[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

Which movie critic has the best taste?


Thread replies: 285
Thread images: 47

File: 1459627732535.jpg (754KB, 2000x1024px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1459627732535.jpg
754KB, 2000x1024px
Which movie critic has the best taste?
>>
>>67813623
All of them are shit
>>
Mark Kermode probs

>>67813623
this has to be a fucking joke
>>
Patrician's Choice right here.
>>
>>67813643
how do you choose what movie to watch?
>>
>>67813623

>The Dark Knight
>The Amazing Spider-Man

I'm not sure which is more embarrassing

>>67813673

Every other critic but Jay stinks
>>
>>67813623
most of them are glorified bloggers with no idea of what they're doing
>>
>>67813623
>Zodiac 6/10
XD
>>
>>67813674
If it looks interesting
>>
>>67813744
does this look interesting?
>>
There's really nothing more pathetic than being a film critic.
>>
>>67813623
>V for Vendetta
>The Usual Suspects
>The Dark Knight
>Death Proof
>Kill Bill Vol. 1
>Sin City
>Avatar
>All more highly rated than Zodiac
>Zodiac is tied with The Amazing Spiderman

What the fuck?
>>
>>67813623
geez adam
>>
>>67813820
how about being a filmmaker?
>>
>>67813623
I'll give you a hint; it's not the furry faggot who hardly ever completes a review.
>>
>>67813785
>low resolution
>not widescreen
Not worth a rent

Also you know I'm right
>>
>>67813707
Dark Knight is a good movie you fucking faggot
>>
>>67813623

None of them. Unless you're really a filmmaker then you have no reason to care about what critics say

>>67813674

I'm an adult and will choose something that sounds interesting to me
>>
File: 1382069960789.jpg (52KB, 655x833px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1382069960789.jpg
52KB, 655x833px
>trying to convince people that he has bad taste by showing how low he rated the pleb bait that is the star wars trilogy
should have just put HE DOESN'T WATCH OLD MOVIES.
>>
>>67813623
looks like he has the IMDB "critic" act down
>>
File: 1459703351384.jpg (71KB, 1600x400px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1459703351384.jpg
71KB, 1600x400px
>>67813877
>>67813893
does this look interesting
>>
>>67813853
Then why the fuck are you on this board faggot? Don't be so butt hurt that other went for their dream and you got stuck in some job
>>
ignatiy vishnevetsky
>>
>>67813946
No, why are his finger tips glowing like ET

It's not that hard to be independently minded
>>
File: homega2[1].jpg (24KB, 359x288px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
homega2[1].jpg
24KB, 359x288px
Best film cricket.
>>
>>67813893

please post a top 10 so we can see what an anti-critic anon thinks about film, I am genuinely curious to see if there is any overlap
>>
Adam is a gay furry scum piece of shit. The only worthwhile things he has done are The Walking Dead reviews and Cool Cat.
>>
>>67813962
>Then why the fuck are you on this board faggot?
shitposting
>>
>>67813667
Props on Kermode.

The man is so very rarely wrong about things.
>>
>>67814210
he was wrong about the babadook, it was a shitty film
>>
>>67814240
not who you're replying to, but I thought it was decent
surprised Kermode didn't rag on Deadpool though
>>
>>67813853
Yeah, unlike film critics, filmmakers have actual talent and create something new with it.
>>
>>67814240

why would you base your opinion of a critic on one opinion they had?

you honestly expect there to be critics out there you agree with 100% of the time?
>>
>>67813623
>V for Vendetta not getting a 4 out of 10 at best.

Seriously what the fuck was he thinking?
As Alan Moore adaptations go its easily one of the worst and a fine example of why Moore himself is rightfully fucking sick of people turning his stuff into sub par films.

Whats next praising From Hell and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen?
Truly Disgusting
>>
>>67814283

so you're saying any form of analysis of any art is all just useless? you're saying that criticism itself isn't creating something new by offering a unique perspective on a work of art that might further illuminate it? you're saying that writing analysis of art isn't an artform in itself that requires significant skill and ability?

are you really that stupid?
>>
thats a very unfair portrayal of his taste, loook at his top 100 they're pretty patrician http://www.imdb.com/list/ls000031161/
>>
>>67813890

It's pretty boring outside of Two-Face and only got praised because of Heath Legend
>>
>>67814350
hahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahah
>>
>>67814350
No. 1.
The Holy Mountain (1973)

man fuck off adam you pretentious piece of furry shit
>>
>>67814210
I disagree with him on a lot of things (and don't get me started on how often he praises a film because it's in line with his politics) but there is no other critic I would rather listen to. He can articulate himself like nobody else, and Simon Mayo is a great co-presenter.
>>
>>67814350
never realised he was this pleb tier
>>
File: 1327868192358.gif (858KB, 240x228px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1327868192358.gif
858KB, 240x228px
>>67814350
>#4
>Lion King
>>
best taste, best accent
https://youtu.be/4s3avRgv6qc
>>
>>67814350
I'm lowing my ratings for all Haneke films after this
>>
>>67814350
>apocalypse now 6/10
>both kill bill's in his top 10 all time best movies
>hasnt seen many movies made before the 90s
>barely any before the 80s
>none before the 60s

man idk what to say. he does his best of lists every year. so one year he'll do one for 2014, the other he'll do it for 2007, then he'll do it for 2015, and then for 2006 and so on

The problem with this is that he's watching movies backwards. You're watching movies that are heavily influenced by what preceded them, so when he actually gets to those films that influenced the ones he likes it wont feel new and it'll feel "cliched". Biggest mistake a critic can make
>>
>>67813890
it really falls flat by the end.
That boatscene is meh and the joker isn't that believable as a character that can kick batmans ass. The mexican standoff isn't that interesting also. I wish Nolan had done something better with two face.

Batman Begins is still my favorite, it lacks a great villain but it's a better film.
>>
>>67814655
>it really falls flat by the end.
It has one of the all time great endings for capeshit
>>
>>67814350
he gives jodorowsky and haneke fans a bad name
>>
>>67814618
>man idk what to say. he does his best of lists every year. so one year he'll do one for 2014, the other he'll do it for 2007, then he'll do it for 2015, and then for 2006 and so on
IIRC he only starts making a 'best of xxxx' list when he's seen everything from that year. Which makes sense in an autistic way.

He doesn't flip 2007 or 2015 around. He's just works his way up to the current year but he'll always be a few years behind.
>>
>>67814685
enlighten me
>>
Reminder:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk
>>
>>67814766
no he goes forward one year then backward the next
>>
>>67814552
literally because he wants to fuck the baby lion too.
>>
>>67814830
blows my mind he thinks this is a good argument
>>
>>67813623
>All that shit rated higher than Alien and Apocalypse Now
Triggered
>>
>>67814338
>you're saying that writing analysis of art isn't an artform in itself that requires significant skill and ability
Yes. Your just stating your opinion about a subjective thing.

Your opinions on a piece of art aren't any more valuable than some one else's.
>>
>>67814840
I'm just watching his top 2008 list, you're right.

I like how he doesn't use a fixed number. If there aren't 10 good movies he'll do less and if there are more he'll do more.
>>
>>67814808
Apart from the way it's directed, TDK, unlike most Superhero films at the time, ends like a tragedy. It's a ballsy, Empire Strikes Back ending where the main villain ultimately defeats the protagonist and forces him into exile. It's just a more thematically interesting ending than most capeshit.
>>
>>67813707
neither, having avatar in your top 5 of all time trumps everything
>>
>>67814830
Well it does make sense from an animal's point of view, it's not like they give a shit if someone jacks them off or something but they probably have something against being killed
>>
>>67815048
Good point.

I still feel like it fizzles out three quarters in. It's been some time seens I've seen it but I think it's mainly because it loses focus around that point.
>>
>>67815139
Go away, Adam.
>>
>>67813946
>>67814134

I didn't say I'm anti critic, I just don't base my opinions off of them. I'm an adult and don't need them to choose my movies for me, I can make my own decisions.
>>
>>67815301

again, post some movies you love

I am truly curious to see what a list looks like from someone who doesn't read the opinions of critics at all

do you ever watch classic movies or do you only pick the ones that sound interesting? do you even know which older movies are considered classic?
>>
>>67815346
I don't agree with the guy but what's his top 10 list gonna achieve?

You'll just shit on it to further your argument, without engaging the core issue.
>>
File: armondwhite.jpg (17KB, 300x362px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
armondwhite.jpg
17KB, 300x362px
the king of /tv/
>>
>>67815525

What is the core issue?

And I am actually just curious to see what a list would look like that is entirely unimpeded by the canon.
>>
>>67815539
the OG contrarian
>>
>>67815539
>republican gay nigger
no thx
>>
>>67815621
>>67815539
He is called White, he is black

Truly a master contrarian
>>
>>67815539
>ctrl + f armo
>he's at the bottom of the thread
damn /tv/ get it together
>>
>>67815539
Reminder that gay nigger likes Max Landis.
>>
>>67815732
>implying thats bad
>>
>>67815561
The core is issue whether critics are a necessary part of watching, appreciating and ranking movies.

But maybe that anon will post his top 10 and we can all call him a pleb.
>>
>>67815750
Go away, Max.
>>
>>67815789

I can't respect that as a core issue as it is an absolutely ridiculous notion.

Film critics exist to be useful to us. We find a film critic or two that we share a lot of opinions with, we then can trust that the movies they like will often be the ones we like. We know it's not 100% reliable and we will make decisions on an individual film basis about movies that we're interested in regardless of their thoughts. They spend a lot more time watching movies then most of us are able to as they are paid to do it so it is what occupies their days. They help us avoid things that there is a good chance we won't like.

I don't see there being any rational argument against this. And no, saying things like "I'm a big boy, don't need nobody" is not an argument, it's generally a preemptive defense against any criticism of one's taste.
>>
>>67815816
I hate him yet I like listening to him talk. Why is this?
>>
>>67815922
>I can't respect that as a core issue as it is an absolutely ridiculous notion.
and then you proceed to write a small essay on the matter.

I agree with you but to say this is isn't a topic of discussion is simply not true. It's come numerous times in the last decades, especially whenever the opinions of critcs and public didn't allign (see BvS).
>>
>>67814830
This is some hilariously warped logic.
>>
>>67816331
because he's like your average /tv/ poster
you hate yourself but at the same time you like relating to people with similar qualities
>>
>>67814562
>I don't like thing because person I don't like like thing
>also a tripfag

You're just as bad.
>>
have you guys seen this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G6QDNC4jPs
>>
>>67817253
What does this have to do with film critics?
>>
>>67817253
No.
>>
>>67814830
Furfag holocaust when?
>>
>>67817313
nothing
>>67817470
watch it let me know what you think
>>
>>67814830
what a sick fuck
>>
>>67815139
doesn't make sense from anyone's point of view, you don't fuck what you eat and you don't eat what you fuck
>>
>>67813674
Please tell me you don't pick your movies based on what the critics like.
>>
>>67814830
are all Americans this disillusioned?
>>
>>67818582
He's Canadian.
>>
>>67818555
not all the time but i do that enough times. please explain to me why this is a bad thing
>>
>>67818593
canada is in america
>>
>>67817253
i'll watch it if you watch this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpsKGvPjAgw
pure kino
>>
>>67818616
"American" is the demonym for people from the United States
>>
>>67818582
Fuck no, we hate animal fuckers.
>>
>>67818662
i was talking about the continent
>>
>>67818653
ive seen this one many times, its a personal favorite. we should have kino music video threads on here, /mu/ is garbage when it comes to that sort of thing

rate this out of 10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSM3w1v-A_Y
>>
>>67818702
Why would you group all of the people from one continent together? Are people from Costa Rica similar to people from North Dakota?
>>
File: 1452708060614.jpg (136KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1452708060614.jpg
136KB, 800x800px
>>67814830
>You can't say sucking a dog's dick is wrong but eating an animal isn't
What?! We need animals for food! Furries are completely insane
>>
>>67818766
well it's not like you americans do the same to people from the european continent
>>
>>67813623
I want to hear his explanation for apocalypse now and which version he watched.
>>
>>67818879
make a thread on [his spoiler]his subreddit[/spoiler] asking him to make a video or at least explain his 6/10
>>
>>67814561
my nigga
>>
>>67818807
in 2016 we don't really need animals for food. Maybe 2000 years ago we did but now we live in an age that we can mass produce any vegetable or fruit year round. Eating animals was a necessary evil but now it's just immoral.

I'm not defending furries though, they should be slaughtered
>>
File: 1459704121150.jpg (15KB, 274x409px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1459704121150.jpg
15KB, 274x409px
>>67819056
>but now it's just immoral.
>>
>>67819056
yeah but living off veggies and fruits is for pansy faggots. gotta have some meat in you
>>
>>67819056
literally nothing wrong with eating meat
>>
>>67814350

>1. The Holy Mountain

Didn't scroll down any further
>>
>>67819195
>>67819142

>nothing wrong will killing a living breathing creature to consume its flesh
yeah, okay m8. Keep up that cognitive dissonance.

>>67819153
I have 3 inches of meat that would fit nicely inside you ;)
>>
>>67814350
the yikes of all yikes
>>
>>67819056
>now we live in an age that we can mass produce any vegetable or fruit year round
Are you serious? Do you know why that is? How is enslaving a bunch of mexican kids to pick berries any less immoral than killing animals?
>>
File: 1452525332162.jpg (22KB, 552x539px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1452525332162.jpg
22KB, 552x539px
>>67819056
>my feelings should dictate how human beings choose to consume calories.
>>
File: 1459686841020.png (48KB, 344x508px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1459686841020.png
48KB, 344x508px
>>67819293
>nothing wrong will killing a living breathing creature to consume its flesh
>fucking hippies
You do know we eat cows and shit, right? Do you know how stupid cows are?
>>
>>67819056
>but now we live in an age that we can mass produce any vegetable or fruit year round
>i know jack shit the post
>>
>>67818611
Hahahahahah
>>
>>67819413
still waiting for an explanation. if you get recs from /tv/ or anywhere online beyond plot synopsis then it's literally no different
>>
>>67819348
>if I believe eating animals is wrong then that must mean I think poor working conditions and child labor is good

what the hell kind of logic is this even supposed to be?

>you don't like playing the drums?
>then you must like digging cowboy movies you fucking idiot!

That's just beyond stupid, anon. You can do better.

>>67819374
>I'm going to eat this living creature because it can't read or do math
>this makes sense, right?
>>
>>67819413
>>67818555
>le fuck the critics- that evil breed- attitude
You're just a pathetic clueless child, got it
>>
>>67819293
do the lion consider the feelings of the antelope before killing it?
>>
>>67819584
Other animals don't have the privilege of a conscience, so comparisons are always faulted.
>>
>>67814618
>>hasnt seen many movies made before the 90s
>>barely any before the 80s
>>none before the 60s
He doesn't like older movies because the production values bother him. There's a post where he talks about this. Somebody should post it ITT if they haven't already.
>>
>>67819639
who are you to say who has and who hasn't got a conscience
>>
File: 1457255882462.jpg (27KB, 315x467px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1457255882462.jpg
27KB, 315x467px
>>67819518
>this makes sense, right?
Yes. In developed countries they're treated nicely anyway so if you wanna talk about "animal rights" you're still fucking wrong
>>
>>67819663
I'm the human aka the big guy in charge of this here Earth
>>
>>67819639
Yes that's why they CHOOSE to go after the babies while distracting the mothers. Go fuck yourself betacuck
>>
>>67819692
>getting eaten
>treated nicely

pick one and ONLY one.

Come on anon, you're not a jackal. You know better than to eat a living creature.
>>
>>67819742
i don't eat living creatures, i eat dead creatures
>>
>>67813623
>listening to a gay furry
>>
>>67819737
Why are you so upset, friend?
>>
>>67819056
Ayo wuz gud wit Jamal? I hope u raisin my son rite
>>
>>67819790
Because I'm a fat virgin and I need a good wank
>>
File: 1456578035615.gif (125KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1456578035615.gif
125KB, 500x281px
>>67819742
>pick one and ONLY one.
Animals don't have the same rights as humans do. Besides, even animals eat each other, it's just how life works.
>>
>>67819737
>he's a human
>he puts himself on the same level as a hyena
>"b-b-b-b-b--b-b-b-b-b-b--b-b-b-but they do it! "

Their females also have giant clitoris that wrap around the males dick and basically suck the sperm out of them against the males will. Do you want that, anon? Do you REALLY want to be on the same level hyena?
>>
>>67813667
I like kermode but he does get it wrong sometimes-like berberian sound studio. what a fucking boring film.
>inb4 you didnt understand it
i did, still boring
>>
>>67819912
Yes I want to my edginess to be feared
>>
>>67813623
>that utterly atrocious taste
>>
>>67819909
The only difference between humans and any other predatory species is that we control and grow our prey.
>>
>>67819641
i made that original thread and made up that quote
>>
>>67820851
link pls
>>
File: 1365116587453.jpg (40KB, 600x685px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1365116587453.jpg
40KB, 600x685px
Prove me wrong
>>
>>67818814
stfu retard
>>
File: disgusted rich.gif (2MB, 252x180px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
disgusted rich.gif
2MB, 252x180px
>>67814830
Why do people listen to this furry fuck? He's a shitty Plinkett-lite who literally sucks dog dick.
>>
Manohla Dargis
Armond White
Ignatiy Vishnevetski
Owen Gleiberman
Kenneth Turan
Scott Tobias
Jean-Baptiste Thoret
Leonard Maltin
>>
>>67813623
Literally who: the post: the image.
>>
>>67821394
He's called YourMovieSucksDOTorg. He's a furfag who reviews films and TV shows.
>>
>>67821394
See
>>67814830
>>
Based Rosenbaum you plebs
>>
>>67814501
This. I trust his reviews even when he has been wrong sometimes.
>>
>>67821572
Oh yeah him too. He's literally of the only critics that line up with my taste
>>
>>67814338
I am laughing hard at you. What you are describing is aesthetics not fucking writing 6/10 not enough explosions on IMDB you fucking mental cuck.
>>
>>67814830
Why don't animal fuckers realize that animals cannot give consent?
>>
>>67815346

I'll watch it, regardless of date or even if it's foreign as long as the plot sounds interesting. I don't see why moviegoers should really care about what critics think. My taste has nothing to do with it.
>>
File: ujNU2kX.gif (2MB, 299x321px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
ujNU2kX.gif
2MB, 299x321px
>>67821853
>Why don't animal fuckers realize that animals cannot give consent?
They're mentally ill. If you listen to the whole thing it gets even more disturbing
>I was also disgusted at first but then I thought about it as critically as I could...
>And now I think it's fine
>>
>>67819293
You realize that almost everything we eat was living or came from something living at one point or another right? What difference does it make if it's an animal
>>
No love for movie Bob?
>>
>>67816331
Because you are a hipster faggot.
>>
>150+ posts
>not a single good critic has been posted
>not a single good argument for why it's good to pay attention to a critic/critics
>>
>>67822635

Because it isn't. As moviegoers we have no reason to care about what they have to say. Only filmmakers should really care
>>
>>67818532
>Clearly has never met vore furries
>>
File: Really?.jpg (67KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Really?.jpg
67KB, 480x480px
>>67813623
>CTRL + F
>Rosenbaum
>mentioned ONCE

fucking shitheads i swear
>>
>>67822635
Jeremy Jahns
>>
>>67821113
>sjw
>likes thunderdome better than road warrior
>doesn't like the phantom of the opera
>looks like he smells like farts and sweat
there
>>
>>67822773
>likes thunderdome better than road warrior
for real ?
>>
>>67813922
Only good SW movie was episode V. Prove me wrong.
>>
>>67822815
Yup, Doug's Mad Max rankings are:

Beyond Thunderdome > Fury Road > Max Mad > The Road Warrior
>>
>>67822842
1,3,4,5,6,7 are all good

2 is a piece of shit
>>
>>67819195
I bet you eat a good 6 inches a night amirite son?
>>
>>67822842
You're the one making claims. Prove yourself right.
>>
>>67822907
jesus christ
>>
File: 1433800516764.jpg (59KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1433800516764.jpg
59KB, 500x500px
>>67822907 (You)
>Max Mad
Goddamn it.
>>
>>67819692
>In developed countries they're treated nicely

You talking shit m8
>>
>>67819195
Dude, the act of eating meat--and by extension condoning and even financing the systematic killing of other living individuals for no good reason but your enjoyment--is completely morally indefensible.

I eat meat, by the way. And lots of it. And I buy the cheap stuff so you know those animals had it completely shit up until the moment they were killed. Don't see myself stopping, either.
>>
>>67821113
>Posts synopsis not film reviews
>Asks retarded questions like they are plot holes yet were answered in the film he just didnt pay attention
>Thinks AI should be considered a masterpiece because it was about friendship between two directors and spielberg tried really hard, not, you know, judging if the final product was any good.

You are wrong.
>>
>>67821303
I guess the people who like him have those things on common with him.
>>
>>67822907
What does one expect from someone whose parody of Mad Max looked like this?
The guy always had a shit taste in movies.

Also, what the fuck is wrong with his fans?
>>
>>67822926
Can't prove a positive. Check m8, atheist scum.
>>
>>67823066
>morally indefensible
morals are subjective and man made. animals have always eaten each other and that's not going to change. we're animals. you want us to change just because we are le advamced teknology xDD? fuck off,

retard


dumbass
>>
>>67813623
Why do you keep making threads about yourself, Adam? Are you incapable of starting movie discussion threads without shilling your embarrassment of a channel?
Do the world a favor and kill yourself.
>>
Literally nothing wrong with fucking a non-human animal. Sex with an animal is just as natural as keeping them in a tiny cage and force feeding them with a tube down their throat until they collapse under their own weight and die.
>>
>>67823389
Hi Adam, I hope you kill yourself.
>>
>>67823211
Carnivores have always eaten other animals because they've always needed to. Even for humans it's been such a necessary dietary staple up until very recently. If it still was, I'd be completely on board, morally. But it isn't. The reason you or I or anyone else living under any condition but extreme poverty in the developed world eats meat is not to survive, but to enjoy the sensation. It's basically a recreational activity nowadays. I don't think killing for pleasure can be justified within any context, really.
>>
>>67813623
I never read reviews, but I do watch some of these youtube reviewers for
>Free entertainment
and
>Curiosity on their opinion/thoughts on movie in question

Some idiots,
like Jeremy Jahns are unwatchable.
But Adam I can take.
>>
>>67823389
the crux is that the animal in question cannot express consent, I guess. Other than that, I don't see anything wrong with fucking a goat or a dog or whatever.
>>
>>67813623
>Movie critics
>Eberts and Siskel are dead
Is this a joke OP?
>>
>>67823389
>if you're going to enslave someone then you might as well rape them while you're at it because what's the difference?
>>
>>67823591
>I don't see anything wrong with fucking a goat or a dog or whatever.
wew lad
>>
>>67823188
aww nigga sheeeet
>>
>>67823591
>I don't see anything wrong with fucking a goat or a dog or whatever.
Nice fedora, faggot.
>>
>>67813623
>Avatar is better than Apocalypse Now

Dude, even plebs know Apocalypse Now is a good fucking movie. Is he just trying to be edgy?
>>
File: reddit.jpg (7KB, 248x203px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
reddit.jpg
7KB, 248x203px
>>67823389
>nothing wrong with fucking a non-human animal
>>
>>67814501
spot on
>>
>>67823638
>>67823662
What? Give me ONE reason that isn't "that's gross man" or "it's just wrong". Do you morally object to a consenting man and a consenting goat making love? You think incest is inherently wrong as well, do you?
>>
>>67823874
You're violating an animal. Using them as a tool for your own sexual gratification.

It's like having sex with someone while they're sleeping. Are there consequences? Probably not, but you're violating that person.
>>
>>67823874
Fucking kill yourself, Adam.
>>
>critic tries to makes a movie
>it's shit
Everytime
>>
>>67823953
Animals obviously can't express consent. What I'm saying is that's the sole objection I have to fucking animals.
>>
File: I laff.jpg (119KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
I laff.jpg
119KB, 500x500px
>>67824142
what is the entire goddamn french new wave you fucking idiot
>>
>>67824046
Seriously man sick fucks like him piss me off

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/dead-dog-found-raped-hung-from-tree-in-rural-thurston-county/
>>
>>67824142
Well, pray tell about all these several, many, uncountable, innumerable times. Oh, wait, you're just shitposting.
>>
>>67824206
>all furries condone and appreciate the rape of innocent animals
>>
File: 1449971298681.jpg (50KB, 575x515px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1449971298681.jpg
50KB, 575x515px
>>67823874
You do get that human sexuality is very different from animals, right? The average man would be much larger than any animal, our dongs are much bigger, basically any sex between human and man wouldn't only be wrong, but would also hurt the animal. When animals don't like something they threaten the other partner, dogs are domestic and not as likely to threaten their human master. So not are only furries fucking stupid, they try to justify hurting their own fucking pets by saying "they like it"
>TLDR go kill yourself
>>
>>67824203
Sorry should've said internet critic so some pleb doesn't think I mean some irrelevant foreign crap film critics feign to like to seem deep from half a century ago
>>67824265
Anything by Channel awesome, the avgn nerd movie and feeding fenzy
>>
>>67824392
You're missing the point of my post.

Assuming the animal in question COULD somehow give consent, would there then be anything objectionable about the act itself?

The fact that animals cannot give consent--which in turn renders all sexual contact with an animal rape--is the only reasonable objection I see.
>>
>>67824563
>Assuming the animal in question COULD somehow give consent, would there then be anything objectionable about the act itself?
Missing the point? To you, consent is the only thing that matters? The only thing? Seriously?
>>
>>67824684
Yeah, pretty much. I don't even see what you're trying to argue, to be honest.
>>
>>67824346
Who said anything about furries?

Nice way to outyourself fuckhead.
>>
>>67823591
They don't express consent to be killed either.
>>67823598
Yes because a dog freely mounting a woman is "rape"
>>67823756
>>67823662
>I disagree with you so that makes you a fedora loving neckbeard from Reddit.
>>67824684
Not the fag you were replying to, but yes, if two beings can both give consent then why is it any of your business? Doesn't matter if you think its ""grody"" or not, its not your life and you have no control over it.
>>
File: 1453778367484.gif (989KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1453778367484.gif
989KB, 250x188px
>>67824864
>then why is it any of your business?
MY BUSINESS IS JUSTICE! Prepare to be arrested, furries! You cannot escape!
>>
>>67824864
>They don't express consent to be killed either.

Who said that?

I'm this guy, by the way:

>>67823066
>>67823508
>>
File: trig.jpg (2KB, 98x103px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
trig.jpg
2KB, 98x103px
>>67824864
kek
>>
>>67824835
so, what's it to you? I'm hurting literally nobody
>>
>>67814350
The only thing he got right was The Thing. Almost everything else, no.
>>
>>67824927
Pic related
>>67824971
The point is if you shouldn't be able to fuck an animal because they don't consent then why should you be able to kill and eat one
>>67824984
Stop saving thumbnails, newfag. I'm not going to split my reply up just because you think its too long.
>>
>>67825039
....?! I literally have not brought up furries yet your screaming fursecution like, if you dont want people to think you have a guilty concience dont make connections where there arnt any you silly willy.
>>
File: tipping.gif (1MB, 833x1000px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
tipping.gif
1MB, 833x1000px
>>67825148
>>
File: 397.jpg (262KB, 651x1600px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
397.jpg
262KB, 651x1600px
>>67824927
>>67825148
>>
File: 1457561941383.jpg (100KB, 881x719px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1457561941383.jpg
100KB, 881x719px
>>67825148
>Pic related
Retarded furries hahaha
>>
File: IMG_20160403_174914.jpg (65KB, 720x844px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
IMG_20160403_174914.jpg
65KB, 720x844px
>>67825225
>>67825253
>>
>>67825253
I honestly didnt realise how retarded they were until this thread kek
>>
>>67825326
see
>>67825234
>>
>>67825383
See
>>67825326
>>
>>67825326
>>
>>67825423
>>67825383
>>67825337
>>67825253
>>67825225
>>67824984
(You)
>>
>>67825421
>NO U

Top kek
>>
File: butthurt.jpg (115KB, 413x441px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
butthurt.jpg
115KB, 413x441px
>>67825472
>>
File: image.jpg (109KB, 512x704px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
image.jpg
109KB, 512x704px
>>67825326
A shit post?
>>
>>67825148
>The point is if you shouldn't be able to fuck an animal because they don't consent then why should you be able to kill and eat one

I would only make that point in regards to a situation in which eating meat is a matter of survival. If there's no way around it, I will put the survival of myself and my species before any other. I don't think that's by any means an outrageous position to hold.
>>
>>67825513
Here's another (you)
>>
>>67814830
Good find m8 this is some disturbing shit
>>
>>67813744
>actually being stupid enough to be swayed by the cover/trailer
You must be either fucking rich or a fucking retard to have enough disposable income and time to waste on shitty movies. I only watch movies that have 75% or more on Rotten Tomatoes.
>>
>>67825622
Thanks bro, i know i'm awesome :D
>>
I actually quite enjoy the videos he puts out. However, whilst I can look past:
>the shitty attitude
>the furry faggotry
I can't look past how fucking long it takes for him to make videos. They aren't well-edited enough to take months (with delays) to make. Even terrible channels like Film Theory manage better-looking videos at a faster rate.
>>
>>67825705
ITT: Reddit
>>
>>67825778
>hating film theory is reddit
>>
>>67825778
???
>>
>>67825798
Reddit stands in for everything /tv/ doesn't like. It's an ebin maymay.
>>
>>67825830
then it's even dumber that he says reddit since filmtheory is one of the most normie-pandering "film" channels ever. it's watchmojo tier bad.
>>
>>67825798
>>67825829
>newfags
>>67825830
Tis
>>
>>67814830
Hmm. What did he mean by this?
>>
>>67821113
>he didn't understand Last Action Hero

Why should I trust him?
>>
File: beta male cuck.png (581KB, 883x600px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
beta male cuck.png
581KB, 883x600px
>>67825912
>>
File: g1332222692991999682.jpg (16KB, 261x258px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
g1332222692991999682.jpg
16KB, 261x258px
>>67825899
>>67826119
>>
>>67826229
>>67826119
ITT: Redditors trying too hard to fit in.
>>
>>67826119
Like shooting fish in a barrel
>>
>>67826229
NO U
>>
>>67818807
>We need animals for food

No we don't.
>>
What the fuck happened to this thread?
>>
why has every YMS related thread reached 300+ replies in the past week?
>>
File: king_candy.jpg (43KB, 900x507px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
king_candy.jpg
43KB, 900x507px
Serious answer?
https://www.youtube.com/user/ralphthemoviemaker
>>
>>67814350
>Kung Power Enter The Fist
>Crank

Patrician as fuck
>>
>>67827287
Hi Ralph!
>>
>>67827287
Fuck, not you again
>>
>>67814830
>c section the baby out
What? Does he actually believe that every calf is born by c section?
>>
>>67818879
What version is generally considered better, btw? I've only watched Redux and I thought it was excellent
>>
File: image.jpg (83KB, 745x689px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
image.jpg
83KB, 745x689px
>>67813623
>Zodiac
>Fincher's best cinéma
>6/10

What the fuck
>>
>>67827464
>it's another Zodiac is his best film poster

Fuck off, that movie was slow as molasses.
>>
>>67813623
>requiem for a dream
>10/10
It's a 6/10 at best
>>
>>67827678
And that's a bad thing why?
>>
>>67827353
Fuck you I'll post ralph until /tv/ learns to love him
>>
>>67827823
Because all his other films, even the mediocre ones, have fantastic pacing.
>>
>>67827959
Slow pacing != bad pacing
>>
>>67813667
He liked:

Hunger Games
Nolan's batshit
>>
Why did he rate the Incredibles so low, it's arguably one of Pixar's very best. Were there not enough furries?
>>
>>67827846
Are you his kid brother
>>
>>67814830
His 'reasoning' makes no sense...are all furries this insane?
>>
>>67813623

>alien, the exorcist and apocalypse now 7 and below

>requiem for a dream 10 and fight club 9

o i am laffin
>>
>>67814830
damn what game is this?
>>
>>67822907
>he likes The Road Warrior the least

What a retard.
>>
File: 1456420638276.jpg (35KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1456420638276.jpg
35KB, 640x640px
>>67822907
>Beyond Thunderdome > Fury Road > Max Mad > The Road Warrior

This is literally the reverse order of what is real
>>
>>67827420
Apocalypse Now vanilla is better than Redux imo.

Anon, if you love that movie as much as I do, you've got to check out Hearts of Darkness, the documentary about making it.
>>
File: 1459644672222.jpg (107KB, 1834x648px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1459644672222.jpg
107KB, 1834x648px
>>67813623
>YMS
>>
>>67833647
Guess people didn't like his top 10 films of 2017 list
>>
>>67822913
>1 and 3 are good
good one
>>
>>67814338
+1
>>
>>67829236
he doesn't like pixar because it is popular
>>
>yfw IHE boasts about how he cares about actual filmmaking techniques and storytelling like he's hot shit at understanding it
>defends The Force Awakens
>>
>>67833647
what the hell happened?
>>
>>67825677
It's easy to tell if a movie is gonna be shit or not. It ain't that hard. If it looks like transformers or 2012 or has a shitty crew behind it I won't waste the money, dumbass
>>
>>67833647
What is this meant to depict? Contributions are only down by $150 month over month.
>>
File: 1458702403152.jpg (6KB, 93x134px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1458702403152.jpg
6KB, 93x134px
>>67837529
>yfw IHE tells people to not get hyped over Starwars because of nostalgia
>does
>>
>>67833250
mad max 1 is a boring movie that sucks and people only like it because road warrior is the sequel. and road warrior is really, really dated.
>>
File: 1367301558507.jpg (73KB, 524x468px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1367301558507.jpg
73KB, 524x468px
>>67839162
>road warrior is really, really dated
Leave.
>>
>>67822842
V is the only one that's good as a legitimate movie.

The rest are kind of fun action movies, and by the rest, I mean IV, VI, and VII.
>>
>>67813623
>I don't watch movies, I watch retarded youtubers

Fuck off back to >>>/v/
Thread replies: 285
Thread images: 47
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK