We're on an express elevator to hell, going down!
Hicks!
We are leave-ing!
Apone? Apone?
>>70433586
In the pipe, 5 by 5.
>Excited to see Alien 3
>Expect to see the continued adventures of Ripley, Hicks, Newt, and Bishop fighting against the xenomorphs.
>Kills everyone off but Ripley in the first five minutes through a fucking hand wave.
>tfw you will never be a xeno
"Nobody Touch Nothin' "
>>70433844
Well they had to do something different, otherwise it would have felt like a rehash of Aliens. Watch the documentary on the making of Alien 3, it's really interesting. How do you think the Blomkamp Alien movie will turn out?
BADASSSS
Yeah, Bishop should go. Good idea.
How many combat drops?
>>70434828
38...simulated
>>70434852
Two, including this one
Whoa whoa whoa, t-this facility has a *significant* dollar value.
>>70433586
Welcome to 4chan
You will never penetrate Vasquez with the full force of an anti-personnel grenade.
Why even wake from cold sleep?
>>70433586
WEIRZBECKI!!!!!
Hudson, sir. He's Hicks.
You secure that shit Hudson.
>>70434047
Feels bad man
>>70433844
Faggots like you are everything that's wrong with this franchise.
>Just one liner my shit up, bruh.
Cameron is a hack.
>Hardened marines with a macho attitude
>Even the chick marines are hardened veterans
>Seen some shit
>Everyone spouts one liners
>Like 80s action heroes
>Like Arnold
>Like Stallone
>Ripley doesn't need one-liners
>Each marine is systematically destroyed by the aliens
>Ripley is the unscathed survivor (along with Newt)
>Badass as fuck
If you don't think the one liners served a function in the storytelling, then you're a faggot
What do you expect us to use man, harsh language?
>>70436125
... the dusk of action cinema? You'll have to try harder than that.
'Hey Vasquez, have you ever been mistaken for a man?'
>>70436245
no have you?
>>70436125
>Ripley doesn't need one-liners
Until she starts using them
>>70434512
This. How awful would the franchise be with this ever expanding cast of plot armor covered characters.
Looks like love at first sight to me.
>>70436125
i missed the 80s so much
>have a butch woman as the heavy weapons marine
nobody scraming yay progresism and equalty, we just rolled with it cause her character was great
feminism was a mistake
>>70436245
Have you ever been mistaken for a ham?
>this is the nobody every posts Bourke post
>>70437014
thats cause muh evil corporation needs bioweapon subplot ruined the movie
>>70437324
but the same exact fucking plot is in the first film u fetus reject
Why is James Cameron the only one who can do strong women without it feeling stupid?
>>70437014
>prone_masturbation.png
feels good
>>70435225
it's "Wyrzbowski"
>>70436357
>feminism was a mistake
except feminism was inherent in all class struggles since before the actress who played Vasquez was born and it would never be acceptable to portray a woman in such fashion before, not to mention she got the part because of positive portrayal, you clinicaly idiot.
>>70437324
can you go back to /pol/? you 're not good at what you 're trying. Go cry to /pol/.
wheres the goddamn beacon? oh i see it.
>>70435225
>>70437837
It's Wierzbowski, you dumb fucks.
We're in the pipe five by five.
>>70438215
yeah, only my prononunciation is probably the ccurate one, you wannabe.
well where the fu.....
>>70438374
you also pronounce "accurate" as "carrot" then?
>>70438340
SHUT THE FUCK UP BITCH
In case you wern't listening to current events we just got our asses licked pal
>>70436125
That because I blew it out of the GODDAMN AIRLOCK!
What about thebonussituation?
>>70440603
Oh, don't worry... you'll get what you deserve.
>>70440847
gimmesomesugartomskerritt.jpg
to be honest, they should just freeze him.
And give a bonus to Parker for thinking of it.
>>70436008
one liner=/=every single line in the whole damn movie is quotable
kys
