Defend this
>>67405247
they're sheep
It was well made and had a plot with characters that had some personality. It wasn't amazing but it was good overall.
>>67405247
>92% of critics agreed that it was a 6/10 or higher
Seems about right
>>67405308
>it was just ok
>ninety two fucking per cent
>>67405362
>I do not understand the tomatometer yet i shall whine about it
it's a very good movie
>>67405362
It was literally pure commercial fan service without any creativity or artistic freedom. So of course reviews and popcorn gobblers liked it. It was made for them
Nostalgia is a very strong drug and all it had to do was be better than prequels
>>67405394
It still has an 81 on meta critic indicating "universal acclaim"
It was a very good movie despite what the contrarians say
Everyone just desperately clinging to the narrative
>OT GOOD
>PT BAD
>ST WILL REDEEM THE SERIES
>>67405442
which it wasn't
>>67405458
Well what are we classifying as a good movie? Because it was well made and mind numbing enough so it was easy to sit there for two hours? Because a lot of movies are like that but that doesn't mean they're good.
Well made/watchable =/= good
Also this whole thread
>movie critics
>mattering in the slightest
Movie critics hardly have a job
>>67406204
>hardly have a job
>says the NEET/wageslave
>>67405415
Talking out of your ass
There seems to be a lot of HATE STAR WARS threads lately, are they coming from jealous DC fans?
>>67405247
Average Rating: 8.2/10
Seems about fine to me
>>67406309
>says the NEET/wageslave
Did we know each other in elementary school? I met quite a few projectors in my time there. Also my employment status has no bearing on the irrelevancy of movie critics
>Talking out of your ass
Well he could try being like you and spew putrid shit from his mouth.
Call me the fucking lord of banterberry because JUSTice has been served to this reddit loving faggot
It was a fun, competently made film that had the potential to doom the franchise forever, but didn't. It looked nothing like a GeorgLucas movie and yet was still able to capture the spirit of one.
>>67405247
it's the new call of duty of movies, everyone will buy it and like it even if it's the same shit every year
>>67406469
Eh. Work on your subtlety.
>>67406546
>yet was still able to capture the spirit of one.
> yet was still able to capture the spirit of one.
> yet was still able to capture the spirit of one.
> yet was still able to capture the spirit of one.
George lucas isn't even that good and I don't think it came close. It captured the feeling of Marvels Avengers pretty well tho
>>67405247
Disneyco is an American NGO.
It's review-proof.
>>67406566
subtlety? no I was gonna wreck the piss outta of that underage faggot.
>>67405308
>>67405360
>>67405411
>>67405458
>>67406346
>>67406546
This.
Everything else ITT is pure literal garbage that isn't worth reading.
>>67405247
>Disney doing their usual safe, inoffensive adventure shtick that put Marvel on the map
>OT pandering out the ass
>not George Lucas
Take your pick.
>>67405362
The rating system seems to be more of a scale of a binary rating of good or bad. It's not representing a score of the movie, but a consensus of reviews saying thumbs up or down.
It was fine, but damn it shits all over universe and all new things were soooooo generic... I was almost bored to death creatively.
>>67406679
t. the guy that became star wars fan in the 10s when it was cool to be a """nerd""""
>>67406725
why are you replying to me. Come back with banter or give up. Everything I said was true if you think I'm just trying to get a rise out of you that isn't my intention.
You're pointless and your existence is futile you bantless witless gutless meme loving faggot
>>67406679
>everyone who disagrees is a dummy
SW7 was a disease. Star wars is shit in general but at least it used to be a creative toy commercial. What's left? A well made toy commercial? Yawn
>>67406885
(You)
>>67406741
plebs will never understand how RT works
Most of them think it has their own reviewers
>>67406800
>>67406953
Nah it was a good movie.
The fact that you can't name a better one to come out in the last decade proves you're just shitposting.
Is a torrent up yet?
>>67405247
>YMS, RLM, Jeremy Jahns, AJ, NC and Chris Stuckmann all say it's good
>some contrarians on /tv/ say it's bad
Eh. I'll go with the normies on this one.
>>67406990
I'm not giving you recs kid
I see what you're trying to do
>>67407059
Yep. The 10 gig version is on kickass.
Thought I would only put it on for a few scenes and ended up watching the whole thing again.
>>67407105
Mmm.
>>67406990
>The fact that you can't name a better one to come out in the last decade proves you're just shitposting.
The fact that you can't name a worse movie from the last decade means you're shitposting
>>67407142
is rarbg best then?
>>67407251
(You)
