>british army girls
>tonight channel 4
Should be pure bantz ladz watching feminists get BTFO
Why do you think they will get BTFO instead of being praised for being women?
>>67964738
Katrina "Combat Barbie" Hodge (chick in OP's pic) is herself opposed to women serving in combat. That shocked the hell out of them.
>>67964759
Anyone who's had any contact with infanteers knows it's a fucking stupid idea to have mixed-gender units.
The physical standards (which they are lowering so they can have more than ten women per year pass out of CIC Catterick) are the least of the issues.
But hell, this is us apparantly, political correctness > soldier's lives.
>>67964738
Watching them fail miserable at every obstacle then when they finally do suceed realising they have a much easier test than the men do. The bantz comes from the cringey shit they say while not knowing they are still inferior and can never be real soldiers
>women are the reason you exist in the first place
>hurrr women suck I hate them all
Men confirmed for ungrateful cunts.
>>67964759
My dick rose to attention
>>67964759
She looks dyel as fuck, even for a girl
>>67964668
>>67964879
>sperm has to race against other sperm for the equivalent of 1000's of miles to get there first and be the best
>egg just lays there ready to get penetrated by multiple sperms
Our reproductive system sums up our genders quite well don't you think
>>67964937
>yfw women argue men arent needed anymore because you can make a baby with 2 eggs
>>67964905
Hahaha she looks cute as fuck but it's crazy to think feminists want her on the front line
Here's my favourite
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rRfCpQx_FDE
>>67964977
those sperm become all humans tho, not just men
>>67964929
>yfw you realise she has got gangbanged by 10+ squaddies while her boyfriend is at home loving her dearly
>>67964937
>ignoring the entire process of growing another human being for 9 months
This country is a fucking joke
>>67965001
Kind of embarrassing how long it took to take her down
Shouldnt have lasted beyond the first punch
>>67965001
That was a lose lose situation for the guy. He loses, he gets laughed at. He wins, he gets shouted at.
>>67965044
>she has got gangbanged by 10+ squaddies
Don't talk shit mate, more like 100+
>>67964905
why do i find this hot
>>67965052
Girls don't do shit, just eat more than normal which they love doing. Fact sperm works harder during pregnancy than the woman does growing the baby
>>67965001
>implying most of /tv/ wouldn't get just as rekt in that same situation
>>67965052
>ignoring the entire process of being served and catered to for 9 months, having years off work and only having to suffer a bit of pain for a day as a consequence
>>67965113
>implying irrelevant implications
>>67965090
>being proud about knowing nothing about biology and how insane the entire gestation process is and all the numerous ways it can go wrong
>>67965090
>>67965126
>growing another living creature inside you is fucking easy cuz I say so
Oh, /tv/.
>>67964759
I look at her and it's obvious that she's British but I don't know why.
What do you think would happen if they got captureed by Isis :/
ITT manchildren with mommy issues
>inb4 "u-ur just strawmanning!!"
>>67965136
>implying
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT
Women have a 0.01% chance of dying due to maternal related issues in the developed world
>>67965162
Don't even think Isis would touch British women desu senpai
>>67965072
>Im bleeding, making me the victor
>>67965193
Yeah they would probs let them go untouched
>>67965155
It's the head shape and the hair. British "slags" all have a similar style of hair
>>67965234
Why did you quote slags? She's in the army, she's a slag m8
I'd probably consider a job in the army if it was anything like it was
>implying I going to work with women in a war zone
>>67965192
>>67965234
Head shape, eh. I think I can see that.
Your class divisions really did a wonder on your genetic stock.
>>67965285
Ewwwwww moles
>>67965136
Having to live for 9 months with a small human sitting on you bladder. Throwing up every day. Having your body split in half during labor.
>>67965326
actually I'm not sure that's her
There's a Korean show like this called Real Men and they have a female celebrity special every year. The women are always terrible.
>>67965326
Moles can be good. They look pretty good on her. Contrast, maybe?
>>67965078
Not really, this is on base, and if the story is true then she's a cunt who has been talking a lot of shit saying she could beat up any man there and everyone probably hates her.
>>67965528
Hello depression my old friend
>>67965001
>taking it like a champ
Thread theme: https://youtu.be/boNRVXR7bqg
>>67965528
>Gay Poots
>>67965113
No one is advocating the use of rotund wheezing young men with cheeto dusted katanas in combat roles instead of the women.
>>67965584
Also, forgot to ask.
OP, what the hell is the premise of this show? Beyond that it's called British Army Girls you haven't said anything.
>>67965623
It's a reality tv show
about girls
in the British Army
>>67965670
A bunch of women in green sitting around collecting glorified welfare. Sounds dank.
>>67965623
Taking some ordinary lasses and training them to be soldiers
>>67964905
Is this a joke?
>>67964879
>>67964879
>>67964879
Is letting people die due to stupidity being "grateful"?
It's a biological fact that men are stronger, faster, and have better stamina than women. Beyond that, the dynamics of mixed-gender groups are just plain bad, not like your stupid movies.
>>67964668
>Channel 4
>Implying they won't selectively edit it so make the women look strong, independent and need no man
>>67965795
>Beyond that, the dynamics of mixed-gender groups are just plain bad
Are there any statistics about this?
>letting people die
Or this?
>>67965695
>glorified welfare
Professional standing armies are useless like history's shown amirite lad?
Fuck off.
You libshits with your anti armed forces bullshit
>>67965795
>Is letting people die due to stupidity being "grateful"?
That's not what you actually care about, admit it.
>>67965869
Professional standing armies have a place, but I think that by the standards of history what many first-world nations have today wouldn't be considered very good professional standing armies.
What percentage of the United States' Armed Forces actually serves in roles dedicated to combat? And how many just sit around at desks burning through R & D money and waiting for the GI Bill to kick in?
Isn't America just killing people with drones nowadays?
>>67965915
>What percentage of the United States' Armed Forces actually serves in roles dedicated to combat? And how many just sit around at desks burning through R & D money and waiting for the GI Bill to kick in?
You tell us, you're the expert
>>67964668
*glares*
ugh, could you just, like..... NOT??? I mean, cant even right now...... UGH!!!
Can't we just have Bad Lads Army back?
>>67965931
It's exactly a 37 - 63 split.
>>67964668
Utter joke that they had to lower the fitness standard so that women could join frontline units.
I can't believe that people still continue on this tripe even though the data proves time and time again women on average are far less physically capable than men.
>>67965859
>letting people die
>group dynamics
First: women act like crybabies
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/25/health/while-at-war-female-soldiers-fight-to-belong.html?referer=&_r=0
"Oh I am so depressed that I am not sure my subordinates like me!"
This kind of attitude where not even you are sure you want to be there is the first step to getting wrecked.
>statistics on female-male dynamics
Do you think anybody actually made a study on it? It's observational, purely. The best you can get is data on co-ed x single-sex ed (which points to the same as I'll say in the next sentences)
But essentially, even if you try to deny it, men are more competitive and tend to form different attachments to women.
If you try to deny it you'll also have to deny any and all claims of sexism ever because you'll be saying men don't act like brainless fucking retards when around females.
French are no better
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HBjcmIe0taU
>>67964759
>google her for bantz
>holy shit
>she grew up in the same town as me
>she's the same age as one of my older siblings
>good chance they would've known each other
Well... that was unepected
>>67966028
Can anyone translate what she is blabbering on about?
>>67965880
>hurr that's not what you care about
Yes, it is. The army becomes inneficient and people die.
If the standards were the same and units were segregated, I'd be for it.
>>67965952
>>67965931
>>67965915
Because despite you not wanting it, support roles are as important as combat.
Do you think an army runs itself without proper management of resources and logistics? Do you think this is some shit where they just buy some AKs and share around?
It's a PROFESSIONAL army, not an african guerrilla. Those humvees ain't gonna fix themselves, parts won't be shipped, ammo won't be bought, checks won't get where they should
>>67965083
I like her teets.
>>67964668
>makeup
>army
>>67966020
Something that article hinted at that I've read before is the way male soldiers protect any female soldiers in the vicinity. The instinct to protect women is so ingrained into the male brain that it leads to unpredictable behavior in mixed units.
>>67964668
My work colleagues daughter is in it.
>>67965937
Also this. Bad Lads Army was fucking based.
i have issues with this issue
>>67966223
Yeah, there's loads of shit about how adding females totally changes the social dynamic of a group -- turns a co-operating group into a competitive one.
>>67966122
I know what logistics are, I'm not retarded. I understand that an army runs on behind the scenes stuff. I still get the impression that there's a lot of REALLY superfluous staff in many armed forces.
>>67965001
Kek. Not going to lie though, she fucking took it like a champ.
>>67964905
I bet they didn't give her eat protection so this could happen
There are going to be so many deaths due to the lowering of standards shit they are pulling.
>>67964879
Here is your reply.
>>67965001
That guy was fucked no matter what. He wins then he is a muh soggy knee ist and if he loses he is a pussy that got beaten by a girl.
He could probably have KO'd her the second it started too so was just humouring her, such is the power of female privilege.
>>67964937
>>67965043
it's first human stage is as a female. depending on how chromosomes line up, they kick in later to change it into a boy
... just pointing that out
>>67964807
>inferior and can never be real soldiers
I agree overall that women easily have inferior physical capabilities and few will be soldiers compared to men. that's a no-brainer, really.
and a female soldier isn't going to be equal to a male one.
But I bet you some of the strongest and toughest and intelligent female soldiers could wipe out weak and dumb male ones pretty easily. (male or female, not all soldiers are created equally.)
And I bet you a million fucking dollars most bad-ass females, soldiers or not, could whoop your sorry faggot ass.
>>67965090
Christ, I know full 4chan is full of high school kids, but you obviously haven't even had middle school health class
>>67967762
Would it really be loud enough to cause any damage to the ears ?
>>67965962
this show is specifically going to support your view given that they are >>67965722
>ordinary lasses
not women who have the character/physical qualities and stamina that lead them to signing up in the first place
>>67969072
Yes
Most people who shoots regulraly wears two layers of ear protection when going shooting
>>67964668
What time and shit?
I'll inform the lads.
>>67966082
how many other causes/issues regarding human lives are you for/against like this?
medicine and health care?
heart disease?
breast cancer?
obesity?
do you care about poverty and hunger affecting US lives?
what about foreign policy in general? what would save the most lives given the current state US defense, and action initiatives?
you insist you care about the lives involved relating to mixed gender fighting groups and the inferiority of women as soldiers so I'm just curious.
>inb4 I'm trying to out-logic you in a debate or moving goalposts or whatever the fuck shut down comeback
I want to make you think a bit, I suppose. I'll admit it. But I am actually curious about how you feel on other issues that involve saving (or costing) lives
>channel 4
can't wait for the bias
I watched that Navy programme they did too, the vast majority of recruits are so fucking thick. Those kids can't even iron a shirt correctly
>>67965155
Pasty skin from being in cloudy england germanic nose but the main thing is the hairstyle familia
>>67964879
>men
you've confused people on 4chan with actual adults mate. that's your mistake.
there;s a reason all this "sjw" "feminazi" gamergate bullshit started here. bitter manchildren who loathe themselves.
>>67966223
>>67966309
ok, show statistics show that as a legit outcome
but at what rate of actual risk of human lives do we deny females in the army or mandate equal physical standards
like >>67966122 said, there is so many vital non-combat roles to fill, reducing the number of women available isn't going to overall be good for the service.
going back to the stats showing how men fight differently with a woman around, and it changes groups from cooperative to competitive -
>the statistics show that
all that means is that those m/f group problems are observed sometimes. it certainly does not mean that every f/m group is going to be affected by that.
Just by human nature, some soldiers are going to put themselves before their mates.
Some are going to put their mates before themselves.
Not every guy is gonna be fucked in the head when a woman is around. Not every group is going to have the guy that is. Levels of "fucked in the head" will vary. And situations where it IS a problem are not ALWAYS going to automatically = death.
lr;dr all the bitching and justifying ITT is so meaningless
>>67969478
>m-muh issues, do you care about them
This is a non argument, in fact it shows you have a poor understanding of how opinions work.
But I will indulge your stupid ass:
>healthcare
We have state-run free healthcare here. But it sucks, it doesn't work because it's poorly administrated. I think the government should help it's citizens in these matters but overall it takes some really good policies to make it work, or you're stuck with something arguably worse than even the US system
>obesity
>heart disease
Why shouldn't I be against these?? What?
I will defend that people have the right to endanger themselves if it's an entirely personal things, but clearly as something personal it shouldn't come at a cost to others. When you put an incapable person in a military position you endanger more than just your life (you have companions after all).
Public policy isn't shaped in the same rule as personal decisions, it's not becase a blind dude wants to be a pilot that you should allow him.
>US policy
I am not a US citizen. I think the US needs more coherence and assertiveness when it matters.
>>67970322
"This plane is more prone to malfunction, but hey other planes can malfunction too so it's alright right?"
Are you kidding me?
Female RAF recruits paid compensation for marching injuries
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-25078544
>putting feminazis and tumblrinas on the front lines
I've wanted this to happen forever. Put them up against ISIS so they can see what an actual patriarchy rape culture looks like.
>>67969184
It isn't just my view point, it is a factual point that women are far worse off.
>not women who have the character/physical qualities and stamina that lead them to signing up in the first place
*snort*
Yeah, that's why they didn't need to change the fit standards, right? jesus
>>67970690
I must not have made my point well. By your analogy, that is not at all what I was attempting to express.
>>67970322
It really isn't.
If they can't make the standard (which they don't), they shouldn't be in the role.
I don't see how you can keep going with this line of thinking, despite everyone having to lower the standards for the girls to pass.
>>67969426
maybe indoor hobbyists do, not in the fucking army
Putting women in completely destroys the group dynamic.
>>67971331
You know professional armies have issued ear protection for decades now, right?
>>67971434
You know professional armies don't run around with earplugs and earmuffs right?
>>67966028
how are there still white people in france?
>>67965937
Bad Lads was proof that national service works.
>>67966223
That just sounds more like some skeezy made-up psychiatric BS /pol/troon types use to justify their soggy knees. What a load of shit.
There's no need to use made-up mental crap to justify keeping women out of infantry combat roles - that they simply can't physically hack it is the one and only reason you need: at some point it all goes to shit and someone has to lump 80kg of gear a long distance in the shortest time possible to keep others alive. That isn't the time to find out the only people available in that bad spot aren't physically capable.
>>67964759
>Katrina "Combat Barbie" Hodge (chick in OP's pic) is herself opposed to women serving in combat. That shocked the hell out of them.
Most serving women seem to think the same way (bar officers in politically sensitive positions). The only people pushing for this kind of affirmative action quotas are those who don't know what real physical exertion is.
>>67971736
You got a source on that?
>>67971477
Except they do. Whether every individual soldier chooses to wear them is another matter. But they're issued.
The last three first hand account books I read of soldiers serving in Iraq/Afghanistan all had at least one mention of a time they forgot their ear pro in their haste.
she throws #LIKEAGIRL
>>67971655
You don't know shit about real life. Women are love, you fuck.
>>67964668
>>67971807
At my last job we had these earplugs that blocked all the noise but you could still hear people speak pretty clearly, its probably something similar they use so they dont accidentally fuck up communication.
>>67968807
>>67968807
Are you female by any chance? Any male I know would whoop the floor with ANY woman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsnaiuPPNr4
>>67971780
IIRC she is the first woman to pass a field medic rank or something similar and she was right at the end, with everyone cheering her on.
>>67968807
>But I bet you some of the strongest and toughest and intelligent female soldiers could wipe out weak and dumb male ones pretty easily. (male or female, not all soldiers are created equally.)
And who the fuck cares about that? They don't join the army to fight weak, elder, mentally handicapped leper men. They join the army to fight well trained terrorists and other armies retard.
>>67972170
good lord that's a field medic?
>>67965001
Both suck at fighting desu.
>>67966191
parades are a thing you know
>>67965859
Yes
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/09/10/439190586/marine-corps-study-finds-all-male-combat-units-faster-than-mixed-units
>watching propaganda
>>67964668
I believe girls can be tough.
It's just that most of them aren't.
But honestly if a woman is willingly joining the army, then she's probably tough.
Women's main disadvantage is strength, but in terms of cardio and endurance they can totally keep up with men (Olympic athletes don't represent all people)
>>67972293
most people look like that at the end, it's pretty much expected
the webm really is lacking context.
>>67972373
not tough enough apparently
>>67972406
that's not the point of the webm, the cheering is.
>>67964759
Damn son.
She seems like the kind of girl you meet at an obscure film festival some time in October and hit it off with, resulting in a makeout session and subsequent sex in a bathroom stall but no real contact after.
You run into her, a few years later, she's run down and depressed because the two of you never really talked beyond that point, and you don't know if you want to try anything now because you feel like you'd lose the magic of it.
She seems like that kind of girl.
>>67972340
I'd like to add the UK government did a report on putting women in combat roles and couldn't actually justify putting them in combat besides "diversity"
>>67971999
lol
>>67972373
>(Olympic athletes don't represent all people)
Yes, they do. Dumbfuck.
>>67972489
>0.1% represent the majority
ok
>>67972553
>literally how the world works
>>67972580
*tips*
>>67969530
>gamergate bullshit
Fembot detected. Probably samefagging too.
Just because you don't like the connotation of "SJW" doesn't mean it isn't a completely valid tag for you. Feminism is no longer about equality of opportunity and your "you're either a part of our deluded, hypocritical hivemind or you're literally Hitler" bullshit doesn't fly.
ITT: Roasties getting toasties
>>67971999
Yeah, they are training how to throw grenades so she won't throw them like that in combat.
>Be corporal in the army
>Conscripts had a grenade handling and throwing exam
>It's a young female's turn
>Give her the training nade
>She screws the handle in place and shows how to open the first safety
>"and this is when I pull the pin"
>order her to pull the pin
>"but we never did it when we trained"
>The instuctions say that she must pull the pin before proceeding to the next step
>she pulls the pin
>The lever flies off
>A long silence
>"We are both dead and you failed with 0 points"
>>67965772
yes it is. She's a journalist, not a woman in the military. It's probably the first time she holds a weapon
All women should be executed tbqh
>>67972794
I would be willing to bet a lot more women fuck up something as simple as throwing a small object than the men do
>>67971736
>pointing your fucking rifle at your face
great soldier right there
You realise women don't actually do any real combat roles in the armed forces yh?
They're like the signallers, sure they do the training, wear the gear and get to shoot on the range occasionally.
But they will never be in combat, they will spend most their time by a desk, filling forms in and doing admin work.
By 30 they will be fat from eating 2500-3000 calories in the mess everyday but not leaving their chair.
They bring them outta their offices for any parade's or anything to make the armed forces look so diverse and modern. But in reality they are in support roles and always will be.
Also we aren't really in real combat at the moment, if a large scale war broke out then the women would be back in the factories/farms while the men picked up weapons to fight.
inb4 but dis one rare case where a womun did make soldier and did shoot gud.
ok.
>>67973156
http://news.sky.com/story/1609261/women-in-close-combat-roles-by-end-of-2016
dumb poster
>>67972916
>that fucking .gif
what the hell? This is cancer
>>67973369
>gif
Hah, it's not 2010 anon
Feel the power of the webm
>>67965001
Why did she acted so confident just until she got KO'd? Did she think she would pull off some Rocky IV shit on him or what?
>>67973331
>>67973331
>allowing women to fight on the frontline
≠
actually having them in roles
In modern wars there is no front line. For example Afghanistan anywhere outside of base in the country could be considered front-line due to ambush style of warfare.
Very few women will actually apply for units that are considered front-line, out of the ones that apply even fewer will actually meet the standards for those roles.
The ones that finally get roles will only see action on very rare occasions. They will most likely still be in supporting roles, they aren't going to be spearheading any assaults.
This changes nothing, if you knew how the armed forces operated and didn't just see newspapers and documentaries you would understand.
Robots will replace combat roles before women will have a significant part in front-line operations.
If you think otherwise you are very naive.
>>67972102
>my job where I broke up large rocks into smaller rocks has the same equipment as the Army
>>67965915
>What percentage of the United States' Armed Forces actually serves in roles dedicated to combat? And how many just sit around at desks burning through R & D money and waiting for the GI Bill to kick in?
Do you even knows what wins fucking wars? Soldiers win the battles, logistics win the wars.
>>67964668
Literally cuck me the thread.
Like this was every going to go well.
>>67973710
Jesus, you are just making shit up as you go along.
Do you actually *know* any of that or do you just *feel* that to be true?
>In modern wars there is no front line.
Really at this point I see there's no point about talking this further with you, since you are just pulling everything out of your arse.
>>67973873
worst one in this thread
>>67965695
The British army get a fraction of the welfare the US does. In fact they wouldn't be a lot worse off and it would be a lot easier to collect regular welfare especially if they had a kid.
So fuck off.
>>67973847
FFS, Jan E. Tor - there'll be a Fallout movie coming eventually so this pic was vaguely relevant.
>>67965859
The US has done lots of studies on this and found all male units perform better than mixed
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/09/10/439190586/marine-corps-study-finds-all-male-combat-units-faster-than-mixed-units
This was better
>>67973917
>A front line in military terminology is the position closest to the area of conflict of an armed force's personnel and equipment.
> In a military conflict, when facing the front line, you face the enemy.
>Typical modern conflicts are vastly different, characterised by "war amongst the people," the concept of a "Three Block War", and the presence of an asymmetric, 360° threat from irregular or extremist, terrorist combatants.
The idea of a front-line was developed in WW1 when it was pretty easy to show where you and your enemy where.
Even near the end of WW1 it was getting blurred.
In modern warfare using the definition of front-line, pretty much everywhere in afghan/iraq was the front-line.
>>67969503
Might wanna have another go at that sentence.
>>67970322
Even if those problems only affect a quater of the men, why would you introduce something that will make a quarter of your manpower less effective when it was fine before?
>>67974220
The fact you don't know there's terms for that shows you really don't know what you are talking about.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_warfare
>>67974325
Because otherwise people who have never been nor ever will be in the armed forces will complain on the internet about the lack of gender equality in the army.
This is the world we have created.
>>67974349
I say there's no front-line in modern warfare
You quote me and call me out for being wrong
Explain that I am right
You agree that I am right but say I don't know what I'm talking about
Being a woman must suck huh?
>>67974427
Because you seem to think that a conventional or symmetric warfare isn't a thing, based upon the fact that asymmetric warfare happens.
Conventional war still very much is.
And unless you have a white paper or something written by Lawrence Freedman that says otherwise stop talking shit.
>>67970322
Do you realize there is and was a reason no one actually thought about giving women combat roles before all these feminist social experiments became a thing?
There are women in militaries but why should we risk lives of people when there is nothing to gain?
>Channel 4
No bantz. They're gonna use the few bits of good footage they have to make them look semi-credible and you know it.
Wellesley commented many times that the reason the British Army was so viable in society was that any regular thieving scumbag could be made useful to his nation by being trained and put into the infantry. But these women aren't even being forced to do that (and rightly so, but it puts their usefulness into question from the very start).
>>67974894
Your post makes no sense, re-read it.
I presume the ingrown razor rash on your sweaty unwashed cunt was distracting you while you typed that out.
>>67975041
>usefulness
I bet they can cook and clean tho right?
>>67974894
srsly are you a girl tho?
if your a girl add me on steam i wont let these guys bully u wit h reason anyomre
>>67975201
I should hope so.
>fucking reddit shitting up my board with equality bull shit
You are mentally and physically weak and your familial line is probably full of weak faggots, too. Never reproduce.
>>67975156
>>67975241
No, it makes sense.
I'll make it simple for you.
You think x can only happen, because x has happened. By x happening, it does not prevent y from happening.
Unless you have academic papers that back your claim, you should stop posting.
>>67965090
>Fact sperm works harder during pregnancy than the woman does growing the baby
>Fact
LOL
>>67975326
>Most people use cars for transport.
>Don't presume people only use cars for transport.
>Just because people use cars for transport it doesn't mean that horse and cart cannot be used for transport.
>Therefore let's talk about transport in terms of horse and cart.
This is your argument so far.
>>67970857
I honestly believe everyone should have to go through some form of boot camp and basic training straight out of high school prior to university, maybe even take a year between junior high and high school (15-16 years old) and just go through a modified basic training. Not for combat, just to instill discipline into people. Learning to work as a team, respect for others, everything that this world pussifies out of children these days. Teach martial arts, wrestling, working out, not a school that teachs teenagers to kill, just a way to instill mental and physical discipline into the next generation. Have inner city kids mixed in with suburban kids, expose people to different cultures prior to college. Obviously you would have males and females separated, but also give them mixed challenges. Would change a lot of peoples views on racism, sexism, and many aspects of the world.
>>67975507
This presumes that conventional warfare is dated and I'm yet to see you post any academic work to back that.
A war is either conventional or unconventional.
You cannot change this, it isn't debatable, because the two previous have been against two non-state actors does not mean you cannot have a war against a state actor.
fuck, how did you even come to this retarded thinking?
>>67975829
>fuck, how did you even come to this retarded thinking?
We're all wondering the same thing.
>>67973640
Bro that webm killed me
>>67975916
I thought putting a shrimp on the barbie was a meme. Based Dundee, reinforcing stereotypes since the 80s.
>>67975916
Who is we?
I can throw document after document at you saying that conventional warfare is still a thing.
Assuming you are a brit:
Here take a look:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/478933/52309_Cm_9161_NSS_SD_Review_web_only.pdf
If conventional warfare wasn't a thing, militarises would not maintain their conventional capability.
>>67972373
Oh really is that why the cardio criteria for women in physical tests are also lighter?
Nigga please.
>>67975829
You actually believe there will be conventional warfare in the future, lel.
There are countries with large military capabilities and countries without.
Since the end of the cold-war countries with large military capability don't involve themselves in conventional warfare with each other. Look at Russia/Nato warfare going on in Ukraine.
The only time we have seen and will see the possibility of conventional warfare is between large military capability countries and small military capability.
This usually take the form of the recent iraq war. Large capability countries sweep in and the war against state is won very quickly with small losses, then they have to spend the next few decades having to fight against unconventional terror style forces.
>>67969530
Gamergate boogeyman strikes again
>>67976159
Half of what you said there is irrelevant and you are wrong, there's no real appetite for interventionism and it will be like that for a long, long time.
Besides from your own conjecture, do you have anything to back that up? Because I'm certainly not claiming to know the future, but state vs state (conventional warfare) conflict will always be a possibility.
>>67964759
I read somewhere that some chick attempted the US Ranger course or something equally hard, she had to drop out due to medical shit, and the doctors said she had wrecked her body so hard that if she'd stayed the course a bit longer she'd go sterile.
I'm sure some women have more constitution than others.. But that should serve as a warning shot.. But they'll probably fix it by lowering the standards even more for women..
>>67976414
>Always be a possibility.
No shit. Most things are a possibility.
Everyone could destroy their cars and start using horse and cart again tomorrow, it's a possibility.
But it doesn't make any sense to look at shit from a possible standpoint. Conventional warfare died along with 200,000 japs in 1945.
Recent warfare has been unconventional and everyday that passes and every bit closer to total globalisation we get the likelihood of it decreases.
Sorry to disappoint but women soldiers being allowed "on the front-line" is a gimmick and will have no impact on anything.
>>67976546
> But they'll probably fix it by lowering the standards even more for women..
They'd face literal mutiny if they did that.
The whole point of Soldier Camaraderie is that even if you think your mate is an absolute twat, you know you can rely on him and vice versa.
If they relaxed standards, that surety goes out the window.
>>67973640
EAT ALL THE EGGS
>>67975731
i'd vote for you
>>67964668
>pure bantz
>pure rape
>>67973753
The only winners are stockholders. Americans havent won a single war ever.
>>67976685
I'm still yet to see any academic work that backs this thinking.
>Conventional warfare died along with 200,000 japs in 1945.
No it didn't.
protip: see the last half 20 century.
The Cold War was a conventional war.
>Recent warfare has been unconventional and everyday that passes and every bit closer to total globalisation we get the likelihood of it decreases.
Falklands War, both Gulf Wars, Indo-Pakistani War.
Conventional war is state vs state warfare.
So long as states exist, conventional war will exist.
My advice is to read a book.
>>67977001
>The Cold War was a conventional war.
>>67977001
>The Cold War was a conventional war.
You're one off, and a complete fucking retard. Numbers dont lie.
>>67977054
>>67977109
It was A STATE VS STATE conflict.
Why are both of you struggling to understand a conventional war is defined as such?
>>67977189
> State x State = symetric warfare
Eh
For every video of a girl in basic training being incompetent there's dozens of guys doing the exact same shit.
You guys are cherry picking here.
>>67977402
?
Whatever, mate I'd still recommend for you to pick up a book.
Read Michael Clarke's essay "Does War Have A Future?" or anything along that line.
>>67977438
>Millions of men in armed forces, a few videos of them fucking up.
>Thousands of women in armed forces, a few videos of them fucking up.
Percentages aren't looking gr8 for you there m8.
>>67977543
>>67977543
I'm not the same dude.
>>67977976
Ah.
>>67977547
You just made those statements up, that doesn't make them facts
>>67978138
Are you now claiming there are more women in the military than men?
>>67978190
Are you being wilfully ignorant here
>>67965178
And that's largely thanks to men.
>>67965001
Of course they want her on the front line, she's beautiful.
They want all the hot women dead so the men have to mate with them instead.
>>67978383
Is that a question or a confirmation?
>didn't answer the question
laughed hard as shit, nice deflecting skills
Modernday feminist:
>wymyn should be allowed go war too
Gets drafted into service
>NO I am disabled becus I have an underactive thyroid and it has made me big and beautiful but still healthy but not healthy enough to go army
>>67972170
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2B1ByAyXK9Q
Here's the source.
Notice the guy walking a brisk pace at the beginning.
>>67978657
lol at the guy at the beginning
>this isn't even difficult
while the whore in the back is barely walking kek
>>67978794
women have almost zero purpose other than giving men sexual pleasure + reproduction.
once we have created good robot sex machines and a way to create new babbys without women they will cease to have any purpose.
>67965937
>>1025471
lol
>>67965937
>>1025471
>>67972168
I see what they were going for with that clip, but arm wrestling is not just about strength.
https://youtu.be/xLWBTAlxLGg
https://youtu.be/IkkL-bAH8H4
I was on my high school's rifle team, we were one of the best in the country. The only girl on the team accidentally shot the ceiling due to shitty trigger discipline. Based coach screamed at her and kicked her off the team.
>>67972468
Kek. Knowing something is a terrible idea but doing it anyway has become the hallmark of our egalitarian society.
It's like reading a scientific paper;
>Ch1 - Types of green tea
>Ch2 - Green tea gives you cancer
>Ch3 - Making the switch to green tea
>>67964937
BTFO
T
F
O
>>67977438
And those to complete the courses and make the best soldiers are still men, who ran male courses. Whereas women fuck up even when the specifications are made to accommodate them.
It's hardly worth comparing. I really don't get the effort to defend women when it comes to their place in the military, there are just some things you need to come to a reasonable acceptance on.
Someone tell me one thing women do better than men.
You can't.
They even fuck up creating children sometimes so the man had to invent the c-section and bring the baby into life himself.
>>67975731
Jesus it's like you are trying to form a healty society and not brainless consumer drones that chimpout over wallmart coupons and camp 2 days in front of the apple-store.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU
>meanwhile in turkey police spec ops hunting down kurdish faggots.
>>67980000
I'd eat her kebab if ya know what I mean.
>>67980000
lol as if that sniper will be any use on the ground.
does she think this is call of duty and she is gonna quickscope people
>>67975731
We have this, it's called conscription.
>>67979940
It really bothers me that I can't think of anything except getting pregnant in response to that that does not consist of pleasing men in some way.
>>67980000
>>67975731
Are you a Jew? It's like this in Israel.
>>67980000
>casting a shadow as a sniper
Jesus Christ women suck at everything
>>67980144
It bothers you because you are a stupid person. There are women that are better at everything than you. You are so immature that you honestly think there is some kind of gender/sex war going on.
There are no men and women, there are individuals.
>>67980296
>There are women that are better at everything than you.
And there are men that are better than those women at everything.
Your argument is so very poor.
>>67980296
What the fuck? I never said anything about a war or individual ability.
Nothing you said had anything to do with my post except the fact I was bothered by something.
>>67980383
Again, what does it mean? How can you judge, let's say two scientists? How can you say one is better than the other? There are both women and men publishing in Science for example.
You are a fool. Grow up. Let me guess, you are just some /pol/ cretin who comes here only to cry about women and feminists?
>>67980296
>There are women
>There are no...women
Make up your mind.
>>67980610
>How can you judge?
Well probably through the various methods of comparison humans have developed in their history.
Fastest 100m sprint in the world, judged by time to go from one point to another. Record held by a man.
Wealthiest person in the world, judged by how much the assets they own are worth. Record held by a man.
Academia, judged by contribution to science, academic testing, publishing. More male scientists and more male contribution to science, more prize winning male inventors and more discoveries were made by men.
Men out perform women in all physical and mental fields.
Show me one physical record a woman holds that's better than a male record.
Show me a list of the most important discoveries/inventions in the history of humans and see how many are a result of men and how many women.
It's ok, you can use the extra large tampons we invented and manufacture to wipe up your tears.
>>67980793
>Show me one physical record a woman holds that's better than a male record.
Fastest birth.
>>67980888
Lel, implying men didn't invent abortions too.
>>67980949
The female body is already designed to kill babies without human intervention.
>>67980793
>More male scientists and more male contribution to science
So what? More males are scientists it makes sense, don't you think? Also, most women were banned from education for the most of history. It's like asking, why most Western scientists in the past were clergyman.
>Show me one physical record a woman holds that's better than a male record.
Except it's not about records. It's about individuals and equal opportunities.
>>67972102
They have noise canceling headsets now that only filter out sound above a certain threshold. They can hear each other talking but loud sharp noises like gunfire and explosions get muted. This tech is so old the civilian version has been on the market by companies like BOSE for the last decade.
>>67975201
>Modern women
>Knowing how to cook or clean
>>67981074
Asks
>How can you judge.
I reply explaining how.
Replies saying
>So what?
Confirmed woman. Doesn't understand logic or basic reasoning. "herp derp i'm right wymyn r importnt cus i seen on tv dis stronk wymyn two"
>>67980610
God damn women really are stupid.
>>67981521
top kek that woman impresionism, nailed it.
Aren't women like the best snipers?
>>67982183
No.
>>67982183
Was Lee Harvey Oswald a woman?
>>67982285
>>67982301
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyudmila_Pavlichenko
>309 kills
>>67982376
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_recorded_sniper_kills
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simo_H%C3%A4yh%C3%A4
is a live thread worth it or what?
IT'S ON LADS
>>67964879
Alles Schlampen außer Mutti.
>still being an MRA manchild
>still watching imperialist propaganda
>you will never be the living latrine of a squadroon of british army girls
Holy shit, that terrible webbing.
Can't even wear helmets properly.
