Do people actually think Harrison Ford was good in this?
do people really think rutger hauer is a good actor?
As good as it gets
>>70834587
Mumbly and monotone was a good fit for Deckard.
Yes. I loved it how his character was drinking all the time
>>70834670
Considering he was a replicant yeah.
you dont need to be "good" by obvious pseudo-cinephile standards to be good as that character. same goes for sean young as rachael, even more so.
>>70834587
the only personn who's been ridiculous in that movie is ridley scott
>>70835687
no he was not
The Deckard character in the book was shit, so it really doesn't matter.
>>70834587
They tailor made the character to suit his general tone of indifference and dour faced experienced veteran. Deckard is a retired manhunter of machines who pretend to be men and he's sick of the absurdity of the hunt.
>>70834621
Do you even tears in rain?
>>70834587
no he's a bad actor and was bad in this
