X-Men

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
X-Men 2016-07-12 21:20:33Post No. 71920197
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: x-men-apocalypse-quicksilver-rescue-scene-3.jpg (586KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

586KB, 1200x630px

X-Men Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:20:33 Post No. 71920197 [Report]

Which movie had the better Quicksilver scene?

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:22:09 Post No.71920234
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:22:09 Post No.71920234 [Report]

DoFP

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:22:10 Post No.71920235
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:22:10 Post No.71920235 [Report]

>>71920197
I think the first one was better. I liked the second, but we saw it before in Futurama.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:23:01 Post No.71920260
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:23:01 Post No.71920260 [Report]

First one was better, but I like the second one more because of Sweet Dreams.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:24:02 Post No.71920293
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:24:02 Post No.71920293 [Report]

>>71920197
DoFP was better, but the 2nd one was entertaining.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:24:43 Post No.71920313
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:24:43 Post No.71920313 [Report]

File: QuickCIAver.png (789KB, 881x552px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

789KB, 881x552px

>new X-Men movie set in the 90s
>Quicksilver shows up
>time freeze
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZYgIrqELFw

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:26:02 Post No.71920345
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:26:02 Post No.71920345 [Report]

anyone who picks the 2nd is a retard with ultra pleb taste
at least in the 1st one the scene seems appropriate to the scenario, in the 2nd one they just added it for the most cheap reasons possible

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:34:32 Post No.71920615
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:34:32 Post No.71920615 [Report]

i liked both of them

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:36:04 Post No.71920655
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:36:04 Post No.71920655 [Report]

Apocalypse.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:36:12 Post No.71920657
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:36:12 Post No.71920657 [Report]

2nd was shit, also he's op and it hurts the movies

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:54:29 Post No.71921175
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:54:29 Post No.71921175 [Report]

>>71920197

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:57:25 Post No.71921262
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 21:57:25 Post No.71921262 [Report]

>>71920657
>he's op
Not when his leg gets impaled/broken (can't quite remember)

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:00:18 Post No.71921357
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:00:18 Post No.71921357 [Report]

>>71920313
this would be perfect

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:21:17 Post No.71921951
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:21:17 Post No.71921951 [Report]

File: Quickass.png (267KB, 237x427px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

267KB, 237x427px

>>71920197
>tfw two on-screen Quicksilvers near enough simultaneously and neither do him justice

*BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPP*

OOOOPS, SORRY WAN-CHAN. NOW HUFF IT ALL UP LIKE A GOOD IMOUTO.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:25:12 Post No.71922079
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:25:12 Post No.71922079 [Report]

Second is way better.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:26:43 Post No.71922122
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-12 22:26:43 Post No.71922122 [Report]

>>71920197
Angry birds