How does one make a movie that would get 'certified fresh' rating?
>>70100553
Pay the manchild critics and make it a safe, PC, bland, inoffensive rehash following a tested formula.
>Movies and TV shows are Certified Fresh with a steady Tomatometer of 75% or higher after a set amount of reviews (80 for wide-release movies, 40 for limited-release movies, 20 for TV shows), including 5 reviews from Top Critics.
>>70100553
capekino
>>70100598
>>70100644
This is the only proper response to these butthurt, comic book store dwelling, manbabies.
>>70100553
Pay the critics and slap "Marvel studios" on it.
Its funny, because when the internet was becoming mainstream and I was 16, I was told about RT and looked at it back in 2004 and said: "meh", doesnt reflect reality.
Now, 12 years later its even worse.
Imdb is the best source of finding out if a movie is worth watching or not.
Some odd ratings seemed inflated like Crash, but usually imdb is spot on.
>>70100553
put the word Marvel somewhere in your movie and presto, instant certified fresh from RT
Make it PC and liberal, don't make it an action movie unless you're going to put hamfisted political stuff in it.
quips
>>70100553
Make a good movie ?
so can /tv/ name a movie that doesnt deserve its rotten/fresh score that ISNT cape?
>>70100840
Only God Forgives
>>70100840
It's young adult novel so it's almost the same, but no way in Hell Hunger Games is better received by critics than Dersu Uzala.
>>70100553
Make a good film.
Make a good film. Except a comedy. Rotten Tomatoes always give comedies low ratings because critics have no sense of humor.
>>70100698
Keep crying fag
>>70100553
PAY THE WEBSITE
>>70100553
>>70101189
How has Warner Brothers not figured that out?
>>70100598
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_amazing_spider_man_2/
Why didn't they pay them off?
Do a reddit survey to find out what they want in your movie
>>70100995
>>70100819
>>70100644
>>70100553
CRITIC'S GUIDE TO MAKING A GOOD MOVIE
>BE AS POLITICALLY CORRECT AS POSSIBLE
>TAKE ABSOLUTELY ZERO RISKS IN THE PLOT
>TAKE ABSOLUTELY ZERO RISKS IN THE VISUALS
>TAKE ABSOLUTELY ZERO RISKS REGARDING THE CHARACTERS
JUST DO A MOVIE THAT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE A MILLION TIMES LMAO
There you go, 80%+ fresh on RT!
>>70101788
Literally every disney/marvel movie.
>>70101622
>>70100553
Remember, most media critics now are millennial/gen-x women and nu-males, so that's who you're pandering to.
>Strong women and non-whites, you can have a white male lead but he'd better not be too competent
>Snarky dialogue and quips that can easily be made into gifs on tumblr and twitter. Try to imagine someone saying "when you ____" before you write a line and see if it works as a reaction image or not
>Non-threatening, mostly harmless villain that fails constantly at everything they attempt. They might get triggered if the bad guy does anything too harsh. If you can make them sympathetic by giving them daddy issues or a traumatic childhood all the better
>Don't dwell on things like civilian casualties or anything like that. Actions should have no consequences for your heroes under any circumstances
>Don't take any big risks with the story. These people don't want to think. "Fun" is all they care about, first last and only. Stick to a simple, shallow retread of movies they already like and don't make them think about anything deeper than a kiddie pool
>Appeal to nostalgia. Make references to things that were popular in the 1990's/early 00's
>Plenty of bright colors and 'sploshuns. If you think it would keep a 10 year-old or a cat entertained you're on the right track
Guaranteed 90% or higher.
>>70102052
>>70102211
guys stop
>>70103209
>>70103384
I wonder who could be behind this post
you guys better stop or I'm telling
>>70103384
top kek
>>70103384
damn I laughed
