>Oh my
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/justice_league/warner-bros-found-guilty-of-paying-for-positive-game-reviews-a143375
They have also been doing this for their flicks but they are TOO shit.
>>71920878
I knew it!
What I find strange is that WB generally produced decent to good games
Why did they need to do this?
>>71920878
IT DIDN'T HELP THEM!!
>>71920913
Batman: Arkham Knight was a huge hit to their PR.
nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares nobody cares
>>71920878
>Remembers those absurd rumors that Disney was paying critics for good reviews of their Marvel superhero films and bad reviews for its competitors? Well, it turns out Warner Bros. was guilty of such a practice, at least for its video games. The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) just found WB culpable in complaints of paying notable YouTube inlfuencers for producing videos presented as game reviews that were actually sponsored content.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhaahahahahahaha
>>71920878
DKEKS IN SUICIDE WATCH!
Twenty years in videogames, how many good guy are left? How many stayed that way?
>>71920980
Why?
>>71920878
DELETE THIS!
>>71921002
Ha
Where were you when the shittiest moviegame got BTFO?
CDPR a shit, Cyberpunk never ever thank fuck
>>71921002
>>71921028
You can't make this up. All this time, they were paying off critics and reviewers.
>>71920878
>Corruption can't even get you good reviews for Batman vs Superman
>>71921146
PC version was FUCKED UP
Think Brendan Fraser in game form
>>71921002
sup WB
If one company is guilty, they all are. That's how these industries work.
>the 29% was AFTER the paid reviews
you CANNOT
i repeat
CANNOT
make this shit up
>paying for good video game reviews
Doesn't everyone do that? I was under the impression that all vidya review sites were soulless shills.
>>71921354
>tfw you've become the face of corruption
>>71921430
e-everyone is doing is doing it, I-I'm sure.
>>71920963
>you go to the movies to watch video games
>>71921524
>video games
well...
>>71921503
>Doesn't everyone do that? I was under the impression that all vidya review sites were soulless shills.
I forget the journalist who left Gamespot for this very reason, he went public, literally no one cared... This was easily 6 years ago.
I don't see why everyone is so surprised about this.
Everyone wants to make money, however they can any way they can regardless of their effect on others.
>>71921603
I think people are more surprised that a company got caught with their pants down.
>>71920878
fw 10 years ago nobody would've been needed to pay to say that a monolith game is good
>>71921603
Its more to do with the fact that DC Fans in this board have been parroting the fact that Disney paid critics and now WB/DC got caught paying for favorable reviews in their games.
I mean, I have no doubt Disney does it too but at least they haven't gotten caught.
>>71920878
shut it down
>>71920878
But Chaim and Shlomo were on 4chan for years telling us there's no way big companies pay for reviews. It's just a /v/ meme. Corruption doesn't real everyone, just buy the games.
If this is true, could it be, I mean might it possibly be the case.. do you guys think that..
These same companies pay for movie reviews???
So what games exactly?
>>71921831
shadow of mordor, maybe something else
>>71921831
The Watcher 33 1/2: The Revenant Hunter
>>71921564
Jeff Gerstman, who went on to make Giant Bomb and become just as soulless as his former employers
GAMERGATE WINS AGAIN
>>71921028
>>Remembers those absurd rumors
No bias here.
>>71920913
They just paid LPers for positive coverage, not reviewers since Lets Players arent critics
>>71921910
Ah, they had a small window of popularity but their shit site was holding them back hard.
Also, what a bunch of fucktards. Their content was like 45 mins... How do you not understand fucking the internet.
>>71920878
Turns out no one in the world liked BvS.
Wow, so even the few positive BvS reviews were shills.
And DCucks say reviewers are Marvel shills. LMFAO.
>>71921553
What Dragon Ball movie is this?
>>71923731
you didn't read the article.
LMFAO.
>>71921943
Hi Warner Bros.
Take that shit back to >>>/v/
>>71924257
Whatever DC shill ROFLMFAOAOFA
If you think they don't also do this for their movies, along with severe Astro turfing on places like /tv/ and paying for preferential moderation and extras like stickies then you're insane.
>>71924513
Agreed.
It's been an open secret for some time.
The irony.
>>71921423
They had only themselves to blame for outsourcing it instead of just pushing it ahead a couple of months
fucking /v/ kiddies, nobody cares.
>>71920878
WB isn't the only ones doing this at all. Every development or publishing group in any aspect of the entertainment industry has paid a review or five thousand here and there. Games, technology, movies, music, etc.
>>71924972
there's a pretty huge difference between "open secret" and "proven in a court of law."
>>71926536
Prove it.
>>71920878
>bribed video game reviews
everyone does it. WB was just stupid enough to get caught.
>>71926637
Do you have all night? There's been drama with Game reviews like this going on before there was a "gamergate"
>DCucks on suicide watch
>>71921228
Agreed based Anon. The Witcher is fucking garbage.
>>71926637
RockStar Games, pretty much every major publisher.
>>71921504
>become the face of corruption
>even your paid shills can't give your product good scores
>>71924513
Of course everyone does it.
Most of them just aren't WB levels of retarded to actually get caught.
