What wentright?
Not trolling or anything.
>>70126007giant-man and spiderman
The only thing people remember was the shit cgi and that cool ant-man scene. That's enough for 94%
>>70126007
Literally everything.
![1463386891819[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/CNVpVVQ.jpg "1463386891819[1].jpg")
>>70126007
Simply put, you have a low cinematic IQ, or some sort of Stockholm Syndrome, from overexposure to bland, safe, PC and soulless mass-produced blockbusters, which has conditioned you into accepting the absolute lowest common denominator standards in filmmaking, writing and cinematography as somehow acceptable, when you should in fact feel nothing but contempt or disgust for any Kevin Feige-conceived product.
Even strictly in the field of capeshit entertainment, where the bar has always been pretty low, since they're primarly a children media, the level of genuine quality and creative abilities (which comes from studios giving freedom to an auteur with a strong personality and vision towards the material) has kept dropping since the 90's.
When Raimi's Darkman/Spider-Man, Del Toro's Blade 2/Hellboy, Burton's Batman 2 or Bird's The Incredibles offered innovative and playful set pieces, meaningful and relevant themes, each with a very distinct, appropriate tone and truly cinematic aesthetics (simply compare the lighting or editing to today's equivalents), none of these qualities are to be found in Avengers or any of the previous MCU entries. This is why Edgar Wright got fired from Ant-Man. This is why Feige keeps hiring visionless point-and-shoot directors who come from TV or comedy, colorblind cinematographers and art/set design teams who seem to be in love with grey, sterile hangars for some unexplainable reason. Action scenes are now being conceived by CGI teams months before the movie begins shooting and all follow the exact same formula.
Even as a child, I couldn't imagine being dazzled or amused by those turds, as they're utterly devoid of any charm, colors, magic or imagination.
>>70126086
>shit cgi
I think Russos barely working with any CGI before showed. I know Russos did a great job with WS, and a decent job with CW, but I'm not sure they are the guys right for IW, Gunn or Whedon seems more like "spectacular full of CGI " movies type.
>>70126007
It was interesting
>>70126308
The mexican trailer was the best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2SK4KqUs-M
Really good at setting tone. That scene with the woman and Stark at the elevator in the beginning was good. I like how the fun fighting scene in the intro is capped off with the death of a bunch of civilians. It set this idea that they were fooling around and it was costing people lives.
The airport scene and finale don't hold up though. Rhodes should have died to emphasize that they were all just fooling around not thinking about the consequences, but they pussed out.
>>70126180
Cry more, fag.
>>70126007
Just about everything
>>70126007
Everything.
>>70126547
Fuck off
>>70128281
No u
>>70126007
Black Panther was the only good part.
>>70126007
Despite the large cast and introducing two new characters, everyone had a moment. It didn't feel cluttered.
>>70126547
>dat mariachi reference
>>70126007
+ good fights
+ didn't end up being a fucking Avengers movie, plenty of time given to Cap and Tony
+ didn't feel rushed unlike most Marvel movies
+ quips were kept to quip containment characters, who didn't get much screen time
- some silly bits, airport fight was too light hearted, Tony flying into a murder rage knowing full well Bucky was brainwashed
7/10 action movie, 9/10 capeshit
