ITT we prove RT is shit
- Home
- Board: /tv/ - Television & Film
- Reading: ITT we prove RT is shit
ITT we prove RT is shit
>inb4 some dc/marvel faggotry
ive never used this site as an actual argument for anything, its just lame
that being said, rocky 4, back to the future 2, and top gun all got way too low
die another day, terminator3, and indiana jones 4 got WAY TOO HIGH
>>70624731
>movie makes critic sad or upset
>critic gives it a bad review
Only reason why High Rise's score is so low. Great film about a descent into chaos with beautiful shots throughout. Polarized critics because about half of them thought it was "too upsetting".I loved it.
The audience score is generally more accurate
always remind of jesus christ
>ITT: We disagree with the majority of critics and want everyone to know about it.
>>70624731
but why? nothing to prove. i'd rather just not waste my time on a site that i have almost no match with in terms of taste.
>>70624853
>62%
I expected mid 70s at least. It was a hell of a ride even if you didn't include its social themes.
>>70624853
Absolute shit compared to the book, the director is a hack for wasting such amazing source material.
>tumblr tomatoes
>>70625251
Same was said about Stanley Kubrick.
>>70624731
Metacritic ftw
>>70625452
Kubrick actually changed certain elements of the story, all wheatly did was glance over important character elements and motivations. Leading to majority of the characters looking like idiots for not just leaving the building.
>>70625615
It was pretty clear that anyone with sense or options had already left. The parking lot had less than half of what it used to by the time shit got really bad.
>I DON'T KNOW WHAT RT ACTUALLY DOES!
>METACRITIC IS TOTALLY BETTAH! THEY AREN'T BOUGHT BY DISNEY!!
>civil war average rating on RT 7.6
>civil war score on metacritic 75
WOW!
>>70624951
>33%
I'd like to go on the record and disagree with the critics on this one. It's at least twice that and at the most twice that.
>>70624731
It's not necessarily shit, it's just that many people feel that the percentage is supposed to represent an aggregate review score (or more specifically their own review score) when that's plainly not how the system works. A movie that 100% of critics agree is good but not great is going to get a 100% and a movie that people either adore or revile is going to get around 50%. I'm not saying that most people don't know how RT works but when I see people saying that a certain movie is too high or too low then I have my doubts.
>>70625991
The percentile is a bit more accurate if the reviews are predominantly negative. If a good movie, like Tango and Cash, gets negative backlash from nearly 70% of the critics, something went wrong.
>>70624883
that's it--fuck RT
>>70626077
From what I see the review score is usually about 10-15 points off, it's just that it's a poor system for displaying difference of opinion, let alone actual critique.
>>70626192
off from the actual aggregate I mean.
>2009
>still using Rotten Tomatoes
>they pick the reviews
>they interpret some reviews
>they choose how many to include
>you think taste is objective
>determined entirely subjectively
>easily rigged for profit
Nope, RT is always right
>>70627608
>that one fucking hothead
>>70627608
>audience rating = 89%
average rating: 3.7/5 = 74%
>>70627874
They didnt get paid enough
>>70627977
The special effects alone have aged fairly well and it was memorable enough to be talked about to this day.
>>70627874
ones a percentage of how many views responded favorably. then users are asked to assign a number to it which is the average you see. they're not the same thing, you're just an idiot.
What exactly happened in 1991?
I'VE SAID THIS BEFORE AND I'LL SAY IT AGAIN.
ROTTEN TOMATOES JUST AGGREGATES REVIEW SCORES TOGETHER AND THEN WRITES A SUMMARY.
THEY DON'T CHOOSE THE SCORE.
THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING, IT'S A FUCKING FANCY VERSION OF METACRITIC FOR MOVIES.
>>70628259
old people don't recognise kino
>>70625285
who the fuck painted those words on the guys face anyways and why?
>>70627977
JUST
Whats the difference between a RT 'critique' and a regular human who watches moveis reguarly?
>>70627608
>2k16
>still cancer posting
I always look forward to the butthurt virgin manlets that call me a hothead for hating their reddit meme
>>70630441
Paycheck
haha who the fuck likes turner and hooch
