What went wrong, /tv/?
>>70104458
it got funding
>>70104458
First one was shit too. Not surprising. More entertaining to read a pedo's drug fueled nonsense.
>>70104458
Critics have increasingly become biased bandwagon bullshitters now.
The first one was legit one of the worst movies I've ever seen.
Not enough Avengers.
Alice wasn't replaced with a black girl.
>>70104681
Man fuck off
what could have been
>new alice movie
>new canvas to explore wonderland
>see repercussions of previous time in wonderland
>reflect on what happened and apply it to the new journey and grow on a personal level
>have a surreal, family friendly experience that both adults and children can enjoy
instead
>"people like johnny depp """"""characters"""""" like jack sparrow, tonto, willy wonka, and mad hatter, right?"
>DUDE let's shoehorn him and his wacky voice and expressions and his concubine helena bonham in because its ebin!!! LMFAO
Didn't the first one get panned critically, why make a sequel?
>>70106637
>why would a profitable CGI shitfest get made after a previous profitable CGI shitfest
Barnaby Joyce got in his head
>>70104458
They made a second one?
Do you see Alice's feet anywhere
>>70106637
Because critics aren't as relevant as they like to imagine
>>70104458
the first movie was the single worst theatrical experience I've had. so glad this is flopping
>>70104482
the first movie made one billion dollars. a sequel seems like a good idea, right? movie executives are so goddamn stupid, they never look at the context for why a movie was a hit in the first place. if they did, they would have known the tim burton alice was a chance strike of lightning and a sequel would be a waste of money. avatar had come out three months earlier, starting the craze for 3D blockbusters with immersive settings. Alice 2011 was literally the next thing in that vein and Disney made sure to market it that way, earning a huge box office from moviegoers looking to recapture that magic. but whatever public fascination with 3D novelty james cameron had fostered with avatar was completely destroyed by alice in wonderland, on account of the movie immersing one billion dollars worth of audiences in pure shit.
just let that sink in. alice in wonderland 2011 was such a shit movie that it destroyed the world's goodwill towards 3D movies within 3 months of Avatar. It was a movie that made a billion dollars purely from lucky timing, because in any other circumstance, the awful hackneyed script, purely phoned-in direction and garbage production design would have resulted in a total flop. And they made a sequel to it not immediately, but 5 years later when the iron was no longer hot!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhSROXv6k9U
Seriously, what the fuck is this? It feels like such shitty hot topic johnny depp maaaad hatter pandering fuck.
>>70104458
It wasn't released in 1999 when Burton was still relevant.
>>70104458
What went wrong is that it wasn't made by marvel/Disney. Anything that isn't from them is instantly attacked by critics
>>70104458
The first one was almost fictional on how awful it was. A sequel would have nothing to work with.
>>70107957
is this b8?
>>70108041
No, it's a recent observation and fact
here with your nonsense.
>>70107856
It's called character development something a Marvel cinematic universe loving fucktard like you wouldn't understand. Go back to Avengers if you want nothing but ebin explosions and quips you jackass.
>>>/v/
Stay there and if I see you post here just one more time I'm seriously gonna flip the fuck out don't test me kiddo I've had it up to
that's what happens when you have a domestic abuser as your star.
critics dont want to be seen giving a good review to that pathetic old man
>>70107638
Epic meme, my friend.
>johnny deep called barnaby joyce a imbread that looks like a tomato
>johnny deep makes movie that is rotten tomato
Karma
>B-B-BUT DISNEY IS PAYING OFF THE REVIEWERS YOU GUYS I SWEAR IT'S ALL SHILLS I SWEAR!
>>70108196
Nice try Amber Heard. Shilling on /tv/ won't increase your alimony.
>>70106637
Because it was one of those movies that somehow managed to be wildly successful without leaving much of a trace on popular culture. It was the #2 movie of 2010 at the box office.
>>70104458
What a surprise, another JD movie that's shit.
>>70104458
Disney forgot to pay the RT Premium Review subscription
