Rate, watch, discuss etc.
Is cinema dead?
http://letterboxd.com/bvgf/
I didn't particularly like The Nice Guys.
Does that help?
>>70945768
At least you're supporting original movies rather than capeshit.
What the actual fuck???
>>70946465
This is the beginning of the end
I watched Eisenstein in Guanajuato, didn't think much of it either way, but I loved the digital effects in the film. Superimposing actors onto digital images and twisting the room around to seem larger, those kinds of thing. Any other movies that don't shy away from the digital like that?
>>70946465
they tryna make you all quit using the site
>Fury Road
>pronouns
This image prophesized the downfall of Letterboxd and /lbg/ and we didn't listen. Never again.
does dannyboytbh reside here
fuck you spic cunt
Should I watch Persona next or start with Tarkovsky?
>>70945712
>literally getting mad plebs are watching pleb movies
you guys are like /v/ crying about about video games being too easy, why would anyone cater to an audience thats hard to please when there's a much bigger audience thats easy to please?
>>70948573
nolan
I'm a bit glad The Nice Guys bombed
>>70948735
>going to /v/
>>70948817
/v/ is literally in a better state than /tv/, which is essentially the new /b/ spilloff board.
>>70948861
then go back to /v/
>>70945712
http://letterboxd.com/evolution_rex/
>pride month pronoun shit
yo, do i really need to stop using this site?
what the fucking fuck
>he uses letterboxd for a reason other than just log/rate the films he watches
>>70948573
Inside Llewyn Davis is a really comfy movie anon, and I like it a lot.
But your favourite? Really?
Can you please tell me your thoughts on it
http://letterboxd.com/sphero/
Please be my friend.
>>70949895
buddy with that taste you'd be lucky if your own mother wanted to be your friend
>>70950017
I don't see anything wrong with his taste
i've been using this since 2012 just to keep track of movies but this lgbt brown nosing is pushing it.
whenis cinemos coming?
>>70949895
Welcome frienderino :)
>>70950017
What's wrong with my taste? Warcraft was a fun '80s style grimdark dad fantasy with cheese and even my elderly mother enjoyed it. The Witch was fantastic. All my favourites are impeccable films, although maybe not the greatest ever made, but they really reasonated with me personally which is why they're my favourites. Please no bully.
This repeating thread is where plebbitors gather to affirm their insecurities. Please go.
>>70950585
t. embryo
>>70946465
i deleted my account
>>70950623
You have to explain this one to me, master.
>>70948983
>the smoldering chair of evolution_rex
Nice job in trying to disguise the horrors that Letterboxd is promoting with this inanity of an OP
>>70950892
plenty of /lbg/ers are actually unironically supporting this pronoun bullshit
>>70951133
It's a very cuckolded community, unfortunately even here. That news piece is utterly abhorrent
>>70946465
Is ze/zir pronounced differently than xe/xyr?
Also
>it
lol does anyone on this planet consider "it" to be empowering?
I've watched 'artistic' movies by fags like bergman and theyre just boring and awful. It's not that I don't have the attention span for it, I read long non-YA books all the time. Artsy movies are usually just awful, and even if they weren't the shit in my post would still be good. pretending to like film as an art is so low effort and pathetic. Ok, you sat down in front of a screen for 7 hours and watched polish people be miserable, youre such a fucking intellectual. New /tv/ is cancer with all the capeshit, but you wannabe film buffs are so much worse. You unironicly think that watching pretentious nonsense makes you better than other people. Literally rape yourself in the throat.
>>70952119
You bore me with your low effort fishing.
>>70951808
it's for the faggots that don't feel they are anything worthwhile.
Can you get banned now for using the wrong pronouns?
https://letterboxd.com/steakbro/
what up homies
>>70949895
hello new guy
>>70952371
>Villeneuve film.
>4/5
>>70952406
>Villeneuve is bad
dude is perfectly functional.
>>70952371
Prisoners was shit.
You're shit.
You probably eat your steaks well done.
I hate you.
>>70952437
i'm fine with the rest of what you said but
>You probably eat your steaks well done.
this is an accusation that i won't take lying down
>>70952406
He's the same mouth breather that thinks Fury Road is the "greatest action film ever made"
my opinion is fact general
>>70945712
I'm about to watch Ex Machina
>>70952716
hope you enjoy it
i thought it was pretty good
>>70952734
>>70952716
Don't listen to him.
It's just a meme flick.
It could have been good but then they started dancing.
>>70952716
The fuck it your profile n*gger
>>70952780
https://letterboxd.com/tachikoma/
bunch of people started following me since i opened an account idk whats the point
>>70952763
have you realized that saying things like "meme flick" makes you sound like a moron yet
>>70952825
First day in /tv/ or /lbg/?
>>70952854
this is a stupid question
i can only extrapolate that you are a stupid person
>>70952873
Ah so it is. Well go back to whatever anti-art shithole hugbox you came from, tourist.
>>70952906
i love art and i've literally never browsed anywhere else
enjoy being a cancer on the community
>>70952935
How am I cancer when you're getting up in arms when someone says they didn't like a third rate science fiction movie? Don't tell me you're the butt hurt Fury Road defender too.
>>70952825
Whether I am or am not a moron is besides the point.
The flick in question had the chance to venture into the profound and be a solid addition to the AI canon, instead it chose to spout memes in order to appeal to the masses.
For this, I cannot forgive it and it is my duty to warn others about it.
/elibroo/
Looking to follow people who have very different interests from me.
>>70953068
>couldn't even properly link
>expects me to copy and paste
fuck off kid.
>>70952800
Rate. What. You. Watch.
>>70952999
i'm not actually that invested in whether or not you approve of EX MACHINA. the issue that i take with you is your use of reductive phrases like "meme flick". it's the sign of someone far more interested in appearances than actual art.
>>70953065
>spout memes
it actually does not do this. there's a scene that was heavily latched onto by a culture that didn't understand it, and maybe the direction is at fault. the intent of the dance scene was clearly to unsettle with the awkwardly observational camera and disingenuous music, as any cinematically literate person should understand. it's not the film's fault that its "fanbase" chose to latch onto it as comedic.
>>70952800
>16 this year
inexcusable
>>70953233
i think he just started his account
>>70953068
followed, my guy.
>colorful logo
>tumblresque userbase
>'to my cisgender friends'
>preferred pronouns
when did you realize that Letterboxd is gay IMDb?
what should I watch for 400 you guys
>>70953253
I never realized Oshii did Angel's Egg, that just shot way up my watch list
>>70953263
At first sight
>>70953337
Jesus Christ m8, that's a few movies a day. What does your weekly schedule look like?
>>70953354
it really is a fantastic piece of work. interested to hear what you think of it - i don't think too many people in /lbg/ have seen it.
>>70953354
It's a tough watch but well worth your time.
Dense, like a century egg, and at first, the palate will recoil in disgust but you will persevere and it will be worth it in the end because muh symbolism.
>>70953337
https://letterboxd.com/film/the-embryo-develops-into-a-fetus/
>>70953337
Problem Road II: Meme Bogaloo.
>>70953222
Okay.
>>70953222
I didn't use that phrase. Why joy do you get out forcing your way into the general and complain nonstop when people don't like the same movies as you? Stop treating this general like the rest of /tv/ you unwelcome piece of shit.
>>70953380
>schedule
normies reee
>>70953481
>unwelcome
now now, we all have the right to be here
http://letterboxd.com/diest/
i'll follow u back
>>70953406
lol
>>70953380
I work a 9-5 that's where I watch two or three.. then I'll come home and watch another
>>70953481
You're pretty retarded, mate
>>70953505
>follow u back
stop this
it's pathetic
you have to earn a follow
>>70953529
>hurrrdurrr muh elite film website
>>70953515
can you get me a job where you work
>>70953522
Thanks for dragging down the discourse to record lows.
>>70946465
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahA9S-f2Vlg
>>70953545
>hurr durr i'm an insecure little embryo seeking attention
>>70953559
no u
>>70953529
>taking trannyboxd this seriously
Is there anything more pathetic?
>>70953559
>record lows
fucking newfags
>>70953571
>you're insecure
>I have elite film tastes
>you need to EARN A FOLLOW
jesus christ do you think before you say things? stop taking a stupid website so seriously
>>70953592
PLEASE FOLLOW ME I'LL FOLLOW YOU BACK I NEED TO PAD MY MEANINGLESS STATS SO I DON'T LOOK LIKE A PATHETIC PIECE OF SHIT EMBRYO
I DON'T CARE IF YOU HAVE SHIT TASTE BECAUSE I DO TOO, BUT IF US EMBRYOS STICK TOGETHER WE CAN LOOK COOL AND POPULAR LOL
>>70953481
>complain nonstop when people don't like the same movies as you
are you sure it's me that's doing this? like i said, i don't really care whether or not someone shares my tastes, and at no point have i really argued in favor of EX MACHINA. basically, my issue is people ever referring to a film as a meme, because, as i stated earlier, it's reductive, and reductionism is the enemy of artistic appreciation.
>>70953559
if you genuinely think this is a record low then you really have not been here for very long. you should see how triggered some people get when a user praises Michael Mann.
>>70953625
I never said I have elite film tastes. But you're probably not wrong considering how much of an embryo you are.
>>70953627
I guess there was something more pathetic. Thanks for not letting me down! :*
>>70946465
>>70946490
>>70947364
>>70947719
>>70950710
>>70951808
>>70952288
>>70953570
back to r/MRA, virgins
>>70953665
Delete your account
>>70953667
>retards trying to pretend they are above other retards
cute
>>70953707
Jokes on you, I already did.
Enjoy your pronouns, faggot.
>>70953814
Wish we could go back to these times. We're stuck with this steakbro mouthbreather now.
>>70953814
I humbly suggest pronounposting, a new modality of memery where you substitute the usual he/she/his/her with fictional, grotesque pronouns for comedic effect
When did you realize that ratings were meaningless and devalued any critic or discussion?
>>70952429
villeneuve is empty. its deakins cinematography highlight reel, and tgats not saying much
>>70954053
Ratings are fine. I just don't bother rating arthouse or experimental films.
>>70954069
like i said, his style is functional, though i'd like to add that it also retains some level of his identity. he's not a true auteur - the quality of his work is highly dependent on both the script and the actors. he hasn't yet delivered a disappointment, so i'm more than willing to give him credit for his successes.
>its deakins cinematography highlight real
have you seen any of Villeneuve's films from before he started working with Deakins? POLYTECHNIQUE and ENEMY are both quite good.
>>70953684
I cringe at these people. Whoop dee fucking doo! "The beginning of the end" lmao.
>>70954124
There is absolutely no style to Villeneuve. If you try to describe me his style, you end up describing the screenplay or Deakins cinematography.
I've seen all of his films, the earlier films are even worse (INCENDIES is practically a shitty Nolan film)
>>70954124
Enemy had potential, but everything else is shit.
>>70954053
It's not if you use a positive rating scale, everything else is pretentious f.
>>70954202
>positive rating scale
explain
>>70954238
https://rateyourmusic.com/list/SellMeAGod/why_i_rate__a_word_about_thee_benefits_of_a_positive_rating_model/
>>70954183
>If you try to describe me his style, you end up describing the screenplay or Deakins cinematography.
your opinion of the films themselves notwithstanding, i think Villeneuve's style is very easy to define: he tends towards fluid camera movement and takes that are above average in length, but has the restraint to avoid indulging in oners or excessively held shots. he also has a focus on very precise framing. it's simple, yet effective for the genres that he works in.
>>70954183
I'm gonna budge in here and ask, what can you precisely credit to a director in a film? Give me a a specific example
>>70954284
>Described me the Deakins cinematography
>>70954304
if it's Deakins' cinematography, why is it still present in his earlier films, and not present in some films that Deakins has worked on? i really don't think you understand what you're talking about here.
>>70954329
Because the wetback probably dreams of Robert Deakins, fucking Enemy looked like derivative of what Deakins has done
>>70954269
I do that anyway.
And without sounding like a wanka.
>>70954385
>wetback
he's Canadian, but okay.
>>70954299
Im not >>70954299 but to answer your question, it varies greatly between directors. There are people like Stanley Kubrick who are present and in control of every stage of the production. He would assist from the very beginning in the writing process to the very end in the editing process. However there are also directors like the contemporary Woodie Allen who are much more like overseers. Allen only really makes small adjustments during the production and will go days without even talking to actors. What you can attribute to the director is ultimately decided by which director it is, however I think after watching several movies from someones filmography, it becomes clear what they do.
Also a side point, how do you guys approach discussing bad acting? I usually am able to attribute it to either a bad actor, a bad director, or a bad script but sometimes there doesn't seem to be a clear answer and I don't know who to "blame".
Beast from Haunted Cave wasn't too bad. Don't know why it took me four attempts to finally watch it. Really nice South Dakota location photography.
>>70954639
profile?
>>70954653
I'm jimjoekelly.
>>70954518
If it's a good, known actor I usually blame the script. A good script with good characters allows good actors to deliver a good performance.
>>70954518
Acting is about the last of things I think of when watching film, that's why I can stomach Mann's newer films (he clearly can't direct his actors).
I'd consider production team (the ones that are involved first handed in shooting a scene for example) a team that can enable each other to far outperform their usual *level* and elevate, "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts".
>>70954748
>he clearly can't direct his actors
what makes you say that?
>>70954899
Oh, sure we can argue that IT IS intentional, since all of his late career films involve similar off beat *acting*, but if it is I don't like it, but then again - I don't really care.
Why do I say, because honestly I've only seen same garbage acting in telenovelas that used to air here at 8AM.
Just look at the Chink Officer Male Model in Blackhat, he fucking changes his way of.. doing the same thing for no reason at least 4 times in the film
its like he has no idea wat to do
>>70954929
i wasn't arguing anything. was just curious about your opinion. thanks for taking the time to type up an explanation.
>>70954958
I get he is going intentionally against the convention, tries to make stuff intimate but due to weak directing/writing (and in Blackhat) due to terrible actors it is just not convincing.
Rohmer and Godard have also off beat acting, ie. not conventional yet they're actually convincing due to having better actors and everything else pretty much.
idk lol im just a boy watching films
>>70954929
>>70954999
>>70954748
Why is there an actual retard in our thread, bros?
As a schmuck I can identify fellow schmucks
http://letterboxd.com/Pupkin/
>>70945729
Schmuck
>>70945768
Schmuck
>>70948573
Schmuck
>>70948983
Uberschmuck
>>70949895
Schmuck
>>70952119
Schmuck
>>70952371
Not a schmuck
>>70952716
Schmuck
>>70952800
Schmuckyes I realise I called you a schmuck twice, you deserve it
>>70953068
Schmuck
>>70953505
Schmuck
>>70953814
Schmuck
>>70954053
Schmuck
>>70954639
>>70954675
Schmuck
Nice Men is the best comedy released this year.
>>70955263
>back to "Not a schmuck" from "Schmuck"
this is oddly fulfilling
>wake up
>lots of cool things to download are shared online
hooray
>>70955263
Omid pls go
>>70955302
Well, tell us what you think is cool today
>>70955490
The Sicilian Connection and 2 more discs of the Alan Clarke set
>>70955302
Nothing cool in rarbg or rutracker today ;_;
>>70955700
Life is tough, brother
![How.Green.Was.My.Valley.1941.720p.mkv_snapshot_01.18.06_[2016.06.17_03.43.46].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/webIydY.jpg "How.Green.Was.My.Valley.1941.720p.mkv_snapshot_01.18.06_[2016.06.17_03.43.46].jpg")
>>70955735
I don't need new stuff though. I still have unwatched Ford films!
>Ninja.Shadow.Of.A.Tear.2013.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-FGT
nice.
>>70956301
>low quality rip
>nice
hmmmmm
why do these garbage reviews get so many likes
>>70956553
To trigger you and your sad fucking life bitching about what other people like
>>70956553
because people want to fuck her I guess
>>70956553
>so many likes
>16 likes
umm...
>>70955572
damn...
Guys! What happened to Alessandro? Is he still alive?
>Letterboxd becomes increasingly more hugboxd tumblr shit hole
>Sharifi has purged the tumblr board out of RYM
S A V A G E
>>70956694
>>70956530
It is nice. In itself, and upon the circumstances for whom it's useful.
cinemos better have an import option, i need to get out of this shit hole
>>70956569
It's not at all nice the growing leaking of the tumblr fairies appearing on /lbg/
Daily reminder to watch more movies and stop being a villager pleb.
https://letterboxd.com/cinebro/list/they-shoot-pictures-dont-they-top-1000-film/
![Clouds-of-Sils-Maria-as-Nuvens-de-Sils-Maria-2014-de-Olivier-Assayas[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/WDd3POd.jpg "Clouds-of-Sils-Maria-as-Nuvens-de-Sils-Maria-2014-de-Olivier-Assayas[1].jpg")
redpill me on clouds of sils maria
>>70957228
Kstew died
>>70957094
hmmmmm
>>70945712
maybe if this movie had lower budget they would've skipped the unnecessary action scenes and turned this flick into kino
>>70957602
>it's a le kino XD post
fuck off, idiot.
odds: kill myself
evens: watch a movie
zero: fap
>>70957705
bye
Why is there a giant banner about pronouns? I don't care that people can change their pronouns, doesn't bother me, but why does it have to be so big, and on every page.
>>70945712
>Patron
More like patroniser. Fucking Bastille Day looked like garbage, and people who give a shit about The Nice Guys (like me) will see it...
People aren't going to go and see a movie you like because there isn't a superhero movie option. They'll just not see a movie at all. Or, if there wasn't a superhero movie, there'd be other popcorn fluff as an alternative. Fucking idiots.
>>70945833
>At least you're supporting original movies rather than capeshit.
GENRE MOVIES ARE NOT THE ENEMY YOU IDIOT FUCK
HOW IS ANY GIVEN SUPERHERO MOVIE AUTOMATICALLY WORSE THAN AN "ORIGINAL MOVIE" LIKE INDEPENDENCE DAY?
>>70946465
This pissed me off.
>>70957825
You can press the x and it will go away
>>70958079
Not the original poster but I'd say there is a difference between the 'cinematic universe' type films where the focus is on branding and merchandising rather than an actual passion for film or creativity and original films/storylines.
That's obviously not to say all original movies are good, but they in general at least feel a bit less like a product than a film
>>70946465
I just cannot understand how "non-binary pronouns" are preferable to they/their even if you are some kind of confused tranny. They/their doesn't assign gender anyway? What the fuck.
>>70958149
They explain the reasons for adding it pretty clearly in the news post
http://news.letterboxd.com/post/146049124623/pronouns
Basically the reason is that adding it is fairly simple and doesn't really hurt anybody, but can actually be good/helpful to those who want it
>>70945712
They/Their is already gender neutral
I don't understand
>>70950244
>cinemos
First I've heard of this, I feel too deep in letterboxd to switch... too much effort.
>>70958250
No, no, no - I understand that it's simple and harmless, it's the WANTING it part I don't get.
>>70958340
So we want to be positive and proactive about how you would like to appear in others’ activity feeds, and how you would like others to refer to you in comments. You should be able to legitimize who you are when you’re on Letterboxd. Using a member’s correct personal pronoun is one of the most basic ways of showing respect for their identity.
>>70958250
>>70958340
>>70958388
Oh, yeah, that's all perfectly reasonable and for such noble reasons! And shouldn't bother no one, of course. But then again who could dare be against it?
Anyone not on the kool-aid just need a glance on this monstrosity to observe the insanity of this kind of 'people'. SJWs genocide soon, decency hopes
>>70958430
Why would it bother anyone, the big banner is pretty annoying but that's one click of an x
pronouns are hardly even used on the site (as far as I can tell only adding to watch list, and commenting on specifically your own list/reviews?) and if you are really genuinely anti-trans then maybe just don't follow them, which I imagine you don't anyway?
>>70958514
How about instead of all these new pronouns we just lump them all under 'it' if they really aren't content with him or her.
Makes life easier and we don't cave in to the demands of the mentally ill.
>>70958388
> You should be able to legitimize who you are when you’re on Letterboxd
It was always non-gender specific though. Ordinarily, the LGBTQRSTUV community is trying to remove gender-specific stuff where it's not needed, so why introduce it here?
>>70958514
It's not bothersome, it's just needless. I think I am a bit anti-trans though desu.
>>70957705
rollin
>>70958610
or they could just do it as they did it. If I log in to my letterboxd right now and go to my activity feed, there is literally no difference to as it was before, I can't even see a pronoun. I don't know why you keep using 'we', you don't work for letterboxd, you didn't 'cave into any demands'. They made a decision that doesn't affect you and you're being angry about it for reasons that aren't aren't particularly obvious. Maybe it will affect people that are currently having issues with their mental health because they are being called the pronoun they don't want to be called, maybe it won't help a single person, but I literally don't care.
>>70958611
So people can refer to you correctly in the comments. like it says right there in that post you just quoted.
>>70958656
I think it probably is needless, but like I said above maybe it isn't, but ultimately it doesn't affect me (and probably not anyone in this thread), the anger just seems pointless and weird
>>70952429
agreed, outstanding director
>>70958740
>So people can refer to you correctly in the comments
No one refers to OP in the comments with anything other than username, but fine.
>>70958740
Thin end of the wedge. Soon enough there'll be trannies everywhere passing as women, straight dudes don't want that.
>>70958825
Like I said in the comment above, it really doesn't seem like it has much use, but it's not hurting people, maybe it will help some users
And I really don't think the addition of pronouns to letterboxd will be the thin end of anything. I don't think there will be some future where somehow transsexuals are everywhere, and even if there is nobody will be citing the web site letterboxd dot com as the turning point that begun to change anything
Lotta cucks in here right now. Makes sense
I changed my pronoun to something silly, how do you even pronounce xyr?
Why does nobody care about Fellini no more
>>70959099
xyst ded
>>70959151
>xyst
>Xyst definition, (in ancient Greek and Roman architecture) a covered portico, as a promenade. See more.
>>70959099
People only like recent films and genreshit
>>70959099
he's the sort of filmmaker I had enough of after two or three films.
>>70958149
>>70958270
We're talking about trannies here.
There is no logic invloved.
>>70959395
Why is that anon?
>http://nonbinary.org/wiki/Pronouns
I still don't understand.
>>70945712
no but I wish Arielrocks5 was
>215 five-star ratings
>>70958270
Xyr/Zimbabwe was someones desired choice, so Lettercucks caved
>>70960117
>Zimbabwe
Is Ron Howard the most average director of all time?
>>70960182
yeah
he does the projects that would otherwise be given to Spielberg but Spielberg found too uninteresting, or at least that's how it feels
>>70960203
That actually makes a shitload of sense. He's like Spielberg without the sense of wonder.
>>70958270
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahA9S-f2Vlg
>>70960261
>Letterboxd thread
>No Goddard discussion that turns into shit-flinging
Has /lbg/ finally passed the embryo stage and started progressing to fetus?
>>70960456
>>70958920
you still haven't answered the question of why pronouns beyond they are necessary, cuck. it's come from a mad tumblr sjw subculture (not unlike 4chan in terms of how fringe/extreme many of its ideas about society are) and yet it is permeating mainstream society and media through fear-mongering, twitter-bashing, and perpetual offendedness. this has all come about from a shouty and vicious minority and by sticking up for them you are sticking up for the ultra-pc brigade, censorship, and the power to arrest people for being mean on the social media.
>>70960451
B--B-BUT IT'S TH-THE C-C-C-C-URRENT YEAR
>>70960523
>first image is of somebody rating a film
low iq image
>>70960530
back to /pol/, neckbeard
>>70960645
nice argument anon. refute one single thing i said.
>>70960530
>Maybe it will affect people that are currently having issues with their mental health because they are being called the pronoun they don't want to be called, maybe it won't help a single person, but I literally don't care.
I don't think it is 'necessary'. But I just don't see what harm it brings me, a user of letterboxd that they've implemented this, and don't know how this relates to censorship or being arrested for being mean on social media
I don't understand why people can't just think 'this doesn't affect me, I don't care about it' and then go watch a movie instead of posting angrily online to nobody that wants to listen
/dropout_bear
ze/zir/db the prince pronouns only
Today I'm watching Shanghai Express and The Big City. I watched The Scarlet Empress a few days ago and instantly loved it, I'm looking forward to exploring von Sternberg's filmography. I haven't watched any Ray since we all watched the Apu trilogy when it hit online in December, but the premise for The Big City sounds very Ozu
>>70960530
I'm sure you have loads of irl friends you fucking autist.
>>70960753
>>70960698
>>70960645
>SJWs en masse on /lbg/
Well, shit
>>70960727
t. embryo
>>70960698
you're oblivious if you don't see that it is a terrible thing for mainstream media being expected to be ultra-pc all the time to the point of catering to any minority that shouts loud enough. you probably also believe that the oscars are full of white people because of racism.
>>70960753
i do actually. it's YOU that is the minority anon, not me.
>>70960810
You will be missed.
>>70960810
I'm just trolling tbchwyf
>>70960836
only my non-embr*o friends are allowed to call me embr*o, embr*o
>>70960655
Alright, giving this a shot
432,620 / 100 (let's just say this dude is 100 years old)
= 4,326 films a year
x 1.75 (in hours, between 90-120 minutes in a hour)
= 7570.5 hours of film over a year
7570.5 / 24
= 315.4375
315.4375 days in a year spent watching movies, and doing nothing else.
315.4375 / 365.25
= 0.863620808
86% of this dudes life, from birth to death, has been spent watching films.
>>70960987
upvoted
/pastafrola
>>70960855
Was this a case of an ultra vocal minority calling for this to be introduced though?
Was letterboxd really threatened/harrassed or even just politely requested to introduce genders? As far as I can tell they just did it because they thought it would be a nice thing to do and was simple to implement.
Your talk of a loudly shouting minority getting the site to cater to them doesn't really seem to reflect reality, or at least not anything I've seen?
>>70954639
I found it unbearable
>>70961047
i'm not talking about letterboxd you dense twit, the pronouns business is just symptomatic of a widespread trend in media. do you think we'd have seen a 'gesture' like this if it weren't for the amount of public figures, celebrities, and corporations being crucified by twitter-warriors for not being pc in the past five years? no, we wouldn't.
>>70951808
It literally says "it/it's" is for things like companies and sites not individual people
>>70961142
Ok, I am talking about letterboxd, this is a letterboxd general thread after all!
If you want to talk about the use of pronouns in wider society id recommend taking it to another board, where such discussions could be on topic
>>70960727
hey zir! how was your experience seeing The Nice Guys™ at our lovely cinema?
We hope you enjoyed your small popcorn for only $13.10, down from $18.25 thanks to being a part of the LGBTQTIALMAO+ community! We are a diverse group of people and continually attempt to teach acceptance of those different than us.
Be sure to come again for another discount! Cheap drinks for all LGBTQTIALMAO+ members, down from 22.79 to 17.99 for a small coca-cola!
Have a nice day!
>>70961227
way to avoid the talking about the reasons that people have an issue with the pronouns feature, the thing which YOU began this conversation by saying was stupid and that YOU didn't understand. maybe you should go back to your echo chamber websites, soppy cunt
>>70960987
Why would you assume it's features and not shorts?
>>70961227
>>70961331
>the thing which YOU began this conversation by saying was stupid and that YOU didn't understand
by which i mean people's reasons for not liking the feature
>>70961041
yikes
>>70961379
I figured there's some that are such, and also some 3+ hours long, so it was a fine balance. It's a rough guess though anyway.
>>70961382
refer to:
>>70953814
Stop talking about the fucking pronouns, you fucking idiots. Nobody cares, it's not mandatory, you hit the fucking X and it doesn't appear. Fucking shits.
>muh degeneracy
>muh end of western civilizationo
fucking idiots
>>70961448
It's just the #lbxd faggots and their ebin crusade to shitpost these threads
>>70961448
Read it in his voice.
>>70960727
only 104 movies in your digital collection
lol fag
>>70961517
*physical
I'm poor :<
>>70961490
no one is on a crusade for anything, little fella
>>70961710
>Entire thread full of couple of faggots crying that other faggots can call themselves it or xanadu
yeah sounds like you are
>inb4 snarky metacomment about my post whining about you whining about letterboxd
>tfw realise you downloaded the Ken Russell BFI coffrets and forgot to ever watch them
>>70957139
What did she mean by this?
>>70961860
>she
'ze'
>>70961490
According to what
>>70961817
you're connecting dots that aren't even there lol. Go outside and get some sun chief
>>70961953
>>70961953
>Go get some sun
Check your sun privilege faggot
its fucking heavy rain and storm here
http://letterboxd.com/futuretech1999/
preferred pronouns are he/him.
>>70961448
Don't forget to vote for Bernie! Oh wait hahaha!
>>70962139
>1999
are you allowed to be posting here
>>70962139
>>70962407
>under 18
M O D S
O
D
S
>>70962139
>space vampires. great effects. good plot. nudity.
how old are you? 15?
>booked tickets to watch The Godfather with a symphony orchestra playing the score for Father's Day
pretty hype
Who /goodson/ here??
>>70962651
>it's actually Frozen
Who /fredo/ here?
when did this pronoun shit go up? i should have seen it coming. i remember one of the top reviews being on there simply because it was written by a tranny who took issue with the danish girl because people in ye olden times didn't call redmayne's character by the right pronouns. ridiculous.
now the site has gone full on cuck and i think i'm done with it. i have no problems with lgb people but trannies are mentally ill and their delusions should not be encouraged.
