Largest drop off from original to sequal
- Home
- Board: /tv/ - Television & Film
- Reading: Largest drop off from original to sequal
What is the sequel that had the largest drop off in quality from the original.
Pic related: Jaws = 10/10 Jaws 2 = 3/10.
>>71682124
I think a better answer would be the following sequels after 2. 2 was still watchable, but every sequel afterwards was infinitely worse than the one before, ending with one of the worst movies of all time in Revenge.
>>71682124
Caddyshack to Caddyshack 2
Road House to Road House 2
Saturday Night Fever to Staying Alive
>>71682124
I remember excitedly renting Jaws 2 as a kid and hating it. Never saw the other sequels, although I do love Richard Jeni's bit about Jaws 4: The Revenge.
>>71682124
Zoolander to Zoolander 2
Mean Girls to Mean Girls 2
Oh second thought maybe i should have inserted some rules that the sequel must have some of the past cast/director in the same project and not just be an entirely new cast that is completely unrelated to the original in everything but name.
You know it's true.
>>71682124
Star Wars episode III and episode VII
>>71682427
then in that case…
Ginger Snaps to Ginger Snaps 2
Silent Hill to Silent Hill 2
It actually wasn't that bad
>>71682492
The Lost World though not nearly as good was "meh" at least. I wouldn't put it up there.
>>71682124
man of steel - bvs
>>71682514
>Silent Hill to Silent Hill 2
Fuuuuck.
Though I still hate the first one for being a third act infodump at least it was competent in other areas.
>>71682514
Both SH movies were 2/10
>>71682427
Then just subtract Roadhouse 2 with >>71682295
>>71682438
I think it was just getting tired. We saw the formula they were working with, the shaky cam was getting irritating, and it just felt way too long.
>>71682605
first silent hill is the definition of comfy horror
>>71682533
It would be fine if they didn't call it American Psycho. If it was just a generic horror movie, it would be considered a decent movie, but everyone compares it too the original, and thats not a fair comparison.
>>71682124
Was it ever explained why this poster depicts a woman snow skiing on the ocean?
>>71682492
DELETE THIS
>>71682124
At least isn't as awful as its next sequels.
>>71682438
>>71682726
>cast?
check
>director and or producers?
i could be wrong but I think the sequels were taken over by people who either had nothing to do with
>idendity
or at least had no grasp on what made the original so great
or maybe both
>increase the shaky cam
>upcrease the pacing!
could've at least tried to be creative, but here's some Djibouti shooty fresh n fruity instead
The matrix franchise, there is no other possible answer
Jaws 2 was decent tho
>>71682492
The Lost World was a cool adventure movie, I've watched it almost as many times as the first movie (and I've seen that at least 50 times).
3 wasn't too bad either but World doesn't feel like it's in the same franchise.
>>71682542
My exact sentiments towards Jaws 2.
>>71684444
I honestly love The Lost World. It's not great by any means, but it's fun. Plus, Jeff Goldblum is a plus.
Not even close. Pretty much the biggest FUCK YOU in movie form
>>71684598
spoony pls go
Does Ep VI to Ep VII count as a sequel cause TFA was complete shit compared to ROTJ.
>>71684480
This. I hate how they changed Terminator from a horror movie to a action flick/road story/buddy movie.
I enjoyed jaws 2, the sailing made it better for me being that it's what I'm familiar with. That being said I'll probably never watch it again.
>>71682124
Joe Dirt to Joe Dirt 2
>>71682492
Don't hate on the Goldblum. Every line of his made the film fun.
>>71684725
Ding ding ding
Balto 2
Any sequel to a Disney animated film with the possible exception of the rescuers down under
>>71682924
I would call any horror movie that is also described as comfy as a 2/10
>>71686231
Return of Jafar is 10/10 kino
>>71687356
I remember liking this.
![movieposter[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/VPNQyjH.jpg "movieposter[1]")
![T1T2[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/9yI345A.png "T1T2[1]")
