when

Plinket reviews don't work unless there's a film that's truly awful enough to be worthy of one, or in rare cases when a movie everyone expects to be completely awful turns out not being that bad.

So, Ghostbusters, probably.

Never; the teaser was the actual review.

>>70816385
He's said that there will never be a review of the classic trilogy because they're decent films, others have tried and failed to extract that type of humor from them.

Also.. he likes the new one. It's not going to happen unless they're desperate for money

>>70816538
>>70818253
You know they already announced a TFA review right?

59 minutes

new botw this week

>>70816538
>Plinket reviews don't work unless there's a film that's truly awful enough to be worthy of one
TFA fits the bill.

>>70816385
Each time someone asks bout it, they push the release date to the next day

FAT FAGGOT JANITOR DELETE THIS THREAD YOU FAGGOT TOOL

YOU DELETE THREADS ABOUT ACTUAL HOLLYWOOD ACTORS WHILE LEAVING UP FUCKING E CELEB YOUTUBE SPAM FUCK YOU NIGGER

>>70818253

There's probably a ton of shit that bothers Mike about TFA now that he's not in his excited 4am daze. He liked Titanic as well and still nitpicked it to death.

>>70816538
I don't think everyone expected Star Trek 09 to be completely awful.

Also, what about Titanic?