Rank 'em
- Home
- Board: /tv/ - Television & Film
- Reading: Rank 'em
Rank 'em
Mann > Innaritu >>> Malcuck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Von Try hard
Malick>>Mann>Inarritu>Von trier
>>71284304
Von Trier = Malick > > > Mann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Innaritu
Inarritu > LVT > Malick > Mann
Terry>Innarittu>Mann>/pol/
Can't believe no one got this right yet:
Mann > Malick > Innaritu > Von Edgelord
How could anyone rate Innaritu so highly?
I makes totally bland, middlebrow, oscarbait crap
Malick's so far above them it's not even a competition.
Herzog is also above both AGI and LVT.
>>71284707
>HERZOG
OH FUCKING SHIT WHAT THE FUCK AM I DOING :DDDDD
Why do you all autismlords call Iñarritu Innarritu?
Anyways
Early Malick >>>> Mann > Late Malick > Von Trier = Iñarritu
terry>lars>meme>inaredditu
>>71284826
>rejecting the path of light.
anon why
Malick > Trier > Innaritu > Mann
Malick
----
----
Trier
----
Mann
---
---
---
---
---
Innaritu
Say all you want about Iñarritu but he really hasn't done a bad film yet, unlike Von Trier and Mann
>>71284896
Tarkovsky and Malick made the same mistake. They started with some GOAT kino and they ended up drowning in a pool of "poetry" and "spiritual art" because they took themselves way too seriously.
>>71284969
Malick is trying to guide you into the light. No obfuscation, just sincere attempt at evoking emotions and seeing the glory of life and path of light.
>Seriously
Yeah that panty stealing scene in Tree of Life is so serious, Malick can jest within his films if he wants to.
>>71285022
If Malick had only done Badlands and Days of heaven he'd have been one of the greatest American directors ever. But...
>>71285108
Then he made a bunch of other films and can be said to be one of the best directors on Earth, so far.
(prime)Malick > Mann > Lars > Inarritu
>>71285174
>Prime Malick
You mean Knight of Cups - To the Wonder - Tree of Life Malick SURELY?
>>71284304
Von Trier looks like a massive pedophile.
>>71285195
Surely he means TRL malick.
>>71285146
nah, senpai, he ruined his legacy
he'll forever be remember as the dude that did 2.5 hour "poetic" borefests
>>71285323
i disagree. he has found some way to portray intense emotions like no other director for me.
>>71284968
Say all you want about Iñarritu but he really hasn't done a good film yet, unlike Von Trier and Mann
Inarritu hasn't done a film that's worth watching. Too little emphasis on blockbusterisms to be worthwhile surface level entertainment, too shallow in its themes to be enjoyable contemplative cinema.
>>71286442
I'm pretty sure you actually think you said something
>>71286607
It's a summary of my thoughts. Biutiful breaks this sort of. I'm bad at explaining my feels, but that's what I think of his films, honestly.
