Is Zack Snyder the Orson Welles of our generation? Is Batman v. Superman REALLY too smart for the average movie going audience?
>people actually think this
>>67537489
nah he's more like the Ingmar Bergman of our generation
>Stanley Kubrick
Thanks Dolby!
BvS and 2001 Reviews
>"intellectually obscure and inordinately long ... a film out of control"
>" and it isn’t thinking, either. It’s obedience."
>"and the ambitious hacks who make them, have no evident motive beyond their own aggrandizement."
>"is a disaster because it is much too abstract"
>"morally pretentious, intellectually obscure and inordinately long ... a film out of control"
>"big, beautiful, but plodding"
>"A dour, disdainful demeanor, plus a gluttony of complex plot twists, dissipates most of the contact high."
>"a film that is so dull, it even dulls our interest in the effects for the sake of which the director has allowed it to become dull"
>"A near-total drag"
Which is which?
>>67537489
Why do you people want this guy to succeed?
>>67538059
He is the sole champion of capekino
>>67537489
>people don't like his movie so by liking his movie i'll appear superior to my anonymous friends on a Taiwanese origami enthusiast forum and they'll like me
>>67537489
Punished Zack.
A fallen legend.
>>67537965
>Look mom, I posted it again!
Are DCucks THIS desperate?
>>67538235
>can't refute Zack's brilliance
>>67537489
Too smart? No. Too complex and thematic, yes. Audience's want the Marvel formula.
>>67538557
>too complex and thematic
>implying this is not a movie for the casual audience that can't notice shit filmmaking
>>67538510
>the single most twisted and failed attempt at making a character into a Christ figure in the entire history of movies
>brilliance
DCucks are either idiots or mentally deranged.