ORGRIM DOOOOOOOOOOMHAMMER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emZUeNhQnvg
>this same guy that types in all caps and spams multiple shill threads
Stop
>>69781899
Who gives a fuck about this.
lmao excuse me, blizzard... orgrim wouldn't wear gloves you fucking retards. he uses his hand grip to burn into the throat handle of his weapon. fucking retards are ruining this once beautiful lore. as soon as draenei went to horde, i tore my posters off my wall. fucking idiots.
>>69782109
>>69782151
this is one of the funniest back-to-back post combos i've ever seen.
>>69782151
>draenei went to horde
What?
>>69782056
>typing in all caps is exclusive to one particular individual
Are you a new to /tv/?
>>69782109
I do.
test
>>69781899
>3 Blizzard Coins® have been added to your Blizzard Wallet™!
>>69782426
This particular anon always starts the thread in all caps, with some poster from the movie and a trailer link. They usually later start dumping stills from trailers.
>>69782675
Who gives a fuck how a thread is started. There's no particular thread starting etiquette is there? It all ends up being the same shit anyway. Stop whining.
>>69783101
>It all ends up being the same shit anyway
200 posts of people debating whether OP is a shill or not. kek
>>69783150
More like 200 posts of people debating how much OP gets paid.
I'd rather have more Warcraft threads on here, than the hundreds of Ghostbusters shill threads we get each day.
>>69783265
But both threads are dedicated to shitting on the movies.
>>69781899
>Orgrim is much more BASED
>>69783358
>All threads are shills on /tv/, no exceptions.
>>69783432
No, only Warcraft and Ghostbuster threads.
The one that desperately need online activity.
>>69783469
The ones you desperately think need online activity cause you're a dumbass.
You must be a dumb motherfucker if you think Ghostbusters isn't getting activity. Just because it's mostly negative doesn't mean it's not activity regardless. You wouldn't even get that many views and dislikes if there wasn't activity.
Warcraft is also trending higher than all movies releasing in June in terms of search interest on both IMDb and Google Trends. Even Finding Dory, which kind of shocked me. I see people talking about it all the time, even if it is mixed so far.
>>69783699
>You must be a dumb motherfucker if you think Ghostbusters isn't getting activity
99% of it are people making jokes about the dislike bar in their trailers, and the 1% are SJWs crying that nobody cares about.
>Warcraft is also trending higher than all movies releasing in June in terms of search interest on both IMDb and Google Trends
>on both IMDb and Google Trends
Exactly.
>>69783739
Trying to frame something a certain way doesn't make your post any more credible mate.
>>69783822
Trying to frame something a certain way doesn't make your post any more credible mate.
>>69783822
Nice one mate.
But look at your post, look at mine. I'm not the one posting quotes with overblown exaggerations or sarcastic one liners to make it seem like I "got'em".
>>69783739
If you're going to debate that at least post something with substance to address it. A bunch of random words doesn't refute the post.
>>69784039
Post relevant information then.
How much are people talking about this movie in social media?
Someone made Warcraft 2 HD based on the Stratagus engine. You can actually select more than 9 units now. Oh, and queuing is now part of the game too.
https://mega.nz/#!7YZFCZII!XB7OGRNNFWcQr9By4KlR7VBmZpWG_2M0Qke__EQQwiI
>>69784060
That is relevant information dumbass. Just because you want to pretend it isn't doesn't make it so. If you had any critical thinking you'd understand anything being searched on google can be extrapolated to a certain degree to reflect what is being discussed on social media.
IMDb is also the most popular movie website on the planet according to all metrics. Most normies go there when something in a movie peeks their interest, so if it's high up there it means there's interest. Not shut the fuck up and go do some research before spewing random bullshit here.
>>69783699
Actually if you compare the current trending levels of World of Warcraft and the Warcraft movie, they are the same. People could just be searching for WoW and it counts as a search for the movie.
>>69784114
Is safe to DL?
I loved WC 2 as a child and have been meaning for a reason to replay it.
>>69784181
No. These are from being compared on a topic by topic basis, not word searches. Go read what "topics" entails on Google Trends and how they derive their metrics to target a specific topic.
>>69784232
Yeah it is.
I tried it myself.
Check this thread for info.
>>>/v/338265156
>>69784181
Uh no, they're not the same at all when comparing topics, not word searches. Learn how to use the tool.
The funny thing I just checked WoW's topic interest and if it were added to the movie it would dwarf even Civil War. So no, they are completely separate when sorting by topics.
