SHAWTY GOT THEM APPLE BOTTOM JEANS
BOOTS WITAH FERRR
delete thread please
>A G5 airplane?
>and lotssss of money. playaaaaaaa
>>70326162
THIS IS FLAMING DRAGON
>>70326257
>big
>dick
>playyaaaaaaa
Swingin' past yo kneeees
>>70326377
big balls
>I will rain down an ungodly fucking firestorm upon you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odd8Zdhuj9o
>>70326257
>big dick playa
>big dick baby
>tfw starting to have genuine nostalgia for the mid to late 2000's
2003 - 2007 in general was comfy as fuck. I think tropic thunder came out in early 08, though. Still...
G5 MAGAZINE
>Wh-what's happening? I'm in charge here!
>>70326344
Oh ok, Flaming Dragon. Fuck face.
Tom Cruise sucks
>>70326162
Tom Cruise was so based in this
tropic thunder could not be made after 2008. imagine the Salon and Jezebel uproar at the blackface in that film (even though it was obviously satirical and mocking method actors)
You were nominated?
I WILL FUCKING MASSACRE YOU, I WILL FUCK YOU UP
>>70326344
FWAMING
DWAGON
>>70326576
Well good thing it was made when it was so that a fucking moron like you could make a post like this about how it couldn't be made now when it was made back then.NO ONE FUCKING CARES
>>70326576
>Salon & Jezebel
It's 2016 and no one cares except fags looking for bait to post of here
>>70326576
If it was done now it would be done by retards who just want some shock value.
can tropicthunderposting be a thing?
>>70326665
>>Salon & Jezebel
>It's 2016 and no one cares except fags looking for bait to post of here
This
>>70326576
Your larger point stands but who cares about those specific blogs
>>70326519
First take a big step back
>>70326804
When I built the pyramids, right, it was tough...it was tough as a muhfucka
https://youtu.be/yYYnDEOxWxY
>>70326162
>We don't negotiate with terrorists.
>>70326983
Kek is this Downey's best role?
Also this movie had goat marketing
>>70327065
Yes.
Are you prepared for 8:46 of pure kino?
https://youtu.be/54_KvM1zvEQ
>>70326983
Is he just making fun of mexicans and Kangz? if so this is pretty fucking based
>>70327411The character is a satire of "method actors", you plebeian
>>70327092
Pure kino
>>70327464
Yeah, but you are missing the possible meta/trolling element that could be there. I can only hope he is this based in real life.
I know this is a movie about a movie but did they have to go that meta about it?
>dat commentary on rapacious hollywood producers
>dat commentary on method acting
>dat commentary on the three kinds of blockbusters
>dat commentary on the award system
>>70327504
you are the kind of person they're making fun of
>>70327638
Isn't there still a Les Grossman movie in the works?
>>70327638
>I know this is a movie about a movie but did they have to go that meta about it?
A movie about the making of a movie is meta, inherently; there aren't gradients of meta: it is or it isn't.
Do people on here not know what meta even means?
>>70327733
checked... and I don't see how. but thats fine. as long as somebody is laughing
>>70326224
Take a big step back, AND LITERALLY FUCK YPUR OWN FACE
>>70327960
