https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h45bAiu_tzg
>>67184053
People have been begging him to run since 1980
https://youtu.be/mxf1XmVZ9qY?t=28
>>67184148
link skips ahead 30s, never meant to
>>67184053
Well he has to become president first. Right now it's just a joke. It's not a prediction.
Trump ran for President in 2000 and that looks like a Zombie Simpsons episode so they weren't predicting anything, they were commenting on his candidacy
>>67184053
You pay now, now!
FUCK YEAH MIDNIGHT BASKETBALL
>>67184170
He'll get the nomination. After that, it's a free for all.
>this is how libcucks justify terrible presidency after terrible presidency
>"I-I-IT WAS THE ADMINISTRATION B-B-BEFORE TH-TH-THIS ONE THAT R-RUINED THE C-COUNTRY!!1"
>>67184170
He'll get fucked out of the nomination.
Any poll that isn't rigged by the media shows him absolutely crushing hillary but the establishment doesn't want you to know that.
They've also been rigging a lot of the primaries too, which I was I believe Sanders got fucked out of a few states.
It amazes me that people still don't believe there's a shadow govt running this country and the president is just a sock puppet.
>>67184394
>Any poll that isn't rigged by the media shows him absolutely crushing hillary
This is what Trumpfags actually believe.
>>67184292
To be fair that's the go to line for either side.
>>67184420
>huffpost
>>67184394
Christ, Americans are fucking paranoid...
>>67184053
Well this is easily fixed, they only need not to invest in children and all will be good.
>>67184420
Huffpost is unbiased
>>67184053
the US broke after trump?
You're already in 17 trillion $ debt you morons
>>67184916
sorry you're not american famalam
>>67184987
it ain't that bad
>>67184987
Why are you sorry for you lardass?
>>67184420
As yes, the Huffington Post. Perhaps the greatest example of journalistic integrity and objectivity in American politics ya raging jackass
>>67185378
>Why are you sorry for you
what did he mean by this?
>>67184292
are you really dismissing bush's warcrimes in destroying an entire country for oil and the shadowy jew as liberals' fault?
>>67185483
nobody knows but this "what did he mean by this" meme is gayer than aids
>>67185517
He's clearly saying that liberals often blame the previous administration as way of dodging criticisms of their own shoddy administrations
Great job on proving his point, by the way
>>67185544
why are nobody means by this memes is gayer aid?
>>67185544
>nobody knows but this "what did he mean by this" meme is gayer than aids
what did he mean by this?
>>67185561
sounded to me like what he was doing was dismissing the liberal wave that put Obama in place due to opposition to everything bush did. way to miss my point, trumpster.
>>67184420
how likely is that hillary will get charged about the email thing?
if that happens her career is over and trump is guaranteed to be president.
>>67185647
>sounded to me like what he was doing was dismissing the liberal wave that put Obama in place due to opposition to everything bush did.
Well pull your head out of your ass, that's not what he said
>>67184053
>there are """people""" here that still watch this show
>>67185754
really? how would you know that? go suck a dick, trumpster.
>>67185737
Economic growth isn't indicative of the quality of a country. India is the fastest growing economy in the world but has one of the greatest populations of impoverished street shitters on the planet. I would trade economic success for no illegals and a healthy American culture and identity any day
>>67185793
trumpster isn't really an insult, its like calling white people "cracker"
they call themselves trumpeteers/trumpsters/trumpwaffen ect
>>67185818
>implying illegals and any of the other brown people are the 1% keeping you from economic success
its funny how asstarded people like you are.
>>67185793
>how would you know that?
I actually read his post and speak English
>>67185737
The authors point, instead, to two factors that have favored Democrats over Republicans: First, rising energy prices, and the negative effects on the economy that result, have tended to occur during GOP administrations. Republicans like Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and George W. Bush, for example, governed during a time of increasing oil prices.
The second factor, according to the authors, is that new technological advances that grow the economy have tended to happen during Democratic administrations. The authors cite the information revolution and the dawn of the Internet that juiced the American economy during the 1990s under Democratic President Bill Clinton.
"Democrats would no doubt like to attribute the large D-R growth gap to macroeconomic policy choices, but the data do not support such a claim," the authors write. "It seems we must look instead to several variables that are mostly 'good luck,' with perhaps a touch of 'good policy.'"
In other words, the healthier performance of the economy under Democrats than Republicans may provide a useful line in a stump speech for Democratic presidential candidates -- but it seems to have more to do with the fortune of timing than anything else.
matt groening is a 33rd degree freemason
>>67185818
HEIL!
>midnight basketball
They wouldn't make this joke today because it would be "problematic".
>>67185862
That's not what I said at all you absolute mongoloid. Stop posting, slowly reread my post five times, then staple an English dictionary to your ugly illiterate face
>>67185905
but its what you think. heil hitler amirite.
>>67185712
zero
obama would have to make the decision to prosecute
>>67185818
They will stop being street shitters because growth will bring the shitters out of poverty.
>>67185974
Nope, totally incorrect. I think illegals promote economic growth which is why major businesses that rely on slave labor and the Koch brothers support open borders. They do of course drive wages down for the American working class and ruin THEIR economic potential/bargaining power, but I'm not a member of the working class and my own economic gain isn't particularly related to theirs.
Has anybody ever told you that you're pretty stupid?
>>67185903
I don't get it, what's the joke?
>>67184420
>huffpost
kek
>>67185517
>implying the iraq war was about oil
babbys first politics
>>67184053
Everyone says the simpsons predicted it but no one brings up how the critic kind of predicted it.
>throwaway joke
>prediction
When you've been on for a bazillion years odds are they're going to say something that becomes "predictive"
