically motivated reviews.
anyone who must say "I am funny" is not funny
>>71941258
He wanted to see the original cast, explicitly.
>>71940350
far right and second from left the best
>>71940075
But the only thing it has to do with the original ghostbusters is the name and also it has ghosts in it.
>>71939036
that's a weird way to spell subjective.
>>71939389
>original
hah
>>71938355
""Our"" 'Ghostbusters' ""review""
>>71940000
Hit the nail on the head.
Can we at least agree that Kate McKinnon is a sexy little minx? (still won't be watching it though)
>>71938744
kek I love this video
>>71947224
Nah, just the less terrible in that 2/10 overall quartet
>>71938565
>AGENDA FUELED TURBO DYKE FEMINIST
>NEW YORK TIMES MOVIE CRITIC
CHECKS OUT
>>71947224
>sexy
>>71938355
What is the Jews' endgame?
>>71946853
"OUR POLITICAL STATEMENT ABOUT RAPECULTURE" --I MEAN MOVIE REVIEW ABOUT WHATEVER
BY THE WAY VOTE HILLARY YOU SHITLORDS
>>71938910
Who is the negro? Does he appear in the movie?
>>71947424
vengeance, and rule over the rest of humanity like cattle.
Their god is actually an vengeful ancestor spirit. and, like him, they are vengeful and bitter.
this shit won't last forever though.
BILLION DOLLAR IDEA
FEMINIST GHOST ALIENS
>>71938910
this pic is so perfedt it's insane.
On the foreground, the spectacle, the show, whatever, in the background, the abyss, swallowing all and everything.
>>71947535
Fuck you're new
>>71938355
>Emerging Republican Platform Goes Far to the Right
Jesus.
>>71947580
This.
Then it moves onto White genocide but we'll strike back before that happens.
>>71938530
oh I'm laffin'
>>71938910
>that nigger's shirt
litteraly how in the fuck do you put on that shirt in the morning knowing you're gonna meet a dying little girl without going, "oh wait, that's kinda fucked up"....
>>71938355
>those headlines
Jesus fuck, this was once a respectable media outlet
>>71947389
Ya sexy, like I'd bone her six ways from Sunday, never said she's drop dead gorgeous, duh
>>71940075
> I would love to see those guys put on the proton packs one more time.
>those guys
I'm sorry, what was your point?
>>71938910
>All this has done is show that putting a social justice spin on a movie's marketing is a viable business strategy,
depends if it does well at the box office
>>71939625
>>71939294
>>71939389
>>71939430
>>71939506
>>71939999
>>71940538
>>71939280
>>71944850
>>71938793
>>71938742
WOW
LOOK AT ALL THESE WHITE KNIGHTS
>>71938910
>All this has done is show that putting a social justice spin on a movie's marketing is a viable business strategy, which is a lose for everyone.
Liberal women are easy to trigger & exploit. Hollywood studio executive are absolute GENIUSES in their strategy
1) Make crap movie with all female cast
2) Get all the women worked up & triggered
3) Blame men
4) Sit back & watch as the triggered cows shill your movie for you
Liberal Women are so easy to manipulate. Just like the blaxploitation films of the '80s.
>>71948122
>Liberal Women are so easy to manipulate.
Hollywood execs know exactly how to play the brain dead liberal SJW crowd and get them all worked up.
wasn't it just a decade ago these SJWs and Feminists were fighting AGAINST corporate greed and hollywood CEOs?
Now liberals are being used by Hollywood to pan their shitty movies... and the liberals have no self awareness that they're being used.
>>71948146
>wasn't it just a decade ago these SJWs and Feminists were fighting AGAINST corporate greed and hollywood CEOs?
3rd wave feminists are in it for attention. period.
>>71939089
>I wonder what will be first.
>Big Trouble in Little China
This one. Starring The Rock. There are just so many ways to fuck it up I don't know where to start.
>>71948212
>>71948146
stop posting this shit every thread, i agree with you specifically on that point and I'M cringing.
Peter Shilletta at /film said the film sucked. That dude likes anything.
>>71947424
Imagine Satan ruling the world and how he would demoralize and induce despair in every single one of us who knows what's right and holy and true.
>>71938530
Ok /tv/, I need to know.
What's the over/under on the number of cats she owns?
I'm thinking 4
>>71938355
>Manohla
stop reading here
>>71938355
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFELNIpeTjY
>>71938910
Does Paul have autism?"
>>71948122
This is the new normal. I've heard women and nu-males proclaim their intentions to see the movie multiple times (or at least buy extra tickets) in order to inflate numbers. The same people actually admit that the movie doesn't even look good, they're just interested in making a statement.
>these headlines
I remember when I was a liberal white male. Man, that shit was embarrassing.
Liberal white dudes here, how do you still do it?
>>71950300
It looks like Pixels with women and a Ghostbusters logo, don't kid yourself.
>>71948469
>Starring The Rock
>A Hawaiian
There's the first way they're fucking it up. The whole point of Kurt Russel's character in Big Trouble In Little China is that he's supposed to be the a-typical white american action hero who doesn't realize that he's not the protagonist in this Chinese Kung Fu adventure that sprung up around him.
>It takes a man to do female comedy right
Am I the only one that finds this ironic?
pitty reviews.
>>71950392
>right
>>71950490
>>71950392
I don't think he's in agreement, he's just making the point that it could be seen as ironic that this supposed feminist movie is written by a problematic boyclub shitlord.
>>71950490
DONT FORGET """""""""""MAN"""""""""""""""
TRY EFFEMINATE FEMKUCK FUCCBOI
>>71950330
THE DEGENERATED MIND OF THE KUCK IS UNKNOWABLE TO NON KUCKS
>>71950614
Now THAT'S a numale.
>>71950458
That's all they are. Nobody can really point out anything specifically good about the movie other than it's "funny" yet they can go into detail about the movie's flaws.
This is hilarious
>/v/ babbies pretending they're /tv/
>/v/ babbies pretending they weren't waiting all fucking week for this to be rotten
>/v/ babbies ignoring this morning and their countdown to it being blown out by critics
>/v/ babbies are now crying check the top critics
>/v/ babbies are now saying imdb matters
>/v/ babbies are now trying to revision what they said
This literally can't get any worse
Whats the next flavor of the month flick coming out?
>>71950330
I live in a country with rational lefties and righties so I do pretty well. There weren't any insane conservatives with any power to mind break the left into the mess you call the US.
>>71950686
probably suicide squad
>>71950490
>didnt see the irony in an ironic post
>>71950686
What exactly is wrong with top critics?
>>71950686
>b-b-but /v/
>>71938355
>The NYT, a former newspaper.
>Relevent opinions.
>>71950686
When did /v/ become our #1 boogie man?
>>71950870
When /co/ invaded.
So what happens when the movie bombs at the box office and these fucks have to come to terms with the real world's disinterest
>>71950870
Long before this link and long before you even joined the site my friend
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/go%20back%20to%20%2Fv%2F/order/asc/
>>71950963
THE LIB-O-SPHERE SJW ECHO BUBBLE IS SO DELUDED ITS HILARIOUS
>>71938355
If you have to tell your readers that they are funny you misogynistic shitlords, they probably aren't funny.
>>71938355
I'm so over it that sometimes I forget the movie is coming out. Mission accomplished. They don't need to worry about us MRA Gamer Grabblers shitlords stinking up the air at their theaters.
>>71939089
Shaft remake with Leslie Jones
>>71950735
But no matter how the right try to be annoying, they just don't have the power or the huge microphone. And the left is 100% right, the right is going away by their voter base just dying off slowly and not breeding.
With 95% of all media being left, you will be annoyed by the left just by the sheer number of retarded articles.
>>71950686
Back to your /co/ntainment board.
>>71950779t
Nothing if plebs didn't cry that all of RT didn't matter when they don't agree with them
>>71951215
I'm on my containment board, tourist
Are you?
>>71939089
Bttf can't be remade until the director and lead writer die and this feminism meme may die out by then.
>>71950963
They will try and make some kind of social media witch hunt out of it but ultimately it won't mean anything, since SJWs don't have normie friends. SJWs are just anti-social spergs of a different variety.
>>71951236
Top critics seems like a better measurement considering it filters out a lot of the hacks from no name websites and blogs.
This is the age of white women and their beautiful black boyfriends. My black husband is an amazing human being, far more so than the racist, sexist white neckbeards on here.
Why are you white boys even that jelly and spiteful anyway? You had your time in history, now it's time to step aside.
>>71951540
>black husband
Statistically nonexistent.
>>71951339
It doesn't matter considering the plebs of this board cried for months that RT in full did not matter.
>>71938355
>FEIG
oy vey!
>>71938530
>http://age-of-treason.com/2011/02/14/jews-run-hollywood-whites-get-the-blame/
>"i am married to a Jewish man"
/pol/ right again
>>71950303
They'll give up after a single showing thankfully. Do they ever finish anything they claim to care about, or hell, even start it for that matter? A few rubber wrist bands and a blog post and their virtue is sealed. There's no way they'll deliberately watch a bad movie several times to "make a change".
>>71938355
Wasn't it written by a man?
>>71938910
>implying this will break 30mil opening weekend
If anything, it'll be a lesson that not all buzz is positive buzz.
>>71951917
Unfortunately there's nothing else coming out this week that I'm aware of. It might make money purely based on the lack of competition.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ghostbusters-denied-release-china-910563
>>71947535
Sadly, that actor was killed after a four year-old wandered into her home.
just saw it, Spy was a better comedy than this
>>71950614
>this hairline
>this lack of bulge
yep, that's a 'numale'
>>71947535
THE ONE IN THE BACK?
UNCREDITED GHOST #4
>>71952264
What the fuck is up with its eyes ?
>>71952036
It's ogre
Heh it's just old ((((Manohla)))) and her girl power fantasies
>>71938355
>this woman makes thousands a year
>you're still a worthless NEET that still relies on mommy's internet and obsessing over a shitty movie's failure
/tv/ BTFO count: 170,877,102,288,003,729,682,875,539
Recovery is not possible.
>>71938355
We did it Canadabros!
>>71950969
This is the second time I've seen someone link this as if it was proof, but those people were stupid then as they're stupid now. A lot of people on 4chan crossboard, pretending that a subsection of the population SUDDENLY DISCOVERED you on the same website is the height of stupidity.
>>71950614
I don't understand. He's gonna kill them all with his hammer?
>>71952739
Better homelessness than being a sjw/feminist
>>71952739
ENTIRE THOUSANDS?
THIS MOVIE IS AN ARTIFACT OF THE PREEMINENT CULTURAL CANCER OF OUR TIME, THE SJW AGENDA
IT'S BOX OFFICE PROJECTIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN REVISED DOWN DUE TO FOCUS TESTING
AND IT WILL UNDER PERFORM THOSE NUMBERS EVEN FURTHER THIS WEEKEND
>>71938355
>new york times
Quite literally jewish propaganda.
>>71938355
>Jew York Post gives a positive review of a SJW remake of a film that's considered a classic.
>girls
Pretty sexist to not call them women.
>>71947795
You sound like you're incredibly fat and probably smell really bad.
>>71938910
>that photo
>that guy's shirt
This is better shot than the movie.
>mfw i'd rather see Progressive's Jamie and Flo lead a ghostbusters movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cin-bvwIaIk
>>71940270
except spice world was actually entertaining
>>71954404
I doubt you've even seen the new Ghostbusters yet.
>>71938355
Girls do rule. Women are funny. But none of the ones that do are involved in this.
>>71954694
>Girls rule
lmao
>Women are funny
As with men, they can be or no not. General statements are deceiving
>>71938355
They're using that headline in all the commercials now
We're living in the bad end of WWII. Hitler should have won, he would have prevented all of this. Now we're stuck in a world run by Jews.
has /tv/, /pol/, /r/kotakuinaction ever been more BTFO?
>>71938355
>manohila
Hahaha, fuckin sad.
New York Times writer
>actually seen the movie
>actually has touched a woman
>actually went to school
4chan, gamergate, woman hating /pol/tard
>never seen the movie
>never touched a woman
>only source of education is /pol/ from badly sourced infographics
Gee I wonder who is more reliable for movie reviews
>>71955078
Maybe the lost rabbit is?
>>71955078
>/pol/tard
its confirmed redditors
i'm not even memeing
>>71950300
>new star trek is worse than new ghostbusters
>>71955078
>badly sourced infographics
Show one /pol/ inforgraphic that lacks proper citations.
>>71955078
>tfw you want to support women but posts like this make it much harder
Still won't go see it.
the question is, should i torrent it or should i ignore it
>>71955453
That's not a feel, you fucking eejit. That's literally what the poster's trying to do
>>71939144
i really hoped we would go for chicksploitation, its rather aimed at women having a girls nights out than feminists having a patriachry hating pow wow
>>71957025
We might have that too. Anecdotal evidence here but a lot of chicks adore Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and it's a pretty decent showBut they can't stand Orange is the New Black
>Boys Rule. Men Are Funny. Get Over it.
JUST
IMAGINE
If you tell someone- even worse, a group of people, or even worse a whole gender- to "GET OVER IT", you can be pretty sure that getting over whatever isn't a thing that is going to happen.
>>71957351
Quiet pussy.
>The New York Times
Literally not even worth lining the bottom of a birdcage with.
Probably even more worthless than Time at this point, which is an achievement.
>>71957506
Do I need to repeat myself?
>liking the first one made you a nerd and looked down upon
>not liking the second one makes you a woman hater
>>71957469
>which is an achievement
So then, it IS worth lining the bottom of a birdcage with? Make up your mind
>>71957609
Your post makes not any sense at all to that post
>>71957657
You just don't know when to shut the fuck up, do you?
>>71957692
The fuck are you on about, retard?
>>71955476
Nobody else is
I might go see Pets with muh girr if we have the time
>>71957719
That's it, final warning. Do not reply or I will fucking eviscerate you
>>71938910
>spawncamping.jpeg
>>71938355
No one questioned if women were funny, they questioned if it was worth seeing a reboot; a rehash piece of shit from washed out Paul Feig.
I saw the movie btw, a total waste of money and time.
>>71957822
I'm waiting, lil bitch. Anytime
>>71957879
Not that guy but you better back off, man
MPAA stats
>cater to millennial SJW
>they dont go to the theater anyways
feig's other "works" have been generally targeting the older female pop ("chick flick")
>whos is feig targeting?
old school fans of the series?
nope burnt that bridge
>>71957866
>I saw the movie btw, a total waste of money and time.
STOP REVIEW RAPING ME SHITLORD
>>71957923
Oh, you're his girlfriend, right? Fucking sissy faggot, I'm gonna fuck your shit up too. Watch out
>>71958077
Yeah well... nice dubs
>>71938355
>Reading TNYT
>Listening to Manohla Dargis
>>71939036
shit, you're right
>>71958017
kek
Alright sorry for wasting your time
>>71940075
>Even if the whole movie's just the Ghostbusters sitting around taking a shit, I'd go see it.
This perfectly encapsulates how bad sony fucked up. Literally all they needed to do was have the original actors playing their original characters and the fans would see it regardless of plot or anything else.
>>71958354
Bill Murray wanted nothing to do with it.
Ghostbusters 3 would be just as bad as this remake anyway.
>>71958316
>Literally "look at me!"
>First things first: Tilda Swinton, as if you needed me to tell you this, is not an innovative artist. Not only are images of sleepers nothing new in art, from Vermeer and Watteau to Courbet and Warhol, but sleeping in a gallery holds no special novelty. It’s been over four decades since Chris Burden, the fearless and confrontational California performance artist, presented his Bed Piece (1972), in which he stripped off, lay on a mattress, and snuggled up.1 Unlike Swinton, who comes to the museum on random days and only remains on view for a couple of hours, Burden had the tenacity to stay in the bed for the entire length of his exhibition—for 22 straight days. “I had a strange power around me, sort of like a bubble or a repulsive magnet,” Burden explained in a 1974 film that documents the work. “Most people wouldn’t come close to me. In fact, most people seemed frightened.”
Burden understood that performing an act as anodyne as sleeping can be elevated to terrifying extremes: quite the opposite of Swinton’s game. And other artists who have slept in galleries, from Marina Abramović to Chajana denHarder, have done so in order to discomfort viewers; Swinton, on the other hand, seems to ask only for quiet contemplation. But if quiet contemplation is your thing, then there are paintings upstairs that’ll be much more rewarding.
Swinton’s MoMA performance is not, in fact, even an original. It’s a remake of an earlier version of The Maybe; the wall text at the museum gives the date of the work as “1995/2013.”
>>71958478
But at least wouldn't promote another chapter in this pathetically manufactured culture war
>>71958478
>Bill Murray wanted nothing to do with it.
And yet he got strong armed into this one
>Ghostbusters 3 would be just as bad as this remake anyway.
You're insane.
People who shit on the new ghostbusters are manchilds(or manchildren) not because they saying the new movie is shit but because they're saying the first one is good, there's no reason to like the original movie if you're over 14 yrs old.
im glad desu it's fun to see the tears of those whiny MRA's
>wahh there's a woman in my movie!!!
grow the fuck up
>>71938355
>New York times
>This is news in 2016, the year the most corrupt politician is getting away with carelessly losing of national security entrusted to her and will be voted President in less than 4 months
Anyone who says there is no conspiracy is part of the conspiracy or blind.
>>71938355
Meanwhile, in the real world:
Honestly at this point there's probably not one single fair review out there. I checked the movie on IMDB and it had like a three point something, I don't wan't to defend shit but it isn't that bad, it's probably like a 6 on IMDB score if you consider the same idiots gave civil war and deadpool an 8. Every review out there is biased they're either giving t a 0 or 10 which is fucking retarded furthermore the original movie wasn't even that good it was a 7 at the most.
>>71957154
>likes Unbreakable
>hates Orange New Black
not sure what to make of it. Orange started out kind of strong but got progressively weaker. Unbreakable had a good pilot and almost immediately went to crap.
The people who shit on this movie are at the sime time saying GoT is the best show of all time and watching Marvel movies, I'm not saying the new Ghosbusters isn't bad but just about that for a second.
>>71958601
>And yet he got strong armed into this one
In the leaked Sony emails they were literally talking about taking legal action if he didn't get involved.
I don't know what kind of case they'd have but I guess he decided it's not worth the hassle of resisting.
>You're insane
You think Ackoroyd is capable of shitting out something good?
>>71938861
get a nomination then smartass
>>71959021
This, too be completely honest senpai.
It's probably a mediocre shit that's not worth watching, but it's probably not worse then your average Dreamworks movie.
>>71958884
>Richard Roeper
Oh I see. A white male, replubican and misogynist. This review is not valid.
>>71959163
All it takes is being jewish or sucking the right jewish cocks. Neither of which require any real skill.
Consider how a stupid cuck like Bernie Sander got as far in politics as he did. It's only because his fellow tribesman helped him along.
>>71959250
Are Ebert and Roeper both fucking dead?
>>71950300
He seriously believes the only thing people really liked about fucking Ghostbusters was Bill's performance as Venkman? This reeks of revisionism.
The problem is that nowadays everyone is entitled to an opinion even worse they can post it on websites that millions of people read including SJWs and manchilds who know nothing about movies.
It should become law to not be allowed to post your opinion unless you have watched the top 250 on IMDB and the top 50 on letterboxd (not saying this makes you an expert but at least you would filter 99% of the crap opinions out there)
>>71938401
underrated
made me kek
>>71959320
>It should become law to not be allowed to post your opinion unless you have watched the top 250 on IMDB and the top 50 on letterboxd (not saying this makes you an expert but at least you would filter 99% of the crap opinions out there)
I like this idea IN PRINCIPLE, but IN REALITY if a rule like this was started, then sjw shit would artificially rise to the top of both of those lists.
>>71939089
>>Indiana Jones
>all female
So Tomb Raider then?
>>71959253
what about the normal christian whites who win pullitzers? you faggots always use the same excuse let me guess you're poor, retarded, in a shitty college and ugly also because you're not jew??
>>71955453
>tfw /tv/ posters makes me feel more positive towards SJWs
The irony is that you guys are so full of vitriol you act like morons, i.e. like the SJWs. I guess if you stare down in the abyss the abyss stares right back at you. If you guys want to take the moral and cultural highground, at least act it
>>71959414
>ugly also because you're not jew??
Are you kidding? Most jews are ugly as fuck. And the Christians who make it these days are usually shitlib cucks. I mean it used to be a little fair, but look how they eviserated Mel Gibson.
>>71959458
Go cry somewhere else, cunt.
>>71959629
Trump won't win
>>71938355
>>71938530
>there is no such thing as paid reviewers
okay then
>>71959653
Nice strawman fag
>>71959478
The problem if you didn't catch it is that you faggot blame everything on jews which is beyond paranoia it's simply idiotic. The pullitzer has credibility you want to call it a meme or shit on a professional level like the oscars and grammies(We all know talyor winning best album grammy is BS) but it still is better than probably anythin you'll achieve in your life and it does take some talent, no amateur or nobody (like you) will get a nomination, so yeah she's better than you faggot, whether she's right about this is an entire different but you're no one to dismiss an entire series of awards just because you read some paranoid shit on /pol/.
>>71959749
A strawman implies there's an argument to begin with, retard. Way to come off as a basement dweller
>>71959743
Too outlandish to be true. Good shop, though
>>71959743
I think you took a quote out of context, that being said I would think the movie deserves someting around the 60% but I guess 75% for a normie isn't that far off
>>71959753
>The problem if you didn't catch it is that you faggot blame everything on jews which is beyond paranoia it's simply idiotic.
The jews literally own 5 of the 6 major news networks and have strong influence over all of Hollywood and the News in American despite only making up about 2% of the population, and they love to pretend to be white people and apologize for their white privillege, when they SHOULD be apologizing for their jewish privillege.
Even this Huffpo article made by damage-control shit libs admit that jews control most media
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/do-jews-control-the-media_b_753227.html
It has the disclaimer that "its not a conspiracy guys" which of course it doesn't have to be. The jewish tribe need only look out for their own kind. They don't need organized plans shared carefully with eachother. It's enough to know that most American jews identify with Israel and being jewish more then with America and being an American citizen.
>paranoid shit on /pol/
Have you actually researched the claims made on /pol/? They're usually pretty well cited.
There's no point in replying to the rest of your post, because you're literally just saying the Pullitzer has credibility because even though other prizes don't have credibility Pullizters are different because you said so.
>>71938910
>kid literally dies
>>71960615
OMG NEPOTISM IS A CONSPIRACY
>>71960667
"conspiracy" I literally never used that once in my entire post EXCEPT IN QUOTATIONS, shortly before explaining that it doesn't HAVE TO BE a conspiracy, because the jewish interests pushed with jewish nepotism are highly destructive to American society, even if they're not strictly speaking a completely organized cabal.
Nice strawman though.
>>71960615
>Have you actually researched the claims made on /pol/? They're usually pretty well cited.
Yeah, I like the ones about Hitler and Churchill with fake quotes.
>>71938401
Dildos, more like it.
>>71960730
No, I mean that retards are actually buying into the "LEL CONSPIRACY THEORY" excuse even though it literally doesn't have to be anything else than pure old fashioned nepotism.
Jesus Christ, even a Paki immigrant in the UK is going to get help from the Paki community to open his cornershop (and they'll discourage others from doing so in various ways), but they managed to convince retards that this somehow doesn't apply when it comes to le holy ppl.
>>71960873
The problem is that le holy ppl have wormed their way deep into our society, and while they may not be inherently more destructive then any other nepotisic un-American group within our borders, they are by far the most successful, and therefore the most dangerous.
>>71938910
FUcking epic... Fucking the girls ar. wow Im thinking hard about how hard these girls have it lOl!
>>71940075
"Hey guys, I don't want to see ghostbusters."
>WHINY MAN-BABY
>>71939407
underrated post
>>71960615
You sound autistic desu senpai, I'm not saying jew don't have power or that SJWs are right but damm dude you're pretty much fucked in the head at this point.
>>71961239
>everything you said is true
>wtf i hate you now
>>71961239
>You sound stupid.
>I don't actually disagree with anything you said, and I don't think sjw's or jews are good, but you are stupid because...?
>>71960615
The problem idiot, is not your stupid pol propaganda which I'm sure you'll defend and believe till the day you die.
The problem lies in that you consider your opinion more trustworthy than the pullitzers as an institution, have you even read the last pullitzer nominees on fiction?? no you probably haven't even read the last winners, you probably haven't even read anything outside the syllabus of your college or highschool yet you're supossed to be 100% right about the pullitzers being shit because jews are x% of the population and they are x% of the writers, moviestars or whatever suits your stupid argument, even if you're right it doesn't take the stupidity of what you said first, you're just trying to change the subject.
>>71961293
samefaging that hard
>>71959653
literally not an argument
>>71961449
>The problem lies in that you consider your opinion more trustworthy than the pullitzers as an institution,
Why should I trust a faceless institution that was started by Joseph Pulitzer who's just some guy who started a successful newspaper company. It doesn't mean he has any kind of objective taste.
I mean I do read plenty of classics from Mark Twain, to Charles Dickens to Tolstoy. but I don't see how me reading books has any impact on whether or not I should trust the Pullitzer institution and you give literally no reason. You're literally just posting angry rants, which is all you really need since your point of view is already mainstream and accepted by most people, but imagine if I did the same you were doing? Imagine if all my posts read as follows:
Your a fuckin idiot, with your dum normy propaganda. You think just cuz some dum news site says something it's TRUE??? Didn't you even read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, ya fuckin' twit?? I bet you think yer 100% right about everything and smart then all of us pollacks cuz you read everything you need to know on facebook, ya ebic cuck!
>>71961449
>even if you're right it doesn't take the stupidity of what you said first, you're just trying to change the subject.
WHAT?
>even if your right... you're still stupid.
WHAT?
>>71961449
wtf i hate /pol/ now.
>>71961764
lol your pretty mad.
>>71939074
nice try to
>>71938520
BUSTIN
>BUSTIN
BUSTIN
>BUSTIN
BUSTIN
>BUSTIN
BUSTIN
>BUSTIN
BUSTIN
>>71961800
even if he's right about jew having too much power, he's wrong about dismissing an entire institution.
Learn to read you stupid fuck
>>71961764
>I do read plenty of classics from Mark Twain, to Charles Dickens to Tolstoy
>Your a fuckin idiot
Yeah sure you do, bud
>>71961764
>You're literally just posting angry rants, which is all you really need since your point of view is already mainstream and accepted by most people
No, I'm just saying you have no authority to call one of the most respected awards shit, also I don't see how reading some highschool books and Tolstoy makes your opinion regarding anything related to literature anything more than foolish.
![5h8yJZR[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/PqPXLb5.png "5h8yJZR[1]")
