[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

Thoughts?Original or remake?


Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3

Thoughts?

Original or remake?
>>
I vastly prefer the Gorge Clooney remake cause hes such a good looking man
>>
>>67091569
The remake if I'm being honest. Tarkovsky's original is poorly paced and feels less coherent. People only pretend to like Tarkovsky's version more because they think it makes them sophisticated.
>>
>>67091793
>>67091661
You all are cunts, original is fucking based
>>
>>67091979
but why?
>>
The book. Both movies missed the point by a fucking mile
>>
>>67091569
There's literally a Solaris thread already. Soderbergh version is very good, never seent the first.
>>
>>67091793
it has a better visual asthetic
>>
File: 1455933798518.jpg (35KB, 612x456px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1455933798518.jpg
35KB, 612x456px
>>67091979
>>
If you read the book, which I doubt any of you did, you would realize that Tarkowsky is an absolute hack.
>>
I was actually offended by the 5 minute long driving scene. But I loved reading peoples analysis of the film saying it was the most beautiful scene. What?! Is your commute beautiful because that's basically the same thing
>>
>>67092274
>muh books

fuck off. grade the movie for its merits not how faithful it is to source material
>>
>>67092364
>grade the movie for its merits
Then it is even worse than previously thought because at least it had the book to fall back on.
>>
The remake of course best remake of all time, along with King Kong

Solaris>Coляpиc
>>
Solaris 2002 is pure kino and better than 1972's
I agree with that
>>
What is wrong with all of you people? this is like when people start going out of their way to support the Star Wars prequels.
>>
Do the Solaris movies even explain how they are essentially living in a station on a planet, Solaris, that is alive? The alien synthesizes people based on the crew's memories.
>>
File: 1405277148164.png (651KB, 745x420px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1405277148164.png
651KB, 745x420px
>everyone in here loves the remake
>mfw
Seriously the only good thing about the remake was the soundtrack.
>>
I think Soderbergh's version works better as a film. The central relationship is far better rounded and realised than in the original version, plus it's immensely more watchable. I may be in the minority here but I find the original Solaris to be one of Tarkovsky's lesser films, perhaps even his weakest film.
Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK