Apologize, misogynistic man-babies

So it's all just run-of-the-mill CGI, is it?

>>69721988
is there a comparison of the old reveal of the ghosts? it definitely looks like they improved the visual effect.look of them in the new trailer.

>>69721988
Literally Scooby doo tier

>>69721988
hmm nvm here is the old trailer, it still looks about the same?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3ugHP-yZXw

That shot with the possessed Chris Hemsworth is pretty good. How ironic that the saving grace of the flick will be a man.

>daytime comedy sequences all look like a shitty sitcom with no blocking and lazy photography, jokes have awful rythm
>night time action sequences look generic but still decent, CGI ghosts actually have good designs
Thanks CGI pre-viz teams and second unit action directors, I guess. ANything where Feig is directly in charge looks atrocious.

File: react-oh-grin-tirian-got44685765.jpg (63KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

63KB, 490x490px

>>69722078
>How ironic that the saving grace of the flick will be a man.

>>69722050
This

>>69721988

the first Ghostbusters was not a great film

this will not be worth watching

why are you idiots fueling the hype-fire for this psyop

>>69721988
For what? The leaks were true, the fucking logo is last boss, dropped

File: Screenshot_2016-05-18-06-40-47.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>69721988

>>69721988
No.