RT: 95%
IMDB: 8.8
Box Office: 3,2 billion USD
>>67778350
Nice try capecuck
RT: 100%
user score: 10.0
Box office: 1 trillion
ready for that era of vidyashit, capeshit is old and busted
also we will get to have deep and philosophical discussions about how vidya movies are art but vidya itself isn't art
>>67778350
80%
7.5
600mil
>>67778350
It will be a new Narnia/Golden Compass, mark my words
>all these scared capecucks
>Vidyashit begins now
RT: 95%
IMDB: 8.8
Box Office: 100 million USD
Not enough men in spandex and capes beating each other up
>>67778350
45%
5.6
180 million
>>67778596
>This is what capecucks believe
You can blame DC for the demise of Capegenre.
Vidyagenre is what wil reign next decade.
Shilling never ends.
Are you guys Fucking memeing me right now?
RT 20%
IMDB 5.5/10
Box office:maybe 10 million
Cap this
RT-55%
IMDb-6.6
800 million
Will it be fun?
>>67778350
RT: 84%
IMDB: 8.6
Box Office: 3 billion
>>67778789
Agreed but this shit is gonna make bank with the chinks so it'll make alot
>>67778616
>>67778789
>>67778794
>>67778872
LMAO nice unscientific claims capecucks
Your time is fucking over
>>67779000
I liked Moon.
>people eat shit from Whedon and Snyder and argue about such movies all day long
>meanwhile they bash on Warcraft because source material is related to a video game
Duncan Jones save us from capeshit
>>67778350
99%
7.5
10000 million
>>67778350
This will be the Iron Man of vidyashit. A decent and enjoyable movie which will spawn a sub-genre full of shitty movies.
RT 57%
IMDB Who gives a fuck about imdb scores?
Box office: $50m domestic
>thinks that a film that's imbued with the spirit of David Bowie can fail
>>67779120
What does that make Ratchet and Clank and Assassin's Creed then? The Incredibles and Batman Begins of capeshit?
You think BvS was a flop? This shit is going to be a disaster.
>>67779159
David Bowie was imbued with the spirit of David Bowie and he got BTFO
>>67779189
>Ratchet and Clank
Inevitable flop.
>Assassin's Creed
Theaters that play it will crash and burn randomly.
>>67779189
>Incredibles
>Batman Begins
>capeshit
RT: 45%
IMDB: 7.5
Box Office: 0,8 billion USD
>>67779228
Fuck you I laughed
>>67779228
He had to let go of his physical flesh in order to ascend to a higher plane of existence so he could make vidyakino a reality.
>>67779228
>>67779256
I have a feeling that Ratchet & Clank will both do okay and is a stealth low-budget CGI film (<$50m, perhaps far lower). Their refusal to announce the budget suggests it's quietly a low-budget affair.
82%
9.3
560mln
BONUS
Meta: 89
meta user: 94
>not trusting Duncan Zowie Haywood Jones
>credits roll
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tgcc5V9Hu3g starts playing
>>67779000
This pretty much, he isn't a bad filmmaker, how bad can Warcraft be?
>>67779348
I also wonder whether the future of CGI movies is creating mid-budget movie and reusing the preproduction and assets for both a game and the movie. You could probably save money on production and marketing that way.
The difference between a CGI film and a game isn't that big these days.
>>67779482
Well, it looks fucking retarded. That's a big barrier to overcome.
RT:42%
IMDB: 6.1
Box Office: A lot
It's one of my most favorite shit-stirring opinions I genuinely hold.
>Zowie > David
>>67779532
It doesn't look retarded. All the 'it's shit' speculation comes from it's source material.
>>67779629
No, it's because the trailer looks as dumb as fuck. The Orc CGI looks ridiculous. People are laughing at it in theaters.
>>67779743
do you like spider-boy's new pyjamas?
critics: 43%
public(retards): 70%
BO: 400 mil
RT: 23%
Box office: $150 WW
>>67779743
Hahaha jesus christ capecucks are so fucking scared
>>67779743
>Orc CGI looks ridiculous
>>67779482
>he's a decent film maker so how bad could the movie be?
But how good could a video game movie possibly be? Not very good at all.
I cannot wait for /tv/ to be proven utterly wrong once again.
>>67779743
>People are laughing at it in theaters
Now that's a fucking lie if I ever heard one. I know that's been the case for some movies ,but I very seriously doubt WarCraft is among them.
>>67779899
It looks like a video-game cinematic. And that's not a good thing.
RT: 75-85% 7.5 average rating
IMDB: 8.7
Box office: 1.3 billion
>>67779939
It's based on The Last Guardian novel.
>>67779946
There's nothing more pathetic than creating your own RT consensus for your Anti-Art trash blockbuster film.
>>67779955
How can I prove it, other than saying I've heard it myself? The response is WTF awkward silence and then laughing when the title appears.
Ultimate actual rankings no debate
RT: 71%
IMDB: 7.8
Box Office: 700 million USD
Source: Economic Analyst with experience in gauging the success of films for two specific production companies
>>67779899
I'm rooting for this movie but that looks like dog shit
>>67780093
Are you sure that was the trailer and not the first scene of BvS?
Also let's not kid ourselves, the CGI is better than all the capeshit coming out this year and besides an unfinished scene there was nothing laughable about the trailer.
>>67779978
>hating video game cinematics
I know /tv/ is infested with /v/ermin so they're going to trick themselves into thinking the average joe gives a shit about this movie but they probably don't. Hell the average "gamer" won't even see it unless of course they played WoW.
Everytime the trailer is shown in a theater multiple laugh at it. Everything about the trailer is so fucking corny.
>the age of vidyashit is upon us
I mean the movies are gonna be garbage but I'll take it over more marvel-shit every day... I think
>>67779159
Labyrinth would like to have a word with you.
>>67779978
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCr7y4SLhck
how can one man be so wrong?
>>67780183
The Orcs look 'off', they look like CGI.
Look at this: >>67779899
This looks like what a videogame will look like in 5-10 years time, not a fucking movie. Everything has that slightly 'off' videogamey look.
>>67778442
>Video games are art
>They're also a sport
>And a science
>But, most of all, they're also world changing recreational inventions that encaptures people's imaginations
Gamers are honestly full of it, and need to be shot down at every single opportunity.
Who is going to see this outside of people who played WoW back in its golden age?
Maybe parents will think it's fantasy capeshit and bring their children to see it?
>>67780322
As opposed to real orcs?
>>67780340
I'll watch anything with Clancy Brown in it
>>67780350
Like living, believable creatures
>>67780064
>Anti-Art trash blockbuster film
>>67780399
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=af4xOyiGmMg
Fuck yeah.
>>67780255
Haven't seen it, critic consensus seems to be that it's good.
>>67780350
They look cartoony and animated as fuck. The entire trailer comes off as a giant CGI green screen. That could be from seeing it in 3D but I dunno.
>>67780350
Something doesn't have to be real to look fake. If someone told me some of the footage was a tech demo done in the CryEngine or the current Far Cry engine then I'd believe them (not sure I'd believe if they said it was the new UE as it doesn't look that shiny).
>>67780431
Oh so like the cat people in Avatar?
>Duncan Jones became a director for hire after only two films
Actually Source Code wasn't THAT good but still.
>>67779978
>>67780161
>>67780322
HAHAHAHAHA THEY REFUSE TO ACCEPT IT
>>67779000
>Your timeIt's all terrible
>>67780219
>Hell the average "gamer" won't even see it unless of course they played WoW.
WoW is by far the most popular MMO and Hearthstone is the most popular card game that's also huge on mobile. Warcraft used to be one of the most popular RTS and DOTA started as a WC3 mod.
If you haven't played any of these games then you are not a gamer.
>>67780520
I liked Source Code enough but it was a small and compact movie. It'll be interesting to see how he handles something as big as Warcraft. Have they dumped a ton of money into this assuming it'll be a success or are they being more conservative and testing the waters?
>>67780495
kinda, but more realistic looking.
>>67780479
Consensus or not, it was a massive flop. 12m gross on a 25m budget.
>>67780621
Oh, like the Autobots and Decepticons?
>>67780520
>Duncan Jones became a director for hire after only two films
Nolan first major film was also his third one
>>6777900
Moon waa nice
>>67780655
yeah, but like creatures made out of flash, not carparts.
>>67780687
*flesh
>>67780557
>trying to talk sense into capecucks
>>67779279
Most likely posted thus far.
I adjust slightly:
45% rt
7.1 imdb
650 million box office
>>67780687
Wait wait wait... so like the trolls in The Hobbit?
>>67780574
Too bad Hearthstone players won't give 2 shits about this movie because then there'd actually be a giant market for it
>>67780495
The Avatar thingys really benefited from having a big bold over-the-top design that was so distinct that it helped sketch over the CGI modelling flaws. Being bold and very fake is way better than being a bit fake because it's harder to compare with your frame of reference.
Also, the lighting on the Orcs looks way worse than anything on Avatar. It looks like a videogame.
>>67780340
>Who is going to see this outside of people who played WoW back in its golden age?
Millions and millions of people played WoW back in the day, hell people still do.
>Maybe parents will think it's fantasy capeshit and bring their children to see it?
My dad used to play Warcraft and Starcraft.
>>67780759
Is Blizz offering some meme cardback with every ticket purchase? It seems like they'd be smart to.
>>67780749
Yes, but more realistic looking, like i already said. or without cgi, like the lord of the rings orcs.
>>67780817
If everyone who ever played a Warcraft game buys a ticket, they will make like $300m global.
You see the problem?
>>67780759
>Too bad Hearthstone players won't give 2 shits about this movie because then there'd actually be a giant market for it
Hearthstone players will recognize a lot of things in the film. And that's the only thing that matters these days.
>>67780857
Lotr orcs have nothing to do with Warcraft orcs.
>>67779430
anon pls
>>67780097
I'm also an economist. I'm curious what your model looks like / what kind of metrics you use?
>>67780880
But that was never the matter, you can't just change subjects.
>>67780824
A card would cause massive uproar but a skin is very likely
>>67778350
D&D 2.0
Who is the black chick? Did they just make Trolls niggers?
>>67780064
this
>>67780857
>like the lord of the rings orcs.
Those were clearly people with makeup, they look nothing like the beastly orcs from the Warcraft games.
>>67779430
>Movie ends on a Dreamworks dance montage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4d7Wp9kKjA
>>67780097
>>67780928
>literally thinking that economics is an actual science
>>67780983
Yeah, i know. And that's what they should have done for the warcraft movie, because the orcs look shit. They could have casted big fucking blacks and it would look better.
>>67780952
It's Garona, a half orc cuck experiment
I kinda of wonder why they didn't find some weighlifters to put in makeup and rubber masks. It would have probably looked better and cost a fraction of the shit they're doing.
>>67780817
I hateto break it to you but every single person who's played WoW would have to go and bring 2 people for this to be capeshit level of succesful. Hey it might happen but the fact it's Warcraft isn't a selling point enough
>>67780824
Yeah that seems like a no brainer but I haven't heard anything so far
>>67780874
I play Hearthstone and I didn't recognize much from the trailer. the average HS player plays it for something to do while shitting. Maybe it will bring in the ~13 year old crowd that plays Hearthstone though
>>67780857
Oh okay so like some cgi but not total cgi, Wolverine?
>>67781036
You know those people would be there to act on top of looking big and fucking your wife?
>>67778350
It will bomb like John Carter
>>67781036
>And that's what they should have done for the warcraft movie
>>67781070
No, good cgi or just prostetics and make up.
>>67781036
>"I-IT LOOKS LIKE S-SHIT!!"
Whedon please go
>>67781137
Like Steve Carrell in Foxcatcher?
>>67781103
Are you stupid or somtething? They could have gone full cgi, do good cgi, oder use make up. that's all i am saying.
>>67781065
You have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about. WoW has had 100 million unique accounts. Please stop posting before you look even more retarded.
>>67781176
I does not look like shit, it just doesn't fit.
I hope it does well, for Bowie's sake
>>67781193
Only someone who has never played any of the Warcraft games would propose using real actors. It's literally impossible for a person to look like those orcs.
>>67781176
Is that from the new 3DMark?
>>67781179
Yes.
>>67780731
Varg a cute
Who's ready for orcs to be transformed into poor refugees looking for a better life?
>>67781226
It fits perfectly, if anything human actors look out of place but full cgi would be extremely expensive and would be harder to watch for the normal movie going audience.
>>67781279
... But Steve Carrel isn't an orc.
>>67781226
Is that your reaction when you see something that's realistic and alien to you?
>"it doesn't fit"
Because you've never seen a realistic orc before and now you have.
>>67781039
>look her up
>half-orc,half-draenei
>mfw
I think it looks fine until the CG characters are sharing a scene with real actors
>>67781065
Well the most recognizable character for Hearthstone players is probably Gul'dan and he hasn't appeared in the trailers yet.
>>67781262
>Only someone who has never played any of the Warcraft games
If that's also required to enjoy the movie, then it's already in deep trouble.
So, did the orcs do nothing wrong this time?
>>67781302
did you even read the thread?
>>67781309
That's what i'm saying here.
>>67781301
Well, he looks like one.
>>67781302
>cartoon proportions are realistic
>>67781217
Yeah dude just like how Hearthstone has 40 million unique players ;)
> muh practical make up effects
>>67781176
I hope that's not the final version because the lighting and reflections are all wrong, everything is too shiny like a videogame.
>>67781377
Is a MacGuffin that does nothing wrong a MacNuffin?
>>67781346
It's required if you want to make a faithful adaptation of the material. It would be like making a Superman film in which Superman doesn't have a cape.
>>67781307
>hating om breeding experiments
Come on dude it's 2016
>>67781422
MUH NOLAN
>>67781450
Couldn't they have at least made her look more attractive than your standard street nigga?
>>67781517
the fuck is this shit?
As someone who's only ever played Hearthstone, has no interest getting into WoW now, and would like to learn about the lore where should I begin?
Just a wiki like Star War's wookipedia?
>>67781595
Rise of the Horde and The Last Guardian if you are into reading.
>>67781383
Oh no look
it's an unrealistically long horse! This just doesn't fit in.
>>67781585
some tv show where people make prosthetics
>>67781623
Actually this might be perfect. I drive a lot for my job and I am finishing up my current audiobook so hopefully I can find these
>>67778350
RT: 60-70%
IMDB: 7-8
Box Office: $80-100 million domestic, $250-350 international
>>67781644
No, but this should clear things up.
>>67781028
Well, if you are speaking about economic philosophy or the undergrad degrees you get a BA in, then absolutely not.
Economists, however, use myriad data to build models that are used to shape monetary policy. It is absolutely a science, now more than ever given recent improvements to data science with regards to machine learning.
>>67778350
>3 months ago, everyone agreed the movie was going to be a piece of trash
>since BvS released it's the second coming of the christ
what happened ? are you manufacturing the next epic RT disaster ?
>>67781176
It's kind of interesting that I can look at that and instantly see its CGI. The most obvious bits are all the spikes/claws looking fake as shit and metallic reflections.
What's also glaring is that not everywhere is the same quality and some areas are too sharp, so the image composition looks off, like there are multiple areas that are in focus and out of focus.
I'd find it massive off-putting. That's the problem - as you get more realistic, the fake looking bits look faker.
>>67781707
>$80-100 million domestic
Ouch. Metzen is counting on this flick to support his coke habit and endless string of high-end escorts catering to corruption fetishes.
>>67781383
MUH PROPORTIONS
>>67779000
>this is what david bowies son looks like
at least you got trips though. i liked his previous movies, but too much of this looks like cgi garbage. when will people learn cgi is best used to accent stuff, not replace stuff
>>67778350
RT: 53%
IMDB: 7.6
Box Office: 330 million USD
When this bombs, we're never going to get the Warhammer movie we richly deserve
>>67781810
The budget is supposedly only like $90 million. I don't think it's going to be a huge hit in America, but it will make a ton in international markets that seem to love these incredibly artificial fantasy movies.
>>67781955
Did Gods of Egypt turn a profit internationally?
What blizzard should have done is committed their cinematic team to a 2 hour movie instead of this live action crap, and I will maintain that until the movie is released and likely well after
>>67781955
90 mill is actually amazing considering the heavy use of cgi which sometimes looks great. Image if they had a full triple A budget. Warcraft 3 Frozen Throne please
>>67781943
i dont want a age of sigmar movie, and GW hates whf for some reason. the total war game looks fun though
Will the biggest WoW fan there is get to watch this kino?
>>67782011
Which wouldn't be released until 2025 since even their 5 minute CGI take a long time to make.
>>67782011
that would cost half a billion dollars instead of 90 million. those cinematics blizz makes are very expensive for how short they are
>>67782060
I doubt they allow movie night in the prison where he's currently rotting.
>>67782001
It made $100 million more than it should have internationally. That film's budget was closer to $150 million though.
>>67778350
Its gonna bomb.
The world is not ready for vidyacrap; capeshit will rule supreme for other 2 decades at least.
>>67782001
It made 130mil WW with a 140mil budget
>>67782060
>Human mage
Jesus what a fucking pleb
>>67782060
>there are people that played enough AB and WSG to get this title
no wonder this guy lost his mind, those 2 bg's are terrible. its AV or nothing
>>67782109
>rotting
Norwegian prison is like a 4-star American hotel
>>67780866
100m+ people have played wow.
The kino locations will also be making bank on many mens wives sons buying buttered popcorn.
>>67781377
It seems that the story will be mostly an adaptation of WC1 with a much bigger role for the Frostwolf clan and Durotan. In the games you basically don't know about them until Thrall shows up in WC3 while in the movie they're going to playing up this conflict between the demon corrupted orcs and the shamanistic orcs.
There are also some other departures from the game story but the one with Durotan is the biggest.
>>67782137
agreed, though wsg is fun in the 10 - 19 bracket if you are geared
>>67782082
>>67782090
Oh I'm completely aware it's not feasible. I'm just saying in terms of quality it would be so much better
RT:63%
Critic Score:2.9/5
IMDB 7.0
691 Million
>>67780557
Your Doomsday doesn't look as retarded as the orc, senpai.
The main problem of this flick is the fact human characters look strange when next to CGI creatures. The same shit happened to the SW prequels.
And my personal struggle with it is the fact they didn't bother with Garona at all - she looks like a human woman with green dye all over her and 2 fangs added it just because.
>>67782228
>twinking
>ever
kys
>>67782281
Because she's half human half orc.
>trying this hard to shit on WC
>>67780557
It's like it's realer than real life.
>>67782344
I don't need to do anything, based Metzen did it for me, friend.
Also she is half-orc, half-goat, fuckboi.
Get your facts right before shitposting.
>>67778350
I predict this movie will tank horribly.
Duncan Jones is a Canucks fan... So there's that risk there.
>>67782344
I like everything about this so far but fucking Garona looks like she is going to a cosplay contest.
>>67782256
People always say this, but I have doubts. First, look at Avatar. It was almost full CG. Second, it would be more than just Blizzard's likely small cinematics team. Third, it would also have an incentive to be more efficient than blowing its load on a expansion release cinematic.
I think a full CG Warcraft movie from Blizzard would definitely be possible.
>>67782582
So you're saying he's absolutely based?
>>67778350
it's going to bomb. big time. no one outside fringe communities like 4chan, and gamers, is excited about Warcraft. superheros can bank because their brand. adults will tag along with their kids to watch a Batman movie b/c they know who Batman and Superman is. there's always an exception, like Guardians, but this film looks like it'll fail b/c it feels like a dumb retread of Lord of the Rings.
>>67781820
Why aren't the Warcraft Orcs quadrupeds?
>>67781799
you see a fucking ORG that's clearly not human in makeup and can instantly tell that it's CGI? No fucking way
opinion discarded
also compare that to fucking avatar, I know they had the "weird, clearly not human-like skin having alien" benefit in a sense that your brian doesn't have any idea how it should look like but still
>>67782852
it's true desu
they're really releasing this movie 10 years too late
i used to be a huge warcraft/wow fan and i really don't think this move will do well
i genuinely don't think anyone gives a shit about it
toys r us is scared of stocking warcraft toys even
every one i've been in has a few hidden away in a corner of the video games section
there's like no hype surrounding this movie
>>67782256
but the Warlords of Draeneor cinematic orcs for example looked like total shit compared to what ILM did, honestly, look at it again and take off your pink nostalgia glasses
in addition they only did 2 of them, rest was hidden in shadows for a good reason
>>67778350
Why don't they just do a full CGI movie? Literally everything but like 2 human actors are CGI.
>>67782060
I'm not a fucking loser, who is this guy?
>>67781425
as a 3D artist I can't help but laugh at people claiming that light is off in scenes like that, clearly not knowing how light simulation works in those cases and that it's actually basically perfect (and not too perfect like hair and sin sometimes either)
Will this be VidyaKino?
>>67783116
Chris Metzen
>>67783010
which is sad because it may even be pretty good. i have no desire to watch it on the big screen unless it gets really good reviews or i'm really bored one day. while it isn't exactly the case, the market seems oversaturated with superhero, fantasy, and comic book films overall. i think everyone and their mother was surprised Deadpool did as well as it did. Warcraft may end up being the sacrificial goat and bomb at the US box office.
>>67783169
The age of kapekino is over. The time of the orcs has come.
>>67783116
A Norwegian mass killer.
>>67783097
as a warcraft fan I would be really disappointed if they did that
Tbh I'm disapointed that didn't go for more makeup suff, humans HAD to be real, no other option for me, orcs had to be CGI for sure, but Dwarfs or Elves could work as practical make up effects for the most part, Draenei too perhabs
I however cant imagine makeup trolls (maybe to small extent but not really), taurens, undeads (for the most part, some zombies could work), demons (some exceptions maybe), goblins, worgens, nagas etc. I guess gnomes could work, centaurs as half cgi-half real actors
>>67783394
I really hope we get to have sequels to see all that
I'm surprised they went for CGI elves and dwarfs to be honest, especially since Garona is played by human, I hope it doesn't ruin the film
>>67783097
Think of the last fully CG movie that was PG-13 or above and earned more than 500 million.
72%
Between 5.5 and 6.5
400-500M USD
>>67783394
yeah no
>>67782714
Photoshop shirt plz
>>67783500
Hobbit/LotR did them properly though, I can imagine that this level of prosthetic is costly and hard to put on/manufacture but it can work even with warcraft style I think
>>67783429
Well, the movie is about the first war against Azeroth so there really shouldn't be any elves and dwarves to begin with
>>67783646
but there are and they used CGI for them not sure if I like the choice but I'll give them a benefit of doubt and watch it anyways
Do people even play warcraft anymore?
38%
570 million
>>67783956
4-5 million people if I'm not mistaken. However, Blizzard has stopped publishing the numbers so it's an estimate.
Post yfw you realized Warcraft gave David Bowie cancer.
>>67780064
>Anti-Art trash blockbuster film.
Hows high school?
