>I heard you disliked the trailer... mind telling us why that is?
Your response?
>>68971471
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDLOO2SZdvY
>>68971471
>tired of reboots
>all female cast is just a gimmick to hype a shit movie
>REALLY tired of getting accused of sexism/racism/whateverism
I've woken up to the amount of hate lefties are directing at me, and I'm refusing to participate in it.
>>68971471
I hate women.
AAAWWW HELLL NAWW. Movie is fine. Fuck the haters.
>>68971471
Because I hate men and a man made this.
>>68971471
I honestly didn't think it was that funny.
Because I'm racist, sexist and hate fat people.
>>68971471
Show me your feet, Kate.
>>68971471
I don't owe you a response
Because I realised Melissa Mccarthy will never sit on my face.
Pointless remake. Seriously thought we were past this reboot/remake phase, this is the last dingleberry still clinging to the asshole and trying to convince people its not like the other dingelberrys.
>>68971471
because we have different opinions
>>68971471
Watch your own trailer, then get back to me. Cunts.
>>68971471
Id show them my proton pack and bust a few ghosts right then and there, preferably to Kate
>>68971471
While the trailer had some promising visual effects, it adds nothing new to the franchise. Some of the scenes rely on capitalizing on nostalgia from the original movie without the appreciation of what made the original so iconic in the first place.
The remake is like taking Bridesmaids and stuffing it into a Ghostbusters suit, rather than adding to the franchise or creating something new.
>>68971960
have you got a death wish, m8?
>>68971471
I haven't seen it. I won't.
>>68971471
I'm black so why is the black character the only non-scientist? are you saying we are all stupid?
fuck you and your racist movie.
The original's a masterpiece that should have never been remade.
>>68971471
That exorcism scene is cringey af
>>68971471
Why make the classic logo, the villain?
>>68971471
I didn't like the original, I don't like Melissa McCarthy and I don't like the Lesbian one because she's a lesbian.
>>68972974
Because the ending hints at Gozer in a sequel
>>68972558
it's not about childhood, it's about how they ruined the core of the movie, the ghosts were just secondary, like the starkiller in TFA, the real core was the relationship between the characters
>>68971527
that was eye opening, corporate creativity everyone
>>68974785
Im not defending the movie here but we havent seen it, they needed to show SOMETHING for the trailer, and the cheapest thing to show to get people into the seats is action sequences and gags.
Because modern American comedy is fucking terrible.
kate i <3 u tho
>>68971471
I hate women desu
I think this movie should be condemned. There's serious comedy fatigue in all the joke-bearing members, the writing is substandard, it's completely inadequate for our plot needs, and the special effects are like a demilitarized zone.
>>68975450
I like you.
>>68971471
personally I can't wait to see just how much shit this shitfest gets when it airs
>>68971471
the answer is simple - it was not remotely funny
add to that the totally different tone to the originals, the shoddy ghosts and the fact that this erases the originals with a new origin and you get an awful looking film almost no-one asked for.
Because it wasn't funny.
Anyone want to place bets on whether or not Armond White will love it?
When does this shit come out?
>>68971527
>Donkey Kong
>>68976137
July 15th
>>68976137
>>68976453
And it's already being buried.
>No TV spots
>No toys or merchandise
>No advertising at all
They have already given up on it and is just damage controlling at this point.
I disliked the trailer because
>it's another barrel-scraping reboot/remake
>it looks cheap and flat
>there is absolutely no chemistry between the cast members
>I think the CGI looks undercooked
>loudmouthed black woman trope goes unsubverted, her character offers nothing new
>every character seems like the "comic relief" type, so the dialogue and energy of the group has all the dynamics of a flat line
>the unoriginal logo ghost thing
I hated the trailer for Bridesbusters because it is unremarkable, and not because of my soggy knees.
>>68976535
>future unemployed women
>>68971527
and yet pixels isn't anywhere near close to the dislikes of ghostbusters
looks like it is misogyny
>>68976652
Because no one had any expectations for Pixels. Ghostbusters is loved though so it being shit hurts more.
it looks like it's shot like an uncreative comedy like pixels or the hangover sequels instead of a supernatural thriller that happens to be funny
>>68976535
>We're women working on a movie!
Well isn't that noteworthy
>>68971471
It's a win-win for them.
If it succeeds, they make a fuckton of cash and promote "muh grrl power"
If it fails, they can claim it's sexism that made it fail, and not just because it was a shitty reboot.
Win/Win
>>68976535
So whenever the movie tanks we know what the problem was.
>>68976715
Unlike the internet, businesses are not in the game for moral victories. They are in it for profit, and it will be a lose when it doesn't turn one.
>>68976535
>appropriated something starring men, directed by a man, and created by men
>GIRL POWER
>>68971471
its a classic movie that didnt need a reboot, and is plainly a cash grab by the studio
>>68976715
If it fails, it won't make money which is all the business cares about.
>>68976774
This, I will be very happy if Ghostbusters falls flat because the execs will start to think that women aren't going to carry their lazy franchises
But then again women are far more likely than men to actually generate money for studios, since men at large actually know how to torrent stuff. I've tried to teach my girlfriend 5 times and she still claims it "doesn't work." She's a senior in an engineering course.
>>68971471
I hate women. They shoved me into lockers in school and now they're taking over my comfy childhood franchises.In b4 accusations of false flagging. It's all entirely true.
So Ghostbusters originally had two prominent female characters via Ellen Potts and Sigourney Weaver.
Do you feel like the new villain/naive secretary boytoy characters will be fairly analogous to iconic female roles listed above?
>>68976535
>50ish of them are women
>out of a crew of a couple of hundred
Because "THE POWER OF PATTY COMPELS YOU" is almost as bad of a line as "I Rebel"
Almost.
>>68976835
Women plus gears equal failure.
>>68976535
i wonder if all those women are going to tell their friends to go see 'ghostbusters' at least 2X and to take their bf's/husbands/male coworkers/etc..
and probably post on their facebook/twitter/etc about how 'good' the movie is and who's going to go see it opening day
or are they updating their resumes/trying to get hired on 'male' movies before 'ghostbusters' ruins their careers?
>>68972106
>capitalizing on nostalgia from the original movie without the appreciation of what made the original so iconic in the first place.
Thank you for saying this. The old iconic logo/premise/outfits/vehicle/location are all present but they still get the play the 'new&progressive' card because it's an all female cast.
>>68976891
You don't get it. It's a lose/lose situation for all of us with this movie. It does poorly? Society is fucked, men are in control and WE HAVE TO STOP THE PATRIARCHY. More fuel for the feminist cause. It does well? GIRL POWER, WE WIMMINS WE DONE DID GREAT, and it opens the floodgates for more horrible shit movies of this kind. You thought meme magic was bad? You have no idea what Jewish magic is. But you soon will.
>>68971471
It's great that they attempted to do something different but it ended up making it less attractive to everyone. Looks like the movie was created by feminists holding the entire team/director hostage and ensuring every frame and line isn't an attack on "females".
1. Lack of comedy
2. All except 1 of the female cast are cringe inducing and not funny.
3. Street-smart black woman because she's stupid for anything else right?
4. Shitty ghosts. At least the original 1st movie had some real scare points in it. This one doesn't.
5. Obviously a cheaply and quickly patched up pile of shit to attempt at cash-cowing on a name because there isn't another way a pro-feminist movie can get any revenue whatsoever in return.
>>68977060
They've got three months and the official trailer got GLARING levels of backlash on youtube. Either their PR team is going to make it as quiet as possible to pull attention away from an impending flop or they're going to go all out and stir up the greatest social justice shitstorm you have ever seen just to ensure ticket sales via people wanting to see what all the 'sexism fuss' is about.
>If you don't see this film you are going to be on the wrong side of history
>>68971471
Rape the two cuties. Put down the gorilla. Execute fatty and render her body into soap
>>68977218
I remember when people did this for Red Tails, I wouldnt rule this out of the equation. Then the movie actually happened and everyone supporting it suddenly went quiet.
>>68972558
Why does male characters being replaced by female characters ruin your childhood? This doesn't make the original content vanish magically.
>>68972150
If you were actually black you'd be eating her character up alongside the rest of Perry's films.
>white /pol/ fedoras pretending to be black
>>68971471
I don't mind it and I might go see it. However, based on the trailers they forced a lot of slapstick humour into the reboot and it really takes away the feel of the original. But I am keeping in mind that trailers lie, and it is possible they are throwing the majority of those moments into the trailer to appeal to a wider audience.
Also saw the Hemsworth featurette and I'm amused by the idea of having him as a total bimbo. What is also funny is the amount of MRA shitters crying about how it wouldn't be okay if it was a woman portrayed this way.
My expectations aren't terribly high though, so I'm not going to be crying if it turns out to be a shit show.
>>68972558
>this cover of Stairway to Heaven ruins my childhood because I grew up listening to Zeppelin
>>68976091
We should know what other critics think about it first. Armond likes being a special snowflake and using big words and retards here eat it up everytime
>>68971471
its really really tryhard and unfunny and seems to miss the tone of the original completely.
>>68972150
This.
>>68971471
Cause fat people, dykes, cougars, and nigger.
>>68977457
>Fire all members of Led Zeppelin
>Replace them with women
>None of them can play instruments or sing
>Band gets booed off stage
>Wow, clearly there is a sexism problem in the music industry
>Better get women some exposure to stick it to those stupid sexists
>All of your favourite bands are replaced with women
>Entire generation grows up on the shitty women bands
>Think it is amazing because they have been programmed for decades to believe the originals were sexist and stupid
>This is the world now
>Sit back in your chair and listen to your good old bands and reminisce about the good old days
>Light dims around you
>Radio dies
>Last thing you hear is your trans grandson and his girlfriend listening to an auto-tuned R&B cover of Stairway to Heaven as sung by Charleen Blacky Black
>Die
>>68977870
I aint sticking my dick in no haunted ass vagina. Getting my dick all possessed by all of the dead children
I've seen poltergeist, I know this shit nigga
>>68977457
Shitty analogies is what defines a retard. I recommend ignoring this post.
>>68977940
>>Fire all members of Led Zeppelin
The movie doesn't replace all the other Ghostbusters content, moron. Murray and the original crew could get together and make a movie tomorrow if they wanted, not that you actually give a fuck about Ghostbusters.
>>68972558
>MUH CHILDHOOD
These are the same people who watch Episode VI. Fuck 'em.
I wouldn't mind the all-female thing if it weren't being done for Paul Feig's politicial agenda
Also it just wasn't funny at all
>>68978056
Not a Ghostbusters movie, faggot.
>>68971471
Not at all. I think the original Ghostbusters is a pile of shit. This new one also looks like a pile of shit that may actually be worse.
>>68976835
What a fucking lie
>>68977989
The movie is literally a "cover" of Ghostbusters and in no way interferes with other past or future Ghostbusters content.
>>68978056
The new movie kills Murray off.
>>68971471
I just want off this ride. Why can't everything be untainted, wholesome and rad like in the 90s?
>>68978056
>he original crew could get together and make a movie tomorrow if they wanted
Good to know Harold Ramis is still up for acting.
>>68978109
>No way interferes with future Ghostbusters content
>Movie bombs
>Ghostbusters franchise is blacklisted
>Movie succeeds
>10 more sequels starring the new cast
>>68978118
What are retrospectives, you buttblasted buffoon?
>>68978056
>Murray and the original crew
Not Ramis
>>68978165
Damn dude, not even the same person. But they do kill off Murray in the new movie.
>>68971527
classic sony
>>68978201
he has a cameo
>>68978159
>Movie bombs
>We don't get that GB movie that wasn't going to exist anyway because we don't actually give a fuck about Ghostbusters
>Movie succeeds
>Shows that only nerds with PTSD from girls giggling at them give a shit about the cast change
>>68971471
>>the power of patty compells you
>>is it the hat or the wig?
>>i know new york
>>68978109
Spotted the shill, you're a bit late to the party
>>68978351
Please refrain from posting anime outside of /a/.
>>68978109
It strictly shits on Ghostbusters past and clearly ruins it's future or annihilates it from existence (more likely), what the fuck you are talking about?
The right way to say what you mean is:
>this movie pretends previous movie never existed, not just story-wise, but overall.
And that is not a good thing to do. Ever.
>>68978414
Please refrain from posting sulky, kicked-dog, alt-right baggage outside of /pol/.
>>68971471
Unfunny and forced gurl powah.
Also, you want to make a whole "Ghostbusters Cinematic Universe" out of this? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAA
>>68972558
That image SCREAMS faggotry
>>68978524
>anime reactions
>>68978254
As the EPA guy. And they kill him.
would fuck top left and bottom right.
>>68978462
Ghostbusters never had a future, not that you actually give a shit about Ghosbusters, and again doesn't cause the previous content to magically disappear.
>>68978524
Please refrain from existing in the same plane of reality as the rest of us
>>68978652
>>68978701
Why do you keep repeating this "You don't really give a shit about Ghostbusters" line? It's clearly not true and is just trying to deflect any comments you don't like.
>>68978740
>Why do you keep repeating this "You don't really give a shit about Ghostbusters" line?
Because who actually does? Where did this sudden Ghostbusters fandom come from? How fucking stupid do you think I am?
>>68978802
Just because someone's a fan of a series doesn't mean they live, breathe, and eat it. I'm a fan of the movies, have the DVDs but other than that I don't own merchandise. As for this new movie it takes everything that looked good about the originals and just shits all over it. All they had to do was make it a continuation and not a reboot and they would have avoided 75% of the hate they're currently getting.
>>68978802
Ghostbusters actually has a pretty sizable fanbase, and there has been a lot of projects using the brand. The thing the fanpeople always managed to do was consider themselves another franchise of the original (ie: NYC) brand when they made films.
If the studio had done this (say and put the 4 of them in Chicago or Boston) half of the negative backlash wouldn't have happened.
>>68978917
>>68978927
Let me ask you both a question, and please give me an honest answer. Of everyone complaining about this movie, how many have earnest emotional investment in Ghostbusters and how many are jumping on the "women ruin everything" fedorawagon? What sort of percentages are we talking about here?
>>68971527
wow they even used the same font at the start
>>68979047
How would anybody know the actual percentage? You think all the people hating on it have group meetings or something?
>>68971960
Would be an awful experience for everyone involved tbqhwu paterfamilias
Kat Dennings would be far superior
>>68979225
I asked you to be honest, not evasive. What do you think the percentage is? How full is /tv/ with /pol/ neckbeards with baggage around women? How many people actually give a flying fuck about Ghostbusters in this day and age?
>>68978802
its been around for decades. there were several well received fan films, and a bunch of cosplay groups that goto the big cons.
http://ghostbustersfanon.wikia.com/wiki/Denver_Ghostbusters
>>68971471
You heard wrong. I didn't watch the trailer, because I don't watch remakes, reboots, sequels, or "creative reimaginings." Now fuck off.
>>68971471
i hate it because it stars fat ugly women. I am not a misogynist by the way. i like cute women. It's not misogyny for men to hate fat ugly women as it is not misandry for women to hate fat ugly men.
>>68979047
You ever see the Critic growing up? Remember when they hire him to make "Ghostchasers 3"? It was in the 90s and he literally explained why this movie was going to be terrible, 20 years ago.
>There shouldn't have been a Ghostchasers 2
>We only have the black guy...and only for 10 minutes
>It doesn't know why it's being made, only cause someone decided to make it.
>Maybe if we 'jazz it up'...
The 'all female cast' and girl power shtick was tacked on because the script was weak and the premise was shit.
>>68979047
I don't watch sequels or remakes. That's the sum total of my objection to this film's being made.
>>68979359
>I asked you to be honest, not evasive.
No, you asked two other anon to do that
To be honest about something they have absolutely no way of knowing and their gut feelings about it would proof absolutely nothing
>>68971471
The jokes fall flat and I'm not feeling like the leads have any chemistry. It feels empty. Given that many of these women have been in ensembles together before, and to great effect I might add, I'm led to believe that this movie is going to be a dud.
Can you release Extreme Ghosbusters on DVD? I need to be reminded of a GOOD Ghostbusters reboot.
Is anyone actually gonna watch this shit?
>>68979843
Unlikely. Even the supporters will likely forget when its coming out.
>>68976652
right, you only ever hear great things about pixels
>>68971746
>This man was Sabrinas teacher
>>68976652
>>68976928
Annie Potts.
Do we really believe the boytoy will be stupid, annoying, and useless? Because Janine/Annie certainly was.
>>68977218
It worked for Disney with VII. All those made up stories like the white supremacist who killed himself because Boyega was cast that no reputable news source actually reported on, it was all clickbait sites and Disney marketers.
>You are going to see our movie right? I mean, you're not racist are you?
>>68977218
It began ages ago, and it is glorious!
>>68977455
>Le middle ground refined gentleman
>>68978056
>The movie doesn't replace all the other Ghostbusters content, moron.
it's a reboot which erases the original origin story, you fuckwit
>>68978149
He could play the new Slimer of the group.
>>68971471
It sucked. You all sucked. You treated Ghostbusters like a God damn slapstick comedy. It was never that. Ghostbusters was funny not because its characters acted like morons, but because they treated every single situation seriously. Its just that their situations were ridiculous. The Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man was a literal world destroying threat, and that is hilarious. You don't even have to make a joke with that. The entire situation would have played out exactly the same if the Destructor had manifested as a Lovecraftian horror. And that's the funny part.
But no, you don't get that. You think that a black woman yelling a lot and slapping people while tired lines like, "Oh that's gonna leave a mark!" and Exorcist jokes are the height of humor. You think that ghosts puking on people will get butts into seats.
God I hope you are wrong.
they went the least interesting way with it: the women are just Fionna & Cake versions of the original Ghostbusters
it should have been a sequel set in the same universe as the originals.
Ghostbusting is now a shit job, like delivering pizzas. Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, and Ernie Hudson run the company, but low level employees would never see them. They could, however, be seen in a TV commercial early on.
The women aren't passionate about their jobs. Their group doesn't have to have the same dynamic as the original ghostbusters. Their car doesn't have to be like the original ghostbuster ambulance, but it could be something similarly quirky. I'd say Pontiac Aztec, but Breaking Bad already "owns" that car so to speak.
When the apocalyptic disaster happens, it happens in a place where the 4 women are the only ones who can get there in time. It's on an island, or the disaster destroys the roads or something like that.
The women are NOT the most qualified team, but at this point Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, and Ernie Hudson get in contact with them over the phone or walkie talkies. In addition to some instructions on how to defeat whatever supernatural monster is threatening mankind, you can have some "nice" moment where the original and women ghostbusters bond over the hassles of the job.
Then there's the action scene where the women use the instructions to kill the monster. Things don't go EXACTLY as planned, and the women improvise a way to make it work, so it's not just like the men did everything.
Not that it'd be great. But that seems like the obvious way to do it. Doing this "remake" thing where the women are also scientists is retarded.
The only thing that really matters is that the jokes are funny. They're obviously not going to be. Every "sexist" just knew that shit is so pussy these days that the comedy would be shitty. It was just an overwhelming feeling.
>>68981069
This
>>68979359
Back to tumblr with you.
>>68971471
Sure.
It's a chick flick, and I don't like chick flicks....outside of porn.
>>68979047
seriously shut the fuck up, idiot
>>68971471
Because, quite frankly, your trailers don't seem to be capturing the spirit of the originals such as layering it over the surface of another mediocre Paul Feig movie.
It's like Bridesmaids wearing Ghostbusters as a skin suit
>>68979831
I don't know, was Extreme actually good or is it childhood nostalgia? I remember them going full SJW with the caste, they had the Mexican, the black (Winston makes that one fine though), The cripple and a girl who can only be described as Tumblr.
How did the cripple work anyway? Did none of the ghosts ever go up stairs?
>>68971471
I just watched the trailer. That is some of the most awful, cringy and clichéd humor I have ever seen in a movie.
It would have been just as fucking awful if it had been a full male cast or whatever stupid constellations of genders and sexualities you can think of.
>>68980867
>>68976918
>being bullied by women
are you really this much of a beta faggot or did you go to school with some amazonian bull-dykes?
>>68981069
That is very similar to Ghostbusters 3 aka the game.
>>68976535
>so many women in charge of making a movie
you can already tell the film is going to suck
women cannot into films
What are the odds on either a rap or wubstep remix of the original being the theme?
>>68981373
That was actually the most condescending article I'd ever read
>>68981587
There's already one in the trailer.only thing I could actually tolerate in the trailer desu
I have a friend who legitimately thinks it looks like it's going to be a good movie. It hurts being his friend.
>>68980867
you are now aware that someone got paid for writing this
>>68977354
It cheapens the name and adds unnecessary dumb baggage.
>>68981690
>legitimately thinks it looks like it's going to be a good movie
>his
Is he a fuckboy or something?
>>68981738
Probably not actually.
>>68981069
I would be absolutely thrilled with that. It at least sounds relatively original
>>68971471
The humor fell terribly flat, the characters seem like obnoxious and unlikable caricatures, it's an unnecessary sequel, and it reeks of appeasement which isn't a good justification for the expenditure of money to create a movie.
>see a women
*starts hating*
pretty much how it works for me
>>68981951
The problem isnt that it has women, people are missing the point entirely. Its that they have no chemistry at all, and each individual has no charisma as an actor. Then again, we havent seen much to go on, but just based on their past roles and gags they are just not the right people.
>>68971527
wow it's like all trailers follow a similar format that intrigues the viewer and tries to catch their interest
What are the odds they'll pull a 21 Jump Street and have the movie mock itself for being a soulless corporate reboot?
So the movie is actually being shilled in this thread. You are really going to waste money better spent on reshoots trying to pass off your magic beans here?
>>68982138
>The problem isnt that it has women
"Has women"? No.
Has women as the main characters? Yes.
Men and women have a different chemistry, and men just aren't into chick chemistry the way chicks are into men. This fact pisses off a lot of women who just can't understand why men aren't willing to watch a bunch of harpy shrews the same way chicks are willing to watch men.
It's biology, and feminists hate us for it.
>>68980867
(+)200.000 / (-)600.000
>>68982138
I never said that I disliked it because it had women. I said it feels like they're trying to appease someone by making it. I wouldn't mind the all female cast if they had found female actors that could give anything above a gratingly cringeworthy performance.
>>68976835
Amy, sweetheart, we've all ready your e-mails. You're actually retarded, its a fact.
WAAAAH MUH CHILDHOOD
Grow up, stop watching grown men in spandex fight each-other. Evolve into a fucking adult and leave your adolescence behind like a normal person.
>>68980147
thanks for proving my point misogynist
pixels was shit yet people don't dislike the trailer
>>68971471
Ghostbusters wasn't sexist that's my biggest problem, Sigourney was a main character and the secretary chick was an alpha female. Why ruin a classic film with this womyn power bullshit?
>>68972558
This is fucking cringe, holy shit. "My childhood" shit is the most disgustingly blatant admission that you're a completely non-functional manchild. This image has to be some sort of false flag. Jesus.
>>68982628
These shitty memes make you sound like a whiny little bitch, kiddo.
>its a cadillac
>i'm black and black people like cadillacsLOL
>>68982628
Hey, you know why stuff like Mad Max Fury Road and Jurassic World were good? Because they didn't try to drastically change the formulas and still call themselves "nostalgia-pandering".
>>68982650
Because the people making the movie aren't creative enough to make their own original movie with stronk wymmyn in it, they have appropriate someone else's creation to shove their story into.
>>68982704
Why are you REEEEEEING around the room you angry Aspie cunt?
>>68972558
>MUH CHILDHOOD
If your childhood was centered around Ghostbusters then you need to reevaluate your life
>>68982741
>Mad Max Fury Road and Jurassic World
>good
>>68982798
Is this because your childhood centered around you getting raped by your father, kid, and you take it out on anyone enjoying entertainments?
>>68979524
whatever happened to IU?
>>68982847
>being this salty for no reason
>>68982729
>kiddo
>>68982812
>mfw i actually look like that guy without all the autism shit like the hat, glasses, gloves, and neckbeard
>>68982937
What does that reply even mean, kiddo?
I guess it was 100% on the nose and now you are hurt and bewildered.
>>68980344
>stupid, annoying and useless
>Janine
Pick one.
>>68971471
Blow me>>68971471
>>68983003
rip
>>68983075
i dont give a fuck what some fag on /tv/ thinks
>>68983013
stop being so triggered, I'm getting second hand embarrassed.
>>68982392
Considering these are destined to both be massive flops, I'm not sure that argument holds water.
>>68982628
Right out of the shill handbook, can't defend the shit you're trying to push? Start attacking the person who disagrees.
A good number of people have already made the decision to skip this movie, you trying to disparage them isn't going to change anything.
>>68978414
>>68983124
Another meaningless response. I;m worried about you. I think you should have a nap and maybe take some of your meds, ok?
Is there an adult there who can supervise you to make sure you don't injure yourself?
>>68983108
I see you're a moron as well as a fedora. Tough mix.
>>68976835
How the fuck did she ever get a job as an executive?
>>68983176
It's scary because they genuinely are shilling for the movie in this thread. Talk about an uphill battle.
>>68977354
>>68977354
>This doesn't make the original content vanish magically.
George Lucas says hi. We still don't have original prints of the original Star Wars trilogy on dvd/blu-ray that aren't garbage.
>>68983196
i said i didnt where the hat and other autist shit. im just fat
>>68971471
mstly its the chicks that arnt the moose from spy it should be her talking shit to a bunch of people all movie then id watch it
>>68983277
And I said rest in piece. You do know what the image is of don't you?
>>68983241
We can only hope they're getting paid by the post, the movie might be bad but I'm all for someone making a good paycheck at the marketers expense.
>>68983315
actually no i dont, what is it?
>>68983282
>mstly its the chicks that arnt the moose from spy it should be her talking shit to a bunch of people all movie then id watch it
Let this sentence be a warning to all of you - ALWAYS wear a crash helmet on a bike or you will get brain damage, like this poor vegetable.
>>68983241
Bad publicity is still publicity and constantly making threads (even shitting on the movie) is gonna interest people to see it and therefore you too are a shill
>>68983370
One of Saint Breiviks slain demons.
>>68983469
am i really a moron for not knowing that anon?
>>68983003
>>68983108
>>68983277
>>68983370
>>68983490
>>68983003
post pics
>>68983315
Why would anyone know this shit, you fucking serial killer psycho-dick?
>>68983547
delete this, wtf
>>68983547
Are you in love with this boy?
>>68983548
I was just goofing around. I'm actually a babyface twink.
>>68983490
You must be pretty new here to not know that particular one. It is basically the most famous fedora picture because of the circumstances.
>>68983569
Maybe you should fuck off back to your r*ddit hugbox, faggot.
>>68976535
Directed By a Men.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>68983469
oh fuck please tell that's not where this guy is from
>>68983646
Are you angry now, kid? Put on your special helmet before you injure yourself running about, banging your pots.
>>68983646
>anon suggests you're a newfag
>you've actually spent close to a decade on this fucking site
>>68982812
This guy was murdered by Breivik for being a liberal and now liberals, feminists and redditors use his image to paint their opponents as neckbeards.
That's comedy.
>>68983627
This only intrigues me more anon
>>68983646
>You must be pretty new here
You must be a retard wasting his life learning childish memes and posting them every day instead of having real friends.
The really sad part is that you think you are clever and in a special club.
>>68983752
Why are there so many homos on 4chan?
>>68983751
you have no idea what you're talking about, redditor. the fat fedora neckbeard meme was created to mock redditors. just because they tried hard to reverse the meaning doesn't mean it worked and the fact that you don't know this confirms you're a redditor
>>68971471
because they're ruining all right movies by making women portray them and remaking okay-good movies...
I mean who is to say may be someday they could remake it but in another form instead of live action....seriously STOP REMAKING MOVIES...IT'S HORRIBLE...MAKE AN ORIGINAL STORY, SCRIPT...
>>68983792
>He's homophobic
Fuck outta here >>reddit is that way, we don't take kindly to your backwards ignorance round here
>>68971471
The editing was terrible and it has no actual hook besides "muh womyn."
The humor is forced and feels like if i yelled the punchline liud enough it'll be funny.
>>68983783
>>68983846
>YOU NOT AM IN MINE SPECIAL KLUB REEEEEEEE!
>>68972558
>Being a manchild who can't let go of his past or ignore any updates or deal with change is better than being a feminazi
Both should be removed. Just fucking ignore the new movie and watch the originals on bluray (or probably VHS since you're so nostalgic).
Both Feminazis and Manchildren are both the whiniest of whiny cunts.
>>68971471
I never really cared for the original Ghostbusters, and the all-girl thing is roundabout sexism anyway.
Imagine if it was an all chinese ghostbusters. An all african american ghostbusters. This passes progressiveness and becomes exploitation; while they are willing participants in it these women are essentially filling the same role as Dolemite in his 80's Blaxploitation films, playing up stereotypes for entertainment while White Male studio heads make capital from what is essentially a twice-removed minstrel show.
But what the fuck would I know, this is just me mansplaining right?
>>68983917
just confirming what we are already knew, little buddy
instead of adapting to 4chan culture you get super butt hurt when you get called out on your ignorant bullshit. instead of just sucking it up and learning from your mistakes you actively try to change things so you can never be uncomfortable again. you're cancer
>>68977870
Wait, is this real?
>>68971471
I HATE WOMEN AND I CANT HANDLE SEEING SUCH A FUNNY TRAILER WITH WOMEN IN IT SO I PRETEND TO HATE IT BECAUSE ITS REALLY THE FUNNIEST BEST TRAILER IVE EVER SENN IN MT LIEF
>>68984034
>4chan culture
HAHA! Yeah, keep telling yourself you have your 'culture', laddie.
A culture which uses the language of children like "super butt hurt".
Have a nice day, Ruprecht. Enjoy your pans.
>>68984130
Deal with it, nigger.
>>68977870
holy shit
this is as bad as that tampon commercial about the wage gap
>>68984572
I will not
>>68983394
Top fucking kek
>>68971471
I hate how the black character isn't an intelligent non-stereotypical urban dweller like Winston from the first movie. Her dialogue seems better suited for a Friday or Barbershop sequel.
>>68985030
AWWWW HELL NAWWW
>>68976967
>I Rebel
Explain this meme.
>>68983211
blackmail.
>>68971471
see pic OP
>>68971471
unnecessary meme remake with women
Cgi looked like an intern did it
it's like im really on >/pol/
>>68985517
>get burned to death ON A OPEN TOP WATER TOWER
>all that feminist had to do is climb into the water tank that's next to her
>nope
>let's run all the way down to the ground that's a long way down
I have no idea what feminist's logic is about some times.
As for the movie, I would of been ok with it if the actors were so butt fugly
>>68985517
shouldn't have watched this.
don't play with gas and fire folks.
>>68971471
>Your response?
I hate remakes
>>68985517
they're just hitting her with a t-shirt.
wtf
>>68985517
>Men never accidentally lit themselves on fire before
If anything, the chick burning is a shining symbol of equality. Fire doesn't give a shit who you are.
I've found the only person more pathetic than the director of this shit
Notice how all but two of the movies he uses as examples came out before Youtube even existed, never mind the fact that youtube today is much larger than it was 10 years ago
>>68983132
They realized ghostbusters was going to be a flop long before they made the trailer. It was just a matter of throwing the easiest format at it.
>>68985682
Well i really doubt that someone, anyone, could think straight when on fire
>>68971471
2 ghost buster movies are enough I want to remember Mel brooks and co as badass and unrivaled original ghostbusters.
The black girl isn't in it for a paycheck like the original guy was she's in it for some superficial "Aw sheniqwa you know the suburbs and streets and shit help us not get stabbed" trope.
it's an all female cast I don't go to see movies where the men are made to look exclusively like the villains, just like most women won't go to see a war movie.
