How did they do this?

They built a really tiny camera and made the cameraman swallow it.

>>71783061
they hired a giant and put a camera in his mouth

alternatively, they made a tiny camera and put it in a regular person's mouth

File: marines.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

22KB, 480x360px

>tell it to the marines!

What did he mean by this?

>>71783089
>>71783094
Yeah but how did they really do it?

They built a prosthetic and placed it in front of the camera, and then used a prosthetic "tongue" and wiggled it around later

They spent millions of dollars on shrinking technology and sent the crew in Fantastic Voyage style.

>>71783061
CGI you dipshit.

File: Babby.jpg (43KB, 600x394px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

43KB, 600x394px

>>71783465
>1986
>CGI

>>71783555
>CGI didn't exist in 1986

Back when FX were genuinely impressive. Last time we had that was Coppollas Dracula. Also the blu ray with the original ending is so much better.

File: Jack Daniels.gif (996KB, 305x183px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

996KB, 305x183px

>You will never help Robert Zemeckis choreograph an elaborate practical effect using no CGI.

look at the plant they made, it was all practical effects. They made a giant mouth and filmed from inside of it

also, best song of the movie?
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xPq6W1EoIc

>>71783994
The Fountain has genuinely impressive FX faggooooooot