>>68970731
i agree

>>68970752

Top lad

Is the sequel on hiatus? I'd imagine they're having trouble writing a worthy script.

>>68970933
no its under a production. the title is 'war for the planet of the apes'

>>68970933

Nah, next year buddy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_for_the_Planet_of_the_Apes

>>68970959
Chills anon, just chills. I wonder how they'll top the NO scene or the Human Work.

>>68970998
yeah those scenes were fuckin great. im hoping they can keep up this momentum.

>>68971085
Me too anon, me too.

Was pleasantly surprised by these movies. Looking forward to the next one. RIP Ash

>>68970998
The attack on San Fran in the first one was pretty badass too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_HWlDa9t6o

Dat 0:33 reveal

>>68972259

True, CGI is aging a bit though

>>68972423
The CGI wasn't even that great in Dawn, but the characters are too great and Andy Serkis does too good of a job for me to complain.

>>68972526

Agreed

All great trilogies fall on the last hurdle: Return of the King, The Dark Knight Rises, Return of the Jedi, Beyond Thunderdome, Godfather Pt III, Back to the Future Pt III, Temple of Doom, Toy Story 3, Spiderman 3 and Terminator 3.

I have little hope for War for the Planet of the Apes.


The Bourne Trilogy is fucking perfect.

>>68972987
>Return of the Jedu
>Temple of Doom

>bad