>new Star Trek movie coming out in just one month
>that guy dies the other day
>still ZERO hype for the movie
what went wrong?
>>71205105
>what went wrong?
Into Darkness
STAR TREK was never very popular with the general audience.
The 2009 reboot built a lot of good will for the property, which was squandered when they took four years to release the sequel, and it wasn't particularly remarkable.
Any good will that was left was once again squandered when they've taken two years to release a sequel, and it frankly looks kinda' cheap and the tone is all over the place.
>>71205155
dont be racist
it's too Partrician
>>71205105
They alienated their fanbase.
>>71205212
>2 years is too long between films
You millennials make me sick.
>>71205430
For the average audience it is.
that first trailer made it look like a marvel movie. Might have done too much damage
>>71205212
>STAR TREK was never very popular with the general audience.
Yeah that's why TOS Star Trek films did so badly right
Oh wait
>>71205397
pretty much this. shit doesn't make sense.
>make a trailer to try and draw in normies even though they don't care
>alienate the people who actually care
Great marketing. Should be taught in schools.
>>71205212
Fuck all that noise, 4 years isn't even that long. The real problem is the movies aren't that good and are forgettable, meanwhile they now have Star Wars to compete with, which has always had more mass appeal. The 2009 reboot was really only so successful because it FELT like star wars. Now people don't have to settle for a substitute.
