this guy is basically the new Nolan. all the 20 year old normies who just got into film hype him and use buzzwords like "riveting", describe him as a genius and never explain what actually makes him one
>>66530907
>the new Nolan
that's pretty mean, even for 4chan
>>66530907
Agreed. Normies can't handle his films
>>66530907
just like you never explain, what makes him bad
>>66530907
>new
He's been making movies for as long
And while Nolan got worse he got better
>>66530980
he's a fraud, overly preachy, self obsessed meme
>>66530980
he's the brett ratner of art film directors
>>66531026
explain what makes him bad
He's like a Terrence Malick except he actually wins awards.
>someone good bacame popular, so we have to hate him now
every time
>>66531078
>>66531026
you just repeated "he is bad"
no. please explain
>>66530980
He made a capeshit film. A CAPESHIT FILM! And he thought we wouldn't notice because he threw in some literary shit. What an attention slut.
>>66531082
was he also an all-american football player in his youth?
>>66531126
I don't hate his mexican movies but ever since he got to hollywood he turned really bad. babel is offensively bad
with birman and revenant he's way too show offy, he wants everybody to see how "good" director he is with the long takes and beautiful images that ultimately do nothing for the movie except distract you on how hollow they are. especially the revenant. each shot is beautiful, each scene is shot the same way and each image has no meaning except be big and show offy, to one up other directors
>>66531142
nice bait
>>66531080
>>66531126
pretentiousness
thematic subtext is literally non existent and is clouded by overdone and shallow technical climatic shots
includs spontaneous shots of leo's wife and son which apparently the audience is supposed to care about
> DUDE CLOSE UP OF THE MORNING DEW LMAO
>>66531026
>can't go one post without resorting to calling someone a meme
I fucking hate you people
>>66530907
This. Omegle is already infested by this new meme reference. Makes me puke internally.
casual film audiences actually watch nolan films though, as in my mum and dad. This is due to nolan making super hero movies and space movies.
His films are the big thing among movie fans but no where near true normie nolan tier. try to get the same people who like the dark knight to watch a movie with a 12 year old masturbating
>>66530907
>never explain what actually makes him one
ONE SHOT SEQUENCE BRILLANT LMAO
>>66530907
>what actually makes him one
>>66530907
>Let me describe this guy's movies by the way I perceive his audience to be.
You're exactly the kind of human garbage you're describing.
Popular = shit - /tv/™
>>66531207
Hollow?
Kino is about the image on the fucking screen, and I would agree were he producing screensavers but even in a simple story like the Revenant, he is able to capture the ineffable beauty of its context.
nolan actually makes films people remember for more than 1 year
Children of Men is incredible so nah
>>66531014>>66531014
>while Nolan got worse he got better
Amores Perros is better than anything he's done in the last 15 years.
>>66532636
Casual film audiences saw The Revenant too.
Actually, in this age of social media and mediocrity spreading real fast, popular = shit
>'riveting' is the new buzzword
jesus christ im out of here lads
>>66531026
>meme
stopped reading there
>>66530907
>keeping his arms folded and refusing to clap because the Mad Max costume designer won over his costume designers
Fucking child.
>>66533523
Wrong Mexican.
>>66534041
this desu
