how does this make /tv/ feel
I haven't watched a single film or television show, since 2009.
How do I feel? Indifferent, of course.
t. Aristotle
Screenwritron 3000™ when?
No one cares about your shitty click bait article fag.
post the six
>>71783409
>nothing for you to actually click
>>71783445
fuck you
>>71783419
Boy meets Girl
Talking Animal or Thing
Boy meets Girl (animated)
Talking Animal or Thing (animated)
Robot vs Monster
Alien Invasion
>>71783330
old news
In fact, there's only one primordial plot: Man against Himself.
>>71783509
Fucking kek
>>71783330
WOAH DUDE
LOOK AS WE APPLY THE POWER OF REDUCTIONISM TO GET SOME SCIENCE UP IN THIS BITCH
WOAAAAAH
Didn't Kurt Vonnegut already cover this like 50 years ago?
>>71783509
What is LOTR
nobody sane cares about plot.
film is a visual medium and filmmaking is an art that is used to express a director's vision.
we judge directors on how they translate their vision onto the screen, not by their script.
there's only so many ways a story can go but visuals have no limits.
>>71783815
This
>researchers
But where does Upstream Color fit in
>>71783419
>Fall-rise-fall
Oedipus Rex.
>Rise and then a fall
What happens to most villains.
>Fall and then a rise
What happens to most superheroes.
>Steady fall
Romeo and Juliet.
>Steady rise
Rags-to-riches story
>Rise-fall-rise
Cinderella.
>>71783330
Or other things that are known to everyone who has ever taken a 100-level creative writing course in college.
>>71783330
>he hasnt transcended the story meme
if you want story read a book
>>71784143
So by plots they mean basic narrative structures? This is hardly a revelation
>>71784143
Do these even count as plots? These are just basic story structures, and it's not so surprising that there's only 6 of them.
>>71784287
the main events of a play, novel, movie, or similar work, devised and presented by the writer as an interrelated sequence.
IN OTHER NEWS, SCIENTISTS DISCOVERY NEW PROPERTY OF WATER....
>>71784287
>>71784272
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601848/data-mining-reveals-the-six-basic-emotional-arcs-of-storytelling/
https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07772
here is the article
>>71784369
the six plot thing isn't old
>>71784143
>>71783330
I guess they never heard of, "Slice of life" genre.
>>71784052
Boy meets girl (pig, in that case--those are replaceable)
>>71784423
/thread
>>71784143
Seems more like penis movements
>>71784444
Which plot does this have?
>>71784423
Yeah, how does Linklater's Slacker fit one of these six plot structures?
>>71784415
BREAKING NEWS! ANONS ON 4CHAN ARE STILL FUCKING STUPID. WE TAKE YOU LIVE, ON THE SCENE, FOR AN INTERVIEW.
Sir, when did you 1st realize you are fucking stupid?
>plotfags
Must be a sad existence...
I dont get it
>>71783330
A lot of Asian story telling doesn't even have conflict, let alone rise-fall scenarios.
>>71783872
Boy (Smough) meets girl (the one ring)
>there are only 26 letters in the alphabet that are used to make ALL the words
Really makes you think...
I used to tell people there were they types of movies:
Good vs. Evil
Boy meets Girl
Giant Monkey
Back when it was a Trilogy, Indiana Jones exemplified each of these. If a movie doesn't fit into one of those categories, then it's probably some David Lynch shit.
>>71784143
>plots
>lol jk we meant arcs
>>71784547
care to name a few examples?
>>71783372
So why are you here?
>reductionists
>>71784620
>If a movie doesn't fit into one of those categories, then it's probably some David Lynch shit.
Or, one of 100s of other types, I guess...
>>71784643
Who do you think invented Slice of Life and Kishotenketsu genres?
>>71784489
you sound pretty smart
>>71784489
>1st
>>71784725
You must be a fucking dumbshit, dumbshit.
>>71784444
>>71784423
>>71784478
Sorry cats, even slice of life follows the structure
http://hedonometer.org/books/v3/43970/
>Did you know that if you generalize enough you can arbitrarily fit anything together?
>>71784767
Not all of them.
Not only that, but arcs are not plots, and reducing things to combinations of rise and fall is about as retarded as it sound.
>>71784803
>Not all of them.
Yes all of them.
The girl cartoons you're watching are not magical special snowflakes that don't have arcs.
>>71783330
Hollywood lies created in order to justify endless reboots and remakes.
>>71784143
they forgot that other plot point, beginning, middle and end. That's my favourite plotline
>>71783509
Someone never watched Kurosawa.
>>71784143
>Tetralemma
There is a middle ground...
>>71783509
>Robot vs Monster
laughed
>>71783330
This isn't news.
>>71784143
>six plots
>are in actuality character arcs
ok
>>71786299
story arcs, see >>71784395
>>71783330
there are two comedy and tragedy
>>71784840
What if I write a story that start with an A then in the middle a B happens but then The Plot twist is revelated...
After the B everything returns to A snd viceverds and the history is unable to end/start:
A - B - A - B - A - B - Ad Infinitum
>Implying that there is a start Point
>>71786428
Fuck iy, Ley's have a chuckle and go meta
>Loop,Neutronics:
ABA
>>71786428
>>71786551
Thanks for being a tripfag.
>he watches movies that have plot
>>71784143
They forgot the overused trope of prologue and epilogue.
Also forgot the annoying plot of good things and bad things happening to characters, so sick of that.
>>71784143
So are there any movies that are just fall-fall-fall?
>>71786917
No. There are movies that are steady fall, unsteady fall, fall, fall-fall, fall then fall, but that's it.
>>71783509
brilliant
![[anon] Mononoke 12 (BD 1280x720 H264 FLAC) [BDEC8FA4].mkv_snapshot_22.05_[2013.11.23_23.15.40].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/jS7QlNF.jpg "[anon] Mononoke 12 (BD 1280x720 H264 FLAC) [BDEC8FA4].mkv_snapshot_22.05_[2013.11.23_23.15.40].jpg")
So what would this show fall under?
There's no beginning and no end. Just continued travels and stories. Main character's identity and past and never revealed.
>>71783330
If you simplify it to such an arbitrarily broad definition you can get it down to just one : "stuff happens"
It's retarded
This thread is kinda the perfect example of why it's impossible to bring science to normals.
They hear about science in clickbait headlines, don't bother to read the article, don't bother to look up the original paper, they just read an inaccurate summary throw together by someone who doesn't understand the subject and then from that extrapolate the whole thing is meaningless.
