How could something this silly make so much money?
Morons, OP. Morons as far as the eye can see.
>>70766925
>>70766821
butthurt haters
>>70766821
YEAH BRO DREDD WAS EPIC
Test
My first post ever in this. I usually go to /b/. Getting tired of that shit.
Anyways...OP...I have no clue. That movie sucked.
>>70766821
>>70766948
false advertising and useless gimmicks that are an insult to cinema.
>>70767577
Whoops! Looks like you just accidentally your 4chan privileges for three days, friend!
How's that proxy?
>>70766821
chinks
It's an above average flick with great visuals. It's not a sequel or an adaptation and even most critics gave it a positive review. The internet just love to hate on it because it's popular.
It was a 3D tech demo.
>>70766821
>winning a war for the right motives
That's comfy.
>>70766821
Based James Cameron doesn't make anything but cinema.
it was literally the first IMAX movie. Everyone was so hyped about MUH VISUALS.
>>70766821
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/11/avatar.movie.blues/
Do you remember it, /tv/?
Also, feel free to >tfw Avatar is 7 years old
>avatar came out 7 yrs ago
>>70766821
The Jews and Jewish-owned media loved it's anti-Western, anti-Capitalist message, so they promoted and supported the film.
First 3d movie with a massive budget and a well known director
>>70767458
You have to go back
>>70770127
You do realize Avatar is an indictment of Jewish oppression over the Palestinian people right?
Extended Edition makes it obvious.
>>70771323
Not true.
Those blue guys represent the native American Indians that were all nature lovers, but had to technology. Also, that white old guy literally said "how does it feel to be a trace traitor?", since the other white guy was helping those blue guys.
all the marketing was about how good the 3D was and how the spent so much money on it, turns out the 3D effect wasn't even very good at all, even at IMAX
