What am I in for?

>>70972085
A masterpiece. Watch The Third Man after Kane. They are unrelated in content but both feature Welles.

>>70972085
MUUUAHHH THE FRENCH

File: ISLH2sM.png (463KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

463KB, 500x500px

>>70972085
The masked man

>>70972085
really boring piece of crap, fell asleep two times.

burger "kino"

File: young_hold_the_door[1].png (947KB, 928x580px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

947KB, 928x580px

ROSE BUD
ROSEBUD
ROBUD
ROBD
ROD

>>70973353
Confirmed for not having seen it.

It's incredibly shouty, filled with shitty '40s acting, has some really awkward scene transitions (like that fucking bird squeak out of nowhere), but I wouldn't call it boring, it's pretty fast moving.

>>70973823
>shitty 40's acting
Bruh it was stagey for sure but that was the style at the time you can't call it shitty or expect some kind of contemporary speech pattern from a classic. Besides people suck at talking these days, just look at Baumbach movies, shit's god awful to watch.

>>70972085
Kane?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFevH5vP32s

>>70972085
Your enjoyment of this movie will very much depend on how many other old hollywood movies you have seen. Perhaps try Touch of Evil first.

>>70975287
I've seen things like Passion of Joan of Arc, Sunrise a song of two humans, and some Chaplin films.