ITT: shit tier CGI that won the Academy for best visual effects
That's not CGI, that's compositing
>>68661926
it's a terrible green screen effect that would look bad even in the late 70s
ITT: butthurt anons 10 yrs out of date in their rustling.
>>68661987
There are movies from the 30s that do a better job than that, it really is a bit embarrassing. To be honest I never much liked LOTR's effects in general, they are very over-done and obvious yet played up for "epic" effect. Not as bad as Jackson's King Kong though.
FOTR should've won the oscar. Of course, Return won it on meme value and if FOTR came out last it would've won too.
>>68661825
Simply a shit tier flick that won 11 Academy Awards
this shot almost ruins the movies
>>68661825
What is the computer generated thing in this image?
>>68663255
greenscreen compositing
>>68661825
It didnt win for this shot, it won for other shots. You get nominated base off of a 2-6 minute scene, they didn't choose this one.
The movie is probably older than op anyway
