And so it begins
> 6.9
>>71839176
69 nice one op
>>71839176
>has to damage control by saying the actresses were good
>>71839176
>having to clarify that womyn are not the problem
Has it come to this?
>the new squad
>a plus
So they are implying that these whales are better than the old one or what? Else it couldnt possibly be a plus.
>ghosts of its past
Wtf does that mean? "Compared to the original this is horseshit"?
no, now it ends
>>71839176
It will be out of theaters by the end of July, except in countries where it hasn't been released yet.
Ship it.
Seriously who is the audience for this movie? Tumblr feminists. They will be done with it with a quickness.
Maybe then they'll go play in the ball pit.
You can tell they wanted to pander to both sides as hard as possible.
>t-the women are not the problem. Some of my best friends are women
The first one sucked, and this one looks much worse.
>>71839225
More like, they can't talk about the actresses being at fault without being called sexist.
Pretty much most of the reviews that have came out go through the lengths of avoiding to talk bad about the actresses even to the point of saying that it was the Directors' fault.
Skyward Sword was better than this
>>71839176
>6.9
Nuo, naow eet endz.
>the new squad
>plus
top cuck
>the new squad
>plus
>ghosts of its past
>minus
uhhh
>Though Jones gets some of the film’s most memorable lines, her character channels a shameful racial stereotype — one that traces back to the days of blackface when it amused audiences to see African-American characters spook easily, bugging their eyes and running for their lives whenever confronted with a ghost
ABSOLUTE KINOGRAPHY CONFIRMED
>the ghostbusters themselves are great
ye im sure they are
It's amazing seeing all these people desperately latching onto even the faintest silver linings (or conjuring them out of nothing) just to be able to say it wasn't COMPLETELY trash so they aren't associated with "internet misogynists".
>ign
>the website that gives the new Call of Duty a 9 or higher every year
>any positive review
>FEMINIST PANDERING!
>any negative review
>MISOGYNY!
Both sides can pat themselves on the back for completely killing the point of reviews. Good job everyone.
>>71839823
Feminists are entirely to blame for that.
>>71839582
For you
>>71839745
>/tv/
>/v/ post
>>71839225
>>71839247
>>71839273
Can you be more of a whiny crying baby?
>noh, nowitenzd
what did he mean by this?
>>71839659
I actually saw a movie like that from the 1920s. It was pretty fun.
>>71839176
>Higher than BvS
>who else not surprised here?
>>71839466
>>71839344
>>71839300
>>71839299
>nobody even stops to appreciate 4 dubs in a row
>>71839823
Coming from some anon that is likely to lazy to read the review instead of look at the score to see if there is any bias's shown.
>>71839892
You mean baby-men.
>It's not because of the female cast! oh god please don't hurt me!
Absolutely dickless
>>71839892
>indirect non-necessary (You)
>Terri Schwartz
Internalized Misogynigygigy
i'm pretty sure it's going to be a huge normie hit anyway
>>71840256
Sony released revenue expectations and they're as low as 50 million, meanwhile the movie's budget is 150.
>>71839176
>6.9, oh that's not that bad
>on the IGN scale
DISASTER OF THE MILLENNIUM!!
>>71839176
6.9
>only positive is "New Squad "
>reviewed by a woman
You know it's way worse.
>>71839176
>Schwartz
>>71840423
And no China release to save it.
>>71839176
>6.9
>okay
So it's shit but critics are being lenient on it. Got it
>ID4 2 had an 8.0 on IGN
yikes
>opening at 67%
>>71839659
black people really are superstitious so what's the problem?
>>71839659
>tfw liberals are literally calling Leslie Jones being herself racist
Have we reached peak insanity yet?
unbiased """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""review""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
https://www.cinemascore.com/
This will be the true measure for the film.
>>71840508
>chinks in charge of caring about women
>>71840611
comics are officially dead aren't they?
>>71840611
you still got blown the fuck out man /v/abby
>>71840543
Was it good?
>>71839176
That's still above average. The ass blasted being of /tv/
>6.9 on IGN
Fieg on suicide watch
>>71840617
>man of steel
>a-
guess it was kino after all.
>>71840681
>That's still above average
oh you poor soul, you think IGN is like IMDB or something?
People are going to look back on these scores in years to come and wonder what the fuck happened
There is no way this film is ~7/10 when the trailers were that abysmal
>>71840611
>im the prize
>>71840707
>CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR
>A
superior kino/umani
>>71840680
it's pretty fine. not as good as the original when you first saw it.
>>71840744
What are your top 10 films of the 2010s?
>>71840744
7/10 on IGN is like 2/10 everywhere else.
>>71840778
Pacific Rim
Dredd
Kingsman
>>71839299
>say it was shit
>branded "problematic" and blacklisted from the progressive media gangbang
>say it was great
>lose every last shred of credibility with your audience
>>71840833
I can tell you frequent IGNA
>>71840778
Not in order, butthis is an anonymous image board, which gives us the advantage of having to take each post, each argument, and each debate on its own merits, instead of just attacking the preferences of person making the argument.
>>71840747
The only winning move is not to play.
>>71840543
>another movie reviewed by a woman
>>71840905
So its same to assume you have shit taste
>>71840949
to an extent, yes.
>>71840487
This.
To top it off, it's an IGN review.
>>71840680
No, its got 30% rt
>>71840969
Don't talk about tastes or scores again until you develop some taste then
this is your final warning
>>71841042
k
ty for the advise
>>71840969
>>71840833
Pal, please stop replying for me
It's weird
>>71840064
>the secretary is billed first
>>71841071
if you say so
>>71839176
>no, noitenz
>>71840068
They weren't in a row
>neckbeards mad about the coming of feministkino
" the coming of feministkino "
found the jew
>>71839176
no, now it ends
>>71839176
>6.9
IGN is playing it super safe. Do you think there's a committee on these """"review"""" sites that spend many hours (maybe days) debating on what the final verdict should look like before being published since its literally black and white with feminists?
>>71842662
>playing it super safe
In case you didn't know, anything that gets below 7.5 or so by IGN is deemed abysmal. They're absolutely nothing like RT or IMDB.
>>71839176
IGN is pathetic in their reviewing. I never take anything they rate as a reliable stat. 6.9 really means 3/10.
>>71839209
That's an IGN score.
>>71839345
It was though. The entire idea was terrible.
>>71843136
I wouldn't know. I don't frequent /v/ senpai.
>>71843287
They review movies too as shown in this thread.
>>71840064
>63 is green for films yet a 75 is yellow for games
Why
>>71843340
because film reception has lower standards.
>>71843340
Games get +30 point bribery bonus to their score whereas films only get +10 points. Getting a score >50 after deducting the bribery bonus puts them in the green.
>>71839287
I looked for you on the Trident.
