>>68778108
>Who makes better films
Kubrick
>and who is a better director?
Kubrick

Kubrick.
Nigga had autistic attention to detail.

>>68778108
Kubrick.
Not fuckin' doubt.

definitely Kubric but edgelords will say he sucks because he made mainstream films

>>68778108
None of them made films.
Lynch makes kinography, Kubrick flicks.

>>68778108
obviously Kubrick

>>68778108
Kubrick on both accounts, but Lynch is extremely good in his own right.

>>68778108
I like Lynch more, though Full Metal Jacket is my top 3 movies.

>>68779204
i would have thought edgy teens would be all for kubrick considering he did a clockwork orange

>>68778108
Kubrick

Lynch is the best at what he does, but Kubrick is a better film maker.

>>68778108
It's like choosing between pie and salmon. I love both but god knows they are totally different.

Kubrick is a better thinker and master of details for sure. Lynch is the Mahdi of feelings and atmosphere. I'd say Kubrick is the better "film maker" but Lynch is the better "creative." If that makes any sense at all.

>>68779275
literally the only correct answer

>>68778108
Lets see their strengths.


Lynch is best at creating surreal imagery/atmosphere.
Blue Velvet, Eraserhead and Mulholland Drive capture his intentions the best.

Kubrick is best at making fast ticking and very organized movies.

Dr. Strangelove and 2001 are good examples of his style.

Both appeal to a very advanced moviebuff, however Kubrick far less so. Still, the least accessible kubrick is more "art" than the Lynch's more accessible.

Now the battle:

Kubrick: 13 oscar nominations, 4 globes nominations, 7 Baftas nominations and 1 win, 7 90+ Rotten Tomatoes movies, 6 movies on IMDb top 250.

Lynch: 4 oscar nominations, 4 golden globe nominations, 5 Palm'd Oro nominations and 1 win, 2 Baftas nominations, 4 90+ Rotten Tomatoes movies, 1 movie in the IMDb top 250

Kubrick wins because Bafta win + 7 90+ Rotten Tomatoes movies + 6 IMDb top 250 movies > Palm D'Oro + 4 90+ Rotten Tomatoes movies + 1 Imdb top 250