>finally watch 2001
>epic scale now makes other films feel like normie shit
Well done based Kubrick
>>71468361
Yes yes well done kubrick, well done!
HOWEVER
Boring piece of shit movie, just like Barry Lyndon
his pinnacle was The Shining
>>71468361
fuck i want that diorama.
fuck everyone who thinks it's pretentious, i hate pretentious shit but i love 2001, in it's simplest form it's a film about the evolution of man, but it's also aesthetically a beautiful film all the way through
>>71468361
Epic Scale?
...one space ship...
That's literally the opening scene of Star Wars Episode 1
You should get around to watching Alien as well, I KNOW IT'S SLOWER PASSED THAN THE OTHER MOVIES YOU'RE USE TO WATCHING.
>>71468361
>epic scale now makes other films feel like normie shit
Watch more films. Even in the simplest of scenes, you'd be surprised as to how much detail and thought goes into every frame. Kubrick's visuals are more provocative than most, yes, but it's wrong to dismiss other films on that basis.
>>71468361
If you really want to feel superior marathon Barry Lyndon
>>71468623
I don't know about that diorama but here:
http://hlj.com/product/MEDMAFEX-35/Act
http://hlj.com/product/MEDMAFEX-34/Act
http://hlj.com/product/MEDRAH-763/Act
I recommend giving this a watch as it's the only film I've seen that comes close to Kubrick.
>>71470685
>>71468361
Why is there a giant Iphone in this movie?
>>71468361
baby first pretentious film
>>71468566
Actually his pinnacle was Barry Lyndon
>>71470685
Go shit yourself
>>71470685
People hate it too needlessly. It wasn't as 'grand' as 2001, but it was certainly more emotional and had just as impressive a soundtrack. Beautiful sibling films
>>71468566
>This is what /tv/ has come to.
Just kill me lads.
>>71470790
Don't ever compare 2001 to fucking Interstellar, in any way, ever again.
>>71468361
2001 is overrated as FUCK
Barry Lyndon, Full metal jacket and Eyes wide shut are all miles better
>>71470685
One of the best films ever made. Haters can go fuck themselves
>>71470838
I'm not even that guy but they are very comparable...
Interstellar is just far more digestible.
>>71468361
this predicted the tablet computer and accurately portrayed space physics before we had even put a man on the moon anyone who doesn't give 2001 it's props can fuck right off
>>71470792
pretty sure it was a shitpost, no one could really believe that
>>71470838
there literally almost the same movie
>>71470877
>>71470955
You two may want to look into assisted suicide. I am available.
>>71470876
>I've only see a handful of films: the post
>>71471022
>i read online somewhere that 2001 is the best film ever and so it is
underage b&
>>71471145
"Interstellar is the same as 2001"
Yep, it's a /tv/ thread
>>71468361
>Epic Scale
>Literally 20 minutes where nothing happens bu a ship moving towards a spacestation
TOO DEEP 4 ME!!!
>>71471240
can you not see the similarities? the homage nolan pays to kubrick in it? i think your just an edgy teenager trying his hand at contrarianism
>>71470877
No shit, nolan more or less made it as an obvious tribute film to 2001.
But /tv/ being the echo-chamber of underaged GoT and godzilla fans it is are too insecure and retarded to even realize this.
>>71471300
Kubrick wouldn't have pandered to idiots with that "Love is a force" horseshit which effectively ruined the movie.
It's a pretentious pile of shit with some good visuals for the time.
Not giving that nigger a you forgot talking shit about lyndon
>epic scale
What did he mean by this?
No seriously, what the fuck does that even mean?
>>71471405
>kissless virgin detected
>>71471405they both have the same "horseshit" last act, mate
>>71470876
This. it's pretty underrated.
>>71468739
> the number of vehicles defines epicness
Go to sleep kiddo
>>71471572
It covers a lot of ground
>>71470907
Yea like on the moon they have earth gravity? Real accurate.
>>71470653
>been wanting to build a proper shelf display for my Kubrick DVDs / Blu Rays
>was only missing some neat collectible to go along with them
Ty anon, I'm totally getting that orange suit. Perhaps Alex too, although that might be a little bit of an overkill.
>>71470745
It symbolizes the catalyst that triggered the evolutionary leap differencing humans from all other life on Earth. Little-known fact: the iPhone was actually based off of it. Jobs thought his product would be so revolutionary it would be on-par with the invention of fire, or the wheel.
>>71468623
but it is pretentious anon. 10 minutes of colour inverts over landscape is not art.
>>71473470
Terraforming
My first experience watching this was as a teen slightly high on VHS
nothing since has been close to it
>>71471572
It's a big film
>>71476326
>>71470685
A music video for the world's greatest organ player's greatest album
>>71470838
DON'T MENTION THEM IN THE SAME SENTENCE!!!!! REEEEEEEEEE
>>71472119
Underrated post.
>>71468566
Barry Lyndon is near perfect and 2001 is perfect and so is the shining.
But his pinnacle was Eyes Wide Shut and only plebs deny it.
>>71468739
>Alien
>slower paced than 2001
Bitch are you stupid?
>you now realize that after touching the black ipad he has specifically and undeniably become a neet hiki for life all the way back in 1968
>
>>71468361
It's pretty good, although some scenes go on for way too long.
ACO and EWS are Kubrick's best.
>tfw love 2001
I feel like such a pleb. I adore it so much and unironically consider it Kubrick's best work.
>>71468361
Kubrick's Top 3 kino are 2001, Barry Lyndon and Dr. Strangelove.
Everything else runs the gamut of very good to outstanding.
>>71476188
Although I am loathe to admit it, Jobs was right. Smartphones are intrinsically part of human culture now for much of the world.
>>71470685
Look, I like interstellar, but it's a far cry from Kubrickian in its execution. Just because people see the plot as similar (which I disagree with), the direction was very different, from everything like lighting to pacing
>>71477531
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. 2001 is the most entry level of pleb filters. If you thing IT is too inaccessible, good luck ever getting into film. I agree it's his best, though an argument could be made for BL or EWS.
>>71477531
You should
Kubrick and 2001 are disgusting entry level trash
Yep you pretty much watched the greatest sci fi of all time
Matrix comes close and Day the earth stood still is a bit behind that but your pretty much done with GOAT scifi after tgat
>>71478143
Bait. No normal person can believe that entry level=bad.
Liking 2OO1 doesn't make you a pleb. Saying it's your all time favorite perhaps means you haven't seen many films, but that doesn't take away from the movie
