>>68663566
Illuminati

>>68663566
>3 years vs 20 years

Whelp, it seems to me they've upped their productivity

>>68663566

Jews.

wall-e is their best film. if you disagree you are wrong

>>68663600
The point is that they're making as many sequels in the next 3 years as they did in their first 20. That doesn't seem like something a creatively healthy studio would do.

Ultimately they make movies for kids and kids are dumb, they don't want good stories they just want shit that is funny and repetition. For Pixar their most profitable movies are Cars, which they are also their least critically acclaimed.

>>68663639
mate that would be The Incredibles

Disney's in-house CGI got gud and they don't need them anymore. Casual moviegoers just think Tangled sand Frozen are Pixar movies anyway. We don't need the hypocritical, preachy messages of Pixar anymore. Disney's are ironic and snarky for the modern age. Now Pixar is desperately slathering make-up on to remind us of when they were pretty.

>>68663639

Wally is for babies. It's about as subtle as a pile driver on your testicles.

>>68663566
The population is aging so sequels that target grown ups sell better than originals.

>>68663860
yeah its been a dark time for cinema ever since all the children disappeared

>>68663775
But Pixar had a special visual style for nearly every movie and Disney just rehashes the same shit

>>68663566
Because they focus more on gaining $$$ hence the sequels rather than thinking of originality.

>>68664245
Normies don't see that.