is this accurate?
- Home
- Board: /tv/ - Television & Film
- Reading: is this accurate?
is this accurate?
>Tarantino that far right
No
the part about marvel and dc is very accurate.
>>70220349
>kubrick
>not boring and pretentious
you done goofed.
>>70220349
Not even close
>>70220468
>Kubrick pretentious
Fight me
>>70220349
>Kubrick that far right
>Shyamalabingbong not at the very bottom
>Bergman that high
This is too generalizing for me. A better chart would be these factors for movies by a single director, or by two directors for comparison. Use Shamaylan as an example. Lady In The Water is the height of stupid, pretentious garbage, but it is the only movie he did that goes that far.
I bet OP enjoys the films of Wes Anderson
probably the worst chart/graph ive ever seen
>>70220790
Like this?
>>70220527
just read some of his quotations, if his movies aren't enough proof for you. it's always highfaluting existential mumbo jumbo.
What's wrong with Edgar Wright?
Nothing, that's what.
>>70221271
Good argument
>>70220887
>Click not brilliant
Shit graph
>>70220349
>Satoshi Kon where he is
I could give you a list of more interesting Japanese directors in and outside of animation.
He has really good taste in composers, though.
