Best Sci-Fi film? Pic related(duh) If your pick is 80s, explain

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 9

Anonymous
2016-04-12 11:11:05 Post No. 68173734
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: StarTrekIntoDarkness_FinalUSPoster.jpg (44 KB, 300x444) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 11:11:05 Post No. 68173734 [Report]

Best Sci-Fi film? Pic related(duh)

If your pick is 80s, explain rather than be a try hard edgy fag. 2001 is garbage only enjoyed by those afraid of having their intelligence questioned.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 11:15:51 Post No.68173810
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 11:15:51 Post No.68173810 [Report]

File: star-wars-the-force-awakens-official-poster-0.jpg (146 KB, 800x480) Image search: [Google]

146 KB, 800x480

/thread

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 11:18:50 Post No.68173860
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 11:18:50 Post No.68173860 [Report]

File: Aliens_ver1_xlg (2).png (2 MB, 991x1500) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 991x1500

NA

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:09:19 Post No.68174754
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:09:19 Post No.68174754 [Report]

File: Star_Trek_IV_The_Voyage_Home.png (165 KB, 275x376) Image search: [Google]

165 KB, 275x376

Best trek coming threw.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:11:21 Post No.68174796
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:11:21 Post No.68174796 [Report]

>>68174754
Nah, undiscovered country or TMP.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:11:24 Post No.68174798
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:11:24 Post No.68174798 [Report]

File: Contact.jpg (277 KB, 953x1400) Image search: [Google]

277 KB, 953x1400

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:12:22 Post No.68174811
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:12:22 Post No.68174811 [Report]

File: gih4L6m9u1yB3PGwyJxB5wjzbqR.jpg (97 KB, 1000x563) Image search: [Google]

97 KB, 1000x563

TWoK > FC > STID > TUC > TVH = ST09

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:18:36 Post No.68174956
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:18:36 Post No.68174956 [Report]

File: startrekII_spotlight.jpg (96 KB, 620x350) Image search: [Google]

96 KB, 620x350

Leave astrokino to me.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:29:06 Post No.68175134
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:29:06 Post No.68175134 [Report]

File: 1460137922187.gif (4 MB, 200x200) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 200x200

>No Bladerunner posted yet.

ffs.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:34:22 Post No.68175234
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:34:22 Post No.68175234 [Report]

File: untitled.pngtreqwars.png (88 KB, 259x194) Image search: [Google]

88 KB, 259x194

best trek coming through.

voyage homo
wrath of can
final frontier
first contact
undiscovered country
spock search
generations
motion picture.
trek jj 1
nemises
trek jj 2

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:38:32 Post No.68175319
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:38:32 Post No.68175319 [Report]

>>68173734
>hero dies except nah he's ok at the end because magic blood
>best sci-fi film

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:41:50 Post No.68175389
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-12 12:41:50 Post No.68175389 [Report]

>>68173734
>>68173810
It is as if it were a match made in mediocrity hell, both of you choosing what only can be described as the worst 'blockbusters' of our age.

Star Trek into Darkness or Wrath of Khan lite and incredibly dumber. And the Force Awakens, a new hope 0.05 that's as good--- if only barely---as episode 3. The Force Awakens has the most glaring, boring uninteresting protagonist ever seen on screen, a maRey Sue, that could only be redeemed if she became the villain, which she wont.