Disney doesn't pay reviewers they said.
maybe it's a good movie
>>67992259
DC is finished. Done.
Or maybe it's good.
>>67992386
There's no way it's better than Batman vs Superman.
Literally no way.
>>67992361
>>67992259
Clearly they pay for good reviews for there movies and pay for bad reviews for anything by Warner Bros/DC
These reviews warp the opinions of the general audience who conform to what the critics say because they're supposed to.
>>67992259
Saw it last night. Nothing amazing. King Louie is alright. Original animated version was better. Deserving of positive reviews, around 6 to 7 out of 10
>tfw they butcher 'I wanna be like you'
>average rating 7.4/10 out of 17 views
>100%
>>67992463
100% of the reviews have a score >50%, which means 100% of the reviews deem the movie positive.
>>67992361
Thanks for confirming it.
>>67992517
That's very confusing for the layman and kind of a crude trick.
>>67992451
>>tfw they butcher 'I wanna be like you'
H-how?
>>67992259
>mfw wife is forcing me to see this because I dragged her to BvS
Explain
>>67992537
>That's very confusing for the layman and kind of a crude trick.
Idiots are idiots.
>>67992589
Are you telling me that the general audiences who view these reviews aren't idiots?
>>67992537
__% of reviewers liked it
nigga, how is that confusing?
>>67992549
Your wife has better taste than you.
Except for the, y'know, choosing you and everything.
>>67992463
RT is a aggregate site, it's not grading the quality of the movie.
it has 100% so far but that doesn't mean all the reviews are giving it 10/10.
>>67992630
haha you're so funny anon
>>67992537
>>67992589
For the general audience, it's more likely they'll enjoy a movie where
100% Rottentomatoes score, average 7.5/10
literally every critic thought was positive
than a movie where
50% rottentomatoes score, average 4/10 with a bunch of 9/10 and a bunch of 2/10s.
since half of the critic loved, while the other half of the critic hated it.
So just by glancing at the score, it's a good tool to see if you want to investigate further. Obviously a movie with 100% rottentomato with 9/10 is probably a better movie still, but the tomato meter has its purpose.
>>67992549
Is her son coming too?
>>67992574
Shhhhh, you're going against the narrative, delete that post or the DCucks will be triggered
Most of Jon Favreau movies get great reviewsexcept Cowboys & Aliens
>>67992727
>tfw wife is even more racist than you are
>>67992641
Whew. Thanks f a m. Was getting worried I wouldn't get a (You) out of that.
>>67992764
anytime fa͏m
>>67992540
It's not even really a song. There's jungle beats in the background, and Christopher Walken kind of stutters the lines of the song. They even make a totally new verse that sucks.
>>67992741
>except Cowboys & Aliens
>win free tickets to watch Cowboys & Aliens
>still feel like I ripped off somehow by watching Cowboys & Aliens
I feel like they went too far on that one, should have dialed it back just a small amount and it would have been good
>voices don't match characters
can someone call armond white? we need his combo breaker
>>67992905
>not liking cowbays and aliens
what, are you gay? That movie was awesome
>>67992905
I thought it was fun..
>>67992574
i feel so bad about how poorly this performed after watching it yesterday.
the child actors were great, grumpy george clooney was good and somehow lindelof didnt completely butcher a screenplay for once. how does shit like this happen and then marvel capeshit just gets perfect reviews for years.
>>67992259
>Disregarding the fact that it might actually be a good movie
Oh god I feel like a shill just typing that. Seriously though, it looks pretty enjoyable from the trailers. Still not sold on Baloo Murray though. Feels like a a cheap trick to get butts in seats.
>>67992259
"With enough animals to keep the mood light, funny quips and songs, Jungle Book was exactly the tonic I needed after Batman v Superman! 4 stars and fresh it up! Its only problem was the plot and characters but it was only 90 minutes so who cares, I got out of the theater fast!"
>>67992574
DELETE THIS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>67992422
>pay for bad reviews for anything by Warner Bros/DC
Why is Mars need Moms rotten? Why TDKR is fresh?
>>67993300
>>67992574
>B-b-but muh conspiracy
Whats sad is you dont even need a high score for a good review, just like a 6, BvS couldnt do that
>>67993300
>>67993339
>not knowing that you have to have plausible deniability built into a conspiracy to make it believable
its like you sheep don't know anything
>mad at disney for paying off reviewers
>not mad at dc for paying Zack Snyder instead of reviewers
>>67993637
kek
>>67992259
That's just the ratio of good reviews to bad reviews, it has an average rating of 7.4/10
gosh you cunts are so stupid no wonder you can't function properly in real life
>>67993473
>Both movies were made before DCCU were announced.
>Disney had a bunch of rotten movies before.
>The only rotten WB movies i know are Batman & Robin and that awful animated movie.
>>67993473
Hanlon's razor you thick tit.
>>67993929
yeah but i wouldn't say reviewers are being paid if it has a score like that
>>67992537
It's only confusing if you're a complete fucking moron. Literally everyone knows how RT works
>>67993901
>BvS has been in the works for years
>Disney knew what they were up against
>make plans that take years to come to fruition to ultimately make billions of dollars and ruin their competition
n-nothing to see here you tinfoil hat wearing /pol/locks!
>>67992259
>it is impossible for people to enjoy a film
DCucks everyone
>>67994142
>it is impossible for people to enjoy a film
>Marvelfags everyone
ftfy
>>67992537
Only if you're a fucking idiot who can't read.
>>67992259
Its a good movie you stupid goose.
>>67992408
>DCucks in charge of logic
>>67992259
>17 reviews
>IT WAS PAY OFFS!
With that amount of fresh reviews it could just as well end up with 20% or bellow.
>>67992422
>tfw they give the reviewers promotional gifts and extravaganzas in exchange for biased reviews
>>67992408
>Jon Favreau
Elf
Iron Man
Chef
>Hack Snyder
Uhh
300?
I guess...
>>67992259
ZERO
FUCKING
DOUBT
the era of cinema where """""professional""""" ""reviews"" matter is done
>>67994421
Come on, Watchmen was decent. The rest? Not so much.
My problem with this whole "Disney paid critics " is this. Why would they care what critics say about them? They have billions of dollars. Plus if they truly did pay off critics then why didn't Tomorrowland get mixed reviews?
>>67994539
>why would disney care if they lost billions in revenue
GEE I WONDER ANON
>>67992259
Why do none of you niggers pay attention to the average rating.
>>67994539
>>67994444
Or maybe the movie is just decent
>>67993913
>Disney
>stupid
seriously anon?
>>67994571
Except they're not losing billions
>>67994715
because their conspiracy worked anon, how are you not getting this?
>>67993473
>stop thinking like logical person you sheep. Its so obvious that they make shit films on purpose to divert from the films they pay reviews for
Wew lad
>>67994463
Does everybody forget his Dawn of the dead remake.
A literal remake was more original than Disney's rehash
>>67994735
Oh I get, its just convoluted and stupid as fuck. Did Richard Linklater pay off critics to call Boyhood the best film in the 21st century? Did Paul Fieg payoff critics so that way Spy would get over 90%? Why didn't Disney paypoff critics to trash Lego Movie? Do you see how fucked this conspiracy is?
>>67994975
Stop anon! You're sounding like a logical person!
>>67994539
According to /pol/, Tomorrowland being a movie with a primarily white cast failed because it wasn't diverse enough.
This is all to push the extinction of white people.
>>67994975
>because other movies were successful means Disney didn't pay off critics
>>67994975
I'm not going to lie when I say RT definitely influences audiences and the box office but the site is totally unreliable, as are the critics and their opinions.
This has been proven time and time again by bad movies getting good scores and vice versa.
It's best to just not pay attention to RT and maybe actually read something for yourself or just watch the trailer and go see the movie.
>>67995174
you know an awful lot about /pol/ anon
>>67995263
>because Disney movies are successful, and others aren't, it means Disney did payoff critics
>>67992386
100% good? Cmon.
>>67995357
>being so deluded
>>67995174
Tomorrowland is a lost chance. They could have make it more into adventure than some philosophical bullshit children (and adults) won't care. I truly was happy when I saw the Divergence Meter, thinking that the movie would take road like Steins;Gate with time travel thingy, but it seems they didn't bother to do it.
>>67995423
>still dodging the questions
>>67994634
i like the guys films, but this was just bad.
Well not bad, but its really no better then the origonal animated one and the voices are really jarring throughout.
>>67992574
>explain
movie was pure shit
>>67996376
Then that destorys the "Disney pays critics" meme
>>67992574
Despite coming from a good place and having decent actors (especially the lead girl and kids), it suffers from being really boring and slow. Hugh Laurie is great.
Also, the 'Disney pays critics' conspiracy is bullshit, and somehow, they'll spin this and say, "Well Disney has to create false flags to make it look like they DON'T pay critics", because they are more out of touch with reality than Zack Snyder is with DC comic books.
>>67995412
There are only 17 reviews in so far
>>67995515
They just want to think Jews are the bad guys so they have something to think about while they cum all over their copies of Mein Kampf and Elders of Zion
BECAUSE DISNEY TOTALLY ALWAYS BUYS THE GREAT REVIEWS AND MAKES GREAT MONIES RIGHT?
>Disney pays critics to put DC down
THEN EXPLAIN THIS!
>>67998084
MUST BE PART OF THE PLAN!
>>67998135
TO HAVE HUGE BOMBS!
>>67994539
>b-b-b-b-but m-m-muh jews!
>>67995412
It just means 100% of the reviewers liked it. It doesn't mean its perfect.
It's easier for kids movies to get higher ratings generally because they are held to different standards.
>>67998084
>>67998102
>>67998135
>>67998171
Absolutely rekt
/tv/ on suicide watch
>>67998135
Still higher than BvS
kek
>>67995412
Is it outrageous to imagine that the 17 people who saw it liked it?
>>67998102
Even if you WANT to use the SJW excuse: It has a higher score then Jessica Jones! Even in SJW conspiracies: This DC show trumps a Marvel. I don't think any Marvel show or movie has reached that score.
>>67994817
That Remake was terrible and you should feel terrible for liking it.
Mowglis sister hooked up with me at a party
>>67994539
It's also pretty hard to hide a shit movie or tell people not to like a good movie.
The scores may influence some people. But a lot of people are going to see things if their friends say its good, or the other way around.
It's not like BvS is some gem and no one will ever know about it because it has a low Tomato score.
DChildren just need to accept not everyone was hyped just because OMG Batman and Superman in one movie!!! Most of us just want a good movie, regardless of what cape characters are in it.
>>67992386
/tv/ hates good movies.
>>67998229
this.
Disney is the king of kids films. always has been.
>>67998102
Who the fuck watches Network capeshit? Especially as boring as Super gossip Girl?
>>67998384
/tv/ likes plenty of good movies
>>67998517
Name one and I'll tell you if we like it.
>>67998472
>"T-T-That argument doesn't apply because it doesn't apply for me!"
>>67998472
Actually, that's the point! Supergirl is a DC superhero show that majority of people think is terrible, but amazing critic response!
It is the antithesis of Superman vs Batman.
>>67998577
>we
Shut up Venom
>>67998084
>>67998102
>>67998135
>>67998171
You know what's so funny about this? WB could have done the same and we are thinking Disney is the only one paying.
>>67999124
Hey! Venom can post on 4chan if he wants to!
>>67998577
>>67998384
Kill yourself, faggot.
>>67992259
Or maybe, just maybe Favreau has done what he's done a half dozen times before and made a well put together movie that does fine with both audiences and critics
>>67999179
Because Disney has all the power, making Disney seem responsible for every wrong doing.
Granted, Disney isn't innocent/guiltless, but Disney gets to be one of the brewing stations of a million conspiracies.
>>67992574
This movie had a lot of problems, a lot, but it tried, and it did a few things very well. This is the kind of movie that I would've absolutely fell in love when I was 14, and seeing it at 24, I still had a hell of a fun time.
>>67994817
>"I just saw 28 days later and wanna do that!"
Fuck Hack Snyder
>>67998345
>>67999349
Controversial opinions on /tv/ that I agree with. Nice.
>>67992422
WE MUST FEAR THE GLOBAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST BAD MOVIES.
WE MUST STRIKE OUT IN DEFENSE OF THE LITTLE GUYS, LIKE TIME-WARNER.
>>67998229
but BvS is a kids film
>>67992259
with panama papers leak it wouldn't even suprise me to be honest.
>>67992574
HAHA, THIS SHIT IS BETTER THAN BVS
>>67992574
this is proving our point that an ACTUAL shit movie has a higher rating than BvS when BvS is a masterpiece.
>>68002253
Nah it was edited down to a pg13 cut I highly doubt kids would enjoy it I don't even think kids enjoy the marvel movies
>>67992540
>cue jungle beats
>bassline starts up, pitch increases
>Mogley turns around
>a Kia Soul pulls up, doors open
>a giant hamster and three transexual Storm Troopers step out
>Baloo starts twerking on the hood of the vehicle
>>68002738
That sentence sounds weird to me.
Did you mean IF it was edited down to a PG-13 cut?Because it was. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2975590/parentalguide#certification Batman V Superman is PG-13
>>68002738
>I don't even think kids enjoy the marvel movies
The movies are literally engineered to become popular and memetic with kids so that they cans sell toys and merchandise.
>>67992607
You are the idiot for thinking you are above average audiences, you narcissistic fag.
>>67992994
The movie falls to illogical shit at the end. Nice start, fucking terrible end.
>>67992994
>Lindelof didn't butcher the screenplay
But that's exactly what the ending is.
>The entire point of the movie up until the ending, is that the world is going to shit, and people need to stop acting like they always did and take the initiative in making things better.
>The ending basically establishes that "oh no! It was actually just this big doom machine making everyone not care! But hooray, it is now gone so yeah, no need to change your life and take the initiative, it will come naturally now! Isn't that great?
>>67992259
>waaah critics like a movie I don't DISNEY JEWS PAID THEM OFF CONFIRMED
every
fucking
time
>>67995423
>playing the "haha I know more than you let me gloat" card instead of confronting him
>>67992463
Congratulations on being retarded.
>>67995412
It will obviously drop a bit eventually, early reviews are almost always better than the average. I think even BvS had over 50% fresh for top critics at one point, now it's 26%.
>>67992574
that was before they started paying reviewers
John Carter: colossal flop
Lone Ranger: even a bigger flop
Tomorrowland: the fuck it let's put money to good use and pay the critics next time
hurr durrr reviews arent paid im a fucking retarded 8 year old.
>paid reviews
This is not video game industry.
>>67992574
>There's another universe where this didn't underperformed at the box office
>They are seeing news about Tron 3 coming out this year right now
>>67994817
Oh you mean the film he made with James Gunn's storyboards?
>>67992259
With kikes, you yikes!
>>67992739
Can't buy 100% score everytime, it's too obvious
