so that's it huh?
i guess the white male lead are extinct now to make way for diversity.
>>67976564
thank god and it took long enough.
adios you dumb fuckers!
>>67976564
Your incredible insecurity would be hilarious, if it weren't so pathetic.
Let women be heroes in movies.
They certainly aren't in the real world.
>>67976564
>diversity = white female
you are too dumb to live and too stupid to die.
>>67976609
Adios you dumb fuckers who women and minorities have to piggyback on to be relevant!
>>67976564
A white female lead in a Star Wars movie is hardly the death of all white male leads ever
HARDCORE HENRY
Based DC giving us two muscular alpha male leads for capekino. Enjoy your Disney SJWars, faggots. I'm sure Civil War will explore Cap and Bucky's "relationship" in full with copious MUH BUCKY moments.
Why do people make these stupid bait threads?
>>67976612
OH WHAT THE HECK I'LL LAUGH ANYWAY
>>67976564
Well I didn't like milquetoaste male leads in the first place. Sam Worthington in Avatar for example.
Now we think we need diversity, when we really just need more interesting actors/characters.
>>67976564
When will these shitty threads die?
>>67976873
HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA
>>67976873
>wonder women saves the day
DC are the biggest cucks out of them all. Stop lying to yourself.
>>67976564
yay another Disney princess for the star wars universe im sure she wont be completely mary sue bullshit like rey
>>67976564
B-BUT SHES HOT
>>67976564
>Extinct = Two Star Wars movies and Hunger Games having women as lead.
>>67976564
so you say something retarded and are provocative and then you jerk off to all the (You)s?
fucking /tv/, sometimes I hate this shithole
Why do people still watch these movies
>>67977025
Never. Niggas still crying about TFA.
>>67977090
Why's she so shiny
>>67977126
>Extinct = Two Star Wars movies and Hunger Games having women as lead.
This fampai.
We got Chris Pratt
A white male
WHITE MALE
As the lead in Jurrassic World.
It is not extinct /tv/ are just full of retards.
>>67976564
What is with the crotch strap?
Can't avoid sexualizing the female just a little bit?
>this will receive feminist praise
>>67977221
so chrome
>>67977025
>>67977204
What are you talking about before the trailer SW stuff was basically dead for about 2 months.
We are back to hype levels so it is here to stay for a while
WOO!!!
I am glad this vesion of /tv/ is back.
I mean honestly /tv/ is a BORING board without SW stuff, tell me anything interesting.
Don't say boring edge /tv/ shows or actor/actress shitposts that stuff is boring.
>>67976564
HOLY SHIT!! Does it realy mather thath much if the lead is a female? Do yoy hate women this much? What about the ALIEN movies? I don't see anyone complaining over Ripley. Tomb Raider? What is it realy about? Weren't you breastfed enough as babies?
Women really need to be genocided
>>67976564
women never made anything good themselves, so they have to be shoehorned into things men made
>>67977382
But /tv/ hates ALIEN and ALIENS because of Ripley.
god i fucking hate women and everything connected to them
Is this the new meme thread that's going to pop up nonstop for months?
Oh goodie.
>>67977467
Realy? Ok, what about if the lead was a tweener Cunny? Would that be okay?
>>67977475
>god i fucking hate women and everything connected to them
Faggot
>>67976564
Shut the fuck up.
Be grateful for beautiful females, cause you're going to get trannies next. And otherkins.
who's her love interest?
>>67977614
She has a white boyfriend but falls in love with a black guy at the end of the movie
>>67977346
Are you fucking 5 years old?
>>67976564
I don't mind staring at a nice female body for the majority of the film. It's the fat girl movies I can't stand
>>67977605
>Be grateful for beautiful females, cause you're going to get trannies next. And otherkins.
This.
People are not appreciating how we are getting someone hot instead of another DAISY GET RIDley OF HER.
Also she doesn't seem boring.
>>67977668
liar
>>67976564
White male directors are not.
>>67977733
>Are you fucking 5 years old?
No but you must be an edgy teen.
>>67976664
who is that trap?
>>67977831
Miranda Cosgrove?
>>67976663
Your mom was a real hero taking 8 big black cocks last night.
>>67977844
her shoulders gave it away, I would still fuck her boipussi desu
> I rebel
what did she mean by this?
>>67978056
>We want the edgelord rebellious teen audiance
>>67976564
Star Wars Barbie Edition
>>67977938
>not liking Miranda Cosgrove's cute feminine body
T A S T E L E S S
>6 Star Wars movies with male lead
>2 Star Wars movie with female lead
>OH NOES /POL/ THIS IS AN OUTRAGE WOMEN ARE TAKING OVER MY STAR WARS, MOM GET ME ANOTHER MOUNTAIN DEW, YOU FUCKING BITCH
>>67976873
Sorry you never had a real friend.
>>67976564
And with that, I'm done.
>>67976564
Long live the Empire
>>67977221
Her foundation has a sheen to it and its oil based to give off that "dewy" summer look
>>67976564
Except the next spinoff is about Obi Wan. Cry more faggot.
>>67976664
which episode was this?
who's ready for based Mon Mothra?
>>67976609
Have women ever successfully lead combat in any way, historically?
>>67979497
Mon Milfthra
>>67979401
>implying obiwan wasn't born an XY female and her movie isn't about the discrimination she faces as a result
the only reason anakin was declared the chosen one over her even though she was stronger is that he's cis
>>67978471
>>OH NOES /POL/ THIS IS AN OUTRAGE WOMEN ARE TAKING OVER MY STAR WARS, MOM GET ME ANOTHER MOUNTAIN DEW, YOU FUCKING BITCH
>>67979502
Allegedly Joan of Arc, but no.
the main girl in rogue one is supposed to be Rey right
>>67979598
that would be cool
transgender obiwan star wars film
>>67979601
"ill bite your dick off anon"
>>67976564
>Lip gloss in space
studios dont give a fuck about SJW agenda / diversity. they will, as they should, go with what is likely to make them the most money.
>>67979698
>>67979770
>they will, as they should, go with what is likely to make them the most money.
but the government is willing to give them money and permits to support their LGBTQXYZ agenda
look at how VAXXED was banned from film festival
>>67979601
I want to lick her teeth so bad
>>67979864
"ill bite your dick off anon
>>67979902
please do daisy
>>67977029
>mfw Marvel is a pedophile and DC is a cucked pedophile
>>67977029
Blonde girl represents critics.
>>67979497
My body is ready.but shouldn't she be played by Cate Blanchette?
>>67979698
I believe you
>>67980038
why not blanch catelette
>>67976663
Thread ends here with the truth.
>>67979497
>>67980038
>>67980109
They got the same exact actress who was Mon Mothma is the deleted scenes from Episode III.
>>67976564
Just root for the imps
>>67976564
is she wearing lil panties underneath the suit?
>>67980300
My wife wears my wife's son's underwear
>>67976858
That's a camera, it's not even sentient.
The lead character might be female, but who is directing, writing, PRODUCING? Women will always be our puppets and we will always control the flow of the money. Let them be the main actor.
>>67980206
>>67976609
>dumb fuckers
Enjoy your movies made to sell toys and games, us white males will be out making a fortune off the resources used to make those products. We will continue to hold all the power, as we always have.
>>67982293
you can tell you're a liberal because you have a group mentality for no reason
>>67976564
Han Solo and Boba Fett films are being made too.
I hate forced diversity too, but don't be so insecure anon.
>>67979502
meg ryan in that one movie she was in
>>67979770
sjw agenda is what's making money. it opens the door for more demographics. turn your brain on
>>67979502
Soviets had some famous female soldiers in WW2
>>67976564
Thank god. Fuck patriarchy. 2017, here we come!
>>67979598
Actually Obina Wanda is her canon name now.
Duke Nukem movie when?
>>67976564
yeah pretty much.
most Hollywood studios are all owned by liberals that donate millions to democratic presidential candidates and since democrats are now the party of feminism, sjw stuff and just generally "fuck men" they are going to continue shit like that
well unless maybe a republican wins the next presidential race and liberals realize that most people don´t like the things they are pushing right now
>>67979401
with a Furiosa type sidekick
The male geek audience is a sure thing. You'll plop down the money for the tickets, no problem. The woman demo is the key here. It's more a marketing thing, than anything.
>>67976564
>privileged white men
is there literally nothing they don't whine about?
>>67976564
what are you talking about? white male's have sure fire WHITE DEVIL roles to play in upcoming films
shut_up_and_take_my_money.jpg
Literally every other movie except maybe like 1 or 2 this year will still have white male leads.
Who gives a shit.
>>67982927
It's the equivalent of getting Tom Hardy or Gerard Butler to play lead in a romantic comedy.
>>67979502
Supposedly Joan of arc, maaaaybe Boudica
>>67976873
>Based DC giving us two muscular alpha male leads for capekino.
>muh MARTHA
>Batman running during the whole final fight
>Wonder Woman was the only one fighting when this was supposed to be Superman epic battle with Doomsday but he is tosed away.
Enjoy your rating.
>>67982927
This. Star Wars is a proven franchise, why not easily get the Hunger Games audience as well?
It's easy money.
They're just riding off the shitty YA trend. Which is exactly what this movie will be. A shitty YA movie.
It'll have the same shitty characters, shitty dialogue, and shitty everything that is in every YA story. There'll probably be 2 male romance options she'll have, 1 really hunky, the other more plan but righteous, and she'll have a tragic past about a sister or some innocent family member that the Empire killed and that made her join up and is the source of her rage.
>>67983119
>Star Wars is a proven franchise
This is an iffy claim considering the context. If it was a main Star Wars movie, you'd be right, but they're introducing what's basically the new EU into theatres with this. If you're suggesting this isn't an enormous risk on behalf of Disney, you're wrong.
This will basically make or break the new EU movies. A poor performance here will echo and change the production of all the ones that will follow.
>>67977346
>We are back to hype levels so it is here to stay for a while
hype? over disney movies ?
/tv/ has changed ....
>>67982650
>20 million casualties
>>67976564
>i guess the white male lead are extinct now to make way for diversity.
Right, because I'm sure they are going to cast a woman as the lead in the Han Solo movie. Go jump up your own ass you emotional twat.
>>67983255
>/tv/ has changed
/his/ has flooded 4chan with sjw's
>>67983083
Joan of Arc was a mere mascot
>>67983252
>If you're suggesting this isn't an enormous risk on behalf of Disney, you're wrong.
Lol no, Disney's marketing machine is too big to fail. Marvel movies already proved this. They will be fine. All the regulars are already going to buy a ticket because "Star Wars" is in the title, and this just ensures that girls/women do too.
They need to introduce Rey's mother. Of course this movie would have a female lead.
>>67983252
>This will basically make or break the new EU movies
Considering the lack of resources that went into this movie in relation to how important it is, Disney might not have actually figured that particular point out.
>>67976612
I want to point out to everyone that this is a prequel set four full movies ago, and you have never seen or heard anything about her since.
This movie is about the death of a female lead.
I will definitely watch it.
>>67979502
No, you silly!
That's what fantasies are for, anon.
>>67983354
>All the regulars are already going to buy a ticket because "Star Wars" is in the title
Prove it
The "regulars" here know this is not a SW movie it's an EU movie. They understand the difference so they're approaching with caution.
>yes sir
boner
>>67983425
>PT box office
>TFA box office
>>67983308
How can we fight this?
I don't like hero movies and i specially don't like disney, i would hate this movie even if the main actor was hulk hogan himself.
Its disney its shit, since when 4chan is hyped over hanna montana in space ?
>>67983425
There is no such thing as "EU movie" to the public, that's an EUfag distinction that the public does not know. The public doesn't care, and once the trailer with Vader drops, they will preorder their tickets like the good sheep that they are.
>>67983443
again:
>this is not a SW movie it's an EU movie
This will fool the casuals but the "male geek audience" that understands the difference will not automatically consider it a SW movie and go into it blindly.
>>67982518
are you accusing me of false flagging? I wasn't.
>>67983473
>There is no such thing as "EU movie" to the public
WE're not talking about the general public we're talking about SW geeks. The normies don't give a shit, they just need good marketing, the fanboys that are the guaranteed asses in seats are the problem. They won't show for this as automatically as they did for TFA.
>>67983495
You are vastly overestimating the "male geel audience." You're probably one of those dumbfucks that think the Old Republic will get a movie.
Casuals will eat it up.
>>67983361
>>67983361
best post
>>67983565
>WE're not talking about the general public we're talking about SW geeks.
Will eat up anything with SW on it too. And hardcore ones that don't, make up a tiny minority of the movie going base, and even they will go in the end.
>>67983473
>>67983495
Whats EU stands for ? europe ?
>>67983612
extended universe
>>67983609
>Will eat up anything with SW on it too
No they won't.
>>67976564
oh no! Now you'll only have to watch any other blockbuster movie!
Who wants to watch movies with protagonists they're sexually attracted to?!?! Who likes women?!?!?!
>>67983612
In this context, it means non-saga related movie.
Doesn't matter, SWCU is the new MCU, and it will all sell like hot cakes, just like MCU does.
>>67983629
One angry nerd does not represent the fanbase.
>>67983596
>praising your own post
Embarrassing.
death star #3016
DC wins yet again
I hope she shows her pussy slit
>>67983692
But that's just Death Star 1.0
>>67983732
Sam Raimi isn't directing this.
>>67983571
>You are vastly overestimating
You're vastly overestimating what I'm talking about because you're a retard that moves the slider to the extreme end when talking to anyone.
>You're probably one of thos
Yeah dude, I'm totally that one boogeyman, you sure showed me how smart you are. Yet again you are the hero the internet needed, congrats.
>Casuals will eat it up.
Casuals will eat anything up as long as it has good marketing.
>>67983609
>Will eat up anything with SW on it too.
I disagree. I think they understand the difference and will approach with caution. What I'm saying is that the audience isn't as guaranteed as you seem to think it is. It was with TFA but this is different, it's a standalone that doesn't necessarily lead into anything else and those geeks are aware of this and will be more cautious.
At least there's a good chance that Vader and co. will wreck a good part of the cast.
Unless they make this chick beat up Vader in a 1v1 fight, guess that wouldn't be too surprising.
>>67976564
I
GUESS
Doesn't bother me, personally. White males have 6 SW movies as both main antagonist and main protagonist. Spicing it up is actually kind of refreshing.
Then again, I'm not a kissless virgin with dominance issues so that might be a factor.
I don't care that she's a female, but I'd rather not have this new lead be a Spunky McSpacejesus.
>>67983796
>I'm not a kissless virgin with dominance issues so that might be a factor.
No, you just hate your genitals and are a male apologist and misandryst
>>67977176
AT-AT's and spaceships and shit.
>>67977406
BUT THEN HOW DO WE MAKE BABIES?
>>67976564
They're trying to help us Star Wars virgins talk to girls. Thank you.
>>67979770
>studios dont give a fuck about SJW agenda / diversity. they will, as they should, go with what is likely to make them the most mone
Disney is a massive company they might be willing to take a hit on movies to push something else. Although that is unlikely.
>>67983794
I like how you already think that the movie is going to be good just because they can reuse stuff from the old movies in an obvious pandering way.
can someone please post a pic of the evil imperial old white man from the trailer?
>>67982953
>What you did there
I see it
>>67982293
>we
You didn't do shit aspie
>>67983945
When did I say that.
>>67983851
I like my genitals, as does my wife.
Sometimes she wakes me up by gently playing with my balls. It's one of the best feelings ever.
>>67979502
inb4 Joan of meme
>>67983923
>>67979770
If you'd actually study the media industry you'd notice that they almost universally push a leftist agenda.
They most certainly do care about
>muh diversity
And do indeed engage in social engineering.
>>67977221
It's called moisturizer you scaly dry fuck.
>>67976564
Holy fuck that poster looks ugly
>>67983986
>I like my genitals
No you don't you hate them and hate yourself, you wish you were a woman, you fucking cuc.k
>>67982953
Lol
>>67983796
you also have terrible taste and worrying complacency
>>67983957
Here brah.
OH YOU MEANT THE NEW TRAILER
>>67976564
>mad about a woman
Her and her team will be dead at the end of the movie anyway. That should get your greasy little peens twitching.
>one star wars film a year
>5 capeshit films a year
>>67984101
>Her and her team will be dead at the end of the movie anyway.
How much do you want to bet the men all die and she alone is crafty enough to defeat vader in their dogfight and escape with the plans?
>>67984022
It almost looks like it came directly out of the anus of JJ Abrams.
I kinda feel bad for ridiculing George Lucas so much when the prequels came out.
I'M SORRY GEORGE!!!
>>67983779
You're wrong, and Rogue One's box office will prove how retarded at you.
Stay mad, irrelevant EUfag.
>>67984189
The droid escapes with the plans, everyone else gets cut down by Vader. Do you even star wars?
>>67984261
She escaped to broadcast the plans to leia's ship. Hurr durr.
>>67984238
>You're wrong
You don't even understand what I'm saying you mouth breathing retard.
>>67984022
That's not it.
>>67984082
Complacency about what? Having a lead character with a vagina? I'm not going to get upset because a main character doesn't have a swinging dick and balls in their pants.
You might be gay bro.
>>67984394
Yeah you're a misandryst
>>67978471
>All the 8 movies were released at the same time
I swear this kikes
>>67984431
I'm not sure what that is but at least I'm not a faggot.
>>67984321
Nope, she gives the plans to the droid and then sacrifices herself to buy time for the droid to make it to Leia.
This is Star Wars. All vital, plot driving data is given or found by droids.
>>67984505
>oh noes 2 films with a female central character call the cops mom women are trying to KILL me!
well at least you know how females felt, and they didn't complain once.
>>67976564
Who gives a shit
>>67984356
I understand you're dumb as fuck.
>>67979502
Boudicia, dido, elizabeth
>>67984586
>and they didn't complain once
you had me going there
People seriously bitching about this kind of shit need to fucking end themselves. You're as bad as the polar opposite.
>>67983991
If this is social engineering then what was going on in the days when almost every hero was a white male?
>>67976564
as a man, i feel oppressed
>>67984608
The shitbricks from /r9k/. when you see one posting outside of its containment board it's your duty to trigger it.
>>67984753
Profits.
>>67984753
art
>>67984753
realism
>>67984808
kek. but srsly fuck off to /pol/
>>67984832
>all of a sudden, boogeyman
Jesus, wtf is wrong with this board. So many cucks
>>67984394
complacency to be pussy footed you giant cuck. you'll enjoy anything because it has a brand name on it because you have a lack of personality. either way it's your problem, so go deal with it instead of polluting the minds of others with your indecisiveness.
>>67984861
>buzzwords
off you go
>>67984586
>and they didnt complain once
How stupid are you?
>>67977281
underrated
>>67976564
It's going to be real fucking uncanny when someone watches this diversity film and then Star Wars 1977 right after and notices the rebels look like this
>>67984900
>uses a buzzword
>complains about buzzwords
Ah yes, cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy, the hallmark of a cuck.
>>67977382
Thise women were realistic. By the end of it all they were cut and burned and bruised and shot. All these movies make the women like princesses but also like warriors. And thats not how it works. Look at women during combat missions in afganistan. They dont look like they just walked out of a salon.
>>67984984
>uses buzzwords
>complains about complaining about buzzwords
>>67984981
>they were really racist and they didn't know how to make REAL movies back then
>>67977029
DELETE THIS
>>67984610
>thinks I'm saying it'll flop
>I understand
No you don't you inbred moron.
>>67984984
buzzword is a buzzword? That's a bit of a reach, eh?
>>67976609
I hope whites wake up and kill your bitch ass.
>>67985113
No you are saying there is a risk.
There is no risk.
Nice try moving the goalposts, dumb fuck.
>>67985197
1. Kinda
2. There's always risk
Stupid faggot.
>>67985123
No, >/pol/ has become a buzzword on /tv/
>>67985261
I didn't mention /pol/ in my post
>>67979698
i wish
>>67985257
If you want to be pedantic, sure, there is always a risk, but it's minimal in this case and not worth considering.
I don't know what the fuck you are thinking. Hunger Game fsilms make tons of money. Star Wars movies make tons of money, and this movie is piggybacking of the OT, with using Vader, the most iconic Star Wars character of all time, as a villain. Who the fuck is this movie going to alienate?
There is no real risk.
>>67983986
Don't you need to take her son to basketball practice right around now?
>>67985349
All I said is that the fanboys aren't guaranteed and not as many as you think are going to autopilot to the movie theatres for this one. The casuals need marketing, the the white male geeks recognize EU when they see it and will be weary.
You're the retard that flipped his shit because you wanted to turn me into some nay-saying boogeyman because again, your'e a retard and need to argue about stupid shit on the internet.
>>67979502
Zenobia
>>67984981
they actually had female pilots in prominent roles and they all got cut out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTBe2gSDqm4
(one of them is pretty terrible though so that's understandable)
>>67985457
>All I said is that the fanboys aren't guaranteed
You did, and you were wrong.
And just because you are butthurt about a female lead? Top kek.
>white male geeks recognize EU
Completely irrelevant and tiny userbase that has never been pandered to, and never will. EU never mattered, and never will when it comes to the movies.
I'm wasting my time, you truly are, dumb as fuck.
>>67984230
He can't hear you, he's buried in money.
>>67985457
>>67985349
Also this IS a risk, if you want to compare it to the MCU it would be like opening with Avengers and then making Ant-Man. It's not as guaranteed as you think it is and being the first movie of a SWCU is risky.
>>67985533
>You did, and you were wrong.
No U
>because you are butthurt about a female lead
I never even mentioned the female lead. There you go trying to turn me into another boogeyman again, Fuck dude, how is it you never get tired of being a complete dick sucking retard?
>Completely irrelevant and tiny userbase
Not the point they are the guaranteed seats. Casuals aren't guaranteed they need good marketing.
>EU never mattered
Not the point, in this instance I'm not using it to promote the old EU I'm using it to describe a movie that isn't part of the main saga. Get your head out of your ass for one second.
>I'm wasting my time
Yes you are, stupid prick.
>>67976564
we live in the era of the cunt... every movie has must have a cunt in... fucking cunts.
>>67976564
WHAT A DUMB LOOKING FUCKING AIRHEAD BIMBO
LMAO HOW IS THIS A POSTER
>>67985736
well they're 49% of the world so yeah. sorry there aren't enough fat dicks in it for you.
>>67985782
it's a fan poster holy shit calm down you retard.
>>67985839
>you retard
words hurt anon
words hurt
;_;
>>67985683
Star Wars is the biggest franchise in movie history, the MCU was not comparable at the time of Avengers. And Thor and Ironman weren't exactly their top properties. Rogue One will feature the literal face of Star Wars and one of the most recognizable cultural icons of our era, as the villain.
>I never even mentioned the female lead.
Then pay attention, the entire conversation started over why there is a female lead in this movie.
>Not the point they are the guaranteed seats. Casuals aren't guaranteed they need good marketing.
And those are two different demographics. The first one is already preordering, the second one will after the trailer. And what the fuck is your point? Of course Disney will market the shit out of this movie, doesn't change the fact that the franchise markets itself based on recognition and the risk here is minuscule.
> I'm not using it to promote the old EU
Then stop using words incorrectly.
>getting upset over something announced over a year ago
>>67983361
Most probably true. Good thinking.
>>67984870
Yeah, lack of personality is not one of my issues. I'm also not indecisive.
>Felicity Jones has a nice ass.
>Therefor I will watch this movie.
That's pretty decisive if you ask me.
>>67985963
>The first one is already preordering
No we aren't.
REEEEEEEE FEMALES GET OUT OF MY SPACE MOVIE
>>67985839
HOW SHOULD I KNOW ITS A FAN POSTER
IT LOOKS FUCKING STUPID ENOUGH TO BE OFFICIAL
ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE STAR WARS NERDS WHO GIVES A FUCK ABOUT THESE UTTER SHITFLICKS
>>67986136
You're on 4chan. You may be autistic, but you're not the "spends 24/7 on wookipedia, fuck yeah EU" kinda of autistic.
>>67985963
>Star Wars is the biggest franchise in movie history
Doesn't matter.
>the MCU was not comparable at the time of Avengers
Someone else used it as a comparison so I am too.
>the entire conversation started over why there is a female lead in this movie.
My issue was with the assumption that the "white male geeks" were a guarantee. The first part of that post not the second and I even quoted that line so you wouldn't go and get all confused.
>And those are two different demographics. The first one is already preordering
Sauce and comparison with TFA?
>the second one will after the trailer. And what the fuck is your point?
That this isn't as guaranteed as you think it is a lot of work went into research and production and will go into marketing. They didn't just plop it out and expect gint sales because they know compared to TFA there's a lot more question marks popping up for it.
>risk here is minuscule.
That's wrong tho.
>Then stop using words incorrectly.
How would "Expanded Universe" be an unsatisfactory description for this you autistic pedantic retard?
Star Wars never raised the bar for storytelling. The first three movies revolutionized CGI, and now the new movies are trying to affect gender politics. I accept that the no Star Wars movie will ever be the "Citizen Kane" of our time, but I don't think pushing a specific, anachronistic, soon-to-be repudiated political agenda is gonna put Star Wars in a good place a few years from now, either.
this is exactly why film will never be considered
high art. because of cucks like you
weighing it down and arguing
over pedantic shit like a female protagonist
or >muh non-white actors.
nevermind that
its a fucking sci-fi opera with a shallow
interpretation of good vs. evil
>>67986179
you're at a 9 and I need you to be at like a 2
>>67986188
Those guys definitely aren't
>>67986299
>The first three movies revolutionized CGI
wut?
>The white males were real?
>I used to wonder that myself. Thought it was a bunch of mumbo-jumbo-whites starring inmovies, tv shows... Crazy thing is, it's true. The skin color, the gender, all of it. It's all true.
>>67986290
>Doesn't matter.
Of course it matters when it comes to selling this film.
>My issue was with the assumption that the "white male geeks" were a guarantee.
Of course they are. The average modern "white male geek" is a liberal faggot redditor. They are clearly going to see this movie. Casuals make up the vast majority of the movie going audience, and they are the ones that are going to get pandered too.
>Sauce and comparison with TFA?
It's a hyperbole faggot. The movie is coming out in 8 months.
>That this isn't as guaranteed as you think it is a lot of work went into research and production and will go into marketing.
Obviously, would never deny that, but this is exactly why Disney is comfortable. They're doing everything correctly, as always.
>TFA there's a lot more question marks popping up for it.
Assuming that's true, the Vader trailer will silence the few people smart enough to ask those questions.
>That's wrong tho.
That's right tho.
>How would "Expanded Universe" be an unsatisfactory description
It doesn't' deal with the EU. It's not an adaption of a story with EU. It has nothing to do with EU. It's an anthology film, or whatever they are calling, and part of SWCU. I'm pretty sure you know that you are one being pedantic here since you obviously know that "EU" does not describe this film properly, and that it is misleading.
>>67986555
>Of course it matters when it comes to selling this film.
But we're talking about a specific group
>They are clearly going to see this movie.
No they aren't they're waiting for good reviews.
>It's a hyperbole faggot.
Then stop making claims you don't want challenged you dumb cunt.
>Obviously, would never deny that
And yet you did via implications.
>They're doing everything correctly, as always.
Like how they engage in wage fixing?
>That's right tho.
No it isn't, it's the first feature film of the new EU, it's a big risk.
> It's an anthology film, or whatever they are calling, and part of SWCU.
Which is an expansion of the universe and therefore part of an "Expanded Universe" if you will, another anon got it in one and qucikly made the connection that in this context it was referring to the new SWCU, why couldn't you? Is it because you might be a retard?
>>67976564
why does that look so fake? Is it the way her head doesn't blend in with the background? Is it the massive bloom, is it the way she has her hair down and perfect like she's in a wella commercial instead of having it in a knot?
>>67984753
white media talking to a white population, coming from wars, knowing women weren't there (or were just traitors to whoever was winning and more violent at the moment)
>>67986805
>But we're talking about a specific group
That will see this movie because it has "Star Wars" in it, like everyone else. Also, these are the same faggots consuming comic books and cartoons just because it has Star Wars on it. Of course they will go see the movie when they are told to.
>No they aren't they're waiting for good reviews.
The opening weekend does not care about reviews.
>Then stop making claims you don't want challenged you dumb cunt.
Sometimes I forgot that people with autism have difficulty comprehending metaphors. Sorry.
>And yet you did via implications.
Nope. I did the opposite of that. Disney is clearly comfortable and knows this movie is easy money. So comfrotable they are waiting with Vader for the actual trailer. Which makes marketing sense, since that's the one that will be shown in theaters. No need to blow their load yet.
>Like how they engage in wage fixing?
I don't know shit about that, I was talking about the marketing of this film.
>No it isn't, it's the first feature film of the new EU, it's a big risk.
It's a Star Wars movie. There is no risk on that alone, ignoring the fact they are coming off a successful movie, have proven track record with Marvel, and they are going to use Vader to sell it.
And it's not the EU because no such thing exists anymore. You're using outdated terminology either to troll, or because you're a dumb EUfag that can't let go. Either way, stop being such stubborn retarded faggot.
>>67987146
>That will see this movie because it has "Star Wars" in it
No they won't because this isn't a SW movie it's a Star Wars EU movie and they'll be more cautious.
>these are the same faggots consuming comic books and cartoons just because it has Star Wars on it.
Is that why the New EU had some of the worst performing comics and novels in the history of SW?
>The opening weekend does not care about reviews.
You tend to have reviews out before the opening weekend dude.
>Nope. I did the opposite of that.
You literally do it in this post I'm quoting right now.
>I don't know shit about that
Clearly, otherwise you wouldn't suck their dick as hard as you do.
>It's a Star Wars movie. There is no risk on that alone
You're an idiot and you're making the implication you said you weren't again.
>ignoring the fact they are coming off a successful movie
That has nothing to do with this movie and merely takes place in the same rough universe.
>have proven track record with Marvel
Which you said shouldn't be compared and I also explained why the comparison was faulty.
>And it's not the EU because no such thing exists anymore
EU is a descriptor, it's describing this movie in reference to other movies it shares a similarity with.
>You're using outdated terminology either to troll
That's right anon, I quickly determined you were a stupid faggot that would get triggered by the use of the term "EU" and so I began using it. You got me, good job. This movie is still an EU movie though.
>>67987563
>the New EU had some of the worst performing comics and novels in the history of SW?
Don't know about comics but it did have the worst performing Novel. Don't remember if it was Tarkin or that YA Rebels tie-in.
>>67987615
pretty sure that maul comic had some of the worse numbers in SW as well
>>67987761
Did it? I thought it performed well.
>>67984677
>Elizabeth
>combat
>>67984677
>dido
historically all she did was fuck a guy and kill herself when he didn't wan to to tap her ass anymore.
>>67987563
>No they won't because this isn't a SW movie it's a Star Wars EU movie and they'll be more cautious.
Now you just went full retard. There is no such thing as Star Wars EU movie, and you know it. And the franchise name is more than enough, especially since the average person can't even tell the difference. And the ones that do, consume Star Wars.
>Is that why the New EU had some of the worst performing comics and novels in the history of SW?
EU was never popular with the casuals aside from video games. And it's irrelevant, the same people who consume those will see the movie automatically.
>You tend to have reviews out before the opening weekend dude.
And they do not have a affect on the opening weekend.
>You literally do it in this post I'm quoting right now.
Prove it. Good luck.
>Clearly, otherwise you wouldn't suck their dick as hard as you do.
God you're a dumb fuck. I don't care about Disney's stock nor do I like the company, but they clearly have a brilliant movie marketing department that knows what it is doing.
>You're an idiot and you're making the implication you said you weren't again.
Sounds like some retarded strawman bro. I've been saying from the start that the franchise name alone ensures this movie is not a risk to Disney.
>That has nothing to do with this movie and merely takes place in the same rough universe.
It doesn't matter, the Star Wars franchise is popular as fuck now thanks to the movie and Disney has restored confidence into the property.
>Which you said shouldn't be compared and I also explained why the comparison was faulty.
No I didn't. And it's a perfect comparison, but SWCU is being treated like it and is already performing in a similar vein to MCU.
>EU is a descriptor
It was. It's outdated now, and EU does not exist anymore.
>That's right anon, I quickly determined you were ...
Yep, you EUfags tend to be pretty butthurt at Disney because they wiped out your fan fiction. Too bad for you.
>>67987896
Not that guy but honestly these walls of argument text posts are getting old.
It's 4chan, just let it go.
>>67987896
>>67987563
>>67987146
>>67986805
>>67986555
>>67986290
holy fuck. it's like a wall of autism
